Common Weakness Enumeration
CWE-682
DiscouragedIncorrect Calculation
Abstraction: Pillar · Status: Draft
The product performs a calculation that generates incorrect or unintended results that are later used in security-critical decisions or resource management.
159 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
CVE-2026-55597 (GCVE-0-2026-55597)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-01 19:03 – Updated: 2026-07-01 19:21
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
ImageMagick: Heap Buffer Over-Write in JP2 encoder when due to incorrect handling of arguments
Summary
ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to version 7.1.2-26, an incorrect handling of arguments can cause a heap buffer over-write in the JP2 encoder. This issue has been fixed in version7.1.2-26.
Severity
5.5 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/securi… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ImageMagick | ImageMagick |
Affected:
< 7.1.2-26
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-55597",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-01T19:20:56.190744Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-01T19:21:38.493Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "ImageMagick",
"vendor": "ImageMagick",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 7.1.2-26"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to version 7.1.2-26, an incorrect handling of arguments can cause a heap buffer over-write in the JP2 encoder. This issue has been fixed in version7.1.2-26."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-682",
"description": "CWE-682: Incorrect Calculation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-787",
"description": "CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-01T19:03:29.911Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/security/advisories/GHSA-c4v7-w88g-m6c4",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/security/advisories/GHSA-c4v7-w88g-m6c4"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-c4v7-w88g-m6c4",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "ImageMagick: Heap Buffer Over-Write in JP2 encoder when due to incorrect handling of arguments"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-55597",
"datePublished": "2026-07-01T19:03:29.911Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-16T23:18:03.170Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-01T19:21:38.493Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-44498 (GCVE-0-2026-44498)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-08 15:09 – Updated: 2026-05-14 21:32
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
ZEBRA: Block Validator Undercounts Coinbase and P2SH Sigops
Summary
ZEBRA is a Zcash node written entirely in Rust. Prior to version 4.4.0, Zebra's block validator undercounts transparent signature operations against the 20000-sigop block limit (MAX_BLOCK_SIGOPS), allowing it to accept blocks that zcashd rejects with bad-blk-sigops. A miner who produces such a block can split the network: Zebra nodes follow the offending chain while zcashd nodes do not. This issue has been patched in version 4.4.0.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-682 - Incorrect Calculation
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/zebra/security… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/zebra/releases… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZcashFoundation | zebra |
Affected:
< 4.4.0
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-44498",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-13T16:11:06.609059Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-14T21:32:52.062Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "zebra",
"vendor": "ZcashFoundation",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 4.4.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "ZEBRA is a Zcash node written entirely in Rust. Prior to version 4.4.0, Zebra\u0027s block validator undercounts transparent signature operations against the 20000-sigop block limit (MAX_BLOCK_SIGOPS), allowing it to accept blocks that zcashd rejects with bad-blk-sigops. A miner who produces such a block can split the network: Zebra nodes follow the offending chain while zcashd nodes do not. This issue has been patched in version 4.4.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.2,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-682",
"description": "CWE-682: Incorrect Calculation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-08T15:09:09.919Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/zebra/security/advisories/GHSA-jv4h-j224-23cc",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/zebra/security/advisories/GHSA-jv4h-j224-23cc"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/zebra/releases/tag/v4.4.0",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/zebra/releases/tag/v4.4.0"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-jv4h-j224-23cc",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "ZEBRA: Block Validator Undercounts Coinbase and P2SH Sigops"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-44498",
"datePublished": "2026-05-08T15:09:09.919Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-06T18:28:20.886Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-14T21:32:52.062Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-44074 (GCVE-0-2026-44074)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-21 08:14 – Updated: 2026-05-21 12:35
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Bitwise OR of errno values
Summary
Netatalk 2.1.0 through 4.4.2 combines multiple errno values using bitwise OR, resulting in incorrect error codes when multiple error conditions occur simultaneously, which may allow a remote attacker to cause a minor service disruption via conditions that trigger incorrect error-handling paths.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-682 - Incorrect Calculation
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://netatalk.io/security/CVE-2026-44074 | vendor-advisory |
Impacted products
Date Public
2026-05-13 00:00
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-44074",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-21T12:31:04.918196Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-21T12:35:55.243Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Netatalk",
"vendor": "Netatalk",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.4.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.5.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Arjun Basnet from Securin"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Netatalk 2.1.0 through 4.4.2 combines multiple errno values using bitwise OR, resulting in incorrect error codes when multiple error conditions occur simultaneously, which may allow a remote attacker to cause a minor service disruption via conditions that trigger incorrect error-handling paths."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 3.7,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-682",
