PYSEC-2020-320

Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2020-09-25 19:15 - Updated: 2021-12-09 06:35
VLAI?
Details

In Tensorflow before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, the data_splits argument of tf.raw_ops.StringNGrams lacks validation. This allows a user to pass values that can cause heap overflow errors and even leak contents of memory In the linked code snippet, all the binary strings after ee ff are contents from the memory stack. Since these can contain return addresses, this data leak can be used to defeat ASLR. The issue is patched in commit 0462de5b544ed4731aa2fb23946ac22c01856b80, and is released in TensorFlow versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1, or 2.3.1.

Impacted products
Name purl
tensorflow-gpu pkg:pypi/tensorflow-gpu
Aliases
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "tensorflow-gpu",
        "purl": "pkg:pypi/tensorflow-gpu"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0462de5b544ed4731aa2fb23946ac22c01856b80"
            }
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow",
          "type": "GIT"
        },
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.15.4"
            },
            {
              "introduced": "2.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.0.3"
            },
            {
              "introduced": "2.1.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.1.2"
            },
            {
              "introduced": "2.2.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.2.1"
            },
            {
              "introduced": "2.3.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.3.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "0.12.0",
        "0.12.1",
        "1.0.0",
        "1.0.1",
        "1.1.0",
        "1.10.0",
        "1.10.1",
        "1.11.0",
        "1.12.0",
        "1.12.2",
        "1.12.3",
        "1.13.1",
        "1.13.2",
        "1.14.0",
        "1.15.0",
        "1.15.2",
        "1.15.3",
        "1.2.0",
        "1.2.1",
        "1.3.0",
        "1.4.0",
        "1.4.1",
        "1.5.0",
        "1.5.1",
        "1.6.0",
        "1.7.0",
        "1.7.1",
        "1.8.0",
        "1.9.0",
        "2.0.0",
        "2.0.1",
        "2.0.2",
        "2.1.0",
        "2.1.1",
        "2.2.0",
        "2.3.0"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-15205",
    "GHSA-g7p5-5759-qv46"
  ],
  "details": "In Tensorflow before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, the `data_splits` argument of `tf.raw_ops.StringNGrams` lacks validation. This allows a user to pass values that can cause heap overflow errors and even leak contents of memory In the linked code snippet, all the binary strings after `ee ff` are contents from the memory stack. Since these can contain return addresses, this data leak can be used to defeat ASLR. The issue is patched in commit 0462de5b544ed4731aa2fb23946ac22c01856b80, and is released in TensorFlow versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1, or 2.3.1.",
  "id": "PYSEC-2020-320",
  "modified": "2021-12-09T06:35:14.101977Z",
  "published": "2020-09-25T19:15:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/security/advisories/GHSA-g7p5-5759-qv46"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/releases/tag/v2.3.1"
    },
    {
      "type": "FIX",
      "url": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/commit/0462de5b544ed4731aa2fb23946ac22c01856b80"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-10/msg00065.html"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.