fkie_cve-2016-0791
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2016-04-07 23:59
Modified
2025-04-12 10:46
Severity ?
Summary
Jenkins before 1.650 and LTS before 1.642.2 do not use a constant-time algorithm to verify CSRF tokens, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass a CSRF protection mechanism via a brute-force approach.
References
Impacted products
{ configurations: [ { nodes: [ { cpeMatch: [ { criteria: "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:openshift:3.1:*:*:*:enterprise:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "F8E35FAB-695F-44DA-945D-60B47C1F200B", vulnerable: true, }, ], negate: false, operator: "OR", }, ], }, { nodes: [ { cpeMatch: [ { criteria: "cpe:2.3:a:jenkins:jenkins:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "18F2C087-76F7-40F2-83DA-4C643363629C", versionEndIncluding: "1.649", vulnerable: true, }, ], negate: false, operator: "OR", }, ], }, { nodes: [ { cpeMatch: [ { criteria: "cpe:2.3:a:jenkins:jenkins:1.642.1:*:*:*:lts:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "8B87EA57-C12B-4329-B969-2867803D0BA0", vulnerable: true, }, ], negate: false, operator: "OR", }, ], }, ], cveTags: [], descriptions: [ { lang: "en", value: "Jenkins before 1.650 and LTS before 1.642.2 do not use a constant-time algorithm to verify CSRF tokens, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass a CSRF protection mechanism via a brute-force approach.", }, { lang: "es", value: "Jenkins en versiones anteriores a 1.650 y LTS en versiones anteriores a 1.642.2 no utiliza un algoritmo de tiempo constante para verificar tokens CSRF, lo que hace más fácil para atacantes remotos eludir el mecanismo de protección CSRF a través de una aproximación por fuerza bruta.", }, ], id: "CVE-2016-0791", lastModified: "2025-04-12T10:46:40.837", metrics: { cvssMetricV2: [ { acInsufInfo: false, baseSeverity: "HIGH", cvssData: { accessComplexity: "LOW", accessVector: "NETWORK", authentication: "NONE", availabilityImpact: "PARTIAL", baseScore: 7.5, confidentialityImpact: "PARTIAL", integrityImpact: "PARTIAL", vectorString: "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P", version: "2.0", }, exploitabilityScore: 10, impactScore: 6.4, obtainAllPrivilege: false, obtainOtherPrivilege: false, obtainUserPrivilege: false, source: "nvd@nist.gov", type: "Primary", userInteractionRequired: false, }, ], cvssMetricV30: [ { cvssData: { attackComplexity: "LOW", attackVector: "NETWORK", availabilityImpact: "HIGH", baseScore: 9.8, baseSeverity: "CRITICAL", confidentialityImpact: "HIGH", integrityImpact: "HIGH", privilegesRequired: "NONE", scope: "UNCHANGED", userInteraction: "NONE", vectorString: "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", version: "3.0", }, exploitabilityScore: 3.9, impactScore: 5.9, source: "nvd@nist.gov", type: "Primary", }, ], }, published: "2016-04-07T23:59:02.863", references: [ { source: "secalert@redhat.com", url: "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1773.html", }, { source: "secalert@redhat.com", url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0711", }, { source: "secalert@redhat.com", tags: [ "Patch", "Vendor Advisory", ], url: "https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/SECURITY/Jenkins+Security+Advisory+2016-02-24", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", url: "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1773.html", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0711", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Patch", "Vendor Advisory", ], url: "https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/SECURITY/Jenkins+Security+Advisory+2016-02-24", }, ], sourceIdentifier: "secalert@redhat.com", vulnStatus: "Deferred", weaknesses: [ { description: [ { lang: "en", value: "CWE-200", }, ], source: "nvd@nist.gov", type: "Primary", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.