CVE-2026-55387 (GCVE-0-2026-55387)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-14 19:21 – Updated: 2026-10-14 19:21
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
InvoiceShelf bulk deletion lacks company scoping
Summary
InvoiceShelf is an open-source web & mobile app that helps track expenses, payments and create professional invoices and estimates. In version 2.3.3 and earlier, InvoiceShelf bulk-delete request validation accepts record identifiers without consistently binding them to the authenticated user's company_id. The affected DeleteCustomersRequest, DeleteEstimatesRequest, DeleteExpensesRequest, DeleteInvoiceRequest, DeleteItemsRequest, DeletePaymentsRequest, and DeleteUserRequest validators check that identifiers exist but do not consistently check tenant ownership. An authenticated user can submit another company's identifier and delete cross-company records. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.4.0.
Severity
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/InvoiceShelf/InvoiceShelf/secu… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/InvoiceShelf/InvoiceShelf/pull/661 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/InvoiceShelf/InvoiceShelf/comm… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/InvoiceShelf/InvoiceShelf/rele… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| InvoiceShelf | InvoiceShelf |
Affected:
< 2.4.0
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "InvoiceShelf",
"vendor": "InvoiceShelf",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 2.4.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "InvoiceShelf is an open-source web \u0026 mobile app that helps track expenses, payments and create professional invoices and estimates. In version 2.3.3 and earlier, InvoiceShelf bulk-delete request validation accepts record identifiers without consistently binding them to the authenticated user\u0027s company_id. The affected DeleteCustomersRequest, DeleteEstimatesRequest, DeleteExpensesRequest, DeleteInvoiceRequest, DeleteItemsRequest, DeletePaymentsRequest, and DeleteUserRequest validators check that identifiers exist but do not consistently check tenant ownership. An authenticated user can submit another company\u0027s identifier and delete cross-company records. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.4.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 7.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-284",
"description": "CWE-284: Improper Access Control",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-639",
"description": "CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-14T19:21:49.520Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/InvoiceShelf/InvoiceShelf/security/advisories/GHSA-wxrv-73x6-8r62",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/InvoiceShelf/InvoiceShelf/security/advisories/GHSA-wxrv-73x6-8r62"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/InvoiceShelf/InvoiceShelf/pull/661",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/InvoiceShelf/InvoiceShelf/pull/661"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/InvoiceShelf/InvoiceShelf/commit/e432e4e62f5aa52238e3ff3fc37a0c78588eec47",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/InvoiceShelf/InvoiceShelf/commit/e432e4e62f5aa52238e3ff3fc37a0c78588eec47"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/InvoiceShelf/InvoiceShelf/releases/tag/2.4.0",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/InvoiceShelf/InvoiceShelf/releases/tag/2.4.0"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-wxrv-73x6-8r62",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "InvoiceShelf bulk deletion lacks company scoping"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-55387",
"datePublished": "2026-10-14T19:21:49.520Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-16T18:57:40.183Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-14T19:21:49.520Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"product": "InvoiceShelf",
"vendor": "InvoiceShelf",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 2.4.0"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "InvoiceShelf is an open-source web \u0026 mobile app that helps track expenses, payments and create professional invoices and estimates. In version 2.3.3 and earlier, InvoiceShelf bulk-delete request validation accepts record identifiers without consistently binding them to the authenticated user\u0027s company_id. The affected DeleteCustomersRequest, DeleteEstimatesRequest, DeleteExpensesRequest, DeleteInvoiceRequest, DeleteItemsRequest, DeletePaymentsRequest, and DeleteUserRequest validators check that identifiers exist but do not consistently check tenant ownership. An authenticated user can submit another company\u0027s identifier and delete cross-company records. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.4.0."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-55387",
"lastModified": "2026-10-14T20:17:48.917",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV40": [
{
"cvssData": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 7.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2026-10-14T20:17:48.917",
"references": [
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/InvoiceShelf/InvoiceShelf/commit/e432e4e62f5aa52238e3ff3fc37a0c78588eec47"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/InvoiceShelf/InvoiceShelf/pull/661"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/InvoiceShelf/InvoiceShelf/releases/tag/2.4.0"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/InvoiceShelf/InvoiceShelf/security/advisories/GHSA-wxrv-73x6-8r62"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
"vulnStatus": "Received",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-284"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-639"
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.