CVE-2026-6988 (GCVE-0-2026-6988)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-25 17:00 – Updated: 2026-04-27 14:07| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://vuldb.com/vuln/359540 | vdb-entrytechnical-description |
| https://vuldb.com/vuln/359540/cti | signaturepermissions-required |
| https://vuldb.com/submit/796427 | third-party-advisory |
| https://github.com/xyh4ck/iot_poc/blob/main/Tenda… | exploit |
| https://www.tenda.com.cn/ | product |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-6988",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-27T14:07:39.860516Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-27T14:07:53.405Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:o:tenda:hg10_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"modules": [
"Boa Service"
],
"product": "HG10",
"vendor": "Tenda",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "HG7_HG9_HG10re_300001138_en_xpon"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "xuanyu (VulDB User)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw has been found in Tenda HG10 HG7_HG9_HG10re_300001138_en_xpon. This issue affects the function formRoute of the file /boaform/formRouting of the component Boa Service. This manipulation of the argument nextHop causes buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"version": "4.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV2_0": {
"baseScore": 9,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR",
"version": "2.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-120",
"description": "Buffer Overflow",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-119",
"description": "Memory Corruption",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-25T17:00:24.221Z",
"orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"shortName": "VulDB"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "VDB-359540 | Tenda HG10 Boa Service formRouting formRoute buffer overflow",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/359540"
},
{
"name": "VDB-359540 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, IOA)",
"tags": [
"signature",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/359540/cti"
},
{
"name": "Submit #796427 | Tenda HG10 HG7_HG9_HG10re_300001138_en_xpon Buffer Overflow",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/submit/796427"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/xyh4ck/iot_poc/blob/main/Tenda/HG10/01_Buffer_Overflow_nextHop/README.md"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://www.tenda.com.cn/"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-04-24T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Advisory disclosed"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-04-24T02:00:00.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry created"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-04-24T21:28:18.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry last update"
}
],
"title": "Tenda HG10 Boa Service formRouting formRoute buffer overflow"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"assignerShortName": "VulDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-6988",
"datePublished": "2026-04-25T17:00:24.221Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-24T19:23:13.271Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-27T14:07:53.405Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-6988",
"date": "2026-10-29",
"epss": "0.00619",
"percentile": "0.49586"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:o:tenda:hg10_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"modules": [
"Boa Service"
],
"product": "HG10",
"vendor": "Tenda",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "HG7_HG9_HG10re_300001138_en_xpon"
}
]
}
],
"source": "cna@vuldb.com"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:tenda:hg10_firmware:300001138:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "FD686201-31B3-44E0-8004-9847C1B0A6E4",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
},
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:h:tenda:hg10:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "C69F22BC-43E3-4D4C-ABB5-33F681B8B569",
"vulnerable": false
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw has been found in Tenda HG10 HG7_HG9_HG10re_300001138_en_xpon. This issue affects the function formRoute of the file /boaform/formRouting of the component Boa Service. This manipulation of the argument nextHop causes buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Se ha encontrado una vulnerabilidad en Tenda HG10 HG7_HG9_HG10re_300001138_en_xpon. Este problema afecta a la funci\u00f3n formRoute del archivo /boaform/formRouting del componente Boa Service. Esta manipulaci\u00f3n del argumento nextHop causa desbordamiento de b\u00fafer. Es posible iniciar el ataque de forma remota. El exploit ha sido publicado y puede ser utilizado."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-6988",
"lastModified": "2026-10-26T21:10:00.170",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "SINGLE",
"availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"baseScore": 9.0,
"confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"integrityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 8.0,
"impactScore": 10.0,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "cna@vuldb.com",
"type": "Secondary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
],
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "cna@vuldb.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"cvssMetricV40": [
{
"cvssData": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 7.4,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"exploitMaturity": "PROOF_OF_CONCEPT",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"source": "cna@vuldb.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-6988",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-27T14:07:39.860516Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-04-25T18:16:17.863",
"references": [
{
"source": "cna@vuldb.com",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/xyh4ck/iot_poc/blob/main/Tenda/HG10/01_Buffer_Overflow_nextHop/README.md"
},
{
"source": "cna@vuldb.com",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory",
"VDB Entry"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/submit/796427"
},
{
"source": "cna@vuldb.com",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory",
"VDB Entry"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/359540"
},
{
"source": "cna@vuldb.com",
"tags": [
"Permissions Required",
"VDB Entry"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/359540/cti"
},
{
"source": "cna@vuldb.com",
"tags": [
"Product"
],
"url": "https://www.tenda.com.cn/"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cna@vuldb.com",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-119"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-120"
}
],
"source": "cna@vuldb.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2026-04-27T19:23:05+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2026-6988",
"id": "CVE-2026-6988",
"initial_release_date": "2026-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "Tenda HG10 Boa Service formRouting formRoute buffer overflow",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-6988.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-6988",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-27T14:07:39.860516Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-27T14:07:48.487Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:o:tenda:hg10_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"modules": [
"Boa Service"
],
"product": "HG10",
"vendor": "Tenda",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "HG7_HG9_HG10re_300001138_en_xpon"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "xuanyu (VulDB User)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw has been found in Tenda HG10 HG7_HG9_HG10re_300001138_en_xpon. This issue affects the function formRoute of the file /boaform/formRouting of the component Boa Service. This manipulation of the argument nextHop causes buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"version": "4.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV2_0": {
"baseScore": 9,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR",
"version": "2.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-120",
"description": "Buffer Overflow",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-119",
"description": "Memory Corruption",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-25T17:00:24.221Z",
"orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"shortName": "VulDB"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "VDB-359540 | Tenda HG10 Boa Service formRouting formRoute buffer overflow",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/359540"
},
{
"name": "VDB-359540 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, IOA)",
"tags": [
"signature",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/359540/cti"
},
{
"name": "Submit #796427 | Tenda HG10 HG7_HG9_HG10re_300001138_en_xpon Buffer Overflow",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/submit/796427"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/xyh4ck/iot_poc/blob/main/Tenda/HG10/01_Buffer_Overflow_nextHop/README.md"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://www.tenda.com.cn/"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-04-24T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Advisory disclosed"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-04-24T02:00:00.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry created"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-04-24T21:28:18.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry last update"
}
],
"title": "Tenda HG10 Boa Service formRouting formRoute buffer overflow"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"assignerShortName": "VulDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-6988",
"datePublished": "2026-04-25T17:00:24.221Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-24T19:23:13.271Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-27T14:07:53.405Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.