Search criteria
1035 vulnerabilities found for OpenSSL by OpenSSL
CERTFR-2025-AVI-0835
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2025-10-01 - Updated: 2025-10-01
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans OpenSSL. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, un déni de service à distance et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpenSSL | OpenSSL | OpenSSL versions 1.0.2x antérieures à 1.0.2zm (support payant) | ||
| OpenSSL | OpenSSL | OpenSSL versions 3.0.x antérieures à 3.0.18 | ||
| OpenSSL | OpenSSL | OpenSSL versions 3.2.x antérieures à 3.2.6 | ||
| OpenSSL | OpenSSL | OpenSSL versions 3.5.x antérieures à 3.5.4 | ||
| OpenSSL | OpenSSL | OpenSSL versions 3.3.x antérieures à 3.3.5 | ||
| OpenSSL | OpenSSL | OpenSSL versions 1.1.1x antérieures à 1.1.1zd (support payant) | ||
| OpenSSL | OpenSSL | OpenSSL versions 3.4.x antérieures à 3.4.3 |
References
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "OpenSSL versions 1.0.2x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.0.2zm (support payant)",
"product": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "OpenSSL versions 3.0.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.0.18",
"product": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "OpenSSL versions 3.2.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.2.6",
"product": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "OpenSSL versions 3.5.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.5.4",
"product": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "OpenSSL versions 3.3.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.3.5",
"product": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "OpenSSL versions 1.1.1x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.1.1zd (support payant)",
"product": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "OpenSSL versions 3.4.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.4.3",
"product": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9230"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2025-10-01T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2025-10-01T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2025-AVI-0835",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2025-10-01T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans OpenSSL. Elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance, un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance et une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans OpenSSL",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2025-09-30",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 OpenSSL",
"url": "https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20250930.txt"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2025-AVI-0444
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:
Une vulnérabilité a été découverte dans OpenSSL. Elle permet à un attaquant de provoquer un contournement de la politique de sécurité.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
Impacted products
References
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "OpenSSL versions 3.5.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.5.1",
"product": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4575",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4575"
}
],
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2025-AVI-0444",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2025-05-23T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
}
],
"summary": "Une vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couverte dans OpenSSL. Elle permet \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer un contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9.",
"title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans OpenSSL",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2025-05-22",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 OpenSSL",
"url": "https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20250522.txt"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2025-AVI-0129
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans OpenSSL. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et une atteinte à l'intégrité des données.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpenSSL | OpenSSL | OpenSSL versions 1.0.2.x antérieures à 1.0.2zl | ||
| OpenSSL | OpenSSL | OpenSSL versions 1.1.1.x antérieures à 1.1.1zb | ||
| OpenSSL | OpenSSL | OpenSSL versions 3.0.x antérieures à 3.0.16 | ||
| OpenSSL | OpenSSL | OpenSSL versions 3.4.x antérieures à 3.4.1 | ||
| OpenSSL | OpenSSL | OpenSSL versions 3.3.x antérieures à 3.3.3 | ||
| OpenSSL | OpenSSL | OpenSSL versions 3.1.x antérieures à 3.1.8 | ||
| OpenSSL | OpenSSL | OpenSSL versions 3.2.x antérieures à 3.2.4 |
References
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "OpenSSL versions 1.0.2.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.0.2zl",
"product": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "OpenSSL versions 1.1.1.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.1.1zb",
"product": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "OpenSSL versions 3.0.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.0.16",
"product": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "OpenSSL versions 3.4.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.4.1",
"product": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "OpenSSL versions 3.3.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.3.3",
"product": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "OpenSSL versions 3.1.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.1.8",
"product": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "OpenSSL versions 3.2.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.2.4",
"product": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2024-12797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-12797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-13176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-13176"
}
],
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2025-AVI-0129",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2025-02-13T00:00:00.000000"
},
{
"description": "Ajout de l\u0027avis OpenSSL 20250120",
"revision_date": "2025-02-17T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans OpenSSL. Elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es et une atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans OpenSSL",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2025-01-20",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 OpenSSL 20250120",
"url": "https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20250120.txt"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-02-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 OpenSSL",
"url": "https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20250211.txt"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2024-AVI-0895
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:
Une vulnérabilité a été découverte dans OpenSSL. Elle permet à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance et un déni de service à distance.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpenSSL | OpenSSL | OpenSSL versions 3.0.x antérieures à 3.0.16 | ||
| OpenSSL | OpenSSL | OpenSSL versions 1.1.1x antérieures à 1.1.1zb | ||
| OpenSSL | OpenSSL | OpenSSL versions 3.3.x antérieures à 3.3.0 | ||
| OpenSSL | OpenSSL | OpenSSL versions 3.1.x antérieures à 3.1.8 | ||
| OpenSSL | OpenSSL | OpenSSL versions 1.0.2x antérieures à 1.0.2zl | ||
| OpenSSL | OpenSSL | OpenSSL versions 3.2.x antérieures à 3.2.4 |
References
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "OpenSSL versions 3.0.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.0.16",
"product": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "OpenSSL versions 1.1.1x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.1.1zb",
"product": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "OpenSSL versions 3.3.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.3.0",
"product": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "OpenSSL versions 3.1.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.1.8",
"product": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "OpenSSL versions 1.0.2x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.0.2zl",
"product": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "OpenSSL versions 3.2.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.2.4",
"product": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2024-9143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9143"
}
],
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2024-AVI-0895",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2024-10-17T00:00:00.000000"
},
{
"description": "Evolution des risques",
"revision_date": "2024-10-18T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
}
],
"summary": "Une vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couverte dans OpenSSL. Elle permet \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance et un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance.",
"title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans OpenSSL",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2024-10-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 OpenSSL",
"url": "https://openssl-library.org/news/vulnerabilities/"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2024-AVI-0736
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:
Une vulnérabilité a été découverte dans OpenSSL. Elle permet à un attaquant de provoquer un déni de service à distance.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
Impacted products
References
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "OpenSSL versions 3.3.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.3.2",
"product": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "OpenSSL versions 3.0.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.0.15",
"product": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "OpenSSL versions 3.2.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.2.3",
"product": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "OpenSSL versions 3.1.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.1.7",
"product": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": {
"name": "OpenSSL",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6119"
}
],
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2024-AVI-0736",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2024-09-04T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
}
],
"summary": "Une vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couverte dans OpenSSL. Elle permet \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance.",
"title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans OpenSSL",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2024-09-03",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 OpenSSL",
"url": "https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20240903.txt"
}
]
}
CVE-2025-9232 (GCVE-0-2025-9232)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-09-30 13:17 – Updated: 2025-11-04 21:15
VLAI?
Summary
Issue summary: An application using the OpenSSL HTTP client API functions may
trigger an out-of-bounds read if the 'no_proxy' environment variable is set and
the host portion of the authority component of the HTTP URL is an IPv6 address.
Impact summary: An out-of-bounds read can trigger a crash which leads to
Denial of Service for an application.
The OpenSSL HTTP client API functions can be used directly by applications
but they are also used by the OCSP client functions and CMP (Certificate
Management Protocol) client implementation in OpenSSL. However the URLs used
by these implementations are unlikely to be controlled by an attacker.
In this vulnerable code the out of bounds read can only trigger a crash.
Furthermore the vulnerability requires an attacker-controlled URL to be
passed from an application to the OpenSSL function and the user has to have
a 'no_proxy' environment variable set. For the aforementioned reasons the
issue was assessed as Low severity.
The vulnerable code was introduced in the following patch releases:
3.0.16, 3.1.8, 3.2.4, 3.3.3, 3.4.0 and 3.5.0.
The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this
issue, as the HTTP client implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module
boundary.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- CWE-125 - Out-of-bounds Read
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Credits
Stanislav Fort (Aisle Research)
Stanislav Fort (Aisle Research)
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-9232",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-09-30T19:22:31.407504Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-30T19:22:35.483Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-04T21:15:19.948Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/09/30/5"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.5.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.5.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.4.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.3.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.3.3",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.2.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.4",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.0.18",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.16",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Stanislav Fort (Aisle Research)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Stanislav Fort (Aisle Research)"
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-09-30T14:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Issue summary: An application using the OpenSSL HTTP client API functions may\u003cbr\u003etrigger an out-of-bounds read if the \u0027no_proxy\u0027 environment variable is set and\u003cbr\u003ethe host portion of the authority component of the HTTP URL is an IPv6 address.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: An out-of-bounds read can trigger a crash which leads to\u003cbr\u003eDenial of Service for an application.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe OpenSSL HTTP client API functions can be used directly by applications\u003cbr\u003ebut they are also used by the OCSP client functions and CMP (Certificate\u003cbr\u003eManagement Protocol) client implementation in OpenSSL. However the URLs used\u003cbr\u003eby these implementations are unlikely to be controlled by an attacker.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eIn this vulnerable code the out of bounds read can only trigger a crash.\u003cbr\u003eFurthermore the vulnerability requires an attacker-controlled URL to be\u003cbr\u003epassed from an application to the OpenSSL function and the user has to have\u003cbr\u003ea \u0027no_proxy\u0027 environment variable set. For the aforementioned reasons the\u003cbr\u003eissue was assessed as Low severity.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe vulnerable code was introduced in the following patch releases:\u003cbr\u003e3.0.16, 3.1.8, 3.2.4, 3.3.3, 3.4.0 and 3.5.0.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this\u003cbr\u003eissue, as the HTTP client implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module\u003cbr\u003eboundary."
}
],
"value": "Issue summary: An application using the OpenSSL HTTP client API functions may\ntrigger an out-of-bounds read if the \u0027no_proxy\u0027 environment variable is set and\nthe host portion of the authority component of the HTTP URL is an IPv6 address.\n\nImpact summary: An out-of-bounds read can trigger a crash which leads to\nDenial of Service for an application.\n\nThe OpenSSL HTTP client API functions can be used directly by applications\nbut they are also used by the OCSP client functions and CMP (Certificate\nManagement Protocol) client implementation in OpenSSL. However the URLs used\nby these implementations are unlikely to be controlled by an attacker.\n\nIn this vulnerable code the out of bounds read can only trigger a crash.\nFurthermore the vulnerability requires an attacker-controlled URL to be\npassed from an application to the OpenSSL function and the user has to have\na \u0027no_proxy\u0027 environment variable set. For the aforementioned reasons the\nissue was assessed as Low severity.\n\nThe vulnerable code was introduced in the following patch releases:\n3.0.16, 3.1.8, 3.2.4, 3.3.3, 3.4.0 and 3.5.0.\n\nThe FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this\nissue, as the HTTP client implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module\nboundary."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "Low"
},
"type": "https://openssl-library.org/policies/general/security-policy/"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-125",
"description": "CWE-125 Out-of-bounds Read",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-30T13:17:19.172Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20250930.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.5.4 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/2b4ec20e47959170422922eaff25346d362dcb35"
},
{
"name": "3.4.3 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/7cf21a30513c9e43c4bc3836c237cf086e194af3"
},
{
"name": "3.3.5 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/bbf38c034cdabd0a13330abcc4855c866f53d2e0"
},
{
"name": "3.2.6 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/89e790ac431125a4849992858490bed6b225eadf"
},
{
"name": "3.0.18 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/654dc11d23468a74fc8ea4672b702dd3feb7be4b"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Out-of-bounds read in HTTP client no_proxy handling",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-9232",
"datePublished": "2025-09-30T13:17:19.172Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-08-20T08:38:12.019Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-04T21:15:19.948Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-9231 (GCVE-0-2025-9231)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-09-30 13:17 – Updated: 2025-11-04 21:15
VLAI?
Summary
Issue summary: A timing side-channel which could potentially allow remote
recovery of the private key exists in the SM2 algorithm implementation on 64 bit
ARM platforms.
Impact summary: A timing side-channel in SM2 signature computations on 64 bit
ARM platforms could allow recovering the private key by an attacker..
While remote key recovery over a network was not attempted by the reporter,
timing measurements revealed a timing signal which may allow such an attack.
OpenSSL does not directly support certificates with SM2 keys in TLS, and so
this CVE is not relevant in most TLS contexts. However, given that it is
possible to add support for such certificates via a custom provider, coupled
with the fact that in such a custom provider context the private key may be
recoverable via remote timing measurements, we consider this to be a Moderate
severity issue.
The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this
issue, as SM2 is not an approved algorithm.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- CWE-385 - Covert Timing Channel
Assigner
References
| URL | Tags | |
|---|---|---|
Impacted products
Credits
Stanislav Fort (Aisle Research)
Stanislav Fort (Aisle Research)
Tomas Mraz
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-9231",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-09-30T19:27:45.704985Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-30T19:28:28.380Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-04T21:15:18.593Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/09/30/5"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.5.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.5.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.4.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.3.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.3.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.2.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Stanislav Fort (Aisle Research)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Stanislav Fort (Aisle Research)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Tomas Mraz"
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-09-30T14:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Issue summary: A timing side-channel which could potentially allow remote\u003cbr\u003erecovery of the private key exists in the SM2 algorithm implementation on 64 bit\u003cbr\u003eARM platforms.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: A timing side-channel in SM2 signature computations on 64 bit\u003cbr\u003eARM platforms could allow recovering the private key by an attacker..\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eWhile remote key recovery over a network was not attempted by the reporter,\u003cbr\u003etiming measurements revealed a timing signal which may allow such an attack.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eOpenSSL does not directly support certificates with SM2 keys in TLS, and so\u003cbr\u003ethis CVE is not relevant in most TLS contexts. However, given that it is\u003cbr\u003epossible to add support for such certificates via a custom provider, coupled\u003cbr\u003ewith the fact that in such a custom provider context the private key may be\u003cbr\u003erecoverable via remote timing measurements, we consider this to be a Moderate\u003cbr\u003eseverity issue.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this\u003cbr\u003eissue, as SM2 is not an approved algorithm."
