FKIE_CVE-2025-20258

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-05-21 17:15 - Updated: 2025-07-23 16:17
Summary
A vulnerability in the self-service portal of Cisco Duo could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to inject arbitrary commands into emails that are sent by the service. This vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by injecting arbitrary commands into a portion of an email that is sent by the service. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to send emails that contain malicious content to unsuspecting users.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
cisco duo -

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:duo:-:*:*:*:*:-:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "5358EFB5-5721-4B7F-BFCB-7A34A3511703",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "A vulnerability in the self-service portal of Cisco Duo could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to inject arbitrary commands into emails that are sent by the service.\r\n\r This vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by injecting arbitrary commands into a portion of an email that is sent by the service. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to send emails that contain malicious content to unsuspecting users."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Una vulnerabilidad en el portal de autoservicio de Cisco Duo podr\u00eda permitir que un atacante remoto no autenticado inyecte comandos arbitrarios en los correos electr\u00f3nicos enviados por el servicio. Esta vulnerabilidad se debe a una validaci\u00f3n de entrada insuficiente. Un atacante podr\u00eda explotar esta vulnerabilidad inyect\u00e1ndolos en una parte del correo electr\u00f3nico enviado por el servicio. Una explotaci\u00f3n exitosa podr\u00eda permitir al atacante enviar correos electr\u00f3nicos con contenido malicioso a usuarios desprevenidos."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-20258",
  "lastModified": "2025-07-23T16:17:17.993",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 5.4,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
        "impactScore": 2.5,
        "source": "psirt@cisco.com",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-05-21T17:15:57.400",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "psirt@cisco.com",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-duo-ssp-cmd-inj-RCmYrNA"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "psirt@cisco.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-77"
        }
      ],
      "source": "psirt@cisco.com",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…