"description": "Incorrect Calculation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-21T08:23:42.792Z",
"orgId": "33c584b5-0579-4c06-b2a0-8d8329fcab9c",
"shortName": "securin"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "Netatalk Security Advisory CVE-2026-44074",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://netatalk.io/security/CVE-2026-44074"
}
],
"title": "Bitwise OR of errno values"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "33c584b5-0579-4c06-b2a0-8d8329fcab9c",
"assignerShortName": "securin",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-44074",
"datePublished": "2026-05-21T08:14:38.297Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-05T07:25:20.197Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-21T12:35:55.243Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-33487 (GCVE-0-2026-33487)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-26 17:17 – Updated: 2026-07-15 01:06
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
goxmldsig has validateSignature Loop Variable Capture Signature Bypass
Summary
goxmlsig provides XML Digital Signatures implemented in Go. Prior to version 1.6.0, the `validateSignature` function in `validate.go` goes through the references in the `SignedInfo` block to find one that matches the signed element's ID. In Go versions before 1.22, or when `go.mod` uses an older version, there is a loop variable capture issue. The code takes the address of the loop variable `_ref` instead of its value. As a result, if more than one reference matches the ID or if the loop logic is incorrect, the `ref` pointer will always end up pointing to the last element in the `SignedInfo.References` slice after the loop. goxmlsig version 1.6.0 contains a patch.
Severity
7.5 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
Assigner
References
12 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/russellhaering/goxmldsig/secur… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-33487 | vdb-entryx_refsource_REDHAT |
| https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2451814 | issue-trackingx_refsource_REDHAT |
| https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/v… | x_sadp-csaf-vex |
| https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22423 | vendor-advisoryx_refsource_REDHAT |
| https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22347 | vendor-advisoryx_refsource_REDHAT |
| https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:21769 | vendor-advisoryx_refsource_REDHAT |
| https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:23345 | vendor-advisoryx_refsource_REDHAT |
| https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:36882 | vendor-advisoryx_refsource_REDHAT |
| https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13548 | vendor-advisoryx_refsource_REDHAT |
| https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20946 | vendor-advisoryx_refsource_REDHAT |
| https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20943 | vendor-advisoryx_refsource_REDHAT |
Impacted products
13 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| russellhaering | goxmldsig |
Affected:
< 1.6.0
|
|
| Red Hat | Multicluster Global Hub 1.3.4 |
Unaffected:
1779212259 , < *
(rpm)
cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_globalhub:1.3::el9 |
|
| Red Hat | Multicluster Global Hub 1.4.5 |
Unaffected:
1779579439 , < *
(rpm)
cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_globalhub:1.4::el9 |
|
| Red Hat | Multicluster Global Hub 1.5.4 |
Unaffected:
1778867753 , < *
(rpm)
cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_globalhub:1.5::el9 |
|
| Red Hat | Multicluster Global Hub 1.6.2 |
Unaffected:
1780167118 , < *
(rpm)
cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_globalhub:1.6::el9 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14 |
Unaffected:
1782693386 , < *
(rpm)
cpe:/a:redhat:acm:2.14::el9 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15 |
Unaffected:
1777142269 , < *
(rpm)
cpe:/a:redhat:acm:2.15::el9 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenShift GitOps 1.18 |
Unaffected:
1779116359 , < *
(rpm)
cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_gitops:1.18::el8 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenShift GitOps 1.19 |
Unaffected:
1779209965 , < *
(rpm)
cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_gitops:1.19::el8 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 4 |
cpe:/a:redhat:advanced_cluster_security:4 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 |
cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:10 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 |
cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 |
cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-33487",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T11:16:13.379400Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-30T11:16:34.970Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_globalhub:1.3::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "multicluster-globalhub/multicluster-globalhub-grafana-rhel9",
"product": "Multicluster Global Hub 1.3.4",
"vendor": "Red Hat",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "1779212259",
"versionType": "rpm"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_globalhub:1.4::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "multicluster-globalhub/multicluster-globalhub-grafana-rhel9",
"product": "Multicluster Global Hub 1.4.5",
"vendor": "Red Hat",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "1779579439",
"versionType": "rpm"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_globalhub:1.5::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "multicluster-globalhub/multicluster-globalhub-grafana-rhel9",
"product": "Multicluster Global Hub 1.5.4",
"vendor": "Red Hat",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "1778867753",
"versionType": "rpm"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_globalhub:1.6::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "multicluster-globalhub/multicluster-globalhub-grafana-rhel9",
"product": "Multicluster Global Hub 1.6.2",
"vendor": "Red Hat",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "1780167118",
"versionType": "rpm"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:acm:2.14::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "rhacm2/acm-grafana-rhel9",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14",
"vendor": "Red Hat",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "1782693386",
"versionType": "rpm"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:acm:2.15::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "rhacm2/acm-grafana-rhel9",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15",
"vendor": "Red Hat",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "1777142269",
"versionType": "rpm"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_gitops:1.18::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "openshift-gitops-1/dex-rhel8",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift GitOps 1.18",
"vendor": "Red Hat",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "1779116359",
