GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-8MCC-HRX5-HVXC

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-08 18:41 – Updated: 2026-09-08 18:41
VLAI
Summary
GitPython: clone_from()/clone() omit --separate-git-dir from unsafe_git_clone_options, enabling arbitrary git-directory creation outside the destination
Details
  • CWE: CWE-73 (External Control of File Name or Path) / CWE-22 (Path Traversal, in the "escapes intended base directory" sense)
  • Affected component: git/repo/base.py, Repo.unsafe_git_clone_options (class attribute, lines 153-165) and Repo._clone() (lines 1477-1520), reached via the public Repo.clone_from() (line 1626) and Repo.clone() (line 1567) APIs.
  • Affected version: GitPython at HEAD (9729ed3b948f2bde09f1f188c5311e172212b67e, 2026-08-05, VERSION 3.1.58)

Reachability

Repo.clone_from(url, to_path, **kwargs) (and Repo.clone()) forward arbitrary keyword arguments to the underlying git clone invocation. Before forwarding, GitPython builds a candidate option list from the kwargs (Git._option_candidates) and checks it against a denylist, Repo.unsafe_git_clone_options, via Git.check_unsafe_options() — unless the caller passes allow_unsafe_options=True. This denylist mechanism is exactly the guard that the last ~16 published GHSAs against this repo (2026-07-12 → 2026-08-05) have repeatedly found incomplete or bypassable for other options (--template, --upload-pack, --config, --exec, --output, --index-output, --pathspec-from-file, etc.).

git clone also accepts --separate-git-dir=<path>, which redirects the repository's entire .git metadata directory to an arbitrary, caller-controlled filesystem path, leaving only a gitlink text file (gitdir: <path>) at the intended destination. This is the exact same primitive already recognized as unsafe by GitPython's own code: Repo.unsafe_git_init_options (line 145-150) blocks --separate-git-dir for Repo.init(), with the comment "Redirects the repository metadata to a caller-controlled path". The Repo._clone()/clone()/clone_from() docstring (line 1450-1452) is even more explicit:

:param allow_unsafe_options:
    Allow unsafe options to be used, such as ``--template`` and
    ``--separate-git-dir``.

i.e. the maintainers' own documentation states that allow_unsafe_options=False (the default) is supposed to block --separate-git-dir for clone. But Repo.unsafe_git_clone_options does not contain it:

unsafe_git_clone_options = [
    "--upload-pack",
    "-u",
    "--config",
    "-c",
    "--template",
    "--bundle-uri",
]

So any application that forwards a separate_git_dir (or separate-git-dir) kwarg into Repo.clone_from() / Repo.clone() — e.g. a CI/build service, a Git-hosting proxy, or any tool that exposes a subset of clone options to a client, the exact threat model already accepted for the sibling --template/--upload-pack/--config entries in this same list — gets no protection at all for --separate-git-dir, even with the default allow_unsafe_options=False.

Root cause

Parity gap between two sibling denylists that guard the same underlying primitive (arbitrary redirection of git metadata storage): unsafe_git_init_options correctly lists --separate-git-dir; unsafe_git_clone_options, covering the same option on a different git subcommand that also accepts it, does not — despite the function's own docstring claiming otherwise. This is the same "denylist omits an equally-dangerous sibling option" pattern already responsible for GHSA-539m-9xh6-q6rr (archive denylist missing --add-file/--add-virtual-file) and GHSA-6p8h-3wgx-97gf (clone denylist missing --template, since fixed).

