GHSA-HRMJ-7RVJ-4HG8

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-22 20:37 – Updated: 2026-09-22 20:37
VLAI
Summary
lightrag-hku: Sensitive Information Exposure Through Raw Exception Messages in API Error Responses
Details

Summary

The LightRAG API server passes raw Python exception messages directly into HTTP error responses across 30+ error handlers in every router. When combined with the default unauthenticated configuration (see companion report on CWE-306), any network-reachable client can trigger exceptions whose raw text discloses internal infrastructure — server filesystem paths, database host/port/user, LLM provider error details, and Python library internals. No global exception handler sanitizes error messages before they reach the client.

Details

Throughout the API route handlers, exceptions are caught and their string representation is returned verbatim via detail=str(e) / detail=str(exc) (and f-string variants such as detail=f"...: {str(e)}"). This occurs in every router file. Location breakdown on the current main branch:

HTTP 500 — raw exception passthrough (except Exception as e): - document_routes.py — 13 - graph_routes.py — 12 (mix of detail=f"...{str(e)}" and detail=error_msg) - query_routes.py — 3 - ollama_api.py — 2 - lightrag_server.py — 1 (health endpoint)

HTTP 422 — raw exception passthrough (except ValueError as exc): - document_routes.py — 2 (chunking-config validation)

Total: ~33 raw-exception-to-HTTP-response locations. The only pre-existing custom exception handler in lightrag_server.py is specific to RequestValidationError for /query/data; it does not cover the generic Exception handlers in route code.

Example pattern (document_routes.py, upload handler):

except Exception as e:
    logger.error(f"Error /documents/upload: {file.filename}: {str(e)}")
    raise HTTPException(status_code=500, detail=str(e))

Categories of sensitive information that can leak through these responses:

  1. Server filesystem paths. File-I/O errors from the default JSON storage backend expose the server's directory layout (e.g. [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/app/data/rag_storage/default/kv_store_full_docs.json'), aiding path-traversal or targeted attacks. (Verified — see PoC Step 1.)

  2. Database host / port / user / database name. Connection errors from the PostgreSQL, MongoDB, Redis, or Neo4j backends surface the target the driver was trying to reach — e.g. asyncpg raises password authentication failed for user "lightrag" (username) or a socket error naming the unreachable host and port. Note on credentials: the PostgreSQL backend uses asyncpg, which is built from keyword parameters and does not echo the password in its exception strings — so a raw asyncpg error leaks host/port/user/db, not the password. URI-configured backends behave differently: the MongoDB backend is built with AsyncMongoClient(MONGO_URI, ...), and a malformed-URI / configuration error from pymongo can surface the connection string itself, which may embed credentials (mongodb://user:password@host:port/). The leak surface is therefore backend- and error-type-dependent.

  3. LLM provider error details. Errors from OpenAI / Gemini / Bedrock and other providers may include model names, organization ids, or partial API error context that reveal the deployment.

  4. Python library internals. Unexpected exceptions expose class names, library-internal messages, and stack fragments that fingerprint the server stack and version.

  5. Configuration details. Errors during configuration/parsing may reveal storage backend types and other configuration values.

The risk is amplified by the default unauthenticated configuration (CWE-306, companion report), which lets any network client trigger and read these errors without credentials.

PoC

Tested on a clean checkout with the [api] extras installed and the server run via lightrag-server.

Step 1 — Filesystem path disclosure (default JSON storage)

With the default storage backend, a file-permission error is returned verbatim:

# Make a storage file unreadable to force an I/O error.
chmod 000 ./rag_storage/default/kv_store_full_docs.json
curl -s http://localhost:9621/documents | python3 -m json.tool

Vulnerable response — the full server-side path is disclosed:

{
    "detail": "[Errno 13] Permission denied: '/app/data/rag_storage/default/kv_store_full_docs.json'"
}

Step 2 — Database infrastructure disclosure (PostgreSQL backend)

Configure a PostgreSQL KV backend pointed at an unreachable / misconfigured host:

LIGHTRAG_KV_STORAGE=PGKVStorage
POSTGRES_HOST=nonexistent-host-12345.example.com
POSTGRES_PORT=5432
POSTGRES_USER=lightrag
POSTGRES_DATABASE=lightrag

A request that touches storage returns the raw connection error, disclosing the host / port / user the server is configured to reach (the asyncpg password is not echoed — see the credentials note above):

{
    "detail": "[Errno -2] Name or service not known"
}

For a URI-configured backend such as MongoDB (MONGO_URI=mongodb://user:pass@host:port/db), a malformed-URI / configuration error can instead surface the connection string itself, including any embedded credentials.

Impact

Error-message information exposure. A client able to reach the LightRAG server can extract:

  • Confidentiality (C:L): server filesystem paths, database host/port/user/db, LLM provider configuration hints, and Python stack internals from raw exception messages; for URI-configured backends, potentially the connection string (with embedded credentials).
  • Escalation risk: leaked hosts/paths aid follow-on attacks; a leaked connection URI could enable direct database access if the database is network-reachable.