"versionType": "rpm"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_gitops:1.19::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "openshift-gitops-1/dex-rhel8",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift GitOps 1.19",
"vendor": "Red Hat",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "1779209965",
"versionType": "rpm"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:advanced_cluster_security:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "advanced-cluster-security/rhacs-main-rhel8",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:advanced_cluster_security:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "advanced-cluster-security/rhacs-rhel8-operator",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:advanced_cluster_security:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "advanced-cluster-security/rhacs-roxctl-rhel8",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:advanced_cluster_security:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "advanced-cluster-security/rhacs-scanner-v4-rhel8",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:10"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "grafana",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "grafana",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "grafana",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-03-26T17:17:51.101Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw was found in goxmlsig, a Go library for XML Digital Signatures. This vulnerability arises from a programming error, specifically a loop variable capture issue, within the `validateSignature` function. When processing XML Digital Signatures, this error can cause the system to incorrectly validate the signature, potentially allowing an attacker to bypass integrity checks. This issue affects Go versions before 1.22 or projects using older `go.mod` configurations."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"namespace": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/",
"value": "Important"
},
"type": "Red Hat severity rating"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-347",
"description": "Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-15T01:06:18.873Z",
"orgId": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
"shortName": "redhat-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-33487"
},
{
"name": "RHBZ#2451814",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2451814"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_sadp-csaf-vex"
],
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-33487.json"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22423"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22347"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:21769"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:23345"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:36882"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13548"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20946"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20943"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:22423: Multicluster Global Hub 1.3.4"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:22347: Multicluster Global Hub 1.4.5"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:21769: Multicluster Global Hub 1.5.4"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:23345: Multicluster Global Hub 1.6.2"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:36882: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:13548: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:20946: Red Hat OpenShift GitOps 1.18"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:20943: Red Hat OpenShift GitOps 1.19"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-03-26T18:02:32.278Z",
"value": "Reported to Red Hat."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-03-26T17:17:51.101Z",
"value": "Made public."
}
],
"title": "github.com/russellhaering/goxmldsig: goxmlsig: Integrity bypass due to incorrect XML Digital Signature validation via loop variable capture issue",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability."
}
],
"x_adpType": "supplier",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "sadp-cli 1.0.0"
}
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "goxmldsig",
"vendor": "russellhaering",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.6.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "goxmlsig provides XML Digital Signatures implemented in Go. Prior to version 1.6.0, the `validateSignature` function in `validate.go` goes through the references in the `SignedInfo` block to find one that matches the signed element\u0027s ID. In Go versions before 1.22, or when `go.mod` uses an older version, there is a loop variable capture issue. The code takes the address of the loop variable `_ref` instead of its value. As a result, if more than one reference matches the ID or if the loop logic is incorrect, the `ref` pointer will always end up pointing to the last element in the `SignedInfo.References` slice after the loop. goxmlsig version 1.6.0 contains a patch."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-347",
"description": "CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-682",
"description": "CWE-682: Incorrect Calculation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-26T17:17:51.101Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/russellhaering/goxmldsig/security/advisories/GHSA-479m-364c-43vc",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/russellhaering/goxmldsig/security/advisories/GHSA-479m-364c-43vc"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-479m-364c-43vc",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "goxmldsig has validateSignature Loop Variable Capture Signature Bypass"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-33487",
"datePublished": "2026-03-26T17:17:51.101Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-20T16:16:48.971Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-15T01:06:18.873Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-28410 (GCVE-0-2026-28410)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-05 20:11 – Updated: 2026-03-06 17:54
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
The Graph: Revocable vesting contracts allows early access to locked tokens
Summary
The Graph is an indexing protocol for querying networks like Ethereum, IPFS, Polygon, and other blockchains. Prior to version 3.0.0, a flaw in the token vesting contracts allows users to access tokens that should still be locked according to their vesting schedule. This issue has been patched in version 3.0.0.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/graphprotocol/contracts/securi… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/graphprotocol/contracts/commit… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| graphprotocol | contracts |
Affected:
< 3.0.0
