FKIE_CVE-2010-3192

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2010-10-14 05:58 - Updated: 2025-04-11 00:51
Severity ?
Summary
Certain run-time memory protection mechanisms in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) print argv[0] and backtrace information, which might allow context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by executing an incorrect program, as demonstrated by a setuid program that contains a stack-based buffer overflow error, related to the __fortify_fail function in debug/fortify_fail.c, and the __stack_chk_fail (aka stack protection) and __chk_fail (aka FORTIFY_SOURCE) implementations.
References
cve@mitre.orghttp://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Apr/399Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/25/8Mailing List
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/6Mailing List
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/7Mailing List
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/2Mailing List
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/3Mailing List
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/4Mailing List
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/5Mailing List
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Apr/399Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/25/8Mailing List
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/6Mailing List
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/7Mailing List
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/2Mailing List
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/3Mailing List
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/4Mailing List
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/5Mailing List
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
gnu glibc *
To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:gnu:glibc:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "D4B57CAA-FEDE-48A6-A22F-56CAEA79F200",
              "versionEndExcluding": "2.26",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Certain run-time memory protection mechanisms in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) print argv[0] and backtrace information, which might allow context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by executing an incorrect program, as demonstrated by a setuid program that contains a stack-based buffer overflow error, related to the __fortify_fail function in debug/fortify_fail.c, and the __stack_chk_fail (aka stack protection) and __chk_fail (aka FORTIFY_SOURCE) implementations."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Algunos mecanismos run-time de protecci\u00f3n de memoria en la Librer\u00eda C de GNU (tambi\u00e9n conocido como glibc o libc6) print argv[0] y backtrace information, lo cual permite a atacantes dependientes del contexto obtener informaci\u00f3n sensible de procesos de memoria mediante la ejecuci\u00f3n de un programa incorrecto, como el demostrado por un programa setuid que contiene un error de desbordamiento de b\u00fafer basado en pila, relacionado con la funci\u00f3n __fortify_fail en debug/fortify_fail.c, y las implementaciones __stack_chk_fail (tambi\u00e9n conocida como stack protection) y __chk_fail (tambi\u00e9n conocida como FORTIFY_SOURCE)."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2010-3192",
  "lastModified": "2025-04-11T00:51:21.963",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "acInsufInfo": false,
        "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
        "cvssData": {
          "accessComplexity": "LOW",
          "accessVector": "NETWORK",
          "authentication": "NONE",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 5.0,
          "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N",
          "version": "2.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
        "impactScore": 2.9,
        "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary",
        "userInteractionRequired": false
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2010-10-14T05:58:06.833",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Apr/399"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/25/8"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/6"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/7"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/2"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/3"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/4"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/5"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Apr/399"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/25/8"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/6"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/7"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/2"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/3"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/4"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/5"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-200"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.