CVE-2019-10201 (GCVE-0-2019-10201)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2019-08-14 16:09 – Updated: 2024-08-04 22:17
VLAI
Summary
It was found that Keycloak's SAML broker, versions up to 6.0.1, did not verify missing message signatures. If an attacker modifies the SAML Response and removes the <Signature> sections, the message is still accepted, and the message can be modified. An attacker could use this flaw to impersonate other users and gain access to sensitive information.
Severity
8.1 (High)
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CWE
Assigner
redhat CNA under the redhat root
CNA scorecard B 82/100 over 1085 records in the last 180 days details
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version CPE status
Red Hat keycloak Affected: up to keycloak 6.0.1
guessed Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T22:17:19.324Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-10201"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "keycloak",
          "vendor": "Red Hat",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "up to keycloak 6.0.1"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "It was found that Keycloak\u0027s SAML broker, versions up to 6.0.1, did not verify missing message signatures. If an attacker modifies the SAML Response and removes the \u003cSignature\u003e sections, the message is still accepted, and the message can be modified. An attacker could use this flaw to impersonate other users and gain access to sensitive information."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_0": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 8.1,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
            "version": "3.0"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-592",
              "description": "CWE-592",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2019-08-14T16:09:38.000Z",
        "orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
        "shortName": "redhat"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-10201"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com",
          "ID": "CVE-2019-10201",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "keycloak",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "up to keycloak 6.0.1"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "Red Hat"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "It was found that Keycloak\u0027s SAML broker, versions up to 6.0.1, did not verify missing message signatures. If an attacker modifies the SAML Response and removes the \u003cSignature\u003e sections, the message is still accepted, and the message can be modified. An attacker could use this flaw to impersonate other users and gain access to sensitive information."
            }
          ]
        },
        "impact": {
          "cvss": [
            [
              {
                "vectorString": "8.1/CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
                "version": "3.0"
              }
            ]
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "CWE-592"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-10201",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-10201"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
    "assignerShortName": "redhat",
    "cveId": "CVE-2019-10201",
    "datePublished": "2019-08-14T16:09:39.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2019-03-27T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T22:17:19.324Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2019-10201",
      "date": "2026-10-31",
      "epss": "0.00714",
      "percentile": "0.53707"
    },
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "configurations": [
        {
          "nodes": [
            {
              "cpeMatch": [
                {
                  "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:keycloak:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                  "matchCriteriaId": "B4169303-407C-4964-8A5E-D34AC060239A",
                  "versionEndIncluding": "6.0.1",
                  "vulnerable": true
                },
                {
                  "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:single_sign-on:7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                  "matchCriteriaId": "9EFEC7CA-8DDA-48A6-A7B6-1F1D14792890",
                  "vulnerable": true
                },
                {
                  "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:single_sign-on:7.3.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                  "matchCriteriaId": "5463868E-60F5-4E8F-AC8F-82AA4088E1FB",
                  "vulnerable": true
                }
              ],
              "negate": false,
              "operator": "OR"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "It was found that Keycloak\u0027s SAML broker, versions up to 6.0.1, did not verify missing message signatures. If an attacker modifies the SAML Response and removes the \u003cSignature\u003e sections, the message is still accepted, and the message can be modified. An attacker could use this flaw to impersonate other users and gain access to sensitive information."
        },
        {
          "lang": "es",
          "value": "Se detect\u00f3 que el broker SAML de Keycloak, versiones hasta 6.0.1, no comprobaba la falta de firmas de mensajes. Si un atacante modifica la Respuesta SAML y elimina las secciones (Signature), el mensaje sigue siendo aceptado y el mensaje puede ser modificado. Un atacante podr\u00eda utilizar este fallo para hacerse pasar por otros usuarios y obtener acceso a informaci\u00f3n confidencial."
