CVE-2016-8212 (GCVE-0-2016-8212)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2017-02-03 07:24 – Updated: 2024-08-06 02:13
VLAI?
Summary
An issue was discovered in EMC RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.2. There is an Improper OCSP Validation Vulnerability. OCSP responses have two time values: thisUpdate and nextUpdate. These specify a validity period; however, both values are optional. Crypto-J treats the lack of a nextUpdate as indicating that the OCSP response is valid indefinitely instead of restricting its validity for a brief period surrounding the thisUpdate time. This vulnerability is similar to the issue described in CVE-2015-4748.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
CWE
  • Improper OCSP Validation Vulnerability
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
n/a RSA BSAFE Crypto-J RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.2 Affected: RSA BSAFE Crypto-J RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.2
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T02:13:21.869Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/540066/30/0/threaded"
          },
          {
            "name": "95831",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_BID",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95831"
          },
          {
            "name": "1037732",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_SECTRACK",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037732"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "RSA BSAFE Crypto-J RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.2",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "RSA BSAFE Crypto-J RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.2"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2017-02-03T00:00:00",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "An issue was discovered in EMC RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.2. There is an Improper OCSP Validation Vulnerability. OCSP responses have two time values: thisUpdate and nextUpdate. These specify a validity period; however, both values are optional. Crypto-J treats the lack of a nextUpdate as indicating that the OCSP response is valid indefinitely instead of restricting its validity for a brief period surrounding the thisUpdate time. This vulnerability is similar to the issue described in CVE-2015-4748."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "Improper OCSP Validation Vulnerability",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2017-07-24T12:57:01",
        "orgId": "c550e75a-17ff-4988-97f0-544cde3820fe",
        "shortName": "dell"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/540066/30/0/threaded"
        },
        {
          "name": "95831",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_BID"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95831"
        },
        {
          "name": "1037732",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_SECTRACK"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037732"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "security_alert@emc.com",
          "ID": "CVE-2016-8212",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "RSA BSAFE Crypto-J RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.2",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "RSA BSAFE Crypto-J RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.2"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "An issue was discovered in EMC RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.2. There is an Improper OCSP Validation Vulnerability. OCSP responses have two time values: thisUpdate and nextUpdate. These specify a validity period; however, both values are optional. Crypto-J treats the lack of a nextUpdate as indicating that the OCSP response is valid indefinitely instead of restricting its validity for a brief period surrounding the thisUpdate time. This vulnerability is similar to the issue described in CVE-2015-4748."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "Improper OCSP Validation Vulnerability"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/540066/30/0/threaded",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/540066/30/0/threaded"
            },
            {
              "name": "95831",
              "refsource": "BID",
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95831"
            },
            {
              "name": "1037732",
              "refsource": "SECTRACK",
              "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037732"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "c550e75a-17ff-4988-97f0-544cde3820fe",
    "assignerShortName": "dell",
    "cveId": "CVE-2016-8212",
    "datePublished": "2017-02-03T07:24:00",
    "dateReserved": "2016-09-13T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T02:13:21.869Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:dell:bsafe_crypto-j:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"versionEndExcluding\": \"6.2.2\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"851A69E5-4591-4C1E-8824-1A30F1B885C3\"}]}]}]",
      "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"An issue was discovered in EMC RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.2. There is an Improper OCSP Validation Vulnerability. OCSP responses have two time values: thisUpdate and nextUpdate. These specify a validity period; however, both values are optional. Crypto-J treats the lack of a nextUpdate as indicating that the OCSP response is valid indefinitely instead of restricting its validity for a brief period surrounding the thisUpdate time. This vulnerability is similar to the issue described in CVE-2015-4748.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"Se descubri\\u00f3 un problema en las versiones de EMC RSA BSAFE Crypto-J anteriores a 6.2.2. Hay una Vulnerabilidad de validaci\\u00f3n OCSP incorrecta. Las respuestas OCSP tienen dos valores de tiempo: thisUpdate y nextUpdate. \\u00c9stos especifican un per\\u00edodo de validez; Sin embargo, ambos valores son opcionales. Crypto-J trata la falta de un nextUpdate como indicando que la respuesta OCSP es v\\u00e1lida indefinidamente en lugar de restringir su validez durante un breve per\\u00edodo que rodea el tiempo thisUpdate. Esta vulnerabilidad es similar al problema descrito en CVE-2015-4748.\"}]",
      "id": "CVE-2016-8212",
      "lastModified": "2024-11-21T02:58:59.833",
      "metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV31\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 7.5, \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 3.9, \"impactScore\": 3.6}], \"cvssMetricV2\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"2.0\", \"vectorString\": \"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 5.0, \"accessVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"accessComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"authentication\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"exploitabilityScore\": 10.0, \"impactScore\": 2.9, \"acInsufInfo\": false, \"obtainAllPrivilege\": false, \"obtainUserPrivilege\": false, \"obtainOtherPrivilege\": false, \"userInteractionRequired\": false}]}",
      "published": "2017-02-03T07:59:00.357",
      "references": "[{\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/540066/30/0/threaded\", \"source\": \"security_alert@emc.com\", \"tags\": [\"Mailing List\", \"Third Party Advisory\", \"VDB Entry\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95831\", \"source\": \"security_alert@emc.com\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\", \"VDB Entry\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037732\", \"source\": \"security_alert@emc.com\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\", \"VDB Entry\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/540066/30/0/threaded\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Mailing List\", \"Third Party Advisory\", \"VDB Entry\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95831\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\", \"VDB Entry\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037732\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\", \"VDB Entry\"]}]",
      "sourceIdentifier": "security_alert@emc.com",
      "vulnStatus": "Modified",
      "weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-404\"}]}]"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2016-8212\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security_alert@emc.com\",\"published\":\"2017-02-03T07:59:00.357\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-04-20T01:37:25.860\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Deferred\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"An issue was discovered in EMC RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.2. There is an Improper OCSP Validation Vulnerability. OCSP responses have two time values: thisUpdate and nextUpdate. These specify a validity period; however, both values are optional. Crypto-J treats the lack of a nextUpdate as indicating that the OCSP response is valid indefinitely instead of restricting its validity for a brief period surrounding the thisUpdate time. This vulnerability is similar to the issue described in CVE-2015-4748.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Se descubri\u00f3 un problema en las versiones de EMC RSA BSAFE Crypto-J anteriores a 6.2.2. Hay una Vulnerabilidad de validaci\u00f3n OCSP incorrecta. Las respuestas OCSP tienen dos valores de tiempo: thisUpdate y nextUpdate. \u00c9stos especifican un per\u00edodo de validez; Sin embargo, ambos valores son opcionales. Crypto-J trata la falta de un nextUpdate como indicando que la respuesta OCSP es v\u00e1lida indefinidamente en lugar de restringir su validez durante un breve per\u00edodo que rodea el tiempo thisUpdate. Esta vulnerabilidad es similar al problema descrito en CVE-2015-4748.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":3.6}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":5.0,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-404\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:dell:bsafe_crypto-j:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"6.2.2\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"851A69E5-4591-4C1E-8824-1A30F1B885C3\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/540066/30/0/threaded\",\"source\":\"security_alert@emc.com\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95831\",\"source\":\"security_alert@emc.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037732\",\"source\":\"security_alert@emc.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/540066/30/0/threaded\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95831\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037732\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.