GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration
KEV

Known Exploited Vulnerability Catalogs

Catalogs of Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) explorable via this Vulnerability-Lookup instance. All catalogs conform to the GCVE BCP-07 standard.

CISA
1709 entries · 7 subscribers · CC0-1.0

For the benefit of the cybersecurity community and network defenders—and to help every organization better manage vulnerabilities and keep pace with threat activity—CISA maintains the authoritative source of vulnerabilities that have been exploited in the wild. Organizations should use the KEV catalog as an input to their vulnerability management prioritization framework.

UUID: 405284c2-e461-4670-8979-7fd2c9755a60
CIRCL Local
24 entries · 6 subscribers · CC0-1.0

CIRCL provides a known-exploited vulnerability catalog and supports the different status reasons described in GCVE BCP-07.

UUID: 1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd
ENISA
50 entries · 5 subscribers

ENISA, via the CSIRTs network, provides a list of known-exploited vulnerabilities observed across the CSIRTs network.

UUID: cce329bf-df49-4c6e-a027-80be2e6483bd
Shadowserver
1313 entries · 5 subscribers

Vulnerabilities actively exploited in the wild as observed by The Shadowserver Foundation's global honeypot network (honeypot/exploited-vulnerabilities API), ranked by number of unique IPs per day and enriched with CVSS scores and CISA KEV status.

UUID: c8fb6bf1-f81f-4cb8-95b1-eadbb3b54ee8
Previdian
2853 entries · 4 subscribers

Evidence-backed KEV intelligence enriched with confidence scoring, exploitation status, CISA KEV status, and sensor telemetry.

UUID: caeb2787-0d58-4236-9039-7c86c3e566f3
Catalog overlap How much each pair of KEV catalogs shares. Each cell is the number of vulnerabilities present in both catalogs; colour intensity is the Jaccard index (shared ÷ combined). The diagonal shows each catalog's own total.

Hover a cell to compare two catalogs.

Less overlap More
Coverage timeline Cumulative number of vulnerabilities each catalog has listed over time, by each catalog's earliest observation date (first seen, then recorded, falling back to the status update). A steep step marks a bulk import.

Hover a line for a catalog's running total.

Coverage lead time Which catalog tends to list a vulnerability first. Based on each catalog's earliest observation date (first seen, then recorded, falling back to the status update).
2625

Across 2625 vulnerabilities listed by more than one catalog, half reach all of their catalogs within 16 days of the first listing. The bars show how often each catalog is the earliest to list a vulnerability it shares.

Overlapping catalogs list 44% of shared vulnerabilities on the same day (often because one catalog mirrors another's listing date), so the per-catalog lead below is typically near zero — it is an average, surfacing the genuine separation in the long tail.

Hover a catalog for its lead-time detail.

Evidence behind the listings What each catalog's assertions rest on: first-hand observation (honeypot, sinkhole, telemetry, incident response) or reports relayed from a vendor, a CSIRT, the public or researchers. A vulnerability listed by both kinds of catalog is corroborated by two independent kinds of evidence — something no single catalog can tell. Click a corroboration bucket to list its vulnerabilities in the coverage table below.
2935

Across 2935 vulnerabilities and 5934 evidence records, 42% are backed by both first-hand observation and reports, 3% by observation alone and 55% by reports alone.

Evidence mix per catalog

Hover a catalog for the evidence behind its entries.

Show as a table
Catalog Entries With evidence Evidence type Records Share Avg confidence
CISA 1709 1709 Vendor report (reports) 1709 100.0% 0.8
CIRCL 24 9 Sinkhole (first-hand observation) 6 66.7% 1.0
Incident response (first-hand observation) 2 22.2%
Public report (reports) 1 11.1%
ENISA 50 50 CSIRT report (reports) 50 100.0% 0.75
Shadowserver 1313 1313 Honeypot (first-hand observation) 1313 100.0% 0.7
Previdian 2853 2853 Public report (reports) 2853 100.0% 0.7

Strongest signal per vulnerability

The firmest claim any catalog makes about each vulnerability, from a confirmed compromise down to an exploit merely being available.

Confirmed compromise 333 · 11%
Successful exploitation 2526 · 86%
In-the-wild attempts 74 · 3%
Mass scanning 0 · 0%
Weaponized exploit 0 · 0%
No signal recorded 2 · 0%

Independent corroboration

Whether a vulnerability's evidence, across every catalog listing it, comes from first-hand observation, from reports, or from both.

The vulnerabilities behind the listings What the CVE records say about what each catalog lists: how old a vulnerability is when the catalog picks it up, how quickly the catalogs as a whole react to newly published CVEs, and how their listings compare with today's EPSS scores. Click a highlighted count to list those vulnerabilities in the coverage table below.
2935

Of 2935 vulnerabilities, 2873 have a CVE publication date on record. 102 of them were listed by some catalog before the CVE was published — exploited as zero-days, or disclosed through the catalog itself — and 135 are listed although EPSS currently scores them below 0.01.

Age at listing

Days between the CVE's publication and the catalog's listing: the box spans the middle half of a catalog's entries, the tick is its median. Entries listed before publication sit at zero and are counted apart.

Hover a catalog for its detail.

Time to first listing, by CVE publication year

Median days from a CVE's publication to its first listing in any catalog. Only CVEs published from 2019-06-17 on, when the earliest catalog started listing: older CVEs were listed when the catalogs were founded, not when their exploitation began.

EPSS today

Where each catalog's entries fall on the current EPSS scale, and the share of them with a critical CVSS base score.

Hover a catalog for its detail.

Show as a table
Catalog Entries Dated p25 Median p75 Before publication EPSS below 0.01 EPSS 0.01 to 0.1 EPSS 0.1 to 0.5 EPSS 0.5 and above No EPSS CVSS ≥ 9
CISA 1709 1709 9 d 252 d 1387 d 60 51 (3%) 366 (21%) 412 (24%) 880 (51%) 0 35% of 1709
CIRCL 24 24 0 d 8 d 356 d 1 0 (0%) 3 (14%) 3 (14%) 15 (71%) 3 74% of 23
ENISA 50 50 15 d 117 d 496 d 2 4 (8%) 4 (8%) 11 (22%) 31 (62%) 0 65% of 48
Shadowserver 1313 1252 105 d 532 d 1184 d 15 55 (4%) 279 (22%) 302 (24%) 615 (49%) 62 55% of 853
Previdian 2853 2852 5 d 277 d 1248 d 80 134 (5%) 740 (26%) 746 (26%) 1231 (43%) 2 38% of 2336

Computed at 2026-09-14T03:33:05+00:00, refreshed hourly.

Blind spots Vulnerabilities other catalogs flag as exploited but a given catalog does not carry. Click a catalog to list its gaps in the coverage table below; the corroborated figure counts those confirmed by two or more other catalogs — the stronger signal worth investigating.
Catalog combinations An UpSet view of catalog membership: each bar counts the vulnerabilities present in exactly the catalogs marked below it. The left bars show each catalog's own total — a catalog's columns are disjoint slices that add up to that total. Click a column to filter the coverage table below to that combination.
2935

Hover a column to see which catalogs share that group of vulnerabilities.

displaying 1 - 20 vulnerabilities in total 102