}
],
"value": "Issue summary: A timing side-channel which could potentially allow remote\nrecovery of the private key exists in the SM2 algorithm implementation on 64 bit\nARM platforms.\n\nImpact summary: A timing side-channel in SM2 signature computations on 64 bit\nARM platforms could allow recovering the private key by an attacker..\n\nWhile remote key recovery over a network was not attempted by the reporter,\ntiming measurements revealed a timing signal which may allow such an attack.\n\nOpenSSL does not directly support certificates with SM2 keys in TLS, and so\nthis CVE is not relevant in most TLS contexts. However, given that it is\npossible to add support for such certificates via a custom provider, coupled\nwith the fact that in such a custom provider context the private key may be\nrecoverable via remote timing measurements, we consider this to be a Moderate\nseverity issue.\n\nThe FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this\nissue, as SM2 is not an approved algorithm."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "Moderate"
},
"type": "https://openssl-library.org/policies/general/security-policy/"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-385",
"description": "CWE-385 Covert Timing Channel",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-30T13:17:12.007Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20250930.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.5.4 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/fc47a2ec078912b3e914fab5734535e76c4820c2"
},
{
"name": "3.4.3 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/eed5adc9f969d77c94f213767acbb41ff923b6f4"
},
{
"name": "3.3.5 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/567f64386e43683888212226824b6a179885a0fe"
},
{
"name": "3.2.6 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/cba616c26ac8e7b37de5e77762e505ba5ca51698"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Timing side-channel in SM2 algorithm on 64 bit ARM",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-9231",
"datePublished": "2025-09-30T13:17:12.007Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-08-20T08:38:09.832Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-04T21:15:18.593Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-9230 (GCVE-0-2025-9230)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-09-30 13:17 – Updated: 2025-11-04 21:15
VLAI?
Summary
Issue summary: An application trying to decrypt CMS messages encrypted using
password based encryption can trigger an out-of-bounds read and write.
Impact summary: This out-of-bounds read may trigger a crash which leads to
Denial of Service for an application. The out-of-bounds write can cause
a memory corruption which can have various consequences including
a Denial of Service or Execution of attacker-supplied code.
Although the consequences of a successful exploit of this vulnerability
could be severe, the probability that the attacker would be able to
perform it is low. Besides, password based (PWRI) encryption support in CMS
messages is very rarely used. For that reason the issue was assessed as
Moderate severity according to our Security Policy.
The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this
issue, as the CMS implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module
boundary.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
Assigner
References
| URL | Tags | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impacted products
Credits
Stanislav Fort (Aisle Research)
Stanislav Fort (Aisle Research)
Viktor Dukhovni
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-9230",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-09-30T19:30:08.302408Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-30T19:30:29.803Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-04T21:15:17.295Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/10/msg00001.html"
},
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/09/30/5"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.5.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.5.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.4.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.3.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.3.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.2.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.0.18",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.1.1zd",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.1.1",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.0.2zm",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.2",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Stanislav Fort (Aisle Research)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Stanislav Fort (Aisle Research)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Viktor Dukhovni"
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-09-30T14:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Issue summary: An application trying to decrypt CMS messages encrypted using\u003cbr\u003epassword based encryption can trigger an out-of-bounds read and write.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: This out-of-bounds read may trigger a crash which leads to\u003cbr\u003eDenial of Service for an application. The out-of-bounds write can cause\u003cbr\u003ea memory corruption which can have various consequences including\u003cbr\u003ea Denial of Service or Execution of attacker-supplied code.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAlthough the consequences of a successful exploit of this vulnerability\u003cbr\u003ecould be severe, the probability that the attacker would be able to\u003cbr\u003eperform it is low. Besides, password based (PWRI) encryption support in CMS\u003cbr\u003emessages is very rarely used. For that reason the issue was assessed as\u003cbr\u003eModerate severity according to our Security Policy.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this\u003cbr\u003eissue, as the CMS implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module\u003cbr\u003eboundary."
}
],
"value": "Issue summary: An application trying to decrypt CMS messages encrypted using\npassword based encryption can trigger an out-of-bounds read and write.\n\nImpact summary: This out-of-bounds read may trigger a crash which leads to\nDenial of Service for an application. The out-of-bounds write can cause\na memory corruption which can have various consequences including\na Denial of Service or Execution of attacker-supplied code.\n\nAlthough the consequences of a successful exploit of this vulnerability\ncould be severe, the probability that the attacker would be able to\nperform it is low. Besides, password based (PWRI) encryption support in CMS\nmessages is very rarely used. For that reason the issue was assessed as\nModerate severity according to our Security Policy.\n\nThe FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this\nissue, as the CMS implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module\nboundary."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "Moderate"
},
"type": "https://openssl-library.org/policies/general/security-policy/"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-125",
"description": "CWE-125 Out-of-bounds Read",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
},
{
"cweId": "CWE-787",
"description": "CWE-787 Out-of-bounds Write",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-30T13:17:00.808Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20250930.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.5.4 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/bae259a211ada6315dc50900686daaaaaa55f482"
},
{
"name": "3.4.3 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/9e91358f365dee6c446dcdcdb01c04d2743fd280"
},
{
"name": "3.3.5 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/5965ea5dd6960f36d8b7f74f8eac67a8eb8f2b45"
},
{
"name": "3.2.6 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/b5282d677551afda7d20e9c00e09561b547b2dfd"
},
{
"name": "3.0.18 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a79c4ce559c6a3a8fd4109e9f33c1185d5bf2def"
},
{
"name": "1.1.1zd git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/dfbaf161d8dafc1132dd88cd48ad990ed9b4c8ba"
},
{
"name": "1.0.2zm git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/c2b96348bfa662f25f4fabf81958ae822063dae3"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Out-of-bounds read \u0026 write in RFC 3211 KEK Unwrap",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-9230",
"datePublished": "2025-09-30T13:17:00.808Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-08-20T08:38:07.678Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-04T21:15:17.295Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-4575 (GCVE-0-2025-4575)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-05-22 13:36 – Updated: 2025-05-22 16:03
VLAI?
Summary
Issue summary: Use of -addreject option with the openssl x509 application adds
a trusted use instead of a rejected use for a certificate.
Impact summary: If a user intends to make a trusted certificate rejected for
a particular use it will be instead marked as trusted for that use.
A copy & paste error during minor refactoring of the code introduced this
issue in the OpenSSL 3.5 version. If, for example, a trusted CA certificate
should be trusted only for the purpose of authenticating TLS servers but not
for CMS signature verification and the CMS signature verification is intended
to be marked as rejected with the -addreject option, the resulting CA
certificate will be trusted for CMS signature verification purpose instead.
Only users which use the trusted certificate format who use the openssl x509
command line application to add rejected uses are affected by this issue.
The issues affecting only the command line application are considered to
be Low severity.
The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this
issue.
OpenSSL 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1, 3.0, 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are also not affected by this
issue.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
Assigner
References
| URL | Tags | |
|---|---|---|
Credits
Alexandr Sosedkin (Red Hat)
Tomáš Mráz
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-4575",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-05-22T14:30:40.495897Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-22T14:32:40.965Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-22T16:03:42.330Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/05/22/1"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.5.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.5.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Alexandr Sosedkin (Red Hat)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Tom\u00e1\u0161 Mr\u00e1z"
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-05-22T14:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Issue summary: Use of -addreject option with the openssl x509 application adds\u003cbr\u003ea trusted use instead of a rejected use for a certificate.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: If a user intends to make a trusted certificate rejected for\u003cbr\u003ea particular use it will be instead marked as trusted for that use.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eA copy \u0026 paste error during minor refactoring of the code introduced this\u003cbr\u003eissue in the OpenSSL 3.5 version. If, for example, a trusted CA certificate\u003cbr\u003eshould be trusted only for the purpose of authenticating TLS servers but not\u003cbr\u003efor CMS signature verification and the CMS signature verification is intended\u003cbr\u003eto be marked as rejected with the -addreject option, the resulting CA\u003cbr\u003ecertificate will be trusted for CMS signature verification purpose instead.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eOnly users which use the trusted certificate format who use the openssl x509\u003cbr\u003ecommand line application to add rejected uses are affected by this issue.\u003cbr\u003eThe issues affecting only the command line application are considered to\u003cbr\u003ebe Low severity.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this\u003cbr\u003eissue.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eOpenSSL 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1, 3.0, 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are also not affected by this\u003cbr\u003eissue."
}
],
"value": "Issue summary: Use of -addreject option with the openssl x509 application adds\na trusted use instead of a rejected use for a certificate.\n\nImpact summary: If a user intends to make a trusted certificate rejected for\na particular use it will be instead marked as trusted for that use.\n\nA copy \u0026 paste error during minor refactoring of the code introduced this\nissue in the OpenSSL 3.5 version. If, for example, a trusted CA certificate\nshould be trusted only for the purpose of authenticating TLS servers but not\nfor CMS signature verification and the CMS signature verification is intended\nto be marked as rejected with the -addreject option, the resulting CA\ncertificate will be trusted for CMS signature verification purpose instead.\n\nOnly users which use the trusted certificate format who use the openssl x509\ncommand line application to add rejected uses are affected by this issue.\nThe issues affecting only the command line application are considered to\nbe Low severity.\n\nThe FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this\nissue.\n\nOpenSSL 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1, 3.0, 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are also not affected by this\nissue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "Low"
},
"type": "https://openssl-library.org/policies/general/security-policy/"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-22T13:36:49.694Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20250522.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.5.1 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/e96d22446e633d117e6c9904cb15b4693e956eaa"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "The x509 application adds trusted use instead of rejected use",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-4575",
"datePublished": "2025-05-22T13:36:49.694Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-05-12T12:08:11.215Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-22T16:03:42.330Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-12797 (GCVE-0-2024-12797)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-02-11 15:59 – Updated: 2025-02-18 14:01
VLAI?
Summary
Issue summary: Clients using RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) to authenticate a
server may fail to notice that the server was not authenticated, because
handshakes don't abort as expected when the SSL_VERIFY_PEER verification mode
is set.
Impact summary: TLS and DTLS connections using raw public keys may be
vulnerable to man-in-middle attacks when server authentication failure is not
detected by clients.
RPKs are disabled by default in both TLS clients and TLS servers. The issue
only arises when TLS clients explicitly enable RPK use by the server, and the
server, likewise, enables sending of an RPK instead of an X.509 certificate
chain. The affected clients are those that then rely on the handshake to
fail when the server's RPK fails to match one of the expected public keys,
by setting the verification mode to SSL_VERIFY_PEER.
Clients that enable server-side raw public keys can still find out that raw
public key verification failed by calling SSL_get_verify_result(), and those
that do, and take appropriate action, are not affected. This issue was
introduced in the initial implementation of RPK support in OpenSSL 3.2.
The FIPS modules in 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- CWE-392 - Missing Report of Error Condition
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Credits
Apple Inc.
Viktor Dukhovni
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-15T00:10:32.191Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/11/3"
},
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/11/4"
},
{
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20250214-0001/"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-12797",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-02-14T20:24:14.595864Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-18T14:01:55.140Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.4.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.3.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.3.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.2.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Apple Inc."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Viktor Dukhovni"
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-02-11T14:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Issue summary: Clients using RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) to authenticate a\u003cbr\u003eserver may fail to notice that the server was not authenticated, because\u003cbr\u003ehandshakes don\u0027t abort as expected when the SSL_VERIFY_PEER verification mode\u003cbr\u003eis set.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: TLS and DTLS connections using raw public keys may be\u003cbr\u003evulnerable to man-in-middle attacks when server authentication failure is not\u003cbr\u003edetected by clients.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eRPKs are disabled by default in both TLS clients and TLS servers. The issue\u003cbr\u003eonly arises when TLS clients explicitly enable RPK use by the server, and the\u003cbr\u003eserver, likewise, enables sending of an RPK instead of an X.509 certificate\u003cbr\u003echain. The affected clients are those that then rely on the handshake to\u003cbr\u003efail when the server\u0027s RPK fails to match one of the expected public keys,\u003cbr\u003eby setting the verification mode to SSL_VERIFY_PEER.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eClients that enable server-side raw public keys can still find out that raw\u003cbr\u003epublic key verification failed by calling SSL_get_verify_result(), and those\u003cbr\u003ethat do, and take appropriate action, are not affected. This issue was\u003cbr\u003eintroduced in the initial implementation of RPK support in OpenSSL 3.2.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe FIPS modules in 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue."