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-28410",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-06T17:54:52.003897Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-06T17:54:59.280Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "contracts",
"vendor": "graphprotocol",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 3.0.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Graph is an indexing protocol for querying networks like Ethereum, IPFS, Polygon, and other blockchains. Prior to version 3.0.0, a flaw in the token vesting contracts allows users to access tokens that should still be locked according to their vesting schedule. This issue has been patched in version 3.0.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-284",
"description": "CWE-284: Improper Access Control",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-682",
"description": "CWE-682: Incorrect Calculation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-05T20:11:54.254Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/graphprotocol/contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-qx35-rc5x-x39r",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/graphprotocol/contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-qx35-rc5x-x39r"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/graphprotocol/contracts/commit/91224ed83eeff3fc3afea01f5ed269373d9bf773",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/graphprotocol/contracts/commit/91224ed83eeff3fc3afea01f5ed269373d9bf773"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-qx35-rc5x-x39r",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "The Graph: Revocable vesting contracts allows early access to locked tokens"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-28410",
"datePublished": "2026-03-05T20:11:54.254Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-02-27T15:33:57.289Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-06T17:54:59.280Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-25634 (GCVE-0-2026-25634)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-02-06 20:21 – Updated: 2026-02-06 20:53
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
iccDEV memcpy-param-overlap in CIccTagMultiProcessElement::Apply()
Summary
iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools that allow for the interaction, manipulation, and application of ICC color management profiles. Prior to 2.3.1.4, SrcPixel and DestPixel stack buffers overlap in CIccTagMultiProcessElement::Apply() int IccTagMPE.cpp. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.3.1.4.
Severity
7.8 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
References
5 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/InternationalColorConsortium/i… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/InternationalColorConsortium/i… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/InternationalColorConsortium/i… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/InternationalColorConsortium/i… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/InternationalColorConsortium/i… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| InternationalColorConsortium | iccDEV |
Affected:
< 2.3.1.4
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-25634",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-02-06T20:52:49.613885Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-06T20:53:17.123Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "iccDEV",
"vendor": "InternationalColorConsortium",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 2.3.1.4"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools that allow for the interaction, manipulation, and application of ICC color management profiles. Prior to 2.3.1.4, SrcPixel and DestPixel stack buffers overlap in CIccTagMultiProcessElement::Apply() int IccTagMPE.cpp. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.3.1.4."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-119",
"description": "CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-123",
"description": "CWE-123: Write-what-where Condition",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-628",
"description": "CWE-628: Function Call with Incorrectly Specified Arguments",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-682",
"description": "CWE-682: Incorrect Calculation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-06T20:21:40.108Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/InternationalColorConsortium/iccDEV/security/advisories/GHSA-35rg-jcmp-583h",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/InternationalColorConsortium/iccDEV/security/advisories/GHSA-35rg-jcmp-583h"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/InternationalColorConsortium/iccDEV/issues/577",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/InternationalColorConsortium/iccDEV/issues/577"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/InternationalColorConsortium/iccDEV/pull/579",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/InternationalColorConsortium/iccDEV/pull/579"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/InternationalColorConsortium/iccDEV/commit/9206e0b8684e4cf4186d9ae768f16760bc1af9ff",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/InternationalColorConsortium/iccDEV/commit/9206e0b8684e4cf4186d9ae768f16760bc1af9ff"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/InternationalColorConsortium/iccDEV/releases/tag/v2.3.1.4",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/InternationalColorConsortium/iccDEV/releases/tag/v2.3.1.4"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-35rg-jcmp-583h",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "iccDEV memcpy-param-overlap in CIccTagMultiProcessElement::Apply()"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-25634",
"datePublished": "2026-02-06T20:21:40.108Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-02-04T05:15:41.790Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-06T20:53:17.123Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-24783 (GCVE-0-2026-24783)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-01-27 22:04 – Updated: 2026-01-28 21:09
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
soroban-fixed-point-math has Incorrect Rounding and Overflow Handling in Signed Fixed-Point Math with Negatives
Summary
soroban-fixed-point-math is a fixed-point math library for Soroban smart contacts. In versions 1.3.0 and 1.4.0, the `mulDiv(x, y, z)` function incorrectly handled cases where both the intermediate product $x * y$ and the divisor $z$ were negative. The logic assumed that if the intermediate product was negative, the final result must also be negative, neglecting the sign of $z$. This resulted in rounding being applied in the wrong direction for cases where both $x * y$ and $z$ were negative. The functions most at risk are `fixed_div_floor` and `fixed_div_ceil`, as they often use non-constant numbers as the divisor $z$ in `mulDiv`. This error is present in all signed `FixedPoint` and `SorobanFixedPoint` implementations, including `i64`, `i128`, and `I256`. Versions 1.3.1 and 1.4.1 contain a patch. No known workarounds for this issue are available.