Exploit path

  1. Attacker-controlled input reaches a separate_git_dir=... (or equivalently "separate-git-dir") keyword argument passed into Repo.clone_from() / Repo.clone() by the host application, with allow_unsafe_options left at its default False.
  2. Git._option_candidates() renders this as --separate-git-dir and Git.check_unsafe_options() checks it against Repo.unsafe_git_clone_options — no match, no UnsafeOptionError raised.
  3. Git.transform_kwargs() renders the same kwarg into the real command line as --separate-git-dir=<attacker path> and GitPython executes git clone -v --separate-git-dir=<attacker path> -- <url> <dest> via subprocess (no shell).
  4. git itself creates the full repository metadata tree (config, description, HEAD, hooks/, index, objects/, refs/, packed-refs, logs/) at the attacker-specified path — which can be any path outside the intended clone destination that the process has permission to create — and leaves a gitlink file at the intended destination pointing to it.

Impact

Arbitrary directory/file creation at a path fully controlled by the attacker (bounded only by filesystem permissions of the process running GitPython), matching the impact class of the already-published, High-severity GHSA-hmq2-w58f-27jc ("Arbitrary Git Repository Creation Outside the Working Tree", CVSS 8.2). Concretely: - Planting a git repository structure (including a hooks/ directory) at an attacker-chosen location outside the sandboxed clone destination the calling application intended to confine the operation to. - If the attacker-chosen path collides with an existing directory the process can write into (e.g. another repository's .git, a shared cache path, a predictable temp location), the clone silently populates/overwrites config, HEAD, hooks/*, refs/*, packed-refs, and index there — an integrity violation of a resource outside the intended destination. - Combined with any later operation that runs git against that redirected/colliding directory (common in CI/build systems that reuse or predict working-directory layouts), this can escalate to hook execution, matching the RCE class already accepted for --template in GHSA-9rj7-rf2p-w77r.

Preconditions

  • The calling application forwards a caller-influenced value into a separate_git_dir kwarg of Repo.clone_from()/Repo.clone() (or into the multi_options list as a raw --separate-git-dir=... token) without itself validating/rejecting it, and does not pass allow_unsafe_options=True intentionally. This is the identical trust model GitPython's own denylist already defends for --template/--upload-pack/--config/--bundle-uri on the very same code path — i.e. this option was clearly meant to be covered by the same guard and was simply omitted.
  • No authentication/role requirement inside GitPython itself; the vulnerable code runs the moment the host application calls the API with the option present.

Evidence

  • git/repo/base.py:145-151 — unsafe_git_init_options includes "--separate-git-dir" with the comment "Redirects the repository metadata to a caller-controlled path".
  • git/repo/base.py:153-165 — unsafe_git_clone_options (the list actually enforced on _clone) does not include "--separate-git-dir".
  • git/repo/base.py:1450-1452 — docstring of clone_from/clone explicitly documents --separate-git-dir as one of the options allow_unsafe_options is supposed to gate.
  • git/repo/base.py:1495-1518 — _clone() special-cases separate_git_dir only to Git.polish_url() it (path normalization for URL-like values), then runs it through Git.check_unsafe_options(options=..., unsafe_options=cls.unsafe_git_clone_options) — which, per the list above, does not flag it.
  • PoC (gitpython-001-poc.py, embedded below) run against this exact checkout confirms the option reaches the real git clone subprocess unguarded and creates a full git directory outside the destination path, with allow_unsafe_options at its default False.

False-positive check (adversarial re-read)

  • Is there a value-level check that would still stop this? No — check_unsafe_options only inspects option names (via _canonicalize_option_name) against the denylist; it performs no filesystem/path validation on separate_git_dir's value, and no other guard in _clone() touches this kwarg besides the Git.polish_url() normalization (which does not reject arbitrary paths).
  • Is --separate-git-dir perhaps a no-op or safely sandboxed for clone specifically (unlike init)? No — confirmed empirically: the option reaches the real git binary unmodified and git honors it exactly as documented, writing the full metadata tree to the given path.
  • Could this be the exact bug already covered by one of the 26 published GHSAs? Checked all 26 entries in _known-advisories.json (Filter 0): GHSA-9rj7-rf2p-w77r covers --template in Repo.init; GHSA-6p8h-3wgx-97gf covers --template in clone (already fixed, present in unsafe_git_clone_options); GHSA-hmq2-w58f-27jc covers arbitrary repo creation via unvalidated .gitmodules submodule names (a different code path — Submodule, not Repo.clone_from() kwargs). None reference --separate-git-dir on the clone path. This is a distinct, currently-unpatched gap.
  • Does this require an unrealistic precondition? The precondition (host app forwards a kwarg into clone_from/clone) is identical to the precondition already accepted by the maintainers for the sibling entries in the same list (--template, --upload-pack, --config, --bundle-uri) — i.e. it is the same threat model the guard exists to cover, just missing one entry.
  • Verdict: no concrete blocker found. CONFIRMED.