}
],
"value": "Issue summary: Clients using RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) to authenticate a\nserver may fail to notice that the server was not authenticated, because\nhandshakes don\u0027t abort as expected when the SSL_VERIFY_PEER verification mode\nis set.\n\nImpact summary: TLS and DTLS connections using raw public keys may be\nvulnerable to man-in-middle attacks when server authentication failure is not\ndetected by clients.\n\nRPKs are disabled by default in both TLS clients and TLS servers. The issue\nonly arises when TLS clients explicitly enable RPK use by the server, and the\nserver, likewise, enables sending of an RPK instead of an X.509 certificate\nchain. The affected clients are those that then rely on the handshake to\nfail when the server\u0027s RPK fails to match one of the expected public keys,\nby setting the verification mode to SSL_VERIFY_PEER.\n\nClients that enable server-side raw public keys can still find out that raw\npublic key verification failed by calling SSL_get_verify_result(), and those\nthat do, and take appropriate action, are not affected. This issue was\nintroduced in the initial implementation of RPK support in OpenSSL 3.2.\n\nThe FIPS modules in 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "High"
},
"type": "https://openssl-library.org/policies/general/security-policy/"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-392",
"description": "CWE-392 Missing Report of Error Condition",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-11T15:59:36.719Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20250211.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.4.1 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/738d4f9fdeaad57660dcba50a619fafced3fd5e9"
},
{
"name": "3.3.3 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/87ebd203feffcf92ad5889df92f90bb0ee10a699"
},
{
"name": "3.2.4 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/798779d43494549b611233f92652f0da5328fbe7"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "RFC7250 handshakes with unauthenticated servers don\u0027t abort as expected",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-12797",
"datePublished": "2025-02-11T15:59:36.719Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-12-19T13:54:37.212Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-18T14:01:55.140Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-13176 (GCVE-0-2024-13176)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-01-20 13:29 – Updated: 2025-11-03 19:29
VLAI?
Summary
Issue summary: A timing side-channel which could potentially allow recovering
the private key exists in the ECDSA signature computation.
Impact summary: A timing side-channel in ECDSA signature computations
could allow recovering the private key by an attacker. However, measuring
the timing would require either local access to the signing application or
a very fast network connection with low latency.
There is a timing signal of around 300 nanoseconds when the top word of
the inverted ECDSA nonce value is zero. This can happen with significant
probability only for some of the supported elliptic curves. In particular
the NIST P-521 curve is affected. To be able to measure this leak, the attacker
process must either be located in the same physical computer or must
have a very fast network connection with low latency. For that reason
the severity of this vulnerability is Low.
The FIPS modules in 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are affected by this issue.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- CWE-385 - Covert Timing Channel
Assigner
References
| URL | Tags | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impacted products
Credits
George Pantelakis (Red Hat)
Alicja Kario (Red Hat)
Tomáš Mráz
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T19:29:14.570Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/01/20/2"
},
{
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20250124-0005/"
},
{
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20250418-0010/"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/05/msg00028.html"
},
{
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20250502-0006/"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "PHYSICAL",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 4.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-13176",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-01-27T20:21:21.345629Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-01-27T20:25:45.572Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.4.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.3.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.3.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.2.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.1.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.0.16",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.1.1zb",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.1.1",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.0.2zl",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.2",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "George Pantelakis (Red Hat)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "Alicja Kario (Red Hat)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "Tom\u00e1\u0161 Mr\u00e1z"
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-01-20T14:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Issue summary: A timing side-channel which could potentially allow recovering\u003cbr\u003ethe private key exists in the ECDSA signature computation.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: A timing side-channel in ECDSA signature computations\u003cbr\u003ecould allow recovering the private key by an attacker. However, measuring\u003cbr\u003ethe timing would require either local access to the signing application or\u003cbr\u003ea very fast network connection with low latency.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThere is a timing signal of around 300 nanoseconds when the top word of\u003cbr\u003ethe inverted ECDSA nonce value is zero. This can happen with significant\u003cbr\u003eprobability only for some of the supported elliptic curves. In particular\u003cbr\u003ethe NIST P-521 curve is affected. To be able to measure this leak, the attacker\u003cbr\u003eprocess must either be located in the same physical computer or must\u003cbr\u003ehave a very fast network connection with low latency. For that reason\u003cbr\u003ethe severity of this vulnerability is Low.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe FIPS modules in 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are affected by this issue."
}
],
"value": "Issue summary: A timing side-channel which could potentially allow recovering\nthe private key exists in the ECDSA signature computation.\n\nImpact summary: A timing side-channel in ECDSA signature computations\ncould allow recovering the private key by an attacker. However, measuring\nthe timing would require either local access to the signing application or\na very fast network connection with low latency.\n\nThere is a timing signal of around 300 nanoseconds when the top word of\nthe inverted ECDSA nonce value is zero. This can happen with significant\nprobability only for some of the supported elliptic curves. In particular\nthe NIST P-521 curve is affected. To be able to measure this leak, the attacker\nprocess must either be located in the same physical computer or must\nhave a very fast network connection with low latency. For that reason\nthe severity of this vulnerability is Low.\n\nThe FIPS modules in 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are affected by this issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "Low"
},
"type": "https://openssl-library.org/policies/general/security-policy/"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-385",
"description": "CWE-385 Covert Timing Channel",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-18T07:51:11.697Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20250120.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.3.4 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/77c608f4c8857e63e98e66444e2e761c9627916f"
},
{
"name": "3.3.3 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/392dcb336405a0c94486aa6655057f59fd3a0902"
},
{
"name": "3.2.4 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4b1cb94a734a7d4ec363ac0a215a25c181e11f65"
},
{
"name": "3.1.8 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/2af62e74fb59bc469506bc37eb2990ea408d9467"
},
{
"name": "3.0.16 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/07272b05b04836a762b4baa874958af51d513844"
},
{
"name": "1.1.1zb git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/a2639000db19878d5d89586ae7b725080592ae86"
},
{
"name": "1.0.2zl git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/0d5fd1ab987f7571e2c955d8d8b638fc0fb54ded"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Timing side-channel in ECDSA signature computation",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-13176",
"datePublished": "2025-01-20T13:29:57.047Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-01-07T09:34:54.572Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T19:29:14.570Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2024-4741 (GCVE-0-2024-4741)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-11-13 10:20 – Updated: 2025-11-04 17:26
VLAI?
Summary
Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_free_buffers may cause
memory to be accessed that was previously freed in some situations
Impact summary: A use after free can have a range of potential consequences such
as the corruption of valid data, crashes or execution of arbitrary code.
However, only applications that directly call the SSL_free_buffers function are
affected by this issue. Applications that do not call this function are not
vulnerable. Our investigations indicate that this function is rarely used by
applications.
The SSL_free_buffers function is used to free the internal OpenSSL buffer used
when processing an incoming record from the network. The call is only expected
to succeed if the buffer is not currently in use. However, two scenarios have
been identified where the buffer is freed even when still in use.
The first scenario occurs where a record header has been received from the
network and processed by OpenSSL, but the full record body has not yet arrived.
In this case calling SSL_free_buffers will succeed even though a record has only
been partially processed and the buffer is still in use.
The second scenario occurs where a full record containing application data has
been received and processed by OpenSSL but the application has only read part of
this data. Again a call to SSL_free_buffers will succeed even though the buffer
is still in use.
While these scenarios could occur accidentally during normal operation a
malicious attacker could attempt to engineer a stituation where this occurs.
We are not aware of this issue being actively exploited.
The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- CWE-416 - Use After Free
Assigner
References
| URL | Tags | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Impacted products
Credits
William Ahern (Akamai)
Matt Caswell
Watson Ladd (Akamai)
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "openssl",
"vendor": "openssl",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.1.1y",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.1.1",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.0.14",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.1.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.2.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.3.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.3.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-4741",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-11-13T14:45:07.092438Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-11-13T14:49:05.977Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-04T17:26:59.261Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/11/msg00000.html"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/10/msg00033.html"
},
{
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240621-0004/"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.3.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.3.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.2.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.1.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.0.14",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.1.1y",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.1.1",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "William Ahern (Akamai)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Matt Caswell"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Watson Ladd (Akamai)"
}
],
"datePublic": "2024-05-27T23:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_free_buffers may cause\u003cbr\u003ememory to be accessed that was previously freed in some situations\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: A use after free can have a range of potential consequences such\u003cbr\u003eas the corruption of valid data, crashes or execution of arbitrary code.\u003cbr\u003eHowever, only applications that directly call the SSL_free_buffers function are\u003cbr\u003eaffected by this issue. Applications that do not call this function are not\u003cbr\u003evulnerable. Our investigations indicate that this function is rarely used by\u003cbr\u003eapplications.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe SSL_free_buffers function is used to free the internal OpenSSL buffer used\u003cbr\u003ewhen processing an incoming record from the network. The call is only expected\u003cbr\u003eto succeed if the buffer is not currently in use. However, two scenarios have\u003cbr\u003ebeen identified where the buffer is freed even when still in use.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe first scenario occurs where a record header has been received from the\u003cbr\u003enetwork and processed by OpenSSL, but the full record body has not yet arrived.\u003cbr\u003eIn this case calling SSL_free_buffers will succeed even though a record has only\u003cbr\u003ebeen partially processed and the buffer is still in use.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe second scenario occurs where a full record containing application data has\u003cbr\u003ebeen received and processed by OpenSSL but the application has only read part of\u003cbr\u003ethis data. Again a call to SSL_free_buffers will succeed even though the buffer\u003cbr\u003eis still in use.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eWhile these scenarios could occur accidentally during normal operation a\u003cbr\u003emalicious attacker could attempt to engineer a stituation where this occurs.\u003cbr\u003eWe are not aware of this issue being actively exploited.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue."
}
],
"value": "Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_free_buffers may cause\nmemory to be accessed that was previously freed in some situations\n\nImpact summary: A use after free can have a range of potential consequences such\nas the corruption of valid data, crashes or execution of arbitrary code.\nHowever, only applications that directly call the SSL_free_buffers function are\naffected by this issue. Applications that do not call this function are not\nvulnerable. Our investigations indicate that this function is rarely used by\napplications.\n\nThe SSL_free_buffers function is used to free the internal OpenSSL buffer used\nwhen processing an incoming record from the network. The call is only expected\nto succeed if the buffer is not currently in use. However, two scenarios have\nbeen identified where the buffer is freed even when still in use.\n\nThe first scenario occurs where a record header has been received from the\nnetwork and processed by OpenSSL, but the full record body has not yet arrived.\nIn this case calling SSL_free_buffers will succeed even though a record has only\nbeen partially processed and the buffer is still in use.\n\nThe second scenario occurs where a full record containing application data has\nbeen received and processed by OpenSSL but the application has only read part of\nthis data. Again a call to SSL_free_buffers will succeed even though the buffer\nis still in use.\n\nWhile these scenarios could occur accidentally during normal operation a\nmalicious attacker could attempt to engineer a stituation where this occurs.\nWe are not aware of this issue being actively exploited.\n\nThe FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "Low"
},
"type": "https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-416",
"description": "CWE-416 Use After Free",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-11-13T10:20:50.711Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20240528.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.3.1 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/e5093133c35ca82874ad83697af76f4b0f7e3bd8"
},
{
"name": "3.2.2 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/c88c3de51020c37e8706bf7a682a162593053aac"
},
{
"name": "3.1.6 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/704f725b96aa373ee45ecfb23f6abfe8be8d9177"
},
{
"name": "3.0.14 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/b3f0eb0a295f58f16ba43ba99dad70d4ee5c437d"
},
{
"name": "1.1.1y git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/f7a045f3143fc6da2ee66bf52d8df04829590dd4"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Use After Free with SSL_free_buffers",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-4741",
"datePublished": "2024-11-13T10:20:50.711Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-05-10T09:56:11.310Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-04T17:26:59.261Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2024-9143 (GCVE-0-2024-9143)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-10-16 17:09 – Updated: 2025-11-03 22:33
VLAI?
Summary
Issue summary: Use of the low-level GF(2^m) elliptic curve APIs with untrusted
explicit values for the field polynomial can lead to out-of-bounds memory reads
or writes.
Impact summary: Out of bound memory writes can lead to an application crash or
even a possibility of a remote code execution, however, in all the protocols
involving Elliptic Curve Cryptography that we're aware of, either only "named
curves" are supported, or, if explicit curve parameters are supported, they
specify an X9.62 encoding of binary (GF(2^m)) curves that can't represent
problematic input values. Thus the likelihood of existence of a vulnerable
application is low.
In particular, the X9.62 encoding is used for ECC keys in X.509 certificates,
so problematic inputs cannot occur in the context of processing X.509
certificates. Any problematic use-cases would have to be using an "exotic"
curve encoding.
The affected APIs include: EC_GROUP_new_curve_GF2m(), EC_GROUP_new_from_params(),
and various supporting BN_GF2m_*() functions.
Applications working with "exotic" explicit binary (GF(2^m)) curve parameters,
that make it possible to represent invalid field polynomials with a zero
constant term, via the above or similar APIs, may terminate abruptly as a
result of reading or writing outside of array bounds. Remote code execution
cannot easily be ruled out.
