GHSA-F74W-488G-8X5R

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-06 21:37 – Updated: 2026-07-06 21:37
VLAI
Summary
Craft CMS: Potential authenticated Remote Code Execution via referrer redirect
Details

Requirements:

  • Control panel access
  • Permissions to edit an entry

Details

Control panel users with the ability to edit entries can execute unsandboxed Twig code via the HTTP Referrer header.

The issue happens when a user is saving entries. Strings for a signed redirect URL are being compiled as a Twig template via renderObjectTemplate(), and while a sandboxed alternative already exists (renderSandboxedObjectTemplate()), it is not used in this case. This signed URL can be specified by users, as it is reflected in the “Referer” HTTP request header, which is under attacker control.

This has been fixed in Craft 5.10.0. Affected users should update to that version or higher to get the fix.

Resources

https://github.com/craftcms/cms/pull/18680

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "craftcms/cms"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "5.9.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "5.10.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-55794"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-94"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-07-06T21:37:06Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-02T00:16:45Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Requirements:\n\n* Control panel access\n* Permissions to edit an entry\n\n### Details\n\nControl panel users with the ability to edit entries can execute unsandboxed Twig code via the HTTP Referrer header.\n\nThe issue happens when a user is saving entries. Strings for a signed redirect URL are being compiled as a Twig template via `renderObjectTemplate()`, and while a sandboxed alternative already exists (`renderSandboxedObjectTemplate()`), it is not used in this case. This signed URL can be specified by users, as it is reflected in the \u201cReferer\u201d HTTP request header, which is under attacker control.\n\nThis has been fixed in Craft 5.10.0. Affected users should update to that version or higher to get the fix.\n\n### Resources\n\nhttps://github.com/craftcms/cms/pull/18680",
  "id": "GHSA-f74w-488g-8x5r",
  "modified": "2026-07-06T21:37:06Z",
  "published": "2026-07-06T21:37:06Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/craftcms/cms/security/advisories/GHSA-f74w-488g-8x5r"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-55794"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/craftcms/cms/pull/18680"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/craftcms/cms"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Craft CMS: Potential authenticated Remote Code Execution via referrer redirect"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…