GHSA-8W7Q-29MW-GF5C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-07 16:23 – Updated: 2026-10-07 16:23
VLAI
Summary
Backstage: Improper validation of MkDocs theme configuration in TechDocs
Details
Impact
When TechDocs is configured to build documentation locally or in a container, a user with write access to a registered repository can include configuration values in mkdocs.yml that cause arbitrary code execution during the documentation build process.
Patches
Patched in @backstage/plugin-techdocs-node version 1.15.4
Workarounds
- Configure TechDocs with
techdocs.generator.runIn: 'docker'instead of'local'to provide container isolation, though this does not fully mitigate the risk. - Restrict write access to repositories registered in the Backstage catalog to trusted users.
Severity
7.7 (High)
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "@backstage/plugin-techdocs-node"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.15.4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-106509"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1336",
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-10-07T16:23:30Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-10-06T22:17:06Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\nWhen TechDocs is configured to build documentation locally or in a container, a user with write access to a registered repository can include configuration values in `mkdocs.yml` that cause arbitrary code execution during the documentation build process.\n\n### Patches\n\nPatched in `@backstage/plugin-techdocs-node` version `1.15.4`\n\n### Workarounds\n\n- Configure TechDocs with `techdocs.generator.runIn: \u0027docker\u0027` instead of `\u0027local\u0027` to provide container isolation, though this does not fully mitigate the risk.\n- Restrict write access to repositories registered in the Backstage catalog to trusted users.",
"id": "GHSA-8w7q-29mw-gf5c",
"modified": "2026-10-07T16:23:30Z",
"published": "2026-10-07T16:23:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/security/advisories/GHSA-8w7q-29mw-gf5c"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-106509"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/commit/02cd7cdbb18b687446277b5602adaee7f1d53cbb"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/commit/a900a9953c8f7ad3ba1906d1d257725a9996cc9d"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/releases/tag/v1.50.5"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/releases/tag/v1.54.6"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Backstage: Improper validation of MkDocs theme configuration in TechDocs"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…