CVE-2020-1710
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2020-09-16 14:28
Modified
2024-08-04 06:46
Severity ?
Summary
The issue appears to be that JBoss EAP 6.4.21 does not parse the field-name in accordance to RFC7230[1] as it returns a 200 instead of a 400.
References
secalert@redhat.comhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793970Issue Tracking, Vendor Advisory
Impacted products
n/aJBoss Enterprise Application Platform
Show details on NVD website

To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T06:46:30.214Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793970"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "JBoss Enterprise Application Platform",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "EAP 6.4.21"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "The issue appears to be that JBoss EAP 6.4.21 does not parse the field-name in accordance to RFC7230[1] as it returns a 200 instead of a 400."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2020-09-16T14:28:20",
        "orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
        "shortName": "redhat"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793970"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com",
          "ID": "CVE-2020-1710",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "JBoss Enterprise Application Platform",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "EAP 6.4.21"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "The issue appears to be that JBoss EAP 6.4.21 does not parse the field-name in accordance to RFC7230[1] as it returns a 200 instead of a 400."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793970",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793970"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
    "assignerShortName": "redhat",
    "cveId": "CVE-2020-1710",
    "datePublished": "2020-09-16T14:28:20",
    "dateReserved": "2019-11-27T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T06:46:30.214Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2020-1710\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"published\":\"2020-09-16T15:15:12.457\",\"lastModified\":\"2020-09-22T20:20:46.720\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"The issue appears to be that JBoss EAP 6.4.21 does not parse the field-name in accordance to RFC7230[1] as it returns a 200 instead of a 400.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"El problema parece ser que JBoss EAP versi\u00f3n 6.4.21, no analiza el nombre de campo de acuerdo con RFC7230[1] ya que devuelve 200 en lugar de 400\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"baseScore\":5.3,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":1.4}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N\",\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"baseScore\":5.0},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"NVD-CWE-Other\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_data_grid:-:*:*:*:text-only:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"2BF03A52-4068-47EA-8846-1E5FB708CE1A\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_data_grid:7.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"CD354E32-A8B0-484C-B4C6-9FBCD3430D2D\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:-:*:*:*:text-only:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"B8423D7F-3A8F-4AD8-BF51-245C9D8DD816\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:6.4.21:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"5B9B368A-C894-4D7A-8E64-4B12DDE572E5\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:7.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"72A54BDA-311C-413B-8E4D-388AD65A170A\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:7.2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"0952BA1A-5DF9-400F-B01F-C3A398A8A2D4\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:7.3.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"8B157A2D-3422-4224-82D9-15AB3B989075\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:openshift_application_runtimes:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"A33441B3-B301-426C-A976-08CE5FE72EFB\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:single_sign-on:-:*:*:*:text-only:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"341E6313-20D5-44CB-9719-B20585DC5AD6\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793970\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.