CVE-2025-14287 (GCVE-0-2025-14287)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-15 09:27 – Updated: 2026-03-15 09:27
VLAI?
Title
Command Injection in mlflow/mlflow
Summary
A command injection vulnerability exists in mlflow/mlflow versions before v3.7.0, specifically in the `mlflow/sagemaker/__init__.py` file at lines 161-167. The vulnerability arises from the direct interpolation of user-supplied container image names into shell commands without proper sanitization, which are then executed using `os.system()`. This allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands by supplying malicious input through the `--container` parameter of the CLI. The issue affects environments where MLflow is used, including development setups, CI/CD pipelines, and cloud deployments.
CWE
  • CWE-94 - Improper Control of Generation of Code
Assigner
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
mlflow mlflow/mlflow Affected: unspecified , ≤ latest (custom)
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "mlflow/mlflow",
          "vendor": "mlflow",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "latest",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "unspecified",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "A command injection vulnerability exists in mlflow/mlflow versions before v3.7.0, specifically in the `mlflow/sagemaker/__init__.py` file at lines 161-167. The vulnerability arises from the direct interpolation of user-supplied container image names into shell commands without proper sanitization, which are then executed using `os.system()`. This allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands by supplying malicious input through the `--container` parameter of the CLI. The issue affects environments where MLflow is used, including development setups, CI/CD pipelines, and cloud deployments."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_0": {
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 7.5,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
            "version": "3.0"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-94",
              "description": "CWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-03-15T09:27:36.706Z",
        "orgId": "c09c270a-b464-47c1-9133-acb35b22c19a",
        "shortName": "@huntr_ai"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/229cd526-41aa-4819-b6f0-e2d0371c89e3"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "229cd526-41aa-4819-b6f0-e2d0371c89e3",
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      },
      "title": "Command Injection in mlflow/mlflow"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "c09c270a-b464-47c1-9133-acb35b22c19a",
    "assignerShortName": "@huntr_ai",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-14287",
    "datePublished": "2026-03-15T09:27:36.706Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-12-08T19:06:12.739Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-03-15T09:27:36.706Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…