The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
Assigner
References
| URL | Tags | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Impacted products
Credits
Google OSS-Fuzz-Gen
Viktor Dukhovni
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-9143",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-10-16T19:45:11.544020Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-11-08T15:30:04.030Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T22:33:18.178Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/10/16/1"
},
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/10/23/1"
},
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/10/24/1"
},
{
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20241101-0001/"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/11/msg00000.html"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/10/msg00033.html"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.3.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.3.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.2.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.1.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.0.16",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.1.1zb",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.1.1",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.0.2zl",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.2",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Google OSS-Fuzz-Gen"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Viktor Dukhovni"
}
],
"datePublic": "2024-10-16T14:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Issue summary: Use of the low-level GF(2^m) elliptic curve APIs with untrusted\u003cbr\u003eexplicit values for the field polynomial can lead to out-of-bounds memory reads\u003cbr\u003eor writes.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: Out of bound memory writes can lead to an application crash or\u003cbr\u003eeven a possibility of a remote code execution, however, in all the protocols\u003cbr\u003einvolving Elliptic Curve Cryptography that we\u0027re aware of, either only \"named\u003cbr\u003ecurves\" are supported, or, if explicit curve parameters are supported, they\u003cbr\u003especify an X9.62 encoding of binary (GF(2^m)) curves that can\u0027t represent\u003cbr\u003eproblematic input values. Thus the likelihood of existence of a vulnerable\u003cbr\u003eapplication is low.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eIn particular, the X9.62 encoding is used for ECC keys in X.509 certificates,\u003cbr\u003eso problematic inputs cannot occur in the context of processing X.509\u003cbr\u003ecertificates. Any problematic use-cases would have to be using an \"exotic\"\u003cbr\u003ecurve encoding.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe affected APIs include: EC_GROUP_new_curve_GF2m(), EC_GROUP_new_from_params(),\u003cbr\u003eand various supporting BN_GF2m_*() functions.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eApplications working with \"exotic\" explicit binary (GF(2^m)) curve parameters,\u003cbr\u003ethat make it possible to represent invalid field polynomials with a zero\u003cbr\u003econstant term, via the above or similar APIs, may terminate abruptly as a\u003cbr\u003eresult of reading or writing outside of array bounds. Remote code execution\u003cbr\u003ecannot easily be ruled out.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue."
}
],
"value": "Issue summary: Use of the low-level GF(2^m) elliptic curve APIs with untrusted\nexplicit values for the field polynomial can lead to out-of-bounds memory reads\nor writes.\n\nImpact summary: Out of bound memory writes can lead to an application crash or\neven a possibility of a remote code execution, however, in all the protocols\ninvolving Elliptic Curve Cryptography that we\u0027re aware of, either only \"named\ncurves\" are supported, or, if explicit curve parameters are supported, they\nspecify an X9.62 encoding of binary (GF(2^m)) curves that can\u0027t represent\nproblematic input values. Thus the likelihood of existence of a vulnerable\napplication is low.\n\nIn particular, the X9.62 encoding is used for ECC keys in X.509 certificates,\nso problematic inputs cannot occur in the context of processing X.509\ncertificates. Any problematic use-cases would have to be using an \"exotic\"\ncurve encoding.\n\nThe affected APIs include: EC_GROUP_new_curve_GF2m(), EC_GROUP_new_from_params(),\nand various supporting BN_GF2m_*() functions.\n\nApplications working with \"exotic\" explicit binary (GF(2^m)) curve parameters,\nthat make it possible to represent invalid field polynomials with a zero\nconstant term, via the above or similar APIs, may terminate abruptly as a\nresult of reading or writing outside of array bounds. Remote code execution\ncannot easily be ruled out.\n\nThe FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "Low"
},
"type": "https://openssl-library.org/policies/general/security-policy/"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-125",
"description": "CWE-125 Out-of-bounds Read",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
},
{
"cweId": "CWE-787",
"description": "CWE-787 Out-of-bounds Write",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-01T08:29:10.392Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20241016.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.3.3 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/c0d3e4d32d2805f49bec30547f225bc4d092e1f4"
},
{
"name": "3.2.4 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/bc7e04d7c8d509fb78fc0e285aa948fb0da04700"
},
{
"name": "3.1.8 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/fdf6723362ca51bd883295efe206cb5b1cfa5154"
},
{
"name": "3.0.16 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/72ae83ad214d2eef262461365a1975707f862712"
},
{
"name": "1.1.1zb git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/8efc0cbaa8ebba8e116f7b81a876a4123594d86a"
},
{
"name": "1.0.2zl git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/9d576994cec2b7aa37a91740ea7e680810957e41"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Low-level invalid GF(2^m) parameters lead to OOB memory access",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-9143",
"datePublished": "2024-10-16T17:09:23.844Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-09-24T08:37:04.834Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T22:33:18.178Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2024-6119 (GCVE-0-2024-6119)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-09-03 15:58 – Updated: 2024-09-12 16:03
VLAI?
Summary
Issue summary: Applications performing certificate name checks (e.g., TLS
clients checking server certificates) may attempt to read an invalid memory
address resulting in abnormal termination of the application process.
Impact summary: Abnormal termination of an application can a cause a denial of
service.
Applications performing certificate name checks (e.g., TLS clients checking
server certificates) may attempt to read an invalid memory address when
comparing the expected name with an `otherName` subject alternative name of an
X.509 certificate. This may result in an exception that terminates the
application program.
Note that basic certificate chain validation (signatures, dates, ...) is not
affected, the denial of service can occur only when the application also
specifies an expected DNS name, Email address or IP address.
TLS servers rarely solicit client certificates, and even when they do, they
generally don't perform a name check against a reference identifier (expected
identity), but rather extract the presented identity after checking the
certificate chain. So TLS servers are generally not affected and the severity
of the issue is Moderate.
The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- CWE-843 - Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion')
Assigner
References
| URL | Tags | |
|---|---|---|
Impacted products
Credits
David Benjamin (Google)
Viktor Dukhovni
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-12T16:03:01.704Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/09/03/4"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-security/2024-September/000303.html"
},
{
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240912-0001/"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "openssl",
"vendor": "openssl",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.3.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.3.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.2.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.1.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.0.15",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-6119",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-03T20:20:39.935362Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-03T20:25:47.056Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.3.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.3.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.2.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.1.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.0.15",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "David Benjamin (Google)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Viktor Dukhovni"
}
],
"datePublic": "2024-09-03T14:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Issue summary: Applications performing certificate name checks (e.g., TLS\u003cbr\u003eclients checking server certificates) may attempt to read an invalid memory\u003cbr\u003eaddress resulting in abnormal termination of the application process.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: Abnormal termination of an application can a cause a denial of\u003cbr\u003eservice.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eApplications performing certificate name checks (e.g., TLS clients checking\u003cbr\u003eserver certificates) may attempt to read an invalid memory address when\u003cbr\u003ecomparing the expected name with an `otherName` subject alternative name of an\u003cbr\u003eX.509 certificate. This may result in an exception that terminates the\u003cbr\u003eapplication program.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eNote that basic certificate chain validation (signatures, dates, ...) is not\u003cbr\u003eaffected, the denial of service can occur only when the application also\u003cbr\u003especifies an expected DNS name, Email address or IP address.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eTLS servers rarely solicit client certificates, and even when they do, they\u003cbr\u003egenerally don\u0027t perform a name check against a reference identifier (expected\u003cbr\u003eidentity), but rather extract the presented identity after checking the\u003cbr\u003ecertificate chain. So TLS servers are generally not affected and the severity\u003cbr\u003eof the issue is Moderate.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue."
}
],
"value": "Issue summary: Applications performing certificate name checks (e.g., TLS\nclients checking server certificates) may attempt to read an invalid memory\naddress resulting in abnormal termination of the application process.\n\nImpact summary: Abnormal termination of an application can a cause a denial of\nservice.\n\nApplications performing certificate name checks (e.g., TLS clients checking\nserver certificates) may attempt to read an invalid memory address when\ncomparing the expected name with an `otherName` subject alternative name of an\nX.509 certificate. This may result in an exception that terminates the\napplication program.\n\nNote that basic certificate chain validation (signatures, dates, ...) is not\naffected, the denial of service can occur only when the application also\nspecifies an expected DNS name, Email address or IP address.\n\nTLS servers rarely solicit client certificates, and even when they do, they\ngenerally don\u0027t perform a name check against a reference identifier (expected\nidentity), but rather extract the presented identity after checking the\ncertificate chain. So TLS servers are generally not affected and the severity\nof the issue is Moderate.\n\nThe FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "Moderate"
},
"type": "https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-843",
"description": "CWE-843 Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type (\u0027Type Confusion\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-03T15:58:06.970Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20240903.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.3.2 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/7dfcee2cd2a63b2c64b9b4b0850be64cb695b0a0"
},
{
"name": "3.2.3 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/05f360d9e849a1b277db628f1f13083a7f8dd04f"
},
{
"name": "3.1.7 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/621f3729831b05ee828a3203eddb621d014ff2b2"
},
{
"name": "3.0.15 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/06d1dc3fa96a2ba5a3e22735a033012aadc9f0d6"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Possible denial of service in X.509 name checks",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-6119",
"datePublished": "2024-09-03T15:58:06.970Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-06-18T09:24:11.739Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-12T16:03:01.704Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-9232 (GCVE-0-2025-9232)
Vulnerability from nvd – Published: 2025-09-30 13:17 – Updated: 2025-11-04 21:15
VLAI?
Summary
Issue summary: An application using the OpenSSL HTTP client API functions may
trigger an out-of-bounds read if the 'no_proxy' environment variable is set and
the host portion of the authority component of the HTTP URL is an IPv6 address.
Impact summary: An out-of-bounds read can trigger a crash which leads to
Denial of Service for an application.
The OpenSSL HTTP client API functions can be used directly by applications
but they are also used by the OCSP client functions and CMP (Certificate
Management Protocol) client implementation in OpenSSL. However the URLs used
by these implementations are unlikely to be controlled by an attacker.
In this vulnerable code the out of bounds read can only trigger a crash.
Furthermore the vulnerability requires an attacker-controlled URL to be
passed from an application to the OpenSSL function and the user has to have
a 'no_proxy' environment variable set. For the aforementioned reasons the
issue was assessed as Low severity.
The vulnerable code was introduced in the following patch releases:
3.0.16, 3.1.8, 3.2.4, 3.3.3, 3.4.0 and 3.5.0.
The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this
issue, as the HTTP client implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module
boundary.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- CWE-125 - Out-of-bounds Read
Assigner
References
| URL | Tags | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Impacted products
Credits
Stanislav Fort (Aisle Research)
Stanislav Fort (Aisle Research)
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-9232",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-09-30T19:22:31.407504Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-30T19:22:35.483Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-04T21:15:19.948Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/09/30/5"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.5.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.5.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.4.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.3.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.3.3",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.2.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.4",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.0.18",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.16",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Stanislav Fort (Aisle Research)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Stanislav Fort (Aisle Research)"
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-09-30T14:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Issue summary: An application using the OpenSSL HTTP client API functions may\u003cbr\u003etrigger an out-of-bounds read if the \u0027no_proxy\u0027 environment variable is set and\u003cbr\u003ethe host portion of the authority component of the HTTP URL is an IPv6 address.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: An out-of-bounds read can trigger a crash which leads to\u003cbr\u003eDenial of Service for an application.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe OpenSSL HTTP client API functions can be used directly by applications\u003cbr\u003ebut they are also used by the OCSP client functions and CMP (Certificate\u003cbr\u003eManagement Protocol) client implementation in OpenSSL. However the URLs used\u003cbr\u003eby these implementations are unlikely to be controlled by an attacker.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eIn this vulnerable code the out of bounds read can only trigger a crash.\u003cbr\u003eFurthermore the vulnerability requires an attacker-controlled URL to be\u003cbr\u003epassed from an application to the OpenSSL function and the user has to have\u003cbr\u003ea \u0027no_proxy\u0027 environment variable set. For the aforementioned reasons the\u003cbr\u003eissue was assessed as Low severity.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe vulnerable code was introduced in the following patch releases:\u003cbr\u003e3.0.16, 3.1.8, 3.2.4, 3.3.3, 3.4.0 and 3.5.0.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this\u003cbr\u003eissue, as the HTTP client implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module\u003cbr\u003eboundary."
}
],
"value": "Issue summary: An application using the OpenSSL HTTP client API functions may\ntrigger an out-of-bounds read if the \u0027no_proxy\u0027 environment variable is set and\nthe host portion of the authority component of the HTTP URL is an IPv6 address.\n\nImpact summary: An out-of-bounds read can trigger a crash which leads to\nDenial of Service for an application.\n\nThe OpenSSL HTTP client API functions can be used directly by applications\nbut they are also used by the OCSP client functions and CMP (Certificate\nManagement Protocol) client implementation in OpenSSL. However the URLs used\nby these implementations are unlikely to be controlled by an attacker.\n\nIn this vulnerable code the out of bounds read can only trigger a crash.\nFurthermore the vulnerability requires an attacker-controlled URL to be\npassed from an application to the OpenSSL function and the user has to have\na \u0027no_proxy\u0027 environment variable set. For the aforementioned reasons the\nissue was assessed as Low severity.\n\nThe vulnerable code was introduced in the following patch releases:\n3.0.16, 3.1.8, 3.2.4, 3.3.3, 3.4.0 and 3.5.0.\n\nThe FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this\nissue, as the HTTP client implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module\nboundary."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "Low"
},
"type": "https://openssl-library.org/policies/general/security-policy/"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-125",
"description": "CWE-125 Out-of-bounds Read",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-30T13:17:19.172Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20250930.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.5.4 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/2b4ec20e47959170422922eaff25346d362dcb35"
},
{
"name": "3.4.3 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/7cf21a30513c9e43c4bc3836c237cf086e194af3"
},
{
"name": "3.3.5 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/bbf38c034cdabd0a13330abcc4855c866f53d2e0"
},
{
"name": "3.2.6 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/89e790ac431125a4849992858490bed6b225eadf"
},
{
"name": "3.0.18 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/654dc11d23468a74fc8ea4672b702dd3feb7be4b"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Out-of-bounds read in HTTP client no_proxy handling",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-9232",
"datePublished": "2025-09-30T13:17:19.172Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-08-20T08:38:12.019Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-04T21:15:19.948Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-9231 (GCVE-0-2025-9231)
Vulnerability from nvd – Published: 2025-09-30 13:17 – Updated: 2025-11-04 21:15
VLAI?
