FKIE_CVE-2025-46629

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-05-01 20:15 - Updated: 2025-05-27 14:24
Summary
Lack of access controls in the 'ate' management binary of the Tenda RX2 Pro 16.03.30.14 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to perform unauthorized configuration changes for any router where 'ate' has been enabled by sending a crafted UDP packet
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
tenda rx2_pro_firmware 16.03.30.14
tenda rx2_pro -

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:tenda:rx2_pro_firmware:16.03.30.14:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "A6C6559F-BD91-44DF-BA9E-2F55C714009C",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        },
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:h:tenda:rx2_pro:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "E95CB932-CDB6-4E44-A868-5DEEAD982F7C",
              "vulnerable": false
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ],
      "operator": "AND"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Lack of access controls in the \u0027ate\u0027 management binary of the Tenda RX2 Pro 16.03.30.14 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to perform unauthorized configuration changes for any router where \u0027ate\u0027 has been enabled by sending a crafted UDP packet"
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "La falta de controles de acceso en el binario de administraci\u00f3n \u0027ate\u0027 del Tenda RX2 Pro 16.03.30.14 permite que un atacante remoto no autenticado realice cambios de configuraci\u00f3n no autorizados para cualquier enrutador donde se haya habilitado \u0027ate\u0027 mediante el env\u00edo de un paquete UDP manipulado."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-46629",
  "lastModified": "2025-05-27T14:24:23.877",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 6.5,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 2.5,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-05-01T20:15:38.660",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Third Party Advisory",
        "Exploit"
      ],
      "url": "https://blog.uturn.dev/#/writeups/iot-village/tenda-rx2pro/README?id=cve-2025-46629-lack-of-authentication-in-ate"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Product"
      ],
      "url": "https://www.tendacn.com/us/default.html"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-284"
        }
      ],
      "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…