CVE-2026-53513 (GCVE-0-2026-53513)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-15 17:15 – Updated: 2026-07-15 17:15
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Better Auth: Server-side request forgery via unvalidated OIDC endpoints on @better-auth/sso provider registration
Summary
Better Auth is an authentication and authorization library for TypeScript. Prior to 1.6.11, the @better-auth/sso plugin's POST /sso/register and POST /sso/update-provider endpoints accept attacker-controlled oidcConfig.userInfoEndpoint, tokenEndpoint, and jwksEndpoint URLs when skipDiscovery: true is set, store them on the ssoProvider row without origin validation, and fetch them during OIDC callback, allowing non-blind server-side request forgery and possible account linking when trustEmailVerified: true is configured. This issue is fixed in version 1.6.11.
Severity
9.6 (Critical)
CWE
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/securi… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/pull/9574 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/commit… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/releas… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| better-auth | better-auth |
Affected:
>= 0.1.0, < 1.6.11
|
|
| @better-auth | sso |
Affected:
>= 0.1.0, < 1.6.11
|
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "better-auth",
"vendor": "better-auth",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 0.1.0, \u003c 1.6.11"
}
]
},
{
"product": "sso",
"vendor": "@better-auth",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 0.1.0, \u003c 1.6.11"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Better Auth is an authentication and authorization library for TypeScript. Prior to 1.6.11, the @better-auth/sso plugin\u0027s POST /sso/register and POST /sso/update-provider endpoints accept attacker-controlled oidcConfig.userInfoEndpoint, tokenEndpoint, and jwksEndpoint URLs when skipDiscovery: true is set, store them on the ssoProvider row without origin validation, and fetch them during OIDC callback, allowing non-blind server-side request forgery and possible account linking when trustEmailVerified: true is configured. This issue is fixed in version 1.6.11."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 9.6,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-20",
"description": "CWE-20: Improper Input Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-441",
"description": "CWE-441: Unintended Proxy or Intermediary (\u0027Confused Deputy\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-918",
"description": "CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-15T17:15:59.611Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/security/advisories/GHSA-5rr4-8452-hf4v",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/security/advisories/GHSA-5rr4-8452-hf4v"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/pull/9574",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/pull/9574"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/commit/37f60cb176cb53147da7dfd5ec15afa5b486e81e",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/commit/37f60cb176cb53147da7dfd5ec15afa5b486e81e"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/releases/tag/v1.6.11",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/releases/tag/v1.6.11"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-5rr4-8452-hf4v",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Better Auth: Server-side request forgery via unvalidated OIDC endpoints on @better-auth/sso provider registration"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-53513",
"datePublished": "2026-07-15T17:15:59.611Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-09T17:30:33.455Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-15T17:15:59.611Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-53513",
"date": "2026-06-14",
"epss": "0.00025",
"percentile": "0.07577"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-53513\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2026-07-15T18:16:47.547\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-07-15T18:16:47.547\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Received\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Better Auth is an authentication and authorization library for TypeScript. Prior to 1.6.11, the @better-auth/sso plugin\u0027s POST /sso/register and POST /sso/update-provider endpoints accept attacker-controlled oidcConfig.userInfoEndpoint, tokenEndpoint, and jwksEndpoint URLs when skipDiscovery: true is set, store them on the ssoProvider row without origin validation, and fetch them during OIDC callback, allowing non-blind server-side request forgery and possible account linking when trustEmailVerified: true is configured. This issue is fixed in version 1.6.11.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"better-auth\",\"product\":\"better-auth\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"\u003e= 0.1.0, \u003c 1.6.11\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]},{\"vendor\":\"@better-auth\",\"product\":\"sso\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"\u003e= 0.1.0, \u003c 1.6.11\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N\",\"baseScore\":9.6,\"baseSeverity\":\"CRITICAL\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"CHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.1,\"impactScore\":5.8}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-20\"},{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-345\"},{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-441\"},{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-918\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/commit/37f60cb176cb53147da7dfd5ec15afa5b486e81e\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/pull/9574\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/releases/tag/v1.6.11\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/security/advisories/GHSA-5rr4-8452-hf4v\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…