Summary
Issue summary: A timing side-channel which could potentially allow remote
recovery of the private key exists in the SM2 algorithm implementation on 64 bit
ARM platforms.
Impact summary: A timing side-channel in SM2 signature computations on 64 bit
ARM platforms could allow recovering the private key by an attacker..
While remote key recovery over a network was not attempted by the reporter,
timing measurements revealed a timing signal which may allow such an attack.
OpenSSL does not directly support certificates with SM2 keys in TLS, and so
this CVE is not relevant in most TLS contexts. However, given that it is
possible to add support for such certificates via a custom provider, coupled
with the fact that in such a custom provider context the private key may be
recoverable via remote timing measurements, we consider this to be a Moderate
severity issue.
The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this
issue, as SM2 is not an approved algorithm.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- CWE-385 - Covert Timing Channel
Assigner
References
| URL | Tags | |
|---|---|---|
Impacted products
Credits
Stanislav Fort (Aisle Research)
Stanislav Fort (Aisle Research)
Tomas Mraz
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-9231",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-09-30T19:27:45.704985Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-30T19:28:28.380Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-04T21:15:18.593Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/09/30/5"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.5.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.5.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.4.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.3.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.3.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.2.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Stanislav Fort (Aisle Research)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Stanislav Fort (Aisle Research)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Tomas Mraz"
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-09-30T14:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Issue summary: A timing side-channel which could potentially allow remote\u003cbr\u003erecovery of the private key exists in the SM2 algorithm implementation on 64 bit\u003cbr\u003eARM platforms.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: A timing side-channel in SM2 signature computations on 64 bit\u003cbr\u003eARM platforms could allow recovering the private key by an attacker..\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eWhile remote key recovery over a network was not attempted by the reporter,\u003cbr\u003etiming measurements revealed a timing signal which may allow such an attack.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eOpenSSL does not directly support certificates with SM2 keys in TLS, and so\u003cbr\u003ethis CVE is not relevant in most TLS contexts. However, given that it is\u003cbr\u003epossible to add support for such certificates via a custom provider, coupled\u003cbr\u003ewith the fact that in such a custom provider context the private key may be\u003cbr\u003erecoverable via remote timing measurements, we consider this to be a Moderate\u003cbr\u003eseverity issue.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this\u003cbr\u003eissue, as SM2 is not an approved algorithm."
}
],
"value": "Issue summary: A timing side-channel which could potentially allow remote\nrecovery of the private key exists in the SM2 algorithm implementation on 64 bit\nARM platforms.\n\nImpact summary: A timing side-channel in SM2 signature computations on 64 bit\nARM platforms could allow recovering the private key by an attacker..\n\nWhile remote key recovery over a network was not attempted by the reporter,\ntiming measurements revealed a timing signal which may allow such an attack.\n\nOpenSSL does not directly support certificates with SM2 keys in TLS, and so\nthis CVE is not relevant in most TLS contexts. However, given that it is\npossible to add support for such certificates via a custom provider, coupled\nwith the fact that in such a custom provider context the private key may be\nrecoverable via remote timing measurements, we consider this to be a Moderate\nseverity issue.\n\nThe FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this\nissue, as SM2 is not an approved algorithm."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "Moderate"
},
"type": "https://openssl-library.org/policies/general/security-policy/"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-385",
"description": "CWE-385 Covert Timing Channel",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-30T13:17:12.007Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20250930.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.5.4 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/fc47a2ec078912b3e914fab5734535e76c4820c2"
},
{
"name": "3.4.3 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/eed5adc9f969d77c94f213767acbb41ff923b6f4"
},
{
"name": "3.3.5 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/567f64386e43683888212226824b6a179885a0fe"
},
{
"name": "3.2.6 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/cba616c26ac8e7b37de5e77762e505ba5ca51698"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Timing side-channel in SM2 algorithm on 64 bit ARM",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-9231",
"datePublished": "2025-09-30T13:17:12.007Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-08-20T08:38:09.832Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-04T21:15:18.593Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-9230 (GCVE-0-2025-9230)
Vulnerability from nvd – Published: 2025-09-30 13:17 – Updated: 2025-11-04 21:15
VLAI?
Summary
Issue summary: An application trying to decrypt CMS messages encrypted using
password based encryption can trigger an out-of-bounds read and write.
Impact summary: This out-of-bounds read may trigger a crash which leads to
Denial of Service for an application. The out-of-bounds write can cause
a memory corruption which can have various consequences including
a Denial of Service or Execution of attacker-supplied code.
Although the consequences of a successful exploit of this vulnerability
could be severe, the probability that the attacker would be able to
perform it is low. Besides, password based (PWRI) encryption support in CMS
messages is very rarely used. For that reason the issue was assessed as
Moderate severity according to our Security Policy.
The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this
issue, as the CMS implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module
boundary.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
Assigner
References
| URL | Tags | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impacted products
Credits
Stanislav Fort (Aisle Research)
Stanislav Fort (Aisle Research)
Viktor Dukhovni
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-9230",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-09-30T19:30:08.302408Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-30T19:30:29.803Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-04T21:15:17.295Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/10/msg00001.html"
},
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/09/30/5"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.5.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.5.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.4.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.3.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.3.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.2.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.0.18",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.1.1zd",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.1.1",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.0.2zm",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.2",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Stanislav Fort (Aisle Research)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Stanislav Fort (Aisle Research)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Viktor Dukhovni"
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-09-30T14:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Issue summary: An application trying to decrypt CMS messages encrypted using\u003cbr\u003epassword based encryption can trigger an out-of-bounds read and write.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: This out-of-bounds read may trigger a crash which leads to\u003cbr\u003eDenial of Service for an application. The out-of-bounds write can cause\u003cbr\u003ea memory corruption which can have various consequences including\u003cbr\u003ea Denial of Service or Execution of attacker-supplied code.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAlthough the consequences of a successful exploit of this vulnerability\u003cbr\u003ecould be severe, the probability that the attacker would be able to\u003cbr\u003eperform it is low. Besides, password based (PWRI) encryption support in CMS\u003cbr\u003emessages is very rarely used. For that reason the issue was assessed as\u003cbr\u003eModerate severity according to our Security Policy.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this\u003cbr\u003eissue, as the CMS implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module\u003cbr\u003eboundary."
}
],
"value": "Issue summary: An application trying to decrypt CMS messages encrypted using\npassword based encryption can trigger an out-of-bounds read and write.\n\nImpact summary: This out-of-bounds read may trigger a crash which leads to\nDenial of Service for an application. The out-of-bounds write can cause\na memory corruption which can have various consequences including\na Denial of Service or Execution of attacker-supplied code.\n\nAlthough the consequences of a successful exploit of this vulnerability\ncould be severe, the probability that the attacker would be able to\nperform it is low. Besides, password based (PWRI) encryption support in CMS\nmessages is very rarely used. For that reason the issue was assessed as\nModerate severity according to our Security Policy.\n\nThe FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this\nissue, as the CMS implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module\nboundary."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "Moderate"
},
"type": "https://openssl-library.org/policies/general/security-policy/"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-125",
"description": "CWE-125 Out-of-bounds Read",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
},
{
"cweId": "CWE-787",
"description": "CWE-787 Out-of-bounds Write",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-30T13:17:00.808Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20250930.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.5.4 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/bae259a211ada6315dc50900686daaaaaa55f482"
},
{
"name": "3.4.3 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/9e91358f365dee6c446dcdcdb01c04d2743fd280"
},
{
"name": "3.3.5 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/5965ea5dd6960f36d8b7f74f8eac67a8eb8f2b45"
},
{
"name": "3.2.6 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/b5282d677551afda7d20e9c00e09561b547b2dfd"
},
{
"name": "3.0.18 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a79c4ce559c6a3a8fd4109e9f33c1185d5bf2def"
},
{
"name": "1.1.1zd git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/dfbaf161d8dafc1132dd88cd48ad990ed9b4c8ba"
},
{
"name": "1.0.2zm git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/c2b96348bfa662f25f4fabf81958ae822063dae3"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Out-of-bounds read \u0026 write in RFC 3211 KEK Unwrap",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-9230",
"datePublished": "2025-09-30T13:17:00.808Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-08-20T08:38:07.678Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-04T21:15:17.295Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-4575 (GCVE-0-2025-4575)
Vulnerability from nvd – Published: 2025-05-22 13:36 – Updated: 2025-05-22 16:03
VLAI?
Summary
Issue summary: Use of -addreject option with the openssl x509 application adds
a trusted use instead of a rejected use for a certificate.
Impact summary: If a user intends to make a trusted certificate rejected for
a particular use it will be instead marked as trusted for that use.
A copy & paste error during minor refactoring of the code introduced this
issue in the OpenSSL 3.5 version. If, for example, a trusted CA certificate
should be trusted only for the purpose of authenticating TLS servers but not
for CMS signature verification and the CMS signature verification is intended
to be marked as rejected with the -addreject option, the resulting CA
certificate will be trusted for CMS signature verification purpose instead.
Only users which use the trusted certificate format who use the openssl x509
command line application to add rejected uses are affected by this issue.
The issues affecting only the command line application are considered to
be Low severity.
The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this
issue.
OpenSSL 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1, 3.0, 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are also not affected by this
issue.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
Assigner
References
| URL | Tags | |
|---|---|---|
Credits
Alexandr Sosedkin (Red Hat)
Tomáš Mráz
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-4575",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-05-22T14:30:40.495897Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-22T14:32:40.965Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-22T16:03:42.330Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/05/22/1"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.5.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.5.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Alexandr Sosedkin (Red Hat)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Tom\u00e1\u0161 Mr\u00e1z"
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-05-22T14:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Issue summary: Use of -addreject option with the openssl x509 application adds\u003cbr\u003ea trusted use instead of a rejected use for a certificate.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: If a user intends to make a trusted certificate rejected for\u003cbr\u003ea particular use it will be instead marked as trusted for that use.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eA copy \u0026 paste error during minor refactoring of the code introduced this\u003cbr\u003eissue in the OpenSSL 3.5 version. If, for example, a trusted CA certificate\u003cbr\u003eshould be trusted only for the purpose of authenticating TLS servers but not\u003cbr\u003efor CMS signature verification and the CMS signature verification is intended\u003cbr\u003eto be marked as rejected with the -addreject option, the resulting CA\u003cbr\u003ecertificate will be trusted for CMS signature verification purpose instead.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eOnly users which use the trusted certificate format who use the openssl x509\u003cbr\u003ecommand line application to add rejected uses are affected by this issue.\u003cbr\u003eThe issues affecting only the command line application are considered to\u003cbr\u003ebe Low severity.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this\u003cbr\u003eissue.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eOpenSSL 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1, 3.0, 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are also not affected by this\u003cbr\u003eissue."
}
],
"value": "Issue summary: Use of -addreject option with the openssl x509 application adds\na trusted use instead of a rejected use for a certificate.\n\nImpact summary: If a user intends to make a trusted certificate rejected for\na particular use it will be instead marked as trusted for that use.\n\nA copy \u0026 paste error during minor refactoring of the code introduced this\nissue in the OpenSSL 3.5 version. If, for example, a trusted CA certificate\nshould be trusted only for the purpose of authenticating TLS servers but not\nfor CMS signature verification and the CMS signature verification is intended\nto be marked as rejected with the -addreject option, the resulting CA\ncertificate will be trusted for CMS signature verification purpose instead.\n\nOnly users which use the trusted certificate format who use the openssl x509\ncommand line application to add rejected uses are affected by this issue.\nThe issues affecting only the command line application are considered to\nbe Low severity.\n\nThe FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this\nissue.\n\nOpenSSL 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1, 3.0, 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are also not affected by this\nissue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "Low"
},
"type": "https://openssl-library.org/policies/general/security-policy/"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-22T13:36:49.694Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20250522.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.5.1 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/e96d22446e633d117e6c9904cb15b4693e956eaa"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "The x509 application adds trusted use instead of rejected use",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-4575",
"datePublished": "2025-05-22T13:36:49.694Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-05-12T12:08:11.215Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-22T16:03:42.330Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-12797 (GCVE-0-2024-12797)
Vulnerability from nvd – Published: 2025-02-11 15:59 – Updated: 2025-02-18 14:01
VLAI?
Summary
Issue summary: Clients using RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) to authenticate a
server may fail to notice that the server was not authenticated, because
handshakes don't abort as expected when the SSL_VERIFY_PEER verification mode
is set.
