GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-QG2G-G9W3-M5H8

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-18 17:16 – Updated: 2026-09-18 17:16
VLAI
Summary
ToolHive: containerized MCP servers can reach host services via host.docker.internal, enabling lateral movement
Details

Summary

A containerized MCP server running with the default network permission profile (insecure_allow_all: true) can reach host-local services via host.docker.internal. This includes the ToolHive API itself, other ToolHive-managed MCP server proxies, and any other service listening on the host's localhost. Combined with the unauthenticated ToolHive API and MCP proxy endpoints, this enables a compromised or malicious MCP server to perform lateral movement without any container escape.

Severity

High — This bypasses the container isolation model that is ToolHive's core security value proposition.

Reproduction

All tests performed from inside the filesystem MCP container (docker.io/mcp/filesystem:latest), started with default settings via thv run filesystem -- /tmp.

1. Container can reach the ToolHive control plane MCP endpoint

$ docker exec <container_id> wget -qO- \
  --header="Content-Type: application/json" \
  --header="Accept: application/json" \
  --post-data='{"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"initialize","params":{"protocolVersion":"2025-03-26","capabilities":{},"clientInfo":{"name":"evil-mcp","version":"1.0"}},"id":1}' \
  http://host.docker.internal:50444/mcp

Result: Full MCP handshake succeeds:

{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"result":{"protocolVersion":"2025-03-26","capabilities":{"logging":{},"tools":{}},"serverInfo":{"name":"toolhive-mcp","version":"v0.9.3"}}}

2. Container can connect to another MCP server's proxy and call its tools

$ docker exec <container_id> wget -qO- \
  --header="Content-Type: application/json" \
  --header="Accept: application/json" \
  --post-data='{"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"tools/list","params":{},"id":2}' \
  http://host.docker.internal:64965/mcp

Result: Returns the full tool list of the target MCP server (read_file, write_file, edit_file, move_file, etc.), and tools can be called:

{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":3,"result":{"content":[{"text":"Allowed directories:\n/tmp","type":"text"}]}}

3. Container can reach other host services

# Kubernetes API
$ docker exec <container_id> wget -qO- --no-check-certificate https://host.docker.internal:6443/version
{"major":"1","minor":"34","gitVersion":"v1.34.1"...}

# Ollama LLM API
$ docker exec <container_id> wget -qO- http://host.docker.internal:11434/api/tags
{"models":[{"name":"kimi-k2:1t-cloud"...}]}

Attack Scenarios

Scenario 1: Malicious MCP server pivots to privileged native MCP tools

Many users run native (non-containerized) MCP servers like Desktop Commander, terminal servers, or custom tools that have execute_command, write_file, or shell capabilities with full host access. These typically listen on localhost ports. A malicious containerized MCP server can:

  1. Port-scan host.docker.internal to discover listening services
  2. Attempt MCP handshakes on discovered ports
  3. Call privileged tools (e.g., execute_command("rm -rf /") or write_file("/etc/crontab", "..."))

This achieves full host compromise without any container escape vulnerability.

Scenario 2: Compromised MCP server manipulates ToolHive itself

Via the unauthenticated ToolHive MCP endpoint on port 50444, a compromised container could potentially:

  • List and stop other running MCP servers (denial of service)
  • Start new MCP servers with attacker-controlled images
  • Modify configurations

Scenario 3: Data exfiltration via cross-MCP-server access

A low-privilege MCP server (e.g., sequentialthinking with no file mounts) could reach the filesystem server's proxy and call read_file to access files it was never authorized to see.

Scenario 4: LLM model theft / abuse

As demonstrated, the container can reach Ollama's API and could enumerate models, run inference, or exfiltrate model weights from self-hosted LLMs.