When combined with the default unauthenticated configuration, any network client can trigger and read these responses without authentication, which is why this is scored PR:N.

Suggested remediation

  1. Replace every detail=str(e) / detail=str(exc) pattern with a generic client message. Log the full exception server-side (message + traceback) and return only a generic message plus a correlation id:

python except Exception as e: logger.error(f"Error /documents/upload: {file.filename}: {e!r}") raise HTTPException(status_code=500, detail="Internal server error")

  1. Register a last-resort global handler as defense-in-depth so any exception that escapes a route is sanitized identically:

python @app.exception_handler(Exception) async def unhandled_exception_handler(request, exc): logger.error(f"Unhandled exception: {exc!r}", exc_info=True) return JSONResponse(status_code=500, content={"detail": "Internal server error"})

  1. Preserve genuine client-input validation feedback. The two HTTP 422 chunking-config validators emit controlled, non-sensitive messages; keep them as 422 feedback rather than genericizing to 500 — but wrap the raw exception so it is never a bare passthrough.

Fix status: implemented in HKUDS/LightRAG#3422 — a shared internal_server_error() helper routes all 500 handlers through a generic body carrying a correlation id (full detail logged server-side), a global @app.exception_handler(Exception) is registered in create_app, and the two 422 validators are wrapped.

Credits

  • Thai Son Dinh from VinSOC Labs (R&D)
  • Nguyen Huy Vu Dung from VinSOC Labs (AppSec)
Severity
5.3 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.5.4"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "lightrag-hku"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.5.5"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-85709"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-209"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-09-22T20:37:36Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-22T17:17:27Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\nThe LightRAG API server passes raw Python exception messages directly into HTTP\nerror responses across 30+ error handlers in every router. When combined with\nthe default unauthenticated configuration (see companion report on CWE-306), any\nnetwork-reachable client can trigger exceptions whose raw text discloses\ninternal infrastructure \u2014 server filesystem paths, database host/port/user, LLM\nprovider error details, and Python library internals. No global exception\nhandler sanitizes error messages before they reach the client.\n\n### Details\n\nThroughout the API route handlers, exceptions are caught and their string\nrepresentation is returned verbatim via `detail=str(e)` / `detail=str(exc)`\n(and f-string variants such as `detail=f\"...: {str(e)}\"`). This occurs in every\nrouter file. Location breakdown on the current `main` branch:\n\n**HTTP 500 \u2014 raw exception passthrough (`except Exception as e`):**\n- `document_routes.py` \u2014 13\n- `graph_routes.py` \u2014 12 (mix of `detail=f\"...{str(e)}\"` and `detail=error_msg`)\n- `query_routes.py` \u2014 3\n- `ollama_api.py` \u2014 2\n- `lightrag_server.py` \u2014 1 (health endpoint)\n\n**HTTP 422 \u2014 raw exception passthrough (`except ValueError as exc`):**\n- `document_routes.py` \u2014 2 (chunking-config validation)\n\n**Total: ~33 raw-exception-to-HTTP-response locations.** The only pre-existing\ncustom exception handler in `lightrag_server.py` is specific to\n`RequestValidationError` for `/query/data`; it does not cover the generic\n`Exception` handlers in route code.\n\nExample pattern (`document_routes.py`, upload handler):\n\n```python\nexcept Exception as e:\n    logger.error(f\"Error /documents/upload: {file.filename}: {str(e)}\")\n    raise HTTPException(status_code=500, detail=str(e))\n```\n\n**Categories of sensitive information that can leak through these responses:**\n\n1. **Server filesystem paths.** File-I/O errors from the default JSON storage\n   backend expose the server\u0027s directory layout\n   (e.g. `[Errno 13] Permission denied: \u0027/app/data/rag_storage/default/kv_store_full_docs.json\u0027`),\n   aiding path-traversal or targeted attacks. *(Verified \u2014 see PoC Step 1.)*\n\n2. **Database host / port / user / database name.** Connection errors from the\n   PostgreSQL, MongoDB, Redis, or Neo4j backends surface the target the driver\n   was trying to reach \u2014 e.g. asyncpg raises\n   `password authentication failed for user \"lightrag\"` (username) or a socket\n   error naming the unreachable host and port.\n   **Note on credentials:** the PostgreSQL backend uses `asyncpg`, which is\n   built from keyword parameters and does **not** echo the password in its\n   exception strings \u2014 so a raw asyncpg error leaks host/port/user/db, not the\n   password. URI-configured backends behave differently: the MongoDB backend is\n   built with `AsyncMongoClient(MONGO_URI, ...)`, and a malformed-URI /\n   configuration error from pymongo can surface the connection string itself,\n   which may embed credentials (`mongodb://user:password@host:port/`). The leak\n   surface is therefore backend- and error-type-dependent.\n\n3. **LLM provider error details.** Errors from OpenAI / Gemini / Bedrock and\n   other providers may include model names, organization ids, or partial API\n   error context that reveal the deployment.