Severity
7.5 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-682 - Incorrect Calculation
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/script3/soroban-fixed-point-ma… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/script3/soroban-fixed-point-ma… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/script3/soroban-fixed-point-ma… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/script3/soroban-fixed-point-ma… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| script3 | soroban-fixed-point-math |
Affected:
= 1.4.0
Affected: = 1.3.0 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-24783",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-01-28T21:08:58.618891Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-28T21:09:12.428Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "soroban-fixed-point-math",
"vendor": "script3",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "= 1.4.0"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "= 1.3.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "soroban-fixed-point-math is a fixed-point math library for Soroban smart contacts. In versions 1.3.0 and 1.4.0, the `mulDiv(x, y, z)` function incorrectly handled cases where both the intermediate product $x * y$ and the divisor $z$ were negative. The logic assumed that if the intermediate product was negative, the final result must also be negative, neglecting the sign of $z$. This resulted in rounding being applied in the wrong direction for cases where both $x * y$ and $z$ were negative. The functions most at risk are `fixed_div_floor` and `fixed_div_ceil`, as they often use non-constant numbers as the divisor $z$ in `mulDiv`. This error is present in all signed `FixedPoint` and `SorobanFixedPoint` implementations, including `i64`, `i128`, and `I256`. Versions 1.3.1 and 1.4.1 contain a patch. No known workarounds for this issue are available."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-682",
"description": "CWE-682: Incorrect Calculation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-27T22:04:18.006Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/script3/soroban-fixed-point-math/security/advisories/GHSA-x5m4-43jf-hh65",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/script3/soroban-fixed-point-math/security/advisories/GHSA-x5m4-43jf-hh65"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/script3/soroban-fixed-point-math/commit/c9233f7094198a49ed66a4d75786a8a3755c936a",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/script3/soroban-fixed-point-math/commit/c9233f7094198a49ed66a4d75786a8a3755c936a"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/script3/soroban-fixed-point-math/releases/tag/v1.3.1",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/script3/soroban-fixed-point-math/releases/tag/v1.3.1"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/script3/soroban-fixed-point-math/releases/tag/v1.4.1",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/script3/soroban-fixed-point-math/releases/tag/v1.4.1"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-x5m4-43jf-hh65",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "soroban-fixed-point-math has Incorrect Rounding and Overflow Handling in Signed Fixed-Point Math with Negatives"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-24783",
"datePublished": "2026-01-27T22:04:18.006Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-01-26T21:06:47.869Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-28T21:09:12.428Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-21911 (GCVE-0-2026-21911)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-01-15 20:23 – Updated: 2026-01-15 20:51
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Junos OS Evolved: Flapping management interface causes MAC learning on label-switched interfaces to stop
Summary
An Incorrect Calculation vulnerability in the Layer 2 Control
Protocol
Daemon (l2cpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated network-adjacent attacker flapping the management interface to cause the learning of new MACs over label-switched interfaces (LSI) to stop while generating a flood of logs, resulting in high CPU usage.