Root Causes

  1. insecure_allow_all: true as default — permits outbound connections to any destination including host.docker.internal
  2. No authentication on ToolHive API / MCP proxies — any client that can reach the port can interact fully
  3. Docker's host.docker.internal DNS — resolves to the host machine, bypassing localhost-only binding assumptions

Suggested Mitigations

Short-term

  • Block host.docker.internal and 172.17.0.1 (Docker gateway) in container networking by default, even when insecure_allow_all is enabled. These should require explicit opt-in.
  • Add authentication to MCP proxy endpoints — even a shared secret or token per session would prevent cross-container lateral movement.

Medium-term

  • Network policy per container — ToolHive already has the permission_profile infrastructure. Add support for explicit allow-lists rather than just the binary none/all choice.
  • Isolate container networks — run each MCP server in its own Docker network with no access to the Docker bridge gateway.

Long-term

  • Mutual TLS or token-based auth between ToolHive proxy and containers, so even if network access exists, unauthorized MCP calls are rejected.
  • Audit logging — log all MCP tool calls with source identification so lateral movement attempts are visible.

Environment

  • ToolHive v0.9.3 (macOS desktop app, Docker runtime)
  • Docker Desktop for Mac (host.docker.internal enabled by default)
  • Tested with docker.io/mcp/filesystem:latest
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/stacklok/toolhive"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.30.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-58197"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284",
      "CWE-306"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-09-18T17:16:02Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\n\nA containerized MCP server running with the default `network` permission profile (`insecure_allow_all: true`) can reach host-local services via `host.docker.internal`. This includes the ToolHive API itself, other ToolHive-managed MCP server proxies, and any other service listening on the host\u0027s localhost. Combined with the unauthenticated ToolHive API and MCP proxy endpoints, this enables a compromised or malicious MCP server to perform lateral movement without any container escape.\n\n## Severity\n\n**High** \u2014 This bypasses the container isolation model that is ToolHive\u0027s core security value proposition.\n\n## Reproduction\n\nAll tests performed from inside the `filesystem` MCP container (`docker.io/mcp/filesystem:latest`), started with default settings via `thv run filesystem -- /tmp`.\n\n### 1. Container can reach the ToolHive control plane MCP endpoint\n\n```bash\n$ docker exec \u003ccontainer_id\u003e wget -qO- \\\n  --header=\"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n  --header=\"Accept: application/json\" \\\n  --post-data=\u0027{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"method\":\"initialize\",\"params\":{\"protocolVersion\":\"2025-03-26\",\"capabilities\":{},\"clientInfo\":{\"name\":\"evil-mcp\",\"version\":\"1.0\"}},\"id\":1}\u0027 \\\n  http://host.docker.internal:50444/mcp\n```\n\n**Result:** Full MCP handshake succeeds:\n```json\n{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"id\":1,\"result\":{\"protocolVersion\":\"2025-03-26\",\"capabilities\":{\"logging\":{},\"tools\":{}},\"serverInfo\":{\"name\":\"toolhive-mcp\",\"version\":\"v0.9.3\"}}}\n```\n\n### 2. Container can connect to another MCP server\u0027s proxy and call its tools\n\n```bash\n$ docker exec \u003ccontainer_id\u003e wget -qO- \\\n  --header=\"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n  --header=\"Accept: application/json\" \\\n  --post-data=\u0027{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"method\":\"tools/list\",\"params\":{},\"id\":2}\u0027 \\\n  http://host.docker.internal:64965/mcp\n```\n\n**Result:** Returns the full tool list of the target MCP server (read_file, write_file, edit_file, move_file, etc.), and tools can be called:\n\n```json\n{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"id\":3,\"result\":{\"content\":[{\"text\":\"Allowed directories:\\n/tmp\",\"type\":\"text\"}]}}\n```\n\n### 3. Container can reach other host services\n\n```bash\n# Kubernetes API\n$ docker exec \u003ccontainer_id\u003e wget -qO- --no-check-certificate https://host.docker.internal:6443/version\n{\"major\":\"1\",\"minor\":\"34\",\"gitVersion\":\"v1.34.1\"...