Remediation

Add "--separate-git-dir" (and its - alias if git ever adds one — currently there is none) to Repo.unsafe_git_clone_options in git/repo/base.py, matching unsafe_git_init_options. Since Repo._clone() already special-cases separate_git_dir for Git.polish_url() normalization, the fix is a one-line addition to the existing list, consistent with how GHSA-6p8h-3wgx-97gf added --template to the same list.

Confidence

High. Root cause is a one-line, unambiguous omission the maintainers' own docstring contradicts; PoC reproduces cleanly and deterministically against the current HEAD; no plausible false-positive path found.

Proof-of-Concept source (gitpython-001-poc.py)

#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
GITPYTHON-001 PoC: Repo.clone_from(separate_git_dir=...) is not in
unsafe_git_clone_options, so it reaches `git clone` unguarded and writes a
full git directory (config, hooks/, objects/, refs/, ...) to an
attacker-controlled path OUTSIDE the intended destination directory, with
allow_unsafe_options left at its default of False.

Run against the GitPython source tree under test, e.g.:
  PYTHONPATH="<repo>:<repo>/gitdb:<repo>/smmap" python3 gitpython-001-poc.py <workdir>

Benign: only writes/reads inside the given workdir. No destructive/exfiltrating
payload. Exits non-zero and prints "NOT VULNERABLE" if the guard blocks the option
or the write does not escape the destination directory.
"""
import os
import sys
import subprocess


def main():
    workdir = sys.argv[1] if len(sys.argv) > 1 else "/tmp/gitpython-001-poc"
    src = os.path.join(workdir, "src")
    dest = os.path.join(workdir, "dest")
    sentinel_dir = os.path.join(workdir, "OUTSIDE_SENTINEL")
    target_gitdir = os.path.join(sentinel_dir, "redirected.git")

    for p in (src, dest, sentinel_dir):
        os.makedirs(p, exist_ok=True)

    # Minimal benign source repo to clone from.
    subprocess.run(["git", "init", "-q", "-b", "main", src], check=True)
    subprocess.run(["git", "-C", src, "config", "user.email", "test@example.com"], check=True)
    subprocess.run(["git", "-C", src, "config", "user.name", "Test"], check=True)
    with open(os.path.join(src, "file.txt"), "w") as f:
        f.write("hello\n")
    subprocess.run(["git", "-C", src, "add", "file.txt"], check=True)
    subprocess.run(["git", "-C", src, "commit", "-q", "-m", "init"], check=True)

    import git  # gitpython under test

    print("unsafe_git_clone_options =", git.Repo.unsafe_git_clone_options)
    assert "--separate-git-dir" not in git.Repo.unsafe_git_clone_options, (
        "guard now includes --separate-git-dir; PoC no longer applicable, target patched"
    )

    try:
        repo = git.Repo.clone_from(src, dest, separate_git_dir=target_gitdir)
    except git.exc.UnsafeOptionError as e:
        print("NOT VULNERABLE: blocked by UnsafeOptionError:", e)
        sys.exit(1)

    wrote_outside = os.path.isdir(os.path.join(target_gitdir, "hooks")) and os.path.isfile(
        os.path.join(target_gitdir, "config")
    )
    gitlink_points_outside = False
    with open(os.path.join(dest, ".git")) as f:
        gitlink = f.read().strip()
        gitlink_points_outside = target_gitdir in gitlink

