CVE-2012-4564
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2012-11-11 11:00
Modified
2024-08-06 20:42
Severity ?
Summary
ppm2tiff does not check the return value of the TIFFScanlineSize function, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted PPM image that triggers an integer overflow, a zero-memory allocation, and a heap-based buffer overflow.
Impacted products
n/an/a
Show details on NVD website


{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T20:42:54.686Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "DSA-2575",
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_refsource_DEBIAN",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2575"
          },
          {
            "name": "86878",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_OSVDB",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/86878"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871700"
          },
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20121102 libtiff: Missing return value check in ppm2tiff leading to heap-buffer overflow when reading a tiff file",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/11/02/3"
          },
          {
            "name": "56372",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_BID",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/56372"
          },
          {
            "name": "USN-1631-1",
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_refsource_UBUNTU",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1631-1"
          },
          {
            "name": "openSUSE-SU-2013:0187",
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_refsource_SUSE",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-01/msg00076.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "libtiff-ppm2tiff-bo(79750)",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_XF",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/79750"
          },
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20121102 Re: libtiff: Missing return value check in ppm2tiff leading to heap-buffer overflow when reading a tiff file",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/11/02/7"
          },
          {
            "name": "51133",
            "tags": [
              "third-party-advisory",
              "x_refsource_SECUNIA",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/51133"
          },
          {
            "name": "RHSA-2012:1590",
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_refsource_REDHAT",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1590.html"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2012-11-02T00:00:00",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "ppm2tiff does not check the return value of the TIFFScanlineSize function, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted PPM image that triggers an integer overflow, a zero-memory allocation, and a heap-based buffer overflow."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2017-08-28T12:57:01",
        "orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
        "shortName": "redhat"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "DSA-2575",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory",
            "x_refsource_DEBIAN"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2575"
        },
        {
          "name": "86878",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_OSVDB"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/86878"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871700"
        },
        {
          "name": "[oss-security] 20121102 libtiff: Missing return value check in ppm2tiff leading to heap-buffer overflow when reading a tiff file",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/11/02/3"
        },
        {
          "name": "56372",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_BID"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/56372"
        },
        {
          "name": "USN-1631-1",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory",
            "x_refsource_UBUNTU"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1631-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "openSUSE-SU-2013:0187",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory",
            "x_refsource_SUSE"
          ],
          "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-01/msg00076.html"
        },
        {
          "name": "libtiff-ppm2tiff-bo(79750)",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_XF"
          ],
          "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/79750"
        },
        {
          "name": "[oss-security] 20121102 Re: libtiff: Missing return value check in ppm2tiff leading to heap-buffer overflow when reading a tiff file",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/11/02/7"
        },
        {
          "name": "51133",
          "tags": [
            "third-party-advisory",
            "x_refsource_SECUNIA"
          ],
          "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/51133"
        },
        {
          "name": "RHSA-2012:1590",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory",
            "x_refsource_REDHAT"
          ],
          "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1590.html"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
    "assignerShortName": "redhat",
    "cveId": "CVE-2012-4564",
    "datePublished": "2012-11-11T11:00:00",
    "dateReserved": "2012-08-21T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T20:42:54.686Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2012-4564\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"published\":\"2012-11-11T13:00:58.290\",\"lastModified\":\"2023-02-13T04:34:45.280\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"ppm2tiff does not check the return value of the TIFFScanlineSize function, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted PPM image that triggers an integer overflow, a zero-memory allocation, and a heap-based buffer overflow.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"ppm2tiff no comprueba el valor devuelto por la funci\u00f3n TIFFScanlineSize, lo que permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (ca\u00edda) y posiblemente ejecutar c\u00f3digo arbitrario a trav\u00e9s de una imagen PPM modificada que provoca un desbordamiento de entero, una asignaci\u00f3n zero-memory, y un desbordamiento de b\u00fafer basado en memoria din\u00e1mica.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P\",\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"baseScore\":6.8},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":8.6,\"impactScore\":6.4,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"NVD-CWE-Other\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:libtiff:libtiff:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndIncluding\":\"4.0.3\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"DD47D8D8-A63A-4B4E-A704-D570DEBB9707\"}]}]},{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"036E8A89-7A16-411F-9D31-676313BB7244\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"16F59A04-14CF-49E2-9973-645477EA09DA\"}]}]},{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:canonical:ubuntu_linux:8.04:*:*:*:-:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"7EBFE35C-E243-43D1-883D-4398D71763CC\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:canonical:ubuntu_linux:10.04:*:*:*:-:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"01EDA41C-6B2E-49AF-B503-EB3882265C11\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:canonical:ubuntu_linux:11.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"E4174F4F-149E-41A6-BBCC-D01114C05F38\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:canonical:ubuntu_linux:12.04:*:*:*:esm:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"8D305F7A-D159-4716-AB26-5E38BB5CD991\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:canonical:ubuntu_linux:12.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"E2076871-2E80-4605-A470-A41C1A8EC7EE\"}]}]},{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_desktop:5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"133AAFA7-AF42-4D7B-8822-AA2E85611BF5\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_desktop:6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"EE249E1B-A1FD-4E08-AA71-A0E1F10FFE97\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_eus:6.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"8382A145-CDD9-437E-9DE7-A349956778B3\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_server:5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"54D669D4-6D7E-449D-80C1-28FA44F06FFE\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_server:6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"9BBCD86A-E6C7-4444-9D74-F861084090F0\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_workstation:5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"D0AC5CD5-6E58-433C-9EB3-6DFE5656463E\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_workstation:6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"E5ED5807-55B7-47C5-97A6-03233F4FBC3A\"}]}]},{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:opensuse:opensuse:11.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"DE554781-1EB9-446E-911F-6C11970C47F4\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-01/msg00076.html\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1590.html\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://secunia.com/advisories/51133\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2575\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/11/02/3\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/11/02/7\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.osvdb.org/86878\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Broken Link\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/56372\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1631-1\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871700\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Issue Tracking\",\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/79750\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.