When the issue is seen, the following log message will be generated:
op:1 flag:0x6 mac:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx bd:2 ifl:13302 reason:0(REASON_NONE) i-op:6(INTRNL_OP_HW_FORCE_DELETE) status:10 lstatus:10 err:26(GETIFBD_VALIDATE_FAILED) err-reason 4(IFBD_VALIDATE_FAIL_EPOCH_MISMATCH) hw_wr:0x4 ctxsync:0 fwdsync:0 rtt-id:51 p_ifl:0 fwd_nh:0 svlbnh:0 event:- smask:0x100000000 dmask:0x0 mplsmask 0x1 act:0x5800 extf:0x0 pfe-id 0 hw-notif-ifl 13302 programmed-ifl 4294967295 pseudo-vtep underlay-ifl-idx 0 stack:GET_MAC, ALLOCATE_MAC, GET_IFL, GET_IFF, GET_IFBD, STOP,
This issue affects Junos OS Evolved:
* all versions before 21.4R3-S7-EVO,
* from 22.2 before 22.2R3-S4-EVO,
* from 22.3 before 22.3R3-S3-EVO,
* from 22.4 before 22.4R3-S2-EVO,
* from 23.2 before 23.2R2-S1-EVO,
* from 23.4 before 23.4R1-S2-EVO, 23.4R2-EVO.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-682 - Incorrect Calculation
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA106010 | vendor-advisory |
| https://kb.juniper.net/JSA106010 | vendor-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Juniper Networks | Junos OS Evolved |
Affected:
0 , < 21.4R3-S7-EVO
(semver)
Affected: 22.2 , < 22.2R3-S4-EVO (semver) Affected: 22.3 , < 22.3R3-S3-EVO (semver) Affected: 22.4 , < 22.4R3-S2-EVO (semver) Affected: 23.2 , < 23.2R2-S1-EVO (semver) Affected: 23.4 , < 23.4R1-S2-EVO, 23.4R2-EVO (semver) |
Date Public
2026-01-14 17:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-21911",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-01-15T20:51:26.965443Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-15T20:51:32.531Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Junos OS Evolved",
"vendor": "Juniper Networks",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "21.4R3-S7-EVO",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "22.2R3-S4-EVO",
"status": "affected",
"version": "22.2",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "22.3R3-S3-EVO",
"status": "affected",
"version": "22.3",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "22.4R3-S2-EVO",
"status": "affected",
"version": "22.4",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "23.2R2-S1-EVO",
"status": "affected",
"version": "23.2",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "23.4R1-S2-EVO, 23.4R2-EVO",
"status": "affected",
"version": "23.4",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "This issue affects label-switched interfaces configured for VPLS. For example:\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003ctt\u003e[routing-instances \u0026lt;name\u0026gt; instance-type vpls]\u003cbr\u003e[routing-instances \u0026lt;name\u0026gt; protocols vpls]\u003c/tt\u003e"
}
],
"value": "This issue affects label-switched interfaces configured for VPLS. For example:\n\n[routing-instances \u003cname\u003e instance-type vpls]\n[routing-instances \u003cname\u003e protocols vpls]"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-01-14T17:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eAn Incorrect Calculation vulnerability in the Layer 2 Control\n\n\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eProtocol \u003c/span\u003e\n\n Daemon (l2cpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated network-adjacent attacker flapping the management interface to cause the learning of new MACs over label-switched interfaces (LSI) to stop while generating a\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003eflood of logs, resulting in high CPU usage.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eWhen the issue is seen, the following log message will be generated:\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003ctt\u003eop:1 flag:0x6 mac:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx bd:2 ifl:13302 reason:0(REASON_NONE) i-op:6(INTRNL_OP_HW_FORCE_DELETE) status:10 lstatus:10 err:26(GETIFBD_VALIDATE_FAILED) err-reason 4(IFBD_VALIDATE_FAIL_EPOCH_MISMATCH) hw_wr:0x4 ctxsync:0 fwdsync:0 rtt-id:51 p_ifl:0 fwd_nh:0 svlbnh:0 event:- smask:0x100000000 dmask:0x0 mplsmask 0x1 act:0x5800 extf:0x0 pfe-id 0 hw-notif-ifl 13302 programmed-ifl 4294967295 pseudo-vtep underlay-ifl-idx 0 stack:GET_MAC, ALLOCATE_MAC, GET_IFL, GET_IFF, GET_IFBD, STOP,\u003c/tt\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects Junos OS Evolved:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003eall versions before 21.4R3-S7-EVO,\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003efrom 22.2 before 22.2R3-S4-EVO,\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003efrom 22.3 before 22.3R3-S3-EVO,\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003efrom 22.4 before 22.4R3-S2-EVO,\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003efrom 23.2 before 23.2R2-S1-EVO,\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003efrom 23.4 before 23.4R1-S2-EVO, 23.4R2-EVO.\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e"
}
],
"value": "An Incorrect Calculation vulnerability in the Layer 2 Control\n\nProtocol \n\n Daemon (l2cpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated network-adjacent attacker flapping the management interface to cause the learning of new MACs over label-switched interfaces (LSI) to stop while generating a\u00a0flood of logs, resulting in high CPU usage.\n\nWhen the issue is seen, the following log message will be generated:\n\nop:1 flag:0x6 mac:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx bd:2 ifl:13302 reason:0(REASON_NONE) i-op:6(INTRNL_OP_HW_FORCE_DELETE) status:10 lstatus:10 err:26(GETIFBD_VALIDATE_FAILED) err-reason 4(IFBD_VALIDATE_FAIL_EPOCH_MISMATCH) hw_wr:0x4 ctxsync:0 fwdsync:0 rtt-id:51 p_ifl:0 fwd_nh:0 svlbnh:0 event:- smask:0x100000000 dmask:0x0 mplsmask 0x1 act:0x5800 extf:0x0 pfe-id 0 hw-notif-ifl 13302 programmed-ifl 4294967295 pseudo-vtep underlay-ifl-idx 0 stack:GET_MAC, ALLOCATE_MAC, GET_IFL, GET_IFF, GET_IFBD, STOP, \n\n\nThis issue affects Junos OS Evolved:\u00a0\n\n * all versions before 21.4R3-S7-EVO,\u00a0\n * from 22.2 before 22.2R3-S4-EVO,\u00a0\n * from 22.3 before 22.3R3-S3-EVO,\u00a0\n * from 22.4 before 22.4R3-S2-EVO,\u00a0\n * from 23.2 before 23.2R2-S1-EVO,\u00a0\n * from 23.4 before 23.4R1-S2-EVO, 23.4R2-EVO."