    print("repo.git_dir =", repo.git_dir)
    print("wrote git directory outside dest (sentinel) =", wrote_outside)
    print("dest/.git gitlink points outside dest =", gitlink_points_outside)

    if wrote_outside and gitlink_points_outside:
        print("VULNERABLE: git directory created at attacker-controlled path "
              f"outside the clone destination: {target_gitdir}")
        sys.exit(0)
    else:
        print("NOT VULNERABLE: sentinel not observed")
        sys.exit(1)


if __name__ == "__main__":
    main()
Severity
7.5 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
8.7 (High)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 3.1.58"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "GitPython"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.1.59"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-78677"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-22",
      "CWE-73"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-09-08T18:41:52Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "- **CWE:** CWE-73 (External Control of File Name or Path) / CWE-22 (Path Traversal, in the \"escapes intended base directory\" sense)\n- **Affected component:** `git/repo/base.py`, `Repo.unsafe_git_clone_options` (class attribute, lines 153-165) and `Repo._clone()` (lines 1477-1520), reached via the public `Repo.clone_from()` (line 1626) and `Repo.clone()` (line 1567) APIs.\n- **Affected version:** GitPython at HEAD (`9729ed3b948f2bde09f1f188c5311e172212b67e`, 2026-08-05, VERSION `3.1.58`)\n\n## Reachability\n`Repo.clone_from(url, to_path, **kwargs)` (and `Repo.clone()`) forward arbitrary keyword arguments to the underlying `git clone` invocation. Before forwarding, GitPython builds a candidate option list from the kwargs (`Git._option_candidates`) and checks it against a denylist, `Repo.unsafe_git_clone_options`, via `Git.check_unsafe_options()` \u2014 *unless* the caller passes `allow_unsafe_options=True`. This denylist mechanism is exactly the guard that the last ~16 published GHSAs against this repo (2026-07-12 \u2192 2026-08-05) have repeatedly found incomplete or bypassable for other options (`--template`, `--upload-pack`, `--config`, `--exec`, `--output`, `--index-output`, `--pathspec-from-file`, etc.).\n\n`git clone` also accepts `--separate-git-dir=\u003cpath\u003e`, which redirects the repository\u0027s entire `.git` metadata directory to an **arbitrary, caller-controlled filesystem path**, leaving only a gitlink text file (`gitdir: \u003cpath\u003e`) at the intended destination. This is the exact same primitive already recognized as unsafe by GitPython\u0027s own code: `Repo.unsafe_git_init_options` (line 145-150) blocks `--separate-git-dir` for `Repo.init()`, with the comment *\"Redirects the repository metadata to a caller-controlled path\"*. The `Repo._clone()`/`clone()`/`clone_from()` docstring (line 1450-1452) is even more explicit:\n\n```\n:param allow_unsafe_options:\n    Allow unsafe options to be used, such as ``--template`` and\n    ``--separate-git-dir``.\n```\n\ni.e. the maintainers\u0027 own documentation states that `allow_unsafe_options=False` (the default) is supposed to block `--separate-git-dir` for clone. But **`Repo.unsafe_git_clone_options` does not contain it**:\n\n```python\nunsafe_git_clone_options = [\n    \"--upload-pack\",\n    \"-u\",\n    \"--config\",\n    \"-c\",\n    \"--template\",\n    \"--bundle-uri\",\n]\n```\n\nSo any application that forwards a `separate_git_dir` (or `separate-git-dir`) kwarg into `Repo.clone_from()` / `Repo.clone()` \u2014 e.g. a CI/build service, a Git-hosting proxy, or any tool that exposes a subset of clone options to a client, the exact threat model already accepted for the sibling `--template`/`--upload-pack`/`--config` entries in this same list \u2014 gets **no protection at all** for `--separate-git-dir`, even with the default `allow_unsafe_options=False`.