        }
      ],
      "id": "CVE-2019-10201",
      "lastModified": "2024-11-21T04:18:38.627",
      "metrics": {
        "cvssMetricV2": [
          {
            "acInsufInfo": false,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "cvssData": {
              "accessComplexity": "LOW",
              "accessVector": "NETWORK",
              "authentication": "SINGLE",
              "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
              "baseScore": 5.5,
              "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
              "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
              "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:N",
              "version": "2.0"
            },
            "exploitabilityScore": 8.0,
            "impactScore": 4.9,
            "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
            "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
            "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
            "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
            "type": "Primary",
            "userInteractionRequired": false
          }
        ],
        "cvssMetricV30": [
          {
            "cvssData": {
              "attackComplexity": "LOW",
              "attackVector": "NETWORK",
              "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
              "baseScore": 8.1,
              "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
              "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
              "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
              "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
              "scope": "UNCHANGED",
              "userInteraction": "NONE",
              "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
              "version": "3.0"
            },
            "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
            "impactScore": 5.2,
            "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
            "type": "Secondary"
          }
        ],
        "cvssMetricV31": [
          {
            "cvssData": {
              "attackComplexity": "LOW",
              "attackVector": "NETWORK",
              "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
              "baseScore": 8.1,
              "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
              "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
              "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
              "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
              "scope": "UNCHANGED",
              "userInteraction": "NONE",
              "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
              "version": "3.1"
            },
            "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
            "impactScore": 5.2,
            "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
            "type": "Primary"
          }
        ]
      },
      "published": "2019-08-14T17:15:11.143",
      "references": [
        {
          "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
          "tags": [
            "Issue Tracking",
            "Mitigation",
            "Vendor Advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-10201"
        },
        {
          "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "tags": [
            "Issue Tracking",
            "Mitigation",
            "Vendor Advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-10201"
        }
      ],
      "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "vulnStatus": "Modified",
      "weaknesses": [
        {
          "description": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CWE-592"
            }
          ],
          "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
          "type": "Secondary"
        },
        {
          "description": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CWE-347"
            }
          ],
          "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
          "type": "Primary"
        }
      ]
    },
    "nvd": {
      "cve": {
        "configurations": [
          {
            "nodes": [
              {
                "cpeMatch": [
                  {
                    "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:keycloak:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "matchCriteriaId": "B4169303-407C-4964-8A5E-D34AC060239A",
                    "versionEndIncluding": "6.0.1",
                    "vulnerable": true
                  },
                  {
                    "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:single_sign-on:7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "matchCriteriaId": "9EFEC7CA-8DDA-48A6-A7B6-1F1D14792890",
                    "vulnerable": true
                  },
                  {
                    "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:single_sign-on:7.3.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "matchCriteriaId": "5463868E-60F5-4E8F-AC8F-82AA4088E1FB",
                    "vulnerable": true
                  }
                ],
                "negate": false,
                "operator": "OR"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "cveTags": [],
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "It was found that Keycloak\u0027s SAML broker, versions up to 6.0.1, did not verify missing message signatures. If an attacker modifies the SAML Response and removes the \u003cSignature\u003e sections, the message is still accepted, and the message can be modified. An attacker could use this flaw to impersonate other users and gain access to sensitive information."
          },
          {
            "lang": "es",
            "value": "Se detect\u00f3 que el broker SAML de Keycloak, versiones hasta 6.0.1, no comprobaba la falta de firmas de mensajes. Si un atacante modifica la Respuesta SAML y elimina las secciones (Signature), el mensaje sigue siendo aceptado y el mensaje puede ser modificado. Un atacante podr\u00eda utilizar este fallo para hacerse pasar por otros usuarios y obtener acceso a informaci\u00f3n confidencial."
          }
        ],
        "id": "CVE-2019-10201",
        "lastModified": "2024-11-21T04:18:38.627",
        "metrics": {
          "cvssMetricV2": [
            {
              "acInsufInfo": false,
              "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
              "cvssData": {
                "accessComplexity": "LOW",
                "accessVector": "NETWORK",
                "authentication": "SINGLE",
                "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
                "baseScore": 5.5,
                "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
                "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
                "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:N",
                "version": "2.0"
              },
              "exploitabilityScore": 8.0,
              "impactScore": 4.9,
              "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
              "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
              "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
              "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
              "type": "Primary",
              "userInteractionRequired": false
            }
          ],
          "cvssMetricV30": [
            {
              "cvssData": {
                "attackComplexity": "LOW",
                "attackVector": "NETWORK",
                "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
                "baseScore": 8.1,
                "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
                "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
                "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
                "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
                "scope": "UNCHANGED",
                "userInteraction": "NONE",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
                "version": "3.0"
              },
              "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
              "impactScore": 5.2,
              "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
              "type": "Secondary"
            }
          ],
          "cvssMetricV31": [
            {
              "cvssData": {
                "attackComplexity": "LOW",
                "attackVector": "NETWORK",
                "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
                "baseScore": 8.1,
                "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
                "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
                "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
                "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
                "scope": "UNCHANGED",
                "userInteraction": "NONE",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
                "version": "3.1"
              },
              "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
              "impactScore": 5.2,
              "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
              "type": "Primary"
            }
          ]
        },
        "published": "2019-08-14T17:15:11.143",
        "references": [
          {
            "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
            "tags": [
              "Issue Tracking",
              "Mitigation",
              "Vendor Advisory"
            ],
            "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-10201"
          },
          {
            "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
            "tags": [
              "Issue Tracking",
              "Mitigation",
              "Vendor Advisory"
            ],
            "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-10201"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
        "vulnStatus": "Modified",
        "weaknesses": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "en",
                "value": "CWE-592"
              }
            ],
            "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
            "type": "Secondary"
          },
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "en",
                "value": "CWE-347"
              }
            ],
            "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
            "type": "Primary"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "redhat_vex": {
      "aggregate_severity": "Important",
      "current_release_date": "2026-06-28T11:28:58+00:00",
      "cve": "CVE-2019-10201",
      "id": "CVE-2019-10201",
      "initial_release_date": "2019-08-13T00:00:00+00:00",
      "product_status:fixed": "3",
      "product_status:known_affected": "3",
      "product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
      "source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "keycloak: SAML broker does not check existence of signature on document allowing any user impersonation",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2019/cve-2019-10201.json",
      "version": "3"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Loading timeline…




    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.