GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

FKIE_CVE-2025-0752

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-01-28 10:15 - Updated: 2026-06-17 08:27
Severity
7.1 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
Summary
A flaw was found in OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6.3 and 2.5.6. Rate-limiter avoidance, access-control bypass, CPU and memory exhaustion, and replay attacks may be possible due to improper HTTP header sanitization in Envoy.
References
secalert@redhat.comhttps://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-0752Vendor Advisory
secalert@redhat.comhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2339115Vendor Advisory
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
redhat openshift_service_mesh 2.5.6
redhat openshift_service_mesh 2.6.3
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://github.com/openshift-service-mesh/proxy",
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageName": "envoyproxy",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "2.6.3",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "2.5.6",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
          "cpes": [
            "cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:2"
          ],
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "packageName": "openshift-service-mesh/proxyv2-rhel8",
          "product": "OpenShift Service Mesh 2",
          "vendor": "Red Hat"
        },
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
          "cpes": [
            "cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:2"
          ],
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageName": "openshift-service-mesh/proxyv2-rhel9",
          "product": "OpenShift Service Mesh 2",
          "vendor": "Red Hat"
        }
      ],
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com"
    }
  ],
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:openshift_service_mesh:2.5.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "888B4C9D-0B35-45BC-9F6D-0C83BC1F14B1",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:openshift_service_mesh:2.6.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "6129D644-AA42-4E25-82E4-053613874178",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "A flaw was found in OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6.3 and 2.5.6. Rate-limiter avoidance, access-control bypass, CPU and memory exhaustion, and replay attacks may be possible due to improper HTTP header sanitization in Envoy."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Se encontr\u00f3 una falla en OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6.3 y 2.5.6. Es posible que se produzcan ataques de evasi\u00f3n de limitadores de velocidad, de control de acceso, de agotamiento de CPU y memoria y de repetici\u00f3n debido al encabezado HTTP desinfecci\u00f3n incorrecto en Envoy."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-0752",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T08:27:05.760",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 7.1,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
        "impactScore": 4.2,
        "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2025-0752",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2025-01-28T14:35:14.655204Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-01-28T10:15:09.493",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-0752"
    },
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2339115"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Modified",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-444"
        }
      ],
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.


Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.