FKIE_CVE-2026-9795

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-05-28 05:16 - Updated: 2026-06-03 19:38
Severity
7.3 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Summary
A flaw was found in Keycloak's Fine-Grained Admin Permissions (FGAPv2) feature. An administrator with limited client management permissions can exploit this vulnerability to assign any realm role, including highly privileged roles, to a client's scope mapping. This bypasses intended security controls, allowing the injected role to be projected into a user's authentication token when they access the modified client. This could lead to unauthorized privilege escalation within the Keycloak realm.
References
secalert@redhat.comhttps://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-9795Mitigation, Vendor Advisory
secalert@redhat.comhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2482462Issue Tracking, Vendor Advisory
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
redhat build_of_keycloak -
To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:build_of_keycloak:-:*:*:*:-:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "E5C930CB-4EAD-497B-A44B-D880F2A1F85B",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "A flaw was found in Keycloak\u0027s Fine-Grained Admin Permissions (FGAPv2) feature. An administrator with limited client management permissions can exploit this vulnerability to assign any realm role, including highly privileged roles, to a client\u0027s scope mapping. This bypasses intended security controls, allowing the injected role to be projected into a user\u0027s authentication token when they access the modified client. This could lead to unauthorized privilege escalation within the Keycloak realm."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-9795",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-03T19:38:04.527",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 7.3,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
          "scope": "CHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.0,
        "impactScore": 5.8,
        "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-05-28T05:16:41.003",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "tags": [
        "Mitigation",
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-9795"
    },
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "tags": [
        "Issue Tracking",
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2482462"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-266"
        }
      ],
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.