JVNDB-2026-012056
Vulnerability from jvndb - Published: 2026-04-21 06:27 - Updated:2026-04-23 08:57
Severity
Summary
Multiple vulnerabilities in silex technology SD-330AC and AMC Manager
Details
SD-330AC and AMC Manager provided by silex technology, Inc. contain multiple vulnerabilities listed below.
- Stack-based buffer overflow in processing the redirect URLs (CWE-121) - CVE-2026-32955
- Heap-based buffer overflow in processing the redirect URLs (CWE-122) - CVE-2026-32956
- Missing authentication for critical function on firmware maintenance (CWE-306) - CVE-2026-32957
- Use of hard-coded cryptographic key (CWE-321) - CVE-2026-32958
- Use of a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm (CWE-327) - CVE-2026-32959
- Sensitive information in resource not removed before reuse (CWE-226) - CVE-2026-32960
- Heap-based buffer overflow in packet data processing of sx_smpd (CWE-122) - CVE-2026-32961
- Missing authentication for critical device setting function (CWE-306) - CVE-2026-32962
- Reflected cross-site scripting (CWE-79) - CVE-2026-32963
- CRLF injection (CWE-93) - CVE-2026-32964
- Initialization of a resource with an insecure default (CWE-1188) - CVE-2026-32965
- Dependency on vulnerable third-party component (CWE-1395) - CVE-2015-5621
- Incorrect privilege assignment (CWE-266) - CVE-2024-24487
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | |
|---|---|---|
{
"@rdf:about": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2026/JVNDB-2026-012056.html",
"dc:date": "2026-04-23T17:57+09:00",
"dcterms:issued": "2026-04-21T15:27+09:00",
"dcterms:modified": "2026-04-23T17:57+09:00",
"description": "SD-330AC and AMC Manager provided by silex technology, Inc. contain multiple vulnerabilities listed below.\u003ca href=\u0027https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/121.html\u0027 target=\u0027_blank\u0027\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\u003ca href=\u0027https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/122.html\u0027 target=\u0027_blank\u0027\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\u003ca href=\u0027https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/306.html\u0027 target=\u0027_blank\u0027\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\u003ca href=\u0027https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/321.html\u0027 target=\u0027_blank\u0027\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\u003ca href=\u0027https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/327.html\u0027 target=\u0027_blank\u0027\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\u003ca href=\u0027https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/226.html\u0027 target=\u0027_blank\u0027\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\u003ca href=\u0027https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/122.html\u0027 target=\u0027_blank\u0027\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\u003ca href=\u0027https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/306.html\u0027 target=\u0027_blank\u0027\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\u003ca href=\u0027https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html\u0027 target=\u0027_blank\u0027\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\u003ca href=\u0027https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/93.html\u0027 target=\u0027_blank\u0027\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\u003ca href=\u0027https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1188.html\u0027 target=\u0027_blank\u0027\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\u003ca href=\u0027https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1395.html\u0027 target=\u0027_blank\u0027\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\u003ca href=\u0027https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/266.html\u0027 target=\u0027_blank\u0027\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003eStack-based buffer overflow in processing the redirect URLs (CWE-121) - CVE-2026-32955\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eHeap-based buffer overflow in processing the redirect URLs (CWE-122) - CVE-2026-32956\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eMissing authentication for critical function on firmware maintenance (CWE-306) - CVE-2026-32957\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eUse of hard-coded cryptographic key (CWE-321) - CVE-2026-32958\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eUse of a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm (CWE-327) - CVE-2026-32959\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eSensitive information in resource not removed before reuse (CWE-226) - CVE-2026-32960\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eHeap-based buffer overflow in packet data processing of sx_smpd (CWE-122) - CVE-2026-32961\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eMissing authentication for critical device setting function (CWE-306) - CVE-2026-32962\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eReflected