OSEC-2026-23 (CVE-2026-28364)
Vulnerability from osv_ocaml – Published: 2026-10-23 21:30 – Updated: 2026-10-23 21:30 – Source websiteSeveral issues have been discovered in the Marshal module:
ANT-2026-K7NTK0FT Stale obj_counter across unmarshal calls enables null/freed intern_obj_table indexing
ANT-2026-2NJYQWEX Custom block size wraparound in CODE_CUSTOM_LEN allocation
ANT-2026-PJC00M7X Unmarshaler accepts forged Closure_tag metadata without validation
This is a followup for OSEC-2026-01
Corrupted or malicious marshaled data that causes undefined behaviour in the runtime system when unmarshaled. input_value should either fail cleanly or produce a well-formed OCaml object, without corrupting the runtime system.
Consequently, this excludes well-formed marshaled data that produces an OCaml object that is not of the type expected by the OCaml code and causes the Ocaml code to crash or misbehave.
Am I affected?
If you use one of the affected bindings Marshal.from_channel, Marshal.from_bytes, Marshal.from_string, Stdlib.input_value (or a wrapper in a library, such as Lwt_io.read_value).
Please note that Marshal is not type safe, and you have to be careful if you use the deserialization on untrusted input (due to type confusion, and remote code execution by design - you can use Marshal for code).
It is recommended to use Marshal only for communication between trusted processes.
Timeline
- 2026-08-24: vulnerability was found
- 2026-08-27: forwarded report to security@ocaml.org
- 2026-09-29: fix merged to trunk
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"affected_bindings": [
"Marshal.from_channel",
"Marshal.from_bytes",
"Marshal.from_string",
"input_value"
],
"opam_constraint": "ocaml {\u003c \"5.5.2\"}"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "opam",
"name": "ocaml",
"purl": "pkg:opam/ocaml"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.5.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
},
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "7da997d28b1ac57dd3a7108a865b327493fd4239"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml",
"type": "GIT"
},
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "709b0ab93e53d54297b42d897d74dced1e9c75a5"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml",
"type": "GIT"
}
],
"versions": [
"3.07",
"3.07+1",
"3.07+2",
"3.08.0",
"3.08.1",
"3.08.2",
"3.08.3",
"3.08.4",
"3.09.0",
"3.09.1",
"3.09.2",
"3.09.3",
"3.10.0",
"3.10.1",
"3.10.2",
"3.11.0",
"3.11.1",
"3.11.2",
"3.12.0",
"3.12.1",
"4.00.0",
"4.00.1",
"4.01.0",
"4.02.0",
"4.02.1",
"4.02.2",
"4.02.3",
"4.02.4",
"4.03.0",
"4.03.1",
"4.04.0",
"4.04.1",
"4.04.2",
"4.04.3",
"4.05.0",
"4.05.1",
"4.06.0",
"4.06.1",
"4.06.2",
"4.07.0",
"4.07.1",
"4.07.2",
"4.08.0",
"4.08.1",
"4.08.2",
"4.09.0",
"4.09.1",
"4.09.2",
"4.10.0",
"4.10.1",
"4.10.2",
"4.10.3",
"4.11.0",
"4.11.1",
"4.11.2",
"4.11.3",
"4.12.0",
"4.12.1",
"4.12.2",
"4.13.0",
"4.13.1",
"4.13.2",
"4.14.0",
"4.14.1",
"4.14.2",
"4.14.3",
"4.14.4",
"4.14.5",
"5.0.0",
"5.0.1",
"5.1.0",
"5.1.1",
"5.1.2",
"5.2.0",
"5.2.1",
"5.2.2",
"5.3.0",
"5.3.1",
"5.4.0",
"5.4.1",
"5.4.2",
"5.5.0",
"5.5.1"
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-28364"
],
"credits": [
{
"name": "Anthropic",
"type": "REPORTER"
},
{
"name": "Hannes Mehnert",
"type": "COORDINATOR"
},
{
"name": "Edwin T\u00f6r\u00f6k",
"type": "COORDINATOR"
},
{
"name": "Nicol\u00e1s Ojeda B\u00e4r",
"type": "REMEDIATION_REVIEWER"
},
{
"name": "Xavier Leroy",
"type": "REMEDIATION_DEVELOPER"
}
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe": [
"CWE-126",
"CWE-502",
"CWE-754"
],
"human_link": "https://github.com/ocaml/security-advisories/tree/main/advisories/2026/OSEC-2026-23.md",
"osv": "https://github.com/ocaml/security-advisories/tree/generated-osv/2026/OSEC-2026-23.json"
},
"details": "Several issues have been discovered in the Marshal module:\n\nANT-2026-K7NTK0FT Stale obj_counter across unmarshal calls enables null/freed intern_obj_table indexing\n\nANT-2026-2NJYQWEX Custom block size wraparound in CODE_CUSTOM_LEN allocation \n\nANT-2026-PJC00M7X Unmarshaler accepts forged Closure_tag metadata without validation\n\nThis is a followup for [OSEC-2026-01](https://osv.dev/vulnerability/OSEC-2026-01)\n\nCorrupted or malicious marshaled data that causes undefined behaviour in the runtime system when unmarshaled. input_value should either fail cleanly or produce a well-formed OCaml object, without corrupting the runtime system.\n\nConsequently, this excludes well-formed marshaled data that produces an OCaml object that is not of the type expected by the OCaml code and causes the Ocaml code to crash or misbehave.\n\n\n## Am I affected?\n\nIf you use one of the affected bindings `Marshal.from_channel`, `Marshal.from_bytes`, `Marshal.from_string`, `Stdlib.input_value` (or a wrapper in a library, such as `Lwt_io.read_value`).\n\nPlease note that Marshal is not type safe, and you have to be careful if you use the deserialization on untrusted input (due to type confusion, and remote code execution by design - you can use Marshal for code).\n\nIt is recommended to use Marshal only for communication between trusted processes.\n\n## Timeline\n\n- 2026-08-24: vulnerability was found\n- 2026-08-27: forwarded report to security@ocaml.org\n- 2026-09-29: fix merged to trunk",
"id": "OSEC-2026-23",
"modified": "2026-10-23T21:30:00Z",
"published": "2026-10-23T21:30:00Z",
"references": [],
"schema_version": "1.7.4",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Multiple issues in Marshal"
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.