CVE-2026-88822 (GCVE-0-2026-88822)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-11-10 18:15 – Updated: 2026-11-10 18:15- CWE-457 - Use of Uninitialized Variable
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "4.1.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.0.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.5.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.5.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Jaehun Lee"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Neil Horman"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-11-10T11:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Issue summary: QUIC, when performing automated peer detection, may allow\u003cbr\u003euninitialized stack data to leak into the received address which is then used\u003cbr\u003eas the destination for outgoing packets.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: Applications using QUIC\u0027s automated peer detection mechanism\u003cbr\u003emay receive an invalid address, leading to connection loss and disclosure of\u003cbr\u003euninitialized stack data to an attacker observing the outgoing network traffic.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eCWE: CWE-457 (Use of Uninitialized Variable)\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eDescription: The OpenSSL QUIC stack contains a feature in which, when using an\u003cbr\u003ealready connected socket, it will auto-detect the peer address during the SSL\u003cbr\u003ehandshake. This feature uses the getpeername() function, passing a buffer of\u003cbr\u003esufficient length to hold any supported address family, but passes a buffer\u003cbr\u003elength that is only sized such that larger addresses, such as IPv6, cannot be\u003cbr\u003eretrieved. The getpeername() function however, still returns the full address\u003cbr\u003elength, which is accepted as the valid input buffer length, leading to the\u003cbr\u003eaddress buffer containing uninitialized stack data instead of the actual peer\u003cbr\u003eaddress. The invalid peer address is then used as destination for the outgoing\u003cbr\u003epackets which leads to a connectivity breakage and a leakage of the\u003cbr\u003euninitialized stack data to passive network observers.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFIPS impact: no\u003cbr\u003eThe FIPS modules in 4.0, 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, and 3.0 are not affected by this CVE as\u003cbr\u003ethe affected protocol is not implemented in the FIPS module."
}
],
"value": "Issue summary: QUIC, when performing automated peer detection, may allow\nuninitialized stack data to leak into the received address which is then used\nas the destination for outgoing packets.\n\nImpact summary: Applications using QUIC\u0027s automated peer detection mechanism\nmay receive an invalid address, leading to connection loss and disclosure of\nuninitialized stack data to an attacker observing the outgoing network traffic.\n\nCWE: CWE-457 (Use of Uninitialized Variable)\n\nDescription: The OpenSSL QUIC stack contains a feature in which, when using an\nalready connected socket, it will auto-detect the peer address during the SSL\nhandshake. This feature uses the getpeername() function, passing a buffer of\nsufficient length to hold any supported address family, but passes a buffer\nlength that is only sized such that larger addresses, such as IPv6, cannot be\nretrieved. The getpeername() function however, still returns the full address\nlength, which is accepted as the valid input buffer length, leading to the\naddress buffer containing uninitialized stack data instead of the actual peer\naddress. The invalid peer address is then used as destination for the outgoing\npackets which leads to a connectivity breakage and a leakage of the\nuninitialized stack data to passive network observers.\n\nFIPS impact: no\nThe FIPS modules in 4.0, 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, and 3.0 are not affected by this CVE as\nthe affected protocol is not implemented in the FIPS module."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "Low"
},
"type": "https://openssl-library.org/policies/general/security-policy/"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-457",
"description": "Use of Uninitialized Variable",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-10T18:15:38.961Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20261110.txt"
},
{
"name": "4.1.1 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/7b4f5344aa0401e7b777640050b5257ed2a70e88"
},
{
"name": "4.0.4 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/911eee8eb7550b95a206f1ad8cbdb986098982f3"
},
{
"name": "3.5.10 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/1a73dc590cbad62d6f0329ea4779eadaa8d8fd75"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "QUIC Uses Uninitialized Stack Bytes During Automated Peer Detection",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-88822",
"datePublished": "2026-11-10T18:15:38.961Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-10T09:08:26.966Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-10T18:15:38.961Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "4.1.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.0.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.5.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.5.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"source": "openssl-security@openssl.org"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Issue summary: QUIC, when performing automated peer detection, may allow\nuninitialized stack data to leak into the received address which is then used\nas the destination for outgoing packets.\n\nImpact summary: Applications using QUIC\u0027s automated peer detection mechanism\nmay receive an invalid address, leading to connection loss and disclosure of\nuninitialized stack data to an attacker observing the outgoing network traffic.\n\nCWE: CWE-457 (Use of Uninitialized Variable)\n\nDescription: The OpenSSL QUIC stack contains a feature in which, when using an\nalready connected socket, it will auto-detect the peer address during the SSL\nhandshake. This feature uses the getpeername() function, passing a buffer of\nsufficient length to hold any supported address family, but passes a buffer\nlength that is only sized such that larger addresses, such as IPv6, cannot be\nretrieved. The getpeername() function however, still returns the full address\nlength, which is accepted as the valid input buffer length, leading to the\naddress buffer containing uninitialized stack data instead of the actual peer\naddress. The invalid peer address is then used as destination for the outgoing\npackets which leads to a connectivity breakage and a leakage of the\nuninitialized stack data to passive network observers.\n\nFIPS impact: no\nThe FIPS modules in 4.0, 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, and 3.0 are not affected by this CVE as\nthe affected protocol is not implemented in the FIPS module."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-88822",
"lastModified": "2026-11-10T22:10:04.727",
"metrics": {},
"published": "2026-11-10T19:21:34.623",
"references": [
{
"source": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/1a73dc590cbad62d6f0329ea4779eadaa8d8fd75"
},
{
"source": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/7b4f5344aa0401e7b777640050b5257ed2a70e88"
},
{
"source": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/911eee8eb7550b95a206f1ad8cbdb986098982f3"
},
{
"source": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
"url": "https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20261110.txt"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-457"
}
],
"source": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
}
}
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.