}\n\n# Ollama LLM API\n$ docker exec \u003ccontainer_id\u003e wget -qO- http://host.docker.internal:11434/api/tags\n{\"models\":[{\"name\":\"kimi-k2:1t-cloud\"...}]}\n```\n\n## Attack Scenarios\n\n### Scenario 1: Malicious MCP server pivots to privileged native MCP tools\n\nMany users run native (non-containerized) MCP servers like Desktop Commander, terminal servers, or custom tools that have `execute_command`, `write_file`, or `shell` capabilities with full host access. These typically listen on localhost ports. A malicious containerized MCP server can:\n\n1. Port-scan `host.docker.internal` to discover listening services\n2. Attempt MCP handshakes on discovered ports\n3. Call privileged tools (e.g., `execute_command(\"rm -rf /\")` or `write_file(\"/etc/crontab\", \"...\")`)\n\nThis achieves **full host compromise without any container escape vulnerability**.\n\n### Scenario 2: Compromised MCP server manipulates ToolHive itself\n\nVia the unauthenticated ToolHive MCP endpoint on port 50444, a compromised container could potentially:\n\n- List and stop other running MCP servers (denial of service)\n- Start new MCP servers with attacker-controlled images\n- Modify configurations\n\n### Scenario 3: Data exfiltration via cross-MCP-server access\n\nA low-privilege MCP server (e.g., `sequentialthinking` with no file mounts) could reach the `filesystem` server\u0027s proxy and call `read_file` to access files it was never authorized to see.\n\n### Scenario 4: LLM model theft / abuse\n\nAs demonstrated, the container can reach Ollama\u0027s API and could enumerate models, run inference, or exfiltrate model weights from self-hosted LLMs.\n\n## Root Causes\n\n1. **`insecure_allow_all: true` as default** \u2014 permits outbound connections to any destination including `host.docker.internal`\n2. **No authentication on ToolHive API / MCP proxies** \u2014 any client that can reach the port can interact fully\n3. **Docker\u0027s `host.docker.internal` DNS** \u2014 resolves to the host machine, bypassing localhost-only binding assumptions\n\n## Suggested Mitigations\n\n### Short-term\n\n- **Block `host.docker.internal` and `172.17.0.1`** (Docker gateway) in container networking by default, even when `insecure_allow_all` is enabled. These should require explicit opt-in.\n- **Add authentication to MCP proxy endpoints** \u2014 even a shared secret or token per session would prevent cross-container lateral movement.\n\n### Medium-term\n\n- **Network policy per container** \u2014 ToolHive already has the `permission_profile` infrastructure. Add support for explicit allow-lists rather than just the binary none/all choice.\n- **Isolate container networks** \u2014 run each MCP server in its own Docker network with no access to the Docker bridge gateway.\n\n### Long-term\n\n- **Mutual TLS or token-based auth** between ToolHive proxy and containers, so even if network access exists, unauthorized MCP calls are rejected.\n- **Audit logging** \u2014 log all MCP tool calls with source identification so lateral movement attempts are visible.\n\n## Environment\n\n- ToolHive v0.9.3 (macOS desktop app, Docker runtime)\n- Docker Desktop for Mac (host.docker.internal enabled by default)\n- Tested with `docker.io/mcp/filesystem:latest`",
  "id": "GHSA-qg2g-g9w3-m5h8",
  "modified": "2026-09-18T17:16:02Z",
  "published": "2026-09-18T17:16:02Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/stacklok/toolhive/security/advisories/GHSA-qg2g-g9w3-m5h8"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/stacklok/toolhive-studio/pull/2469"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/stacklok/toolhive/pull/5583"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/stacklok/toolhive-studio/commit/968182d7f3ee1e55123369e66ad88f82128119b0"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/stacklok/toolhive/commit/d8f40cb1599b8bf66657f2dfff15bfbfc236e712"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/stacklok/toolhive"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/stacklok/toolhive-studio/releases/tag/v0.38.0"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/stacklok/toolhive/releases/tag/v0.30.1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "ToolHive: containerized MCP servers can reach host services via host.docker.internal, enabling lateral movement"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…