cve-2020-25688
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2020-11-23 21:07
Modified
2024-08-04 15:40
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
A flaw was found in rhacm versions before 2.0.5 and before 2.1.0. Two internal service APIs were incorrectly provisioned using a test certificate from the source repository. This would result in all installations using the same certificates. If an attacker could observe network traffic internal to a cluster, they could use the private key to decode API requests that should be protected by TLS sessions, potentially obtaining information they would not otherwise be able to. These certificates are not used for service authentication, so no opportunity for impersonation or active MITM attacks were made possible.
References
▼ | URL | Tags | |
---|---|---|---|
secalert@redhat.com | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892551 | Issue Tracking, Vendor Advisory | |
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892551 | Issue Tracking, Vendor Advisory |
Impacted products
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T15:40:36.675Z", "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "shortName": "CVE" }, "references": [ { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred" ], "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892551" } ], "title": "CVE Program Container" } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "product": "rhacm", "vendor": "n/a", "versions": [ { "status": "affected", "version": "All rhacm versions before 2.0.5 and before 2.1.0" } ] } ], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "A flaw was found in rhacm versions before 2.0.5 and before 2.1.0. Two internal service APIs were incorrectly provisioned using a test certificate from the source repository. This would result in all installations using the same certificates. If an attacker could observe network traffic internal to a cluster, they could use the private key to decode API requests that should be protected by TLS sessions, potentially obtaining information they would not otherwise be able to. These certificates are not used for service authentication, so no opportunity for impersonation or active MITM attacks were made possible." } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "cweId": "CWE-321", "description": "CWE-321", "lang": "en", "type": "CWE" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2020-11-23T21:07:06", "orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749", "shortName": "redhat" }, "references": [ { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC" ], "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892551" } ], "x_legacyV4Record": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com", "ID": "CVE-2020-25688", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "rhacm", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_value": "All rhacm versions before 2.0.5 and before 2.1.0" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "n/a" } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "A flaw was found in rhacm versions before 2.0.5 and before 2.1.0. Two internal service APIs were incorrectly provisioned using a test certificate from the source repository. This would result in all installations using the same certificates. If an attacker could observe network traffic internal to a cluster, they could use the private key to decode API requests that should be protected by TLS sessions, potentially obtaining information they would not otherwise be able to. These certificates are not used for service authentication, so no opportunity for impersonation or active MITM attacks were made possible." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "CWE-321" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892551", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892551" } ] } } } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749", "assignerShortName": "redhat", "cveId": "CVE-2020-25688", "datePublished": "2020-11-23T21:07:06", "dateReserved": "2020-09-16T00:00:00", "dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T15:40:36.675Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1", "vulnerability-lookup:meta": { "fkie_nvd": { "configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:advanced_cluster_management_for_kubernetes:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"versionEndExcluding\": \"2.0.5\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"78C66909-F927-460E-9B2F-45E32949B4F2\"}]}]}]", "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"A flaw was found in rhacm versions before 2.0.5 and before 2.1.0. Two internal service APIs were incorrectly provisioned using a test certificate from the source repository. This would result in all installations using the same certificates. If an attacker could observe network traffic internal to a cluster, they could use the private key to decode API requests that should be protected by TLS sessions, potentially obtaining information they would not otherwise be able to. These certificates are not used for service authentication, so no opportunity for impersonation or active MITM attacks were made possible.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"Se encontr\\u00f3 un fallo en rhacm versiones anteriores a 2.0.5 y anteriores a 2.1.0.\u0026#xa0;Se aprovisionaron incorrectamente dos API de servicios internos usando un certificado de prueba del repositorio de origen.\u0026#xa0;Esto resultar\\u00eda en que todas las instalaciones utilicen los mismos certificados.\u0026#xa0;Si un atacante pudiera observar el tr\\u00e1fico de red interno en un cl\\u00faster, podr\\u00eda usar la clave privada para decodificar las peticiones de la API que deber\\u00edan estar protegidas por sesiones TLS, obteniendo potencialmente informaci\\u00f3n que de otro modo no podr\\u00edan obtener.\u0026#xa0;Estos certificados no se usan para la autenticaci\\u00f3n de servicios, por lo que no hay oportunidad de que una suplantaci\\u00f3n de identidad o ataques MITM activos sea posible realizar\"}]", "id": "CVE-2020-25688", "lastModified": "2024-11-21T05:18:28.433", "metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV31\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 3.5, \"baseSeverity\": \"LOW\", \"attackVector\": \"ADJACENT_NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"LOW\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 2.1, \"impactScore\": 1.4}], \"cvssMetricV2\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"2.0\", \"vectorString\": \"AV:A/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 2.7, \"accessVector\": \"ADJACENT_NETWORK\", \"accessComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"authentication\": \"SINGLE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"baseSeverity\": \"LOW\", \"exploitabilityScore\": 5.1, \"impactScore\": 2.9, \"acInsufInfo\": false, \"obtainAllPrivilege\": false, \"obtainUserPrivilege\": false, \"obtainOtherPrivilege\": false, \"userInteractionRequired\": false}]}", "published": "2020-11-23T22:15:12.180", "references": "[{\"url\": \"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892551\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\", \"tags\": [\"Issue Tracking\", \"Vendor Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892551\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Issue Tracking\", \"Vendor Advisory\"]}]", "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com", "vulnStatus": "Modified", "weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\", \"type\": \"Secondary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-321\"}]}, {\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-798\"}]}]" }, "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2020-25688\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"published\":\"2020-11-23T22:15:12.180\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T05:18:28.433\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"A flaw was found in rhacm versions before 2.0.5 and before 2.1.0. Two internal service APIs were incorrectly provisioned using a test certificate from the source repository. This would result in all installations using the same certificates. If an attacker could observe network traffic internal to a cluster, they could use the private key to decode API requests that should be protected by TLS sessions, potentially obtaining information they would not otherwise be able to. These certificates are not used for service authentication, so no opportunity for impersonation or active MITM attacks were made possible.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Se encontr\u00f3 un fallo en rhacm versiones anteriores a 2.0.5 y anteriores a 2.1.0.\u0026#xa0;Se aprovisionaron incorrectamente dos API de servicios internos usando un certificado de prueba del repositorio de origen.\u0026#xa0;Esto resultar\u00eda en que todas las instalaciones utilicen los mismos certificados.\u0026#xa0;Si un atacante pudiera observar el tr\u00e1fico de red interno en un cl\u00faster, podr\u00eda usar la clave privada para decodificar las peticiones de la API que deber\u00edan estar protegidas por sesiones TLS, obteniendo potencialmente informaci\u00f3n que de otro modo no podr\u00edan obtener.\u0026#xa0;Estos certificados no se usan para la autenticaci\u00f3n de servicios, por lo que no hay oportunidad de que una suplantaci\u00f3n de identidad o ataques MITM activos sea posible realizar\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":3.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"LOW\",\"attackVector\":\"ADJACENT_NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.1,\"impactScore\":1.4}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:A/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":2.7,\"accessVector\":\"ADJACENT_NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"SINGLE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"LOW\",\"exploitabilityScore\":5.1,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-321\"}]},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-798\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:advanced_cluster_management_for_kubernetes:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"2.0.5\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"78C66909-F927-460E-9B2F-45E32949B4F2\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892551\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892551\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}" } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.