Impact summary: TLS and DTLS connections using raw public keys may be
vulnerable to man-in-middle attacks when server authentication failure is not
detected by clients.
RPKs are disabled by default in both TLS clients and TLS servers. The issue
only arises when TLS clients explicitly enable RPK use by the server, and the
server, likewise, enables sending of an RPK instead of an X.509 certificate
chain. The affected clients are those that then rely on the handshake to
fail when the server's RPK fails to match one of the expected public keys,
by setting the verification mode to SSL_VERIFY_PEER.
Clients that enable server-side raw public keys can still find out that raw
public key verification failed by calling SSL_get_verify_result(), and those
that do, and take appropriate action, are not affected. This issue was
introduced in the initial implementation of RPK support in OpenSSL 3.2.
The FIPS modules in 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- CWE-392 - Missing Report of Error Condition
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Credits
Apple Inc.
Viktor Dukhovni
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-15T00:10:32.191Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/11/3"
},
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/11/4"
},
{
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20250214-0001/"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-12797",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-02-14T20:24:14.595864Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-18T14:01:55.140Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.4.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.3.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.3.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.2.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Apple Inc."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Viktor Dukhovni"
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-02-11T14:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Issue summary: Clients using RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) to authenticate a\u003cbr\u003eserver may fail to notice that the server was not authenticated, because\u003cbr\u003ehandshakes don\u0027t abort as expected when the SSL_VERIFY_PEER verification mode\u003cbr\u003eis set.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: TLS and DTLS connections using raw public keys may be\u003cbr\u003evulnerable to man-in-middle attacks when server authentication failure is not\u003cbr\u003edetected by clients.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eRPKs are disabled by default in both TLS clients and TLS servers. The issue\u003cbr\u003eonly arises when TLS clients explicitly enable RPK use by the server, and the\u003cbr\u003eserver, likewise, enables sending of an RPK instead of an X.509 certificate\u003cbr\u003echain. The affected clients are those that then rely on the handshake to\u003cbr\u003efail when the server\u0027s RPK fails to match one of the expected public keys,\u003cbr\u003eby setting the verification mode to SSL_VERIFY_PEER.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eClients that enable server-side raw public keys can still find out that raw\u003cbr\u003epublic key verification failed by calling SSL_get_verify_result(), and those\u003cbr\u003ethat do, and take appropriate action, are not affected. This issue was\u003cbr\u003eintroduced in the initial implementation of RPK support in OpenSSL 3.2.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe FIPS modules in 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue."
}
],
"value": "Issue summary: Clients using RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) to authenticate a\nserver may fail to notice that the server was not authenticated, because\nhandshakes don\u0027t abort as expected when the SSL_VERIFY_PEER verification mode\nis set.\n\nImpact summary: TLS and DTLS connections using raw public keys may be\nvulnerable to man-in-middle attacks when server authentication failure is not\ndetected by clients.\n\nRPKs are disabled by default in both TLS clients and TLS servers. The issue\nonly arises when TLS clients explicitly enable RPK use by the server, and the\nserver, likewise, enables sending of an RPK instead of an X.509 certificate\nchain. The affected clients are those that then rely on the handshake to\nfail when the server\u0027s RPK fails to match one of the expected public keys,\nby setting the verification mode to SSL_VERIFY_PEER.\n\nClients that enable server-side raw public keys can still find out that raw\npublic key verification failed by calling SSL_get_verify_result(), and those\nthat do, and take appropriate action, are not affected. This issue was\nintroduced in the initial implementation of RPK support in OpenSSL 3.2.\n\nThe FIPS modules in 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "High"
},
"type": "https://openssl-library.org/policies/general/security-policy/"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-392",
"description": "CWE-392 Missing Report of Error Condition",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-11T15:59:36.719Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20250211.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.4.1 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/738d4f9fdeaad57660dcba50a619fafced3fd5e9"
},
{
"name": "3.3.3 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/87ebd203feffcf92ad5889df92f90bb0ee10a699"
},
{
"name": "3.2.4 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/798779d43494549b611233f92652f0da5328fbe7"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "RFC7250 handshakes with unauthenticated servers don\u0027t abort as expected",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-12797",
"datePublished": "2025-02-11T15:59:36.719Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-12-19T13:54:37.212Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-18T14:01:55.140Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-13176 (GCVE-0-2024-13176)
Vulnerability from nvd – Published: 2025-01-20 13:29 – Updated: 2025-11-03 19:29
VLAI?
Summary
Issue summary: A timing side-channel which could potentially allow recovering
the private key exists in the ECDSA signature computation.
Impact summary: A timing side-channel in ECDSA signature computations
could allow recovering the private key by an attacker. However, measuring
the timing would require either local access to the signing application or
a very fast network connection with low latency.
There is a timing signal of around 300 nanoseconds when the top word of
the inverted ECDSA nonce value is zero. This can happen with significant
probability only for some of the supported elliptic curves. In particular
the NIST P-521 curve is affected. To be able to measure this leak, the attacker
process must either be located in the same physical computer or must
have a very fast network connection with low latency. For that reason
the severity of this vulnerability is Low.
The FIPS modules in 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are affected by this issue.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- CWE-385 - Covert Timing Channel
Assigner
References
| URL | Tags | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impacted products
Credits
George Pantelakis (Red Hat)
Alicja Kario (Red Hat)
Tomáš Mráz
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T19:29:14.570Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/01/20/2"
},
{
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20250124-0005/"
},
{
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20250418-0010/"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/05/msg00028.html"
},
{
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20250502-0006/"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "PHYSICAL",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 4.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-13176",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-01-27T20:21:21.345629Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-01-27T20:25:45.572Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.4.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.3.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.3.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.2.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.1.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.0.16",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.1.1zb",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.1.1",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.0.2zl",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.2",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "George Pantelakis (Red Hat)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "Alicja Kario (Red Hat)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "Tom\u00e1\u0161 Mr\u00e1z"
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-01-20T14:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Issue summary: A timing side-channel which could potentially allow recovering\u003cbr\u003ethe private key exists in the ECDSA signature computation.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: A timing side-channel in ECDSA signature computations\u003cbr\u003ecould allow recovering the private key by an attacker. However, measuring\u003cbr\u003ethe timing would require either local access to the signing application or\u003cbr\u003ea very fast network connection with low latency.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThere is a timing signal of around 300 nanoseconds when the top word of\u003cbr\u003ethe inverted ECDSA nonce value is zero. This can happen with significant\u003cbr\u003eprobability only for some of the supported elliptic curves. In particular\u003cbr\u003ethe NIST P-521 curve is affected. To be able to measure this leak, the attacker\u003cbr\u003eprocess must either be located in the same physical computer or must\u003cbr\u003ehave a very fast network connection with low latency. For that reason\u003cbr\u003ethe severity of this vulnerability is Low.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe FIPS modules in 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are affected by this issue."
}
],
"value": "Issue summary: A timing side-channel which could potentially allow recovering\nthe private key exists in the ECDSA signature computation.\n\nImpact summary: A timing side-channel in ECDSA signature computations\ncould allow recovering the private key by an attacker. However, measuring\nthe timing would require either local access to the signing application or\na very fast network connection with low latency.\n\nThere is a timing signal of around 300 nanoseconds when the top word of\nthe inverted ECDSA nonce value is zero. This can happen with significant\nprobability only for some of the supported elliptic curves. In particular\nthe NIST P-521 curve is affected. To be able to measure this leak, the attacker\nprocess must either be located in the same physical computer or must\nhave a very fast network connection with low latency. For that reason\nthe severity of this vulnerability is Low.\n\nThe FIPS modules in 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are affected by this issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "Low"
},
"type": "https://openssl-library.org/policies/general/security-policy/"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-385",
"description": "CWE-385 Covert Timing Channel",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-18T07:51:11.697Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20250120.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.3.4 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/77c608f4c8857e63e98e66444e2e761c9627916f"
},
{
"name": "3.3.3 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/392dcb336405a0c94486aa6655057f59fd3a0902"
},
{
"name": "3.2.4 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4b1cb94a734a7d4ec363ac0a215a25c181e11f65"
},
{
"name": "3.1.8 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/2af62e74fb59bc469506bc37eb2990ea408d9467"
},
{
"name": "3.0.16 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/07272b05b04836a762b4baa874958af51d513844"
},
{
"name": "1.1.1zb git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/a2639000db19878d5d89586ae7b725080592ae86"
},
{
"name": "1.0.2zl git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/0d5fd1ab987f7571e2c955d8d8b638fc0fb54ded"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Timing side-channel in ECDSA signature computation",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-13176",
"datePublished": "2025-01-20T13:29:57.047Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-01-07T09:34:54.572Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T19:29:14.570Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2024-4741 (GCVE-0-2024-4741)
Vulnerability from nvd – Published: 2024-11-13 10:20 – Updated: 2025-11-04 17:26
VLAI?
Summary
Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_free_buffers may cause
memory to be accessed that was previously freed in some situations
Impact summary: A use after free can have a range of potential consequences such
as the corruption of valid data, crashes or execution of arbitrary code.
However, only applications that directly call the SSL_free_buffers function are
affected by this issue. Applications that do not call this function are not
vulnerable. Our investigations indicate that this function is rarely used by
applications.
The SSL_free_buffers function is used to free the internal OpenSSL buffer used
when processing an incoming record from the network. The call is only expected
to succeed if the buffer is not currently in use. However, two scenarios have
been identified where the buffer is freed even when still in use.
The first scenario occurs where a record header has been received from the
network and processed by OpenSSL, but the full record body has not yet arrived.
In this case calling SSL_free_buffers will succeed even though a record has only
been partially processed and the buffer is still in use.
The second scenario occurs where a full record containing application data has
been received and processed by OpenSSL but the application has only read part of
this data. Again a call to SSL_free_buffers will succeed even though the buffer
is still in use.
While these scenarios could occur accidentally during normal operation a
malicious attacker could attempt to engineer a stituation where this occurs.
We are not aware of this issue being actively exploited.
The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- CWE-416 - Use After Free
Assigner
References
| URL | Tags | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Impacted products
Credits
William Ahern (Akamai)
Matt Caswell
Watson Ladd (Akamai)
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "openssl",
"vendor": "openssl",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.1.1y",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.1.1",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.0.14",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.1.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.2.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.3.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.3.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-4741",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-11-13T14:45:07.092438Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-11-13T14:49:05.977Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-04T17:26:59.261Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/11/msg00000.html"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/10/msg00033.html"
},
{
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240621-0004/"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.3.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.3.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.2.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.1.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.0.14",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.1.1y",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.1.1",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "William Ahern (Akamai)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Matt Caswell"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Watson Ladd (Akamai)"
}
],
"datePublic": "2024-05-27T23:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_free_buffers may cause\u003cbr\u003ememory to be accessed that was previously freed in some situations\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: A use after free can have a range of potential consequences such\u003cbr\u003eas the corruption of valid data, crashes or execution of arbitrary code.\u003cbr\u003eHowever, only applications that directly call the SSL_free_buffers function are\u003cbr\u003eaffected by this issue. Applications that do not call this function are not\u003cbr\u003evulnerable. Our investigations indicate that this function is rarely used by\u003cbr\u003eapplications.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe SSL_free_buffers function is used to free the internal OpenSSL buffer used\u003cbr\u003ewhen processing an incoming record from the network. The call is only expected\u003cbr\u003eto succeed if the buffer is not currently in use. However, two scenarios have\u003cbr\u003ebeen identified where the buffer is freed even when still in use.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe first scenario occurs where a record header has been received from the\u003cbr\u003enetwork and processed by OpenSSL, but the full record body has not yet arrived.\u003cbr\u003eIn this case calling SSL_free_buffers will succeed even though a record has only\u003cbr\u003ebeen partially processed and the buffer is still in use.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe second scenario occurs where a full record containing application data has\u003cbr\u003ebeen received and processed by OpenSSL but the application has only read part of\u003cbr\u003ethis data. Again a call to SSL_free_buffers will succeed even though the buffer\u003cbr\u003eis still in use.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eWhile these scenarios could occur accidentally during normal operation a\u003cbr\u003emalicious attacker could attempt to engineer a stituation where this occurs.\u003cbr\u003eWe are not aware of this issue being actively exploited.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue."
