FKIE_CVE-2025-23512

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-01-22 15:15 - Updated: 2026-06-17 08:54
Summary
Missing Authorization vulnerability in 118group Team 118GROUP Agent team-118group-agent allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Team 118GROUP Agent: from n/a through <= 1.6.0.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://wordpress.org/plugins",
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageName": "team-118group-agent",
          "product": "Team 118GROUP Agent",
          "vendor": "118group",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "1.6.0",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "audit@patchstack.com"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in 118group Team 118GROUP Agent team-118group-agent allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Team 118GROUP Agent: from n/a through \u003c= 1.6.0."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Vulnerabilidad de falta de autorizaci\u00f3n en Team118GROUP El agente Team 118GROUP permite explotar niveles de seguridad de control de acceso configurados incorrectamente. Este problema afecta al agente Team 118GROUP desde n/a hasta 1.6.0."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-23512",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T08:54:57.823",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 7.5,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 3.6,
        "source": "audit@patchstack.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2025-23512",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "yes"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2025-01-22T16:18:21.754320Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-01-22T15:15:17.160",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "audit@patchstack.com",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/team-118group-agent/vulnerability/wordpress-team-118group-agent-plugin-1-6-0-arbitrary-content-deletion-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "audit@patchstack.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-862"
        }
      ],
      "source": "audit@patchstack.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…