CVE-2025-8267 (GCVE-0-2025-8267)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-07-28 05:00 – Updated: 2025-07-28 16:01
VLAI?
Summary
Versions of the package ssrfcheck before 1.2.0 are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) due to an incomplete denylist of IP address ranges. Specifically, the package fails to classify the reserved IP address space 224.0.0.0/4 (Multicast) as invalid. This oversight allows attackers to craft requests targeting these multicast addresses.
Severity ?
CWE
- CWE-918 - Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Assigner
References
Credits
Liran Tal
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-8267",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-07-28T16:01:27.452463Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-28T16:01:35.358Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "ssrfcheck",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.2.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Liran Tal"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Versions of the package ssrfcheck before 1.2.0 are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) due to an incomplete denylist of IP address ranges. Specifically, the package fails to classify the reserved IP address space 224.0.0.0/4 (Multicast) as invalid. This oversight allows attackers to craft requests targeting these multicast addresses."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 8.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"exploitCodeMaturity": "PROOF_OF_CONCEPT",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N/E:P",
"version": "3.1"
},
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "PROOF_OF_CONCEPT",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-918",
"description": "Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
"lang": "en"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-28T05:00:00.992Z",
"orgId": "bae035ff-b466-4ff4-94d0-fc9efd9e1730",
"shortName": "snyk"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-SSRFCHECK-9510756"
},
{
"url": "https://gist.github.com/lirantal/2976840639df824cb3abe60d13c65e04"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/felippe-regazio/ssrfcheck/issues/5"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/felippe-regazio/ssrfcheck/commit/9507b49fd764f2a1a1d1e3b9ee577b7545e6950e"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "bae035ff-b466-4ff4-94d0-fc9efd9e1730",
"assignerShortName": "snyk",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-8267",
"datePublished": "2025-07-28T05:00:00.992Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-07-27T12:56:36.513Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-28T16:01:35.358Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-8267\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"report@snyk.io\",\"published\":\"2025-07-28T05:16:20.673\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-08-07T14:42:32.477\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Versions of the package ssrfcheck before 1.2.0 are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) due to an incomplete denylist of IP address ranges. Specifically, the package fails to classify the reserved IP address space 224.0.0.0/4 (Multicast) as invalid. This oversight allows attackers to craft requests targeting these multicast addresses.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Las versiones del paquete ssrfcheck anteriores a la 1.2.0 son vulnerables a la Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) debido a una lista de denegaci\u00f3n incompleta de rangos de direcciones IP. En concreto, el paquete no clasifica el espacio de direcciones IP reservado 224.0.0.0/4 (Multicast) como inv\u00e1lido. Este descuido permite a los atacantes manipular solicitudes dirigidas a estas direcciones de multicast.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"report@snyk.io\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":8.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"attackRequirements\":\"NONE\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"PROOF_OF_CONCEPT\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}],\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"report@snyk.io\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N\",\"baseScore\":8.2,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":4.2},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N\",\"baseScore\":5.3,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":1.4}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"report@snyk.io\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-918\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:felipperegazio:ssrf_check:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"1.2.0\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"28635FBF-C34E-4999-BF3D-1679DA5D2448\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://gist.github.com/lirantal/2976840639df824cb3abe60d13c65e04\",\"source\":\"report@snyk.io\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/felippe-regazio/ssrfcheck/commit/9507b49fd764f2a1a1d1e3b9ee577b7545e6950e\",\"source\":\"report@snyk.io\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/felippe-regazio/ssrfcheck/issues/5\",\"source\":\"report@snyk.io\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\"]},{\"url\":\"https://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-SSRFCHECK-9510756\",\"source\":\"report@snyk.io\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}",
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2025-8267\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"poc\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-07-28T16:01:27.452463Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-07-28T16:01:31.611Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Liran Tal\"}], \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 8.2, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N/E:P\", \"integrityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"exploitCodeMaturity\": \"PROOF_OF_CONCEPT\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}, \"cvssV4_0\": {\"version\": \"4.0\", \"baseScore\": 8.8, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P\", \"exploitMaturity\": \"PROOF_OF_CONCEPT\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"attackRequirements\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"subIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnIntegrityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"subAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"subConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnConfidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"n/a\", \"product\": \"ssrfcheck\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"0\", \"lessThan\": \"1.2.0\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-SSRFCHECK-9510756\"}, {\"url\": \"https://gist.github.com/lirantal/2976840639df824cb3abe60d13c65e04\"}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/felippe-regazio/ssrfcheck/issues/5\"}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/felippe-regazio/ssrfcheck/commit/9507b49fd764f2a1a1d1e3b9ee577b7545e6950e\"}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Versions of the package ssrfcheck before 1.2.0 are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) due to an incomplete denylist of IP address ranges. Specifically, the package fails to classify the reserved IP address space 224.0.0.0/4 (Multicast) as invalid. This oversight allows attackers to craft requests targeting these multicast addresses.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-918\", \"description\": \"Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"bae035ff-b466-4ff4-94d0-fc9efd9e1730\", \"shortName\": \"snyk\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-07-28T05:00:00.992Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2025-8267\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-07-28T16:01:35.358Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2025-07-27T12:56:36.513Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"bae035ff-b466-4ff4-94d0-fc9efd9e1730\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-07-28T05:00:00.992Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"snyk\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…