\n\n## Root cause\nParity gap between two sibling denylists that guard the same underlying primitive (arbitrary redirection of git metadata storage): `unsafe_git_init_options` correctly lists `--separate-git-dir`; `unsafe_git_clone_options`, covering the same option on a different git subcommand that also accepts it, does not \u2014 despite the function\u0027s own docstring claiming otherwise. This is the same \"denylist omits an equally-dangerous sibling option\" pattern already responsible for `GHSA-539m-9xh6-q6rr` (`archive` denylist missing `--add-file`/`--add-virtual-file`) and `GHSA-6p8h-3wgx-97gf` (`clone` denylist missing `--template`, since fixed).\n\n## Exploit path\n1. Attacker-controlled input reaches a `separate_git_dir=...` (or equivalently `\"separate-git-dir\"`) keyword argument passed into `Repo.clone_from()` / `Repo.clone()` by the host application, with `allow_unsafe_options` left at its default `False`.\n2. `Git._option_candidates()` renders this as `--separate-git-dir` and `Git.check_unsafe_options()` checks it against `Repo.unsafe_git_clone_options` \u2014 no match, no `UnsafeOptionError` raised.\n3. `Git.transform_kwargs()` renders the same kwarg into the real command line as `--separate-git-dir=\u003cattacker path\u003e` and GitPython executes `git clone -v --separate-git-dir=\u003cattacker path\u003e -- \u003curl\u003e \u003cdest\u003e` via `subprocess` (no shell).\n4. `git` itself creates the full repository metadata tree (`config`, `description`, `HEAD`, `hooks/`, `index`, `objects/`, `refs/`, `packed-refs`, `logs/`) at the attacker-specified path \u2014 which can be **any path outside the intended clone destination** that the process has permission to create \u2014 and leaves a gitlink file at the intended destination pointing to it.\n\n## Impact\nArbitrary directory/file creation at a path fully controlled by the attacker (bounded only by filesystem permissions of the process running GitPython), matching the impact class of the already-published, High-severity `GHSA-hmq2-w58f-27jc` (\"Arbitrary Git Repository Creation Outside the Working Tree\", CVSS 8.2). Concretely:\n- Planting a git repository structure (including a `hooks/` directory) at an attacker-chosen location outside the sandboxed clone destination the calling application intended to confine the operation to.\n- If the attacker-chosen path collides with an existing directory the process can write into (e.g. another repository\u0027s `.git`, a shared cache path, a predictable temp location), the clone silently populates/overwrites `config`, `HEAD`, `hooks/*`, `refs/*`, `packed-refs`, and `index` there \u2014 an integrity violation of a resource outside the intended destination.\n- Combined with any later operation that runs `git` against that redirected/colliding directory (common in CI/build systems that reuse or predict working-directory layouts), this can escalate to hook execution, matching the RCE class already accepted for `--template` in `GHSA-9rj7-rf2p-w77r`.\n\n## Preconditions\n- The calling application forwards a caller-influenced value into a `separate_git_dir` kwarg of `Repo.clone_from()`/`Repo.clone()` (or into the `multi_options` list as a raw `--separate-git-dir=...` token) without itself validating/rejecting it, and does not pass `allow_unsafe_options=True` intentionally. This is the identical trust model GitPython\u0027s own denylist already defends for `--template`/`--upload-pack`/`--config`/`--bundle-uri` on the very same code path \u2014 i.e. this option was clearly meant to be covered by the same guard and was simply omitted.\n- No authentication/role requirement inside GitPython itself; the vulnerable code runs the moment the host application calls the API with the option present.\n\n## Evidence\n- `git/repo/base.py:145-151` \u2014 `unsafe_git_init_options` includes `\"--separate-git-dir\"` with the comment \"Redirects the repository metadata to a caller-controlled path\".