fkie_cve-2005-4269
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2005-12-15 20:11
Modified
2025-04-03 01:03
Severity ?
Summary
mshtml.dll in Microsoft Windows XP, Server 2003, and Internet Explorer 6.0 SP1 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (access violation) by causing mshtml.dll to process button-focus events at the same time that a document is reloading, as seen in Microsoft Office InfoPath 2003 by repeatedly clicking the "Delete" button in a repeating section in a form. NOTE: the normal operation of InfoPath appears to involve a local user without any privilege boundaries, so this might not be a vulnerability in InfoPath. If no realistic scenarios exist for this problem in other products, then perhaps it should be excluded from CVE.
References
cve@mitre.orghttp://support.microsoft.com/kb/908233/
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.securiteam.com/windowsntfocus/6V00B1FEUE.html
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://support.microsoft.com/kb/908233/
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.securiteam.com/windowsntfocus/6V00B1FEUE.html
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
microsoft ie 6.0
microsoft windows_2003_server r2
microsoft windows_xp *


To clipboard 

{
   configurations: [
      {
         nodes: [
            {
               cpeMatch: [
                  {
                     criteria: "cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:ie:6.0:sp1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                     matchCriteriaId: "24DF2AB3-DEAB-4D70-986E-FFBB7E64B96A",
                     vulnerable: true,
                  },
               ],
               negate: false,
               operator: "OR",
            },
         ],
      },
      {
         nodes: [
            {
               cpeMatch: [
                  {
                     criteria: "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_2003_server:r2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                     matchCriteriaId: "4E7FD818-322D-4089-A644-360C33943D29",
                     vulnerable: true,
                  },
                  {
                     criteria: "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_xp:*:gold:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                     matchCriteriaId: "580B0C9B-DD85-40FA-9D37-BAC0C96D57FC",
                     vulnerable: true,
                  },
               ],
               negate: false,
               operator: "OR",
            },
         ],
      },
   ],
   cveTags: [],
   descriptions: [
      {
         lang: "en",
         value: "mshtml.dll in Microsoft Windows XP, Server 2003, and Internet Explorer 6.0 SP1 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (access violation) by causing mshtml.dll to process button-focus events at the same time that a document is reloading, as seen in Microsoft Office InfoPath 2003 by repeatedly clicking the \"Delete\" button in a repeating section in a form.  NOTE: the normal operation of InfoPath appears to involve a local user without any privilege boundaries, so this might not be a vulnerability in InfoPath.  If no realistic scenarios exist for this problem in other products, then perhaps it should be excluded from CVE.",
      },
      {
         lang: "es",
         value: "mshtml.dll en Microsoft Windows XP, Server 2003, e Internet Explorer 6.0 SP1, permite a atacantes causar una denegación de servicio (violación de acceso) causando que mshtml.dll procese eventos de foco de botón al mismo tiempo que un documento se está recargando, como se ha visto en Microsoft Office InfoPath 2003 haciendo clic repetidamente en el botón \"Borrar\" en una sección repetitiva en un formulario.\r\nNOTA: La operación normal de InfoPath parece conllevar un usuario local sin límites de privilegios, por lo que esto puede no ser una  vulnerabilidad de Infopath. Si no existen escenarios realistas con este problema en otros productos, entonces quizás debería ser exclido de CVE.",
      },
   ],
   id: "CVE-2005-4269",
   lastModified: "2025-04-03T01:03:51.193",
   metrics: {
      cvssMetricV2: [
         {
            acInsufInfo: false,
            baseSeverity: "HIGH",
            cvssData: {
               accessComplexity: "LOW",
               accessVector: "NETWORK",
               authentication: "NONE",
               availabilityImpact: "COMPLETE",
               baseScore: 7.8,
               confidentialityImpact: "NONE",
               integrityImpact: "NONE",
               vectorString: "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C",
               version: "2.0",
            },
            exploitabilityScore: 10,
            impactScore: 6.9,
            obtainAllPrivilege: false,
            obtainOtherPrivilege: false,
            obtainUserPrivilege: false,
            source: "nvd@nist.gov",
            type: "Primary",
            userInteractionRequired: false,
         },
      ],
   },
   published: "2005-12-15T20:11:00.000",
   references: [
      {
         source: "cve@mitre.org",
         url: "http://support.microsoft.com/kb/908233/",
      },
      {
         source: "cve@mitre.org",
         url: "http://www.securiteam.com/windowsntfocus/6V00B1FEUE.html",
      },
      {
         source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
         url: "http://support.microsoft.com/kb/908233/",
      },
      {
         source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
         url: "http://www.securiteam.com/windowsntfocus/6V00B1FEUE.html",
      },
   ],
   sourceIdentifier: "cve@mitre.org",
   vulnStatus: "Deferred",
   weaknesses: [
      {
         description: [
            {
               lang: "en",
               value: "NVD-CWE-Other",
            },
         ],
         source: "nvd@nist.gov",
         type: "Primary",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.