}
],
"exploits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Juniper SIRT is not aware of any malicious exploitation of this vulnerability."
}
],
"value": "Juniper SIRT is not aware of any malicious exploitation of this vulnerability."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "YES",
"Recovery": "AUTOMATIC",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "AMBER",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "CONCENTRATED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L/AU:Y/R:A/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "MODERATE"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-682",
"description": "CWE-682 Incorrect Calculation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-15T20:23:54.924Z",
"orgId": "8cbe9d5a-a066-4c94-8978-4b15efeae968",
"shortName": "juniper"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA106010"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://kb.juniper.net/JSA106010"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "The following software releases have been updated to resolve this specific issue: 21.4R3-S7-EVO, 22.2R3-S4-EVO, 22.3R3-S3-EVO, 22.4R3-S2-EVO, 23.2R2-S1-EVO, 23.4R1-S2-EVO, 23.4R2-EVO, 24.2R1-EVO, and all subsequent releases."
}
],
"value": "The following software releases have been updated to resolve this specific issue: 21.4R3-S7-EVO, 22.2R3-S4-EVO, 22.3R3-S3-EVO, 22.4R3-S2-EVO, 23.2R2-S1-EVO, 23.4R1-S2-EVO, 23.4R2-EVO, 24.2R1-EVO, and all subsequent releases."
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "JSA106010",
"defect": [
"1802153"
],
"discovery": "USER"
},
"title": "Junos OS Evolved: Flapping management interface causes MAC learning on label-switched interfaces to stop",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "There are no known workarounds for this issue.\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "There are no known workarounds for this issue."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8cbe9d5a-a066-4c94-8978-4b15efeae968",
"assignerShortName": "juniper",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-21911",
"datePublished": "2026-01-15T20:23:54.924Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-01-05T17:32:48.710Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-15T20:51:32.531Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-10512 (GCVE-0-2026-10512)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-25 19:58 – Updated: 2026-06-26 13:49
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
X25519 x86_64 assembly final reduction leaves non-canonical field element
Summary
The X25519 x86_64 assembly implementation fails to clear the most significant bit during the final modular reduction, so the computed result may not be fully reduced modulo the field prime 2^255 - 19. This can leave the field element in a non-canonical form, producing an incorrect result from the scalar multiplication and potentially a wrong shared secret. The final carry-propagation chains in the x64 and AVX2 reduction routines could overflow into the top bit, and the high limb was not masked afterward, so the 255-bit field element was left non-canonical.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-682 - Incorrect Calculation
Assigner
References
2 references
Impacted products
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-10512",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-26T13:49:37.963089Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-26T13:49:49.898Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "wolfSSL",
"vendor": "wolfSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.9.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.6.4",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Haruki Oyama"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eThe X25519 x86_64 assembly implementation fails to clear the most significant bit during the final modular reduction, so the computed result may not be fully reduced modulo the field prime 2^255 - 19. This can leave the field element in a non-canonical form, producing an incorrect result from the scalar multiplication and potentially a wrong shared secret. The final carry-propagation chains in the x64 and AVX2 reduction routines could overflow into the top bit, and the high limb was not masked afterward, so the 255-bit field element was left non-canonical.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "The X25519 x86_64 assembly implementation fails to clear the most significant bit during the final modular reduction, so the computed result may not be fully reduced modulo the field prime 2^255 - 19. This can leave the field element in a non-canonical form, producing an incorrect result from the scalar multiplication and potentially a wrong shared secret. The final carry-propagation chains in the x64 and AVX2 reduction routines could overflow into the top bit, and the high limb was not masked afterward, so the 255-bit field element was left non-canonical."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 2.3,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-682",
"description": "CWE-682 Incorrect Calculation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-25T19:58:16.013Z",
"orgId": "50d2cd11-d01a-48ed-9441-5bfce9d63b27",
"shortName": "wolfSSL"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/pull/10536"
},
{
"url": "https://www.wolfssl.com/docs/security-vulnerabilities/"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "X25519 x86_64 assembly final reduction leaves non-canonical field element",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.2"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "50d2cd11-d01a-48ed-9441-5bfce9d63b27",