\n- `git/repo/base.py:153-165` \u2014 `unsafe_git_clone_options` (the list actually enforced on `_clone`) does **not** include `\"--separate-git-dir\"`.\n- `git/repo/base.py:1450-1452` \u2014 docstring of `clone_from`/`clone` explicitly documents `--separate-git-dir` as one of the options `allow_unsafe_options` is supposed to gate.\n- `git/repo/base.py:1495-1518` \u2014 `_clone()` special-cases `separate_git_dir` only to `Git.polish_url()` it (path normalization for URL-like values), then runs it through `Git.check_unsafe_options(options=..., unsafe_options=cls.unsafe_git_clone_options)` \u2014 which, per the list above, does not flag it.\n- PoC (`gitpython-001-poc.py`, embedded below) run against this exact checkout confirms the option reaches the real `git clone` subprocess unguarded and creates a full git directory outside the destination path, with `allow_unsafe_options` at its default `False`.\n\n## False-positive check (adversarial re-read)\n- **Is there a value-level check that would still stop this?** No \u2014 `check_unsafe_options` only inspects option *names* (via `_canonicalize_option_name`) against the denylist; it performs no filesystem/path validation on `separate_git_dir`\u0027s value, and no other guard in `_clone()` touches this kwarg besides the `Git.polish_url()` normalization (which does not reject arbitrary paths).\n- **Is `--separate-git-dir` perhaps a no-op or safely sandboxed for `clone` specifically (unlike `init`)?** No \u2014 confirmed empirically: the option reaches the real `git` binary unmodified and git honors it exactly as documented, writing the full metadata tree to the given path.\n- **Could this be the exact bug already covered by one of the 26 published GHSAs?** Checked all 26 entries in `_known-advisories.json` (Filter 0): `GHSA-9rj7-rf2p-w77r` covers `--template` in `Repo.init`; `GHSA-6p8h-3wgx-97gf` covers `--template` in clone (already fixed, present in `unsafe_git_clone_options`); `GHSA-hmq2-w58f-27jc` covers arbitrary repo creation via unvalidated **`.gitmodules` submodule names** (a different code path \u2014 `Submodule`, not `Repo.clone_from()` kwargs). None reference `--separate-git-dir` on the clone path. This is a distinct, currently-unpatched gap.\n- **Does this require an unrealistic precondition?** The precondition (host app forwards a kwarg into `clone_from`/`clone`) is identical to the precondition already accepted by the maintainers for the sibling entries in the same list (`--template`, `--upload-pack`, `--config`, `--bundle-uri`) \u2014 i.e. it is the same threat model the guard exists to cover, just missing one entry.\n- Verdict: no concrete blocker found. **CONFIRMED.**\n\n## Remediation\nAdd `\"--separate-git-dir\"` (and its `-` alias if git ever adds one \u2014 currently there is none) to `Repo.unsafe_git_clone_options` in `git/repo/base.py`, matching `unsafe_git_init_options`. Since `Repo._clone()` already special-cases `separate_git_dir` for `Git.polish_url()` normalization, the fix is a one-line addition to the existing list, consistent with how `GHSA-6p8h-3wgx-97gf` added `--template` to the same list.\n\n## Confidence\nHigh. Root cause is a one-line, unambiguous omission the maintainers\u0027 own docstring contradicts; PoC reproduces cleanly and deterministically against the current HEAD; no plausible false-positive path found.\n\n\n## Proof-of-Concept source (`gitpython-001-poc.py`)\n\n```python\n#!/usr/bin/env python3\n\"\"\"\nGITPYTHON-001 PoC: Repo.clone_from(separate_git_dir=...) is not in\nunsafe_git_clone_options, so it reaches `git clone` unguarded and writes a\nfull git directory (config, hooks/, objects/, refs/, ...) to an\nattacker-controlled path OUTSIDE the intended destination directory, with\nallow_unsafe_options left at its default of False.