\n\n4. **Python library internals.** Unexpected exceptions expose class names,\n   library-internal messages, and stack fragments that fingerprint the server\n   stack and version.\n\n5. **Configuration details.** Errors during configuration/parsing may reveal\n   storage backend types and other configuration values.\n\nThe risk is amplified by the default unauthenticated configuration (CWE-306,\ncompanion report), which lets any network client trigger and read these errors\nwithout credentials.\n\n### PoC\n\nTested on a clean checkout with the `[api]` extras installed and the server run\nvia `lightrag-server`.\n\n#### Step 1 \u2014 Filesystem path disclosure (default JSON storage)\n\nWith the default storage backend, a file-permission error is returned verbatim:\n\n```bash\n# Make a storage file unreadable to force an I/O error.\nchmod 000 ./rag_storage/default/kv_store_full_docs.json\ncurl -s http://localhost:9621/documents | python3 -m json.tool\n```\n\nVulnerable response \u2014 the full server-side path is disclosed:\n\n```json\n{\n    \"detail\": \"[Errno 13] Permission denied: \u0027/app/data/rag_storage/default/kv_store_full_docs.json\u0027\"\n}\n```\n\n#### Step 2 \u2014 Database infrastructure disclosure (PostgreSQL backend)\n\nConfigure a PostgreSQL KV backend pointed at an unreachable / misconfigured host:\n\n```\nLIGHTRAG_KV_STORAGE=PGKVStorage\nPOSTGRES_HOST=nonexistent-host-12345.example.com\nPOSTGRES_PORT=5432\nPOSTGRES_USER=lightrag\nPOSTGRES_DATABASE=lightrag\n```\n\nA request that touches storage returns the raw connection error, disclosing the\nhost / port / user the server is configured to reach (the asyncpg password is\nnot echoed \u2014 see the credentials note above):\n\n```json\n{\n    \"detail\": \"[Errno -2] Name or service not known\"\n}\n```\n\nFor a URI-configured backend such as MongoDB (`MONGO_URI=mongodb://user:pass@host:port/db`),\na malformed-URI / configuration error can instead surface the connection string\nitself, including any embedded credentials.\n\n### Impact\n\nError-message information exposure. A client able to reach the LightRAG\nserver can extract:\n\n- **Confidentiality (C:L):** server filesystem paths, database host/port/user/db,\n  LLM provider configuration hints, and Python stack internals from raw\n  exception messages; for URI-configured backends, potentially the connection\n  string (with embedded credentials).\n- **Escalation risk:** leaked hosts/paths aid follow-on attacks; a leaked\n  connection URI could enable direct database access if the database is\n  network-reachable.\n\nWhen combined with the default unauthenticated configuration, any\nnetwork client can trigger and read these responses without authentication,\nwhich is why this is scored `PR:N`.\n\n### Suggested remediation\n\n1. **Replace every `detail=str(e)` / `detail=str(exc)` pattern** with a generic\n   client message. Log the full exception server-side (message + traceback) and\n   return only a generic message plus a correlation id:\n\n   ```python\n   except Exception as e:\n       logger.error(f\"Error /documents/upload: {file.filename}: {e!r}\")\n       raise HTTPException(status_code=500, detail=\"Internal server error\")\n   ```\n\n2. **Register a last-resort global handler** as defense-in-depth so any\n   exception that escapes a route is sanitized identically:\n\n   ```python\n   @app.exception_handler(Exception)\n   async def unhandled_exception_handler(request, exc):\n       logger.error(f\"Unhandled exception: {exc!r}\", exc_info=True)\n       return JSONResponse(status_code=500, content={\"detail\": \"Internal server error\"})\n   ```\n\n3. **Preserve genuine client-input validation feedback.** The two HTTP 422\n   chunking-config validators emit controlled, non-sensitive messages; keep them\n   as 422 feedback rather than genericizing to 500 \u2014 but wrap the raw exception\n   so it is never a bare passthrough.\n\n**Fix status:** implemented in HKUDS/LightRAG#3422 \u2014 a shared\n`internal_server_error()` helper routes all 500 handlers through a generic body\ncarrying a correlation id (full detail logged server-side), a global\n`@app.exception_handler(Exception)` is registered in `create_app`, and the two\n422 validators are wrapped.\n\n### Credits\n- Thai Son Dinh from VinSOC Labs (R\u0026D)\n- Nguyen Huy Vu Dung from VinSOC Labs (AppSec)",
  "id": "GHSA-hrmj-7rvj-4hg8",
  "modified": "2026-09-22T20:37:36Z",
  "published": "2026-09-22T20:37:36Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/HKUDS/LightRAG/security/advisories/GHSA-hrmj-7rvj-4hg8"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-85709"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/HKUDS/LightRAG/pull/3422"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/HKUDS/LightRAG/commit/4d90a0eb35d40b45f3a9045e308ec126897a3364"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/HKUDS/LightRAG/commit/dcab315d7dc1eea682e9b2c4fcb1b06474484c47"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/HKUDS/LightRAG"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/HKUDS/LightRAG/releases/tag/v1.5.5"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "lightrag-hku: Sensitive Information Exposure Through Raw Exception Messages in API Error Responses"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.