"assignerShortName": "wolfSSL",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-10512",
"datePublished": "2026-06-25T19:58:16.013Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-01T04:32:49.584Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-26T13:49:49.898Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-7836 (GCVE-0-2026-7836)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-21 07:35 – Updated: 2026-05-21 12:12
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
hextoint macro uppercase bug
Summary
An incorrect calculation in the hextoint macro in Netatalk 2.0.0 through 4.4.2 due to improper uppercase character handling allows a remote authenticated attacker to cause limited data modification via crafted hexadecimal input.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-682 - Incorrect Calculation
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://netatalk.io/security/CVE-2026-7836 | vendor-advisory |
Impacted products
Date Public
2026-05-13 00:00
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-7836",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-21T12:12:27.745784Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-21T12:12:38.186Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Netatalk",
"vendor": "Netatalk",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.4.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.5.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Arjun Basnet from Securin"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "An incorrect calculation in the hextoint macro in Netatalk 2.0.0 through 4.4.2 due to improper uppercase character handling allows a remote authenticated attacker to cause limited data modification via crafted hexadecimal input."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 3.1,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-682",
"description": "Incorrect Calculation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-21T07:53:03.045Z",
"orgId": "33c584b5-0579-4c06-b2a0-8d8329fcab9c",
"shortName": "securin"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "Netatalk Security Advisory CVE-2026-7836",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://netatalk.io/security/CVE-2026-7836"
}
],
"title": "hextoint macro uppercase bug"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "33c584b5-0579-4c06-b2a0-8d8329fcab9c",
"assignerShortName": "securin",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-7836",
"datePublished": "2026-05-21T07:35:13.096Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-05T07:25:35.245Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-21T12:12:38.186Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Mitigation
Implementation
Understand your programming language's underlying representation and how it interacts with numeric calculation. Pay close attention to byte size discrepancies, precision, signed/unsigned distinctions, truncation, conversion and casting between types, "not-a-number" calculations, and how your language handles numbers that are too large or too small for its underlying representation.
Mitigation MIT-8
Implementation
Strategy: Input Validation
Perform input validation on any numeric input by ensuring that it is within the expected range. Enforce that the input meets both the minimum and maximum requirements for the expected range.
Mitigation
Implementation
Use the appropriate type for the desired action. For example, in C/C++, only use unsigned types for values that could never be negative, such as height, width, or other numbers related to quantity.
Mitigation
Architecture and Design
Strategy: Language Selection
- Use languages, libraries, or frameworks that make it easier to handle numbers without unexpected consequences.
- Examples include safe integer handling packages such as SafeInt (C++) or IntegerLib (C or C++).
Mitigation
Architecture and Design
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use languages, libraries, or frameworks that make it easier to handle numbers without unexpected consequences.
- Examples include safe integer handling packages such as SafeInt (C++) or IntegerLib (C or C++).
Mitigation MIT-26
Implementation
Strategy: Compilation or Build Hardening
Examine compiler warnings closely and eliminate problems with potential security implications, such as signed / unsigned mismatch in memory operations, or use of uninitialized variables. Even if the weakness is rarely exploitable, a single failure may lead to the compromise of the entire system.
CAPEC-128: Integer Attacks
An attacker takes advantage of the structure of integer variables to cause these variables to assume values that are not expected by an application. For example, adding one to the largest positive integer in a signed integer variable results in a negative number. Negative numbers may be illegal in an application and the application may prevent an attacker from providing them directly, but the application may not consider that adding two positive numbers can create a negative number do to the structure of integer storage formats.
CAPEC-129: Pointer Manipulation
This attack pattern involves an adversary manipulating a pointer within a target application resulting in the application accessing an unintended memory location. This can result in the crashing of the application or, for certain pointer values, access to data that would not normally be possible or the execution of arbitrary code. Since pointers are simply integer variables, Integer Attacks may often be used in Pointer Attacks.