GHSA-QXVM-PCFM-QC39

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-16 21:30 – Updated: 2026-06-16 21:30
VLAI
Summary
Daytona: Cross-org IDOR in organization role update/delete — any org owner can rewrite or destroy another org's roles
Details

Summary

Daytona's organization role update and delete endpoints authorized the caller as an owner of the organization named in the request path, but resolved and mutated the target role by its identifier alone, without verifying the role belonged to that organization. An authenticated user who owns any organization (organizations are self-service) could therefore modify the permissions of, or delete, a role belonging to a different organization, given that role's identifier.

Impact

This is a cross-tenant broken access control (IDOR) issue affecting multi-tenant deployments, including the managed Daytona platform. Using a target role's identifier, an attacker with owner rights over their own organization could:

  • Overwrite the target role's name and permission set, escalating or stripping privileges for every member and API key in the victim organization that holds that role.
  • Delete the target role, removing the associated permissions from its holders.
  • Observe the victim role's current permission set returned in the update response (limited information disclosure).

Exploitation requires knowledge of the target role's identifier, which is not enumerable across organizations and is not exposed to non-members through the API.

Affected versions

All versions up to and including 0.184.0.

Patches

Fixed in 0.185.0. The role update, delete, and role-assignment lookups are now scoped to the caller's organization, so a role belonging to another organization resolves to "not found" before any read or mutation. The managed Daytona platform was updated on release of 0.185.0.

Workarounds

None. Upgrade to 0.185.0. Single-organization self-hosted deployments are not exploitable, as the issue requires a second organization to target.

Credit

Reported by @vnth4nhnt.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.184.0"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/daytonaio/daytona"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.185.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-54322"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-639",
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-16T21:30:08Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nDaytona\u0027s organization role update and delete endpoints authorized the caller as an owner of the organization named in the request path, but resolved and mutated the target role by its identifier alone, without verifying the role belonged to that organization. An authenticated user who owns any organization (organizations are self-service) could therefore modify the permissions of, or delete, a role belonging to a different organization, given that role\u0027s identifier.\n\n### Impact\nThis is a cross-tenant broken access control (IDOR) issue affecting multi-tenant deployments, including the managed Daytona platform. Using a target role\u0027s identifier, an attacker with owner rights over their own organization could:\n\n- Overwrite the target role\u0027s name and permission set, escalating or stripping privileges for every member and API key in the victim organization that holds that role.\n- Delete the target role, removing the associated permissions from its holders.\n- Observe the victim role\u0027s current permission set returned in the update response (limited information disclosure).\n\nExploitation requires knowledge of the target role\u0027s identifier, which is not enumerable across organizations and is not exposed to non-members through the API.\n\n### Affected versions\nAll versions up to and including 0.184.0.\n\n### Patches\nFixed in 0.185.0. The role update, delete, and role-assignment lookups are now scoped to the caller\u0027s organization, so a role belonging to another organization resolves to \"not found\" before any read or mutation. The managed Daytona platform was updated on release of 0.185.0.\n\n### Workarounds\nNone. Upgrade to 0.185.0. Single-organization self-hosted deployments are not exploitable, as the issue requires a second organization to target.\n\n### Credit\nReported by @vnth4nhnt.",
  "id": "GHSA-qxvm-pcfm-qc39",
  "modified": "2026-06-16T21:30:08Z",
  "published": "2026-06-16T21:30:08Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/daytonaio/daytona/security/advisories/GHSA-qxvm-pcfm-qc39"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/daytonaio/daytona"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Daytona: Cross-org IDOR in organization role update/delete \u2014 any org owner can rewrite or destroy another org\u0027s roles"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…