CVE-2022-44566
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2023-02-09 00:00
Modified
2024-08-03 13:54
Severity ?
Summary
A denial of service vulnerability present in ActiveRecord's PostgreSQL adapter <7.0.4.1 and <6.1.7.1. When a value outside the range for a 64bit signed integer is provided to the PostgreSQL connection adapter, it will treat the target column type as numeric. Comparing integer values against numeric values can result in a slow sequential scan resulting in potential Denial of Service.
Impacted products
Show details on NVD website


{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T13:54:03.838Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://discuss.rubyonrails.org/t/cve-2022-44566-possible-denial-of-service-vulnerability-in-activerecords-postgresql-adapter/82119"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://code.jeremyevans.net/2022-11-01-forcing-sequential-scans-on-postgresql.html"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "https://github.com/rails/rails",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "7.0.4.1, 6.1.7.1"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "A denial of service vulnerability present in ActiveRecord\u0027s PostgreSQL adapter \u003c7.0.4.1 and \u003c6.1.7.1. When a value outside the range for a 64bit signed integer is provided to the PostgreSQL connection adapter, it will treat the target column type as numeric. Comparing integer values against numeric values can result in a slow sequential scan resulting in potential Denial of Service."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-400",
              "description": "Denial of Service (CWE-400)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2023-02-09T00:00:00",
        "orgId": "36234546-b8fa-4601-9d6f-f4e334aa8ea1",
        "shortName": "hackerone"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://discuss.rubyonrails.org/t/cve-2022-44566-possible-denial-of-service-vulnerability-in-activerecords-postgresql-adapter/82119"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://code.jeremyevans.net/2022-11-01-forcing-sequential-scans-on-postgresql.html"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "36234546-b8fa-4601-9d6f-f4e334aa8ea1",
    "assignerShortName": "hackerone",
    "cveId": "CVE-2022-44566",
    "datePublished": "2023-02-09T00:00:00",
    "dateReserved": "2022-11-01T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T13:54:03.838Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2022-44566\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"support@hackerone.com\",\"published\":\"2023-02-09T20:15:11.017\",\"lastModified\":\"2023-06-23T18:29:30.760\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"A denial of service vulnerability present in ActiveRecord\u0027s PostgreSQL adapter \u003c7.0.4.1 and \u003c6.1.7.1. When a value outside the range for a 64bit signed integer is provided to the PostgreSQL connection adapter, it will treat the target column type as numeric. Comparing integer values against numeric values can result in a slow sequential scan resulting in potential Denial of Service.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":3.6}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"NVD-CWE-Other\"}]},{\"source\":\"support@hackerone.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-400\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:activerecord_project:activerecord:*:*:*:*:*:ruby:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"6.1.7.1\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"959FB9CC-9272-4B41-A05B-4A65C2071899\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:activerecord_project:activerecord:*:*:*:*:*:ruby:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"7.0.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"7.0.4.1\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"EDE689E3-57CB-4121-9EE3-1857079325E6\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://code.jeremyevans.net/2022-11-01-forcing-sequential-scans-on-postgresql.html\",\"source\":\"support@hackerone.com\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Mitigation\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://discuss.rubyonrails.org/t/cve-2022-44566-possible-denial-of-service-vulnerability-in-activerecords-postgresql-adapter/82119\",\"source\":\"support@hackerone.com\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...
  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.