}
],
"value": "Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_free_buffers may cause\nmemory to be accessed that was previously freed in some situations\n\nImpact summary: A use after free can have a range of potential consequences such\nas the corruption of valid data, crashes or execution of arbitrary code.\nHowever, only applications that directly call the SSL_free_buffers function are\naffected by this issue. Applications that do not call this function are not\nvulnerable. Our investigations indicate that this function is rarely used by\napplications.\n\nThe SSL_free_buffers function is used to free the internal OpenSSL buffer used\nwhen processing an incoming record from the network. The call is only expected\nto succeed if the buffer is not currently in use. However, two scenarios have\nbeen identified where the buffer is freed even when still in use.\n\nThe first scenario occurs where a record header has been received from the\nnetwork and processed by OpenSSL, but the full record body has not yet arrived.\nIn this case calling SSL_free_buffers will succeed even though a record has only\nbeen partially processed and the buffer is still in use.\n\nThe second scenario occurs where a full record containing application data has\nbeen received and processed by OpenSSL but the application has only read part of\nthis data. Again a call to SSL_free_buffers will succeed even though the buffer\nis still in use.\n\nWhile these scenarios could occur accidentally during normal operation a\nmalicious attacker could attempt to engineer a stituation where this occurs.\nWe are not aware of this issue being actively exploited.\n\nThe FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "Low"
},
"type": "https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-416",
"description": "CWE-416 Use After Free",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-11-13T10:20:50.711Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20240528.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.3.1 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/e5093133c35ca82874ad83697af76f4b0f7e3bd8"
},
{
"name": "3.2.2 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/c88c3de51020c37e8706bf7a682a162593053aac"
},
{
"name": "3.1.6 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/704f725b96aa373ee45ecfb23f6abfe8be8d9177"
},
{
"name": "3.0.14 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/b3f0eb0a295f58f16ba43ba99dad70d4ee5c437d"
},
{
"name": "1.1.1y git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/f7a045f3143fc6da2ee66bf52d8df04829590dd4"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Use After Free with SSL_free_buffers",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-4741",
"datePublished": "2024-11-13T10:20:50.711Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-05-10T09:56:11.310Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-04T17:26:59.261Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2024-9143 (GCVE-0-2024-9143)
Vulnerability from nvd – Published: 2024-10-16 17:09 – Updated: 2025-11-03 22:33
VLAI?
Summary
Issue summary: Use of the low-level GF(2^m) elliptic curve APIs with untrusted
explicit values for the field polynomial can lead to out-of-bounds memory reads
or writes.
Impact summary: Out of bound memory writes can lead to an application crash or
even a possibility of a remote code execution, however, in all the protocols
involving Elliptic Curve Cryptography that we're aware of, either only "named
curves" are supported, or, if explicit curve parameters are supported, they
specify an X9.62 encoding of binary (GF(2^m)) curves that can't represent
problematic input values. Thus the likelihood of existence of a vulnerable
application is low.
In particular, the X9.62 encoding is used for ECC keys in X.509 certificates,
so problematic inputs cannot occur in the context of processing X.509
certificates. Any problematic use-cases would have to be using an "exotic"
curve encoding.
The affected APIs include: EC_GROUP_new_curve_GF2m(), EC_GROUP_new_from_params(),
and various supporting BN_GF2m_*() functions.
Applications working with "exotic" explicit binary (GF(2^m)) curve parameters,
that make it possible to represent invalid field polynomials with a zero
constant term, via the above or similar APIs, may terminate abruptly as a
result of reading or writing outside of array bounds. Remote code execution
cannot easily be ruled out.
The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
Assigner
References
| URL | Tags | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Impacted products
Credits
Google OSS-Fuzz-Gen
Viktor Dukhovni
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-9143",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-10-16T19:45:11.544020Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-11-08T15:30:04.030Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T22:33:18.178Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/10/16/1"
},
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/10/23/1"
},
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/10/24/1"
},
{
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20241101-0001/"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/11/msg00000.html"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/10/msg00033.html"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.3.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.3.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.2.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.1.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.0.16",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.1.1zb",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.1.1",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.0.2zl",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.2",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Google OSS-Fuzz-Gen"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Viktor Dukhovni"
}
],
"datePublic": "2024-10-16T14:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Issue summary: Use of the low-level GF(2^m) elliptic curve APIs with untrusted\u003cbr\u003eexplicit values for the field polynomial can lead to out-of-bounds memory reads\u003cbr\u003eor writes.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: Out of bound memory writes can lead to an application crash or\u003cbr\u003eeven a possibility of a remote code execution, however, in all the protocols\u003cbr\u003einvolving Elliptic Curve Cryptography that we\u0027re aware of, either only \"named\u003cbr\u003ecurves\" are supported, or, if explicit curve parameters are supported, they\u003cbr\u003especify an X9.62 encoding of binary (GF(2^m)) curves that can\u0027t represent\u003cbr\u003eproblematic input values. Thus the likelihood of existence of a vulnerable\u003cbr\u003eapplication is low.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eIn particular, the X9.62 encoding is used for ECC keys in X.509 certificates,\u003cbr\u003eso problematic inputs cannot occur in the context of processing X.509\u003cbr\u003ecertificates. Any problematic use-cases would have to be using an \"exotic\"\u003cbr\u003ecurve encoding.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe affected APIs include: EC_GROUP_new_curve_GF2m(), EC_GROUP_new_from_params(),\u003cbr\u003eand various supporting BN_GF2m_*() functions.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eApplications working with \"exotic\" explicit binary (GF(2^m)) curve parameters,\u003cbr\u003ethat make it possible to represent invalid field polynomials with a zero\u003cbr\u003econstant term, via the above or similar APIs, may terminate abruptly as a\u003cbr\u003eresult of reading or writing outside of array bounds. Remote code execution\u003cbr\u003ecannot easily be ruled out.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue."
}
],
"value": "Issue summary: Use of the low-level GF(2^m) elliptic curve APIs with untrusted\nexplicit values for the field polynomial can lead to out-of-bounds memory reads\nor writes.\n\nImpact summary: Out of bound memory writes can lead to an application crash or\neven a possibility of a remote code execution, however, in all the protocols\ninvolving Elliptic Curve Cryptography that we\u0027re aware of, either only \"named\ncurves\" are supported, or, if explicit curve parameters are supported, they\nspecify an X9.62 encoding of binary (GF(2^m)) curves that can\u0027t represent\nproblematic input values. Thus the likelihood of existence of a vulnerable\napplication is low.\n\nIn particular, the X9.62 encoding is used for ECC keys in X.509 certificates,\nso problematic inputs cannot occur in the context of processing X.509\ncertificates. Any problematic use-cases would have to be using an \"exotic\"\ncurve encoding.\n\nThe affected APIs include: EC_GROUP_new_curve_GF2m(), EC_GROUP_new_from_params(),\nand various supporting BN_GF2m_*() functions.\n\nApplications working with \"exotic\" explicit binary (GF(2^m)) curve parameters,\nthat make it possible to represent invalid field polynomials with a zero\nconstant term, via the above or similar APIs, may terminate abruptly as a\nresult of reading or writing outside of array bounds. Remote code execution\ncannot easily be ruled out.\n\nThe FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "Low"
},
"type": "https://openssl-library.org/policies/general/security-policy/"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-125",
"description": "CWE-125 Out-of-bounds Read",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
},
{
"cweId": "CWE-787",
"description": "CWE-787 Out-of-bounds Write",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-01T08:29:10.392Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20241016.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.3.3 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/c0d3e4d32d2805f49bec30547f225bc4d092e1f4"
},
{
"name": "3.2.4 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/bc7e04d7c8d509fb78fc0e285aa948fb0da04700"
},
{
"name": "3.1.8 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/fdf6723362ca51bd883295efe206cb5b1cfa5154"
},
{
"name": "3.0.16 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/72ae83ad214d2eef262461365a1975707f862712"
},
{
"name": "1.1.1zb git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/8efc0cbaa8ebba8e116f7b81a876a4123594d86a"
},
{
"name": "1.0.2zl git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/9d576994cec2b7aa37a91740ea7e680810957e41"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Low-level invalid GF(2^m) parameters lead to OOB memory access",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-9143",
"datePublished": "2024-10-16T17:09:23.844Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-09-24T08:37:04.834Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T22:33:18.178Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2024-6119 (GCVE-0-2024-6119)
Vulnerability from nvd – Published: 2024-09-03 15:58 – Updated: 2024-09-12 16:03
VLAI?
Summary
Issue summary: Applications performing certificate name checks (e.g., TLS
clients checking server certificates) may attempt to read an invalid memory
address resulting in abnormal termination of the application process.
Impact summary: Abnormal termination of an application can a cause a denial of
service.
Applications performing certificate name checks (e.g., TLS clients checking
server certificates) may attempt to read an invalid memory address when
comparing the expected name with an `otherName` subject alternative name of an
X.509 certificate. This may result in an exception that terminates the
application program.
Note that basic certificate chain validation (signatures, dates, ...) is not
affected, the denial of service can occur only when the application also
specifies an expected DNS name, Email address or IP address.
TLS servers rarely solicit client certificates, and even when they do, they
generally don't perform a name check against a reference identifier (expected
identity), but rather extract the presented identity after checking the
certificate chain. So TLS servers are generally not affected and the severity
of the issue is Moderate.
The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- CWE-843 - Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion')
Assigner
References
| URL | Tags | |
|---|---|---|
Impacted products
Credits
David Benjamin (Google)
Viktor Dukhovni
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-12T16:03:01.704Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/09/03/4"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-security/2024-September/000303.html"
},
{
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240912-0001/"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "openssl",
"vendor": "openssl",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.3.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.3.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.2.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.1.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.0.15",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-6119",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-03T20:20:39.935362Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-03T20:25:47.056Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.3.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.3.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.2.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.1.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.0.15",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "David Benjamin (Google)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Viktor Dukhovni"
}
],
"datePublic": "2024-09-03T14:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Issue summary: Applications performing certificate name checks (e.g., TLS\u003cbr\u003eclients checking server certificates) may attempt to read an invalid memory\u003cbr\u003eaddress resulting in abnormal termination of the application process.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: Abnormal termination of an application can a cause a denial of\u003cbr\u003eservice.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eApplications performing certificate name checks (e.g., TLS clients checking\u003cbr\u003eserver certificates) may attempt to read an invalid memory address when\u003cbr\u003ecomparing the expected name with an `otherName` subject alternative name of an\u003cbr\u003eX.509 certificate. This may result in an exception that terminates the\u003cbr\u003eapplication program.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eNote that basic certificate chain validation (signatures, dates, ...) is not\u003cbr\u003eaffected, the denial of service can occur only when the application also\u003cbr\u003especifies an expected DNS name, Email address or IP address.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eTLS servers rarely solicit client certificates, and even when they do, they\u003cbr\u003egenerally don\u0027t perform a name check against a reference identifier (expected\u003cbr\u003eidentity), but rather extract the presented identity after checking the\u003cbr\u003ecertificate chain. So TLS servers are generally not affected and the severity\u003cbr\u003eof the issue is Moderate.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue."
}
],
"value": "Issue summary: Applications performing certificate name checks (e.g., TLS\nclients checking server certificates) may attempt to read an invalid memory\naddress resulting in abnormal termination of the application process.\n\nImpact summary: Abnormal termination of an application can a cause a denial of\nservice.\n\nApplications performing certificate name checks (e.g., TLS clients checking\nserver certificates) may attempt to read an invalid memory address when\ncomparing the expected name with an `otherName` subject alternative name of an\nX.509 certificate. This may result in an exception that terminates the\napplication program.\n\nNote that basic certificate chain validation (signatures, dates, ...) is not\naffected, the denial of service can occur only when the application also\nspecifies an expected DNS name, Email address or IP address.\n\nTLS servers rarely solicit client certificates, and even when they do, they\ngenerally don\u0027t perform a name check against a reference identifier (expected\nidentity), but rather extract the presented identity after checking the\ncertificate chain. So TLS servers are generally not affected and the severity\nof the issue is Moderate.\n\nThe FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "Moderate"
},
"type": "https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-843",
"description": "CWE-843 Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type (\u0027Type Confusion\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-03T15:58:06.970Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20240903.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.3.2 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/7dfcee2cd2a63b2c64b9b4b0850be64cb695b0a0"
},
{
"name": "3.2.3 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/05f360d9e849a1b277db628f1f13083a7f8dd04f"
},
{
"name": "3.1.7 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/621f3729831b05ee828a3203eddb621d014ff2b2"
},
{
"name": "3.0.15 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/06d1dc3fa96a2ba5a3e22735a033012aadc9f0d6"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Possible denial of service in X.509 name checks",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-6119",
"datePublished": "2024-09-03T15:58:06.970Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-06-18T09:24:11.739Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-12T16:03:01.704Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
FKIE_CVE-2025-4575
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-05-22 14:16 - Updated: 2025-10-23 14:51
Severity ?
Summary
Issue summary: Use of -addreject option with the openssl x509 application adds
a trusted use instead of a rejected use for a certificate.
Impact summary: If a user intends to make a trusted certificate rejected for
a particular use it will be instead marked as trusted for that use.
A copy & paste error during minor refactoring of the code introduced this
issue in the OpenSSL 3.5 version. If, for example, a trusted CA certificate
should be trusted only for the purpose of authenticating TLS servers but not
for CMS signature verification and the CMS signature verification is intended
to be marked as rejected with the -addreject option, the resulting CA
certificate will be trusted for CMS signature verification purpose instead.
Only users which use the trusted certificate format who use the openssl x509
command line application to add rejected uses are affected by this issue.
The issues affecting only the command line application are considered to
be Low severity.
The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this
issue.
OpenSSL 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1, 3.0, 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are also not affected by this
issue.