\n\nRun against the GitPython source tree under test, e.g.:\n  PYTHONPATH=\"\u003crepo\u003e:\u003crepo\u003e/gitdb:\u003crepo\u003e/smmap\" python3 gitpython-001-poc.py \u003cworkdir\u003e\n\nBenign: only writes/reads inside the given workdir. No destructive/exfiltrating\npayload. Exits non-zero and prints \"NOT VULNERABLE\" if the guard blocks the option\nor the write does not escape the destination directory.\n\"\"\"\nimport os\nimport sys\nimport subprocess\n\n\ndef main():\n    workdir = sys.argv[1] if len(sys.argv) \u003e 1 else \"/tmp/gitpython-001-poc\"\n    src = os.path.join(workdir, \"src\")\n    dest = os.path.join(workdir, \"dest\")\n    sentinel_dir = os.path.join(workdir, \"OUTSIDE_SENTINEL\")\n    target_gitdir = os.path.join(sentinel_dir, \"redirected.git\")\n\n    for p in (src, dest, sentinel_dir):\n        os.makedirs(p, exist_ok=True)\n\n    # Minimal benign source repo to clone from.\n    subprocess.run([\"git\", \"init\", \"-q\", \"-b\", \"main\", src], check=True)\n    subprocess.run([\"git\", \"-C\", src, \"config\", \"user.email\", \"test@example.com\"], check=True)\n    subprocess.run([\"git\", \"-C\", src, \"config\", \"user.name\", \"Test\"], check=True)\n    with open(os.path.join(src, \"file.txt\"), \"w\") as f:\n        f.write(\"hello\\n\")\n    subprocess.run([\"git\", \"-C\", src, \"add\", \"file.txt\"], check=True)\n    subprocess.run([\"git\", \"-C\", src, \"commit\", \"-q\", \"-m\", \"init\"], check=True)\n\n    import git  # gitpython under test\n\n    print(\"unsafe_git_clone_options =\", git.Repo.unsafe_git_clone_options)\n    assert \"--separate-git-dir\" not in git.Repo.unsafe_git_clone_options, (\n        \"guard now includes --separate-git-dir; PoC no longer applicable, target patched\"\n    )\n\n    try:\n        repo = git.Repo.clone_from(src, dest, separate_git_dir=target_gitdir)\n    except git.exc.UnsafeOptionError as e:\n        print(\"NOT VULNERABLE: blocked by UnsafeOptionError:\", e)\n        sys.exit(1)\n\n    wrote_outside = os.path.isdir(os.path.join(target_gitdir, \"hooks\")) and os.path.isfile(\n        os.path.join(target_gitdir, \"config\")\n    )\n    gitlink_points_outside = False\n    with open(os.path.join(dest, \".git\")) as f:\n        gitlink = f.read().strip()\n        gitlink_points_outside = target_gitdir in gitlink\n\n    print(\"repo.git_dir =\", repo.git_dir)\n    print(\"wrote git directory outside dest (sentinel) =\", wrote_outside)\n    print(\"dest/.git gitlink points outside dest =\", gitlink_points_outside)\n\n    if wrote_outside and gitlink_points_outside:\n        print(\"VULNERABLE: git directory created at attacker-controlled path \"\n              f\"outside the clone destination: {target_gitdir}\")\n        sys.exit(0)\n    else:\n        print(\"NOT VULNERABLE: sentinel not observed\")\n        sys.exit(1)\n\n\nif __name__ == \"__main__\":\n    main()\n\n```",
  "id": "GHSA-8mcc-hrx5-hvxc",
  "modified": "2026-09-08T18:41:53Z",
  "published": "2026-09-08T18:41:52Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/security/advisories/GHSA-8mcc-hrx5-hvxc"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-78677"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/pull/2210"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/commit/b68afff45af0f49e79a3e2d2162018986b37ad5d"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/releases/tag/3.1.59"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/gitpython/PYSEC-2026-3787.yaml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/gitpython-before-path-traversal-via-separate-git-dir"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "GitPython: clone_from()/clone() omit --separate-git-dir from unsafe_git_clone_options, enabling arbitrary git-directory creation outside the destination"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.


Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.