cross-site scripting (CWE-79) - CVE-2026-32963\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eCRLF injection (CWE-93) - CVE-2026-32964\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eInitialization of a resource with an insecure default (CWE-1188) - CVE-2026-32965\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eDependency on vulnerable third-party component (CWE-1395) - CVE-2015-5621\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eIncorrect privilege assignment (CWE-266) - CVE-2024-24487\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003eFrancesco La Spina of Forescout Technologies reported these vulnerabilities to CISA ICS. At the request of CISA ICS, JPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer.",
"link": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2026/JVNDB-2026-012056.html",
"sec:cpe": [
{
"#text": "cpe:/a:silex:amc_manager",
"@product": "AMC Manager",
"@vendor": "silex technology",
"@version": "2.2"
},
{
"#text": "cpe:/h:silex:sd_330ac",
"@product": "SD-330AC",
"@vendor": "silex technology",
"@version": "2.2"
}
],
"sec:cvss": {
"@score": "8.8",
"@severity": "High",
"@type": "Base",
"@vector": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"@version": "3.0"
},
"sec:identifier": "JVNDB-2026-012056",
"sec:references": [
{
"#text": "https://jvn.jp/en/vu/JVNVU94271449/index.html",
"@id": "JVNVU#94271449",
"@source": "JVN"
},
{
"#text": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-5621",
"@id": "CVE-2015-5621",
"@source": "CVE"
},
{
"#text": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24487",
"@id": "CVE-2024-24487",
"@source": "CVE"
},
{
"#text": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-32955",
"@id": "CVE-2026-32955",
"@source": "CVE"
},
{
"#text": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-32956",
"@id": "CVE-2026-32956",
"@source": "CVE"
},
{
"#text": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-32957",
"@id": "CVE-2026-32957",
"@source": "CVE"
},
{
"#text": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-32958",
"@id": "CVE-2026-32958",
"@source": "CVE"
},
{
"#text": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-32959",
"@id": "CVE-2026-32959",
"@source": "CVE"
},
{
"#text": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-32960",
"@id": "CVE-2026-32960",
"@source": "CVE"
},
{
"#text": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-32961",
"@id": "CVE-2026-32961",
"@source": "CVE"
},
{
"#text": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-32962",
"@id": "CVE-2026-32962",
"@source": "CVE"
},
{
"#text": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-32963",
"@id": "CVE-2026-32963",
"@source": "CVE"
},
{
"#text": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-32964",
"@id": "CVE-2026-32964",
"@source": "CVE"
},
{
"#text": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-32965",
"@id": "CVE-2026-32965",
"@source": "CVE"
},
{
"#text": "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-26-111-10",
"@id": "ICSA-26-111-10",
"@source": "ICS-CERT ADVISORY"
},
{
"#text": "https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1188.html",
"@id": "CWE-1188",
"@title": "Insecure Default Initialization of Resource(CWE-1188)"
},
{
"#text": "https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/121.html",
"@id": "CWE-121",
"@title": "Stack-based Buffer Overflow(CWE-121)"
},
{
"#text": "https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/122.html",
"@id": "CWE-122",
"@title": "Heap-based Buffer Overflow(CWE-122)"
},
{
"#text": "https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1395.html",
"@id": "CWE-1395",
"@title": "Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component(CWE-1395)"
},
{
"#text": "https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/226.html",
"@id": "CWE-226",
"@title": "Sensitive Information in Resource Not Removed Before Reuse(CWE-226)"
},
{
"#text": "https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/266.html",
"@id": "CWE-266",
"@title": "Incorrect Privilege Assignment(CWE-266)"
},
{
"#text": "https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/306.html",
"@id": "CWE-306",
"@title": "Missing Authentication for Critical Function(CWE-306)"
},
{
"#text": "https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/321.html",
"@id": "CWE-321",
"@title": "Use of Hard-coded Cryptographic Key(CWE-321)"
},
{
"#text": "https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/327.html",
"@id": "CWE-327",
"@title": "Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm(CWE-327)"
},
{
"#text": "https://www.ipa.go.jp/en/security/vulnerabilities/cwe.html",
"@id": "CWE-79",
"@title": "Cross-site Scripting(CWE-79)"
},
{
"#text": "https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/93.html",
"@id": "CWE-93",
"@title": "Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences (\u0027CRLF Injection\u0027)(CWE-93)"
}
],
"title": "Multiple vulnerabilities in silex technology SD-330AC and AMC Manager"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.