References
| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl-security@openssl.org | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/e96d22446e633d117e6c9904cb15b4693e956eaa | Patch | |
| openssl-security@openssl.org | https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20250522.txt | Vendor Advisory | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/05/22/1 | Third Party Advisory, Mailing List |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "91ADE80D-F0FB-4EC0-AAB1-2AA34E2FC63D",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Issue summary: Use of -addreject option with the openssl x509 application adds\na trusted use instead of a rejected use for a certificate.\n\nImpact summary: If a user intends to make a trusted certificate rejected for\na particular use it will be instead marked as trusted for that use.\n\nA copy \u0026 paste error during minor refactoring of the code introduced this\nissue in the OpenSSL 3.5 version. If, for example, a trusted CA certificate\nshould be trusted only for the purpose of authenticating TLS servers but not\nfor CMS signature verification and the CMS signature verification is intended\nto be marked as rejected with the -addreject option, the resulting CA\ncertificate will be trusted for CMS signature verification purpose instead.\n\nOnly users which use the trusted certificate format who use the openssl x509\ncommand line application to add rejected uses are affected by this issue.\nThe issues affecting only the command line application are considered to\nbe Low severity.\n\nThe FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this\nissue.\n\nOpenSSL 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1, 3.0, 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are also not affected by this\nissue."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Resumen del problema: El uso de la opci\u00f3n -addreject con la aplicaci\u00f3n openssl x509 a\u00f1ade un uso confiable en lugar de uno rechazado para un certificado. Resumen del impacto: Si un usuario intenta rechazar un certificado confiable para un uso espec\u00edfico, se marcar\u00e1 como confiable para ese uso. Un error de copiar y pegar durante una peque\u00f1a refactorizaci\u00f3n del c\u00f3digo introdujo este problema en la versi\u00f3n OpenSSL 3.5. Si, por ejemplo, un certificado de CA confiable solo debe ser confiable para autenticar servidores TLS, pero no para la verificaci\u00f3n de firmas CMS, y esta verificaci\u00f3n se marca como rechazada con la opci\u00f3n -addreject, el certificado de CA resultante se considerar\u00e1 confiable para la verificaci\u00f3n de firmas CMS. Este problema solo afecta a los usuarios que usan el formato de certificado confiable y la aplicaci\u00f3n de l\u00ednea de comandos openssl x509 para a\u00f1adir usos rechazados. Los problemas que afectan solo a la aplicaci\u00f3n de l\u00ednea de comandos se consideran de gravedad baja. Los m\u00f3dulos FIPS de las versiones 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 y 3.0 no se ven afectados. OpenSSL 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1, 3.0, 1.1.1 y 1.0.2 tampoco se ven afectados por este problema."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-4575",
"lastModified": "2025-10-23T14:51:30.377",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 2.5,
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2025-05-22T14:16:07.630",
"references": [
{
"source": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/e96d22446e633d117e6c9904cb15b4693e956eaa"
},
{
"source": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20250522.txt"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory",
"Mailing List"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/05/22/1"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-295"
}
],
"source": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
FKIE_CVE-2024-6119
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2024-09-03 16:15 - Updated: 2025-06-03 10:51
Severity ?
7.5 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
7.5 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
7.5 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Summary
Issue summary: Applications performing certificate name checks (e.g., TLS
clients checking server certificates) may attempt to read an invalid memory
address resulting in abnormal termination of the application process.
Impact summary: Abnormal termination of an application can a cause a denial of
service.
Applications performing certificate name checks (e.g., TLS clients checking
server certificates) may attempt to read an invalid memory address when
comparing the expected name with an `otherName` subject alternative name of an
X.509 certificate. This may result in an exception that terminates the
application program.
Note that basic certificate chain validation (signatures, dates, ...) is not
affected, the denial of service can occur only when the application also
specifies an expected DNS name, Email address or IP address.
TLS servers rarely solicit client certificates, and even when they do, they
generally don't perform a name check against a reference identifier (expected
identity), but rather extract the presented identity after checking the
certificate chain. So TLS servers are generally not affected and the severity
of the issue is Moderate.
The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.
References
| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl-security@openssl.org | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/05f360d9e849a1b277db628f1f13083a7f8dd04f | Patch | |
| openssl-security@openssl.org | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/06d1dc3fa96a2ba5a3e22735a033012aadc9f0d6 | Patch | |
| openssl-security@openssl.org | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/621f3729831b05ee828a3203eddb621d014ff2b2 | Patch | |
| openssl-security@openssl.org | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/7dfcee2cd2a63b2c64b9b4b0850be64cb695b0a0 | Patch | |
| openssl-security@openssl.org | https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20240903.txt | Vendor Advisory | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/09/03/4 | Mailing List | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-security/2024-September/000303.html | Mailing List | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240912-0001/ | Third Party Advisory |
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | openssl | * | |
| openssl | openssl | * | |
| openssl | openssl | * | |
| openssl | openssl | * | |
| netapp | active_iq_unified_manager | - | |
| netapp | management_services_for_element_software_and_netapp_hci | - | |
| netapp | ontap_9 | - | |
| netapp | ontap_select_deploy_administration_utility | - | |
| netapp | ontap_tools | 9 | |
| netapp | brocade_fabric_operating_system | - | |
| netapp | h300s_firmware | - | |
| netapp | h300s | - | |
| netapp | h500s_firmware | - | |
| netapp | h500s | - | |
| netapp | h700s_firmware | - | |
| netapp | h700s | - | |
| netapp | h410s_firmware | - | |
| netapp | h410s | - | |
| netapp | h410c_firmware | - | |
| netapp | h410c | - | |
| netapp | h610c_firmware | - | |
| netapp | h610c | - | |
| netapp | h610s_firmware | - | |
| netapp | h610s | - | |
| netapp | h615c | - | |
| netapp | h615c_firmware | - | |
| netapp | bootstrap_os | - | |
| netapp | hci_compute_node | - | |
| netapp | a250_firmware | - | |
| netapp | a250 | - | |
| netapp | 500f_firmware | - | |
| netapp | 500f | - | |
| netapp | c250_firmware | - | |
| netapp | c250 | - |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F6B2B529-0ABC-49F4-BD03-380F291A84D4",
"versionEndExcluding": "3.0.15",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.0.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "30CD2859-B247-4957-A511-0FE284AA4A3A",
"versionEndExcluding": "3.1.7",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.1.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "B822EA84-566B-44F2-9485-8A97103249D5",
"versionEndExcluding": "3.2.3",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.2.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "37FD7956-A868-459B-90EA-C0D2DCF63AFC",
"versionEndExcluding": "3.3.2",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.3.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
},
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:netapp:active_iq_unified_manager:-:*:*:*:*:vmware_vsphere:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "3A756737-1CC4-42C2-A4DF-E1C893B4E2D5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:netapp:management_services_for_element_software_and_netapp_hci:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "FDAC85F0-93AF-4BE3-AE1A-8ADAF1CDF9AB",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:netapp:ontap_9:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "AD886814-B4A0-4764-9F08-2060601D8E89",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:netapp:ontap_select_deploy_administration_utility:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E7CF3019-975D-40BB-A8A4-894E62BD3797",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:netapp:ontap_tools:9:*:*:*:*:vmware_vsphere:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "C2D814BE-93EC-42EF-88C5-EA7E7DF07BE5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:netapp:brocade_fabric_operating_system:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "A2119FFC-08F9-4C3F-881C-9C72916BC652",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
},
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:netapp:h300s_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "6770B6C3-732E-4E22-BF1C-2D2FD610061C",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
},
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:h:netapp:h300s:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "9F9C8C20-42EB-4AB5-BD97-212DEB070C43",
"vulnerable": false
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
},
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:netapp:h500s_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "7FFF7106-ED78-49BA-9EC5-B889E3685D53",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
},
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:h:netapp:h500s:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E63D8B0F-006E-4801-BF9D-1C001BBFB4F9",
"vulnerable": false
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
},
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:netapp:h700s_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "56409CEC-5A1E-4450-AA42-641E459CC2AF",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
},
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:h:netapp:h700s:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "B06F4839-D16A-4A61-9BB5-55B13F41E47F",
"vulnerable": false
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
},
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:netapp:h410s_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "D0B4AD8A-F172-4558-AEC6-FF424BA2D912",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
},
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:h:netapp:h410s:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "8497A4C9-8474-4A62-8331-3FE862ED4098",
"vulnerable": false
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
},
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:netapp:h410c_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "234DEFE0-5CE5-4B0A-96B8-5D227CB8ED31",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
},
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:h:netapp:h410c:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "CDDF61B7-EC5C-467C-B710-B89F502CD04F",
"vulnerable": false
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
},
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:netapp:h610c_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "89612649-BACF-4FAC-9BA4-324724FD93A6",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
},
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:h:netapp:h610c:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F3D9B255-C1AF-42D1-BF9B-13642FBDC080",
"vulnerable": false
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
},
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:netapp:h610s_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "FD7CFE0E-9D1E-4495-B302-89C3096FC0DF",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
},
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:h:netapp:h610s:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F63A3FA7-AAED-4A9D-9FDE-6195302DA0F6",
"vulnerable": false
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
},
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:h:netapp:h615c:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "7296A1F2-D315-4FD5-8A73-65C480C855BE",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
},
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:netapp:h615c_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "5921A877-18BF-43FE-915C-D226E140ACFC",
"vulnerable": false
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
},
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:netapp:bootstrap_os:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "95BA156C-C977-4F0C-8DFB-3FAE9CC8C02D",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
},
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:h:netapp:hci_compute_node:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "AD7447BC-F315-4298-A822-549942FC118B",
"vulnerable": false
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
},
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:netapp:a250_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "1236B66D-EB11-4324-929F-E2B86683C3C7",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
},
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:h:netapp:a250:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "281DFC67-46BB-4FC2-BE03-3C65C9311F65",
"vulnerable": false
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
},
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:netapp:500f_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "ECF32BB1-9A58-4821-AE49-5D5C8200631F",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
},
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:h:netapp:500f:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F21DE67F-CDFD-4D36-9967-633CD0240C6F",
"vulnerable": false
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
},
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:netapp:c250_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F1AB1EC2-2560-494A-A51B-6F20CE318FEB",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
},
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:h:netapp:c250:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "58DE2B52-4E49-4CD0-9310-00291B0352C7",
"vulnerable": false
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Issue summary: Applications performing certificate name checks (e.g., TLS\nclients checking server certificates) may attempt to read an invalid memory\naddress resulting in abnormal termination of the application process.\n\nImpact summary: Abnormal termination of an application can a cause a denial of\nservice.\n\nApplications performing certificate name checks (e.g., TLS clients checking\nserver certificates) may attempt to read an invalid memory address when\ncomparing the expected name with an `otherName` subject alternative name of an\nX.509 certificate. This may result in an exception that terminates the\napplication program.\n\nNote that basic certificate chain validation (signatures, dates, ...) is not\naffected, the denial of service can occur only when the application also\nspecifies an expected DNS name, Email address or IP address.\n\nTLS servers rarely solicit client certificates, and even when they do, they\ngenerally don\u0027t perform a name check against a reference identifier (expected\nidentity), but rather extract the presented identity after checking the\ncertificate chain. So TLS servers are generally not affected and the severity\nof the issue is Moderate.\n\nThe FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Resumen del problema: Las aplicaciones que realizan comprobaciones de nombres de certificados (por ejemplo, clientes TLS que comprueban certificados de servidor) pueden intentar leer una direcci\u00f3n de memoria no v\u00e1lida, lo que da como resultado la finalizaci\u00f3n anormal del proceso de la aplicaci\u00f3n. Resumen del impacto: La finalizaci\u00f3n anormal de una aplicaci\u00f3n puede causar una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio. Las aplicaciones que realizan comprobaciones de nombres de certificados (por ejemplo, clientes TLS que comprueban certificados de servidor) pueden intentar leer una direcci\u00f3n de memoria no v\u00e1lida al comparar el nombre esperado con un nombre alternativo de sujeto `otherName` de un certificado X.509. Esto puede dar como resultado una excepci\u00f3n que finalice el programa de aplicaci\u00f3n. Tenga en cuenta que la validaci\u00f3n b\u00e1sica de la cadena de certificados (firmas, fechas, ...) no se ve afectada, la denegaci\u00f3n de servicio puede ocurrir solo cuando la aplicaci\u00f3n tambi\u00e9n especifica un nombre DNS, una direcci\u00f3n de correo electr\u00f3nico o una direcci\u00f3n IP esperados. Los servidores TLS rara vez solicitan certificados de cliente, e incluso cuando lo hacen, generalmente no realizan una comprobaci\u00f3n de nombre contra un identificador de referencia (identidad esperada), sino que extraen la identidad presentada despu\u00e9s de comprobar la cadena de certificados. Por lo tanto, los servidores TLS generalmente no se ven afectados y la gravedad del problema es moderada. Los m\u00f3dulos FIPS en 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 y 3.0 no se ven afectados por este problema."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2024-6119",
"lastModified": "2025-06-03T10:51:54.117",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
},
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2024-09-03T16:15:07.177",
"references": [
{
"source": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/05f360d9e849a1b277db628f1f13083a7f8dd04f"
},
{
"source": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/06d1dc3fa96a2ba5a3e22735a033012aadc9f0d6"
},
{
"source": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/621f3729831b05ee828a3203eddb621d014ff2b2"
},
{
"source": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/7dfcee2cd2a63b2c64b9b4b0850be64cb695b0a0"
},
{
"source": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20240903.txt"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Mailing List"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/09/03/4"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Mailing List"
],
"url": "https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-security/2024-September/000303.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240912-0001/"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-843"
}
],
"source": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-843"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}