ghsa-v6w7-gq3g-fwvm
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 17:43
Modified
2022-06-04 00:00
Severity ?
Details
A stack overflow via an infinite recursion vulnerability was found in the eepro100 i8255x device emulator of QEMU. This issue occurs while processing controller commands due to a DMA reentry issue. This flaw allows a guest user or process to consume CPU cycles or crash the QEMU process on the host, resulting in a denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2021-20255" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-674", "CWE-835" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2021-03-09T20:15:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "A stack overflow via an infinite recursion vulnerability was found in the eepro100 i8255x device emulator of QEMU. This issue occurs while processing controller commands due to a DMA reentry issue. This flaw allows a guest user or process to consume CPU cycles or crash the QEMU process on the host, resulting in a denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability.", "id": "GHSA-v6w7-gq3g-fwvm", "modified": "2022-06-04T00:00:55Z", "published": "2022-05-24T17:43:53Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-20255" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1930646" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/04/msg00009.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://ruhr-uni-bochum.sciebo.de/s/NNWP2GfwzYKeKwE?path=%2Feepro100_stackoverflow1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210507-0003" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/02/25/1" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.