ghsa-84j7-475p-hp8v
Vulnerability from github
Published
2020-02-28 16:53
Modified
2023-05-16 16:16
Severity ?
Summary
HTTP Response Splitting in Puma
Details
In Puma (RubyGem) before 4.3.2 and 3.12.3, if an application using Puma allows untrusted input in a response header, an attacker can use newline characters (i.e. CR
, LF
or/r
, /n
) to end the header and inject malicious content, such as additional headers or an entirely new response body. This vulnerability is known as HTTP Response Splitting.
While not an attack in itself, response splitting is a vector for several other attacks, such as cross-site scripting (XSS).
This is related to CVE-2019-16254, which fixed this vulnerability for the WEBrick Ruby web server.
This has been fixed in versions 4.3.2 and 3.12.3 by checking all headers for line endings and rejecting headers with those characters.
{ "affected": [ { "database_specific": { "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c 3.12.3" }, "package": { "ecosystem": "RubyGems", "name": "puma" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "fixed": "3.12.4" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] }, { "database_specific": { "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c 4.3.2" }, "package": { "ecosystem": "RubyGems", "name": "puma" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "4.0.0" }, { "fixed": "4.3.3" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2020-5247" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-113" ], "github_reviewed": true, "github_reviewed_at": "2020-02-28T16:50:49Z", "nvd_published_at": "2020-02-28T17:15:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "In Puma (RubyGem) before 4.3.2 and 3.12.3, if an application using Puma allows untrusted input in a response header, an attacker can use newline characters (i.e. `CR`, `LF` or`/r`, `/n`) to end the header and inject malicious content, such as additional headers or an entirely new response body. This vulnerability is known as HTTP Response Splitting.\n\nWhile not an attack in itself, response splitting is a vector for several other attacks, such as cross-site scripting (XSS).\n\nThis is related to CVE-2019-16254, which fixed this vulnerability for the WEBrick Ruby web server.\n\nThis has been fixed in versions 4.3.2 and 3.12.3 by checking all headers for line endings and rejecting headers with those characters. ", "id": "GHSA-84j7-475p-hp8v", "modified": "2023-05-16T16:16:12Z", "published": "2020-02-28T16:53:55Z", "references": [ { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/puma/puma/security/advisories/GHSA-84j7-475p-hp8v" }, { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-5247" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/puma/puma/commit/c36491756f68a9d6a8b3a49e7e5eb07fe6f1332f" }, { "type": "PACKAGE", "url": "https://github.com/puma/puma" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/puma/CVE-2020-5247.yml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/05/msg00034.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BMJ3CGZ3DLBJ5WUUKMI5ZFXFJQMXJZIK" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DIHVO3CQMU7BZC7FCTSRJ33YDNS3GFPK" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/NJ3LL5F5QADB6LM46GXZETREAKZMQNRD" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/HTTP_Response_Splitting" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2019/10/01/http-response-splitting-in-webrick-cve-2019-16254" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ], "summary": "HTTP Response Splitting in Puma" }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.