GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

CVE-2026-9076 (GCVE-0-2026-9076)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-09 16:03 – Updated: 2026-06-10 07:47
VLAI
Title
Out-of-Bounds Read in CMS Password-Based Decryption
Summary
Issue summary: When CMS password-based decryption (RFC 3211 / PWRI key unwrap) processes attacker-supplied CMS data, an attacker-chosen stream-mode KEK cipher can trigger a heap out-of-bounds read in kek_unwrap_key(). Impact summary: A heap buffer over-read may trigger a crash which leads to Denial of Service for an application if the input buffer ends at a memory page boundary and the following page is unmapped. There is no information disclosure as the over-read bytes are not revealed to the attacker. The key unwrapping function performs a check-byte test as specified in the RFC that reads 7 bytes from a heap allocation that is based on the wrapped key length from the message. There is a minimum length check based on the block length of the wrapping cipher. However the cipher is selected from an OID carried in the attacker's PWRI keyEncryptionAlgorithm with no requirement that the cipher be a block cipher. When an attacker selects a stream-mode cipher the guard will be ineffective and the allocated buffer containing the unwrapped key can be too small to fit the check-bytes specified in the RFC and a buffer over-read can happen. Applications calling CMS_decrypt() or CMS_decrypt_set1_password() (equivalently openssl cms -decrypt -pwri_password ...) on untrusted CMS data are vulnerable to this issue. No password knowledge is required: the over-read happens during the unwrap attempt before any authentication succeeds. The over-read is limited to a few bytes and is not written to output, so there is no information disclosure. Triggering a crash requires the allocation to border unmapped memory, which is unlikely with the normal allocator. The FIPS modules are not affected by this issue.
Severity
7.5 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: yes Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-06-09 19:04 UTC
CWE
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version CPE status
OpenSSL OpenSSL Affected: 4.0.0 , < 4.0.1 (semver)
Affected: 3.6.0 , < 3.6.3 (semver)
Affected: 3.5.0 , < 3.5.7 (semver)
Affected: 3.4.0 , < 3.4.6 (semver)
Affected: 3.0.0 , < 3.0.21 (semver)
Affected: 1.1.1 , < 1.1.1zh (custom)
Affected: 1.0.2 , < 1.0.2zq (custom)
guessed Create a notification for this product.
Date Public
2026-06-09 14:00
Credits
Bhabani Sankar Das Haruki Oyama (Waseda University) Nikola Pajkovsky
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "cvssV3_1": {
              "attackComplexity": "LOW",
              "attackVector": "NETWORK",
              "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
              "baseScore": 7.5,
              "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
              "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
              "integrityImpact": "NONE",
              "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
              "scope": "UNCHANGED",
              "userInteraction": "NONE",
              "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
              "version": "3.1"
            }
          },
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-9076",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-06-09T19:04:07.840133Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-06-09T19:04:20.258Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "OpenSSL",
          "vendor": "OpenSSL",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "4.0.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "4.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "3.6.3",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.6.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "3.5.7",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.5.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "3.4.6",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.4.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "3.0.21",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "1.1.1zh",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "1.1.1",
              "versionType": "custom"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "1.0.2zq",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "1.0.2",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "reporter",
          "value": "Bhabani Sankar Das"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "reporter",
          "value": "Haruki Oyama (Waseda University)"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "Nikola Pajkovsky"
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2026-06-09T14:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "Issue summary: When CMS password-based decryption (RFC 3211 / PWRI key unwrap)\u003cbr\u003eprocesses attacker-supplied CMS data, an attacker-chosen stream-mode KEK\u003cbr\u003ecipher can trigger a heap out-of-bounds read in kek_unwrap_key().\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: A heap buffer over-read may trigger a crash which leads to\u003cbr\u003eDenial of Service for an application if the input buffer ends at a memory\u003cbr\u003epage boundary and the following page is unmapped. There is no information\u003cbr\u003edisclosure as the over-read bytes are not revealed to the attacker.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe key unwrapping function performs a check-byte test as specified in the\u003cbr\u003eRFC that reads 7 bytes from a heap allocation that is based on the wrapped\u003cbr\u003ekey length from the message. There is a minimum length check based on the\u003cbr\u003eblock length of the wrapping cipher. However the cipher is selected from\u003cbr\u003ean OID carried in the attacker\u0027s PWRI keyEncryptionAlgorithm with no\u003cbr\u003erequirement that the cipher be a block cipher. When an attacker selects\u003cbr\u003ea stream-mode cipher the guard will be ineffective and the allocated buffer\u003cbr\u003econtaining the unwrapped key can be too small to fit the check-bytes\u003cbr\u003especified in the RFC and a buffer over-read can happen.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eApplications calling CMS_decrypt() or CMS_decrypt_set1_password()\u003cbr\u003e(equivalently openssl cms -decrypt -pwri_password ...) on untrusted CMS\u003cbr\u003edata are vulnerable to this issue. No password knowledge is required: the\u003cbr\u003eover-read happens during the unwrap attempt before any authentication\u003cbr\u003esucceeds.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe over-read is limited to a few bytes and is not written to output, so\u003cbr\u003ethere is no information disclosure. Triggering a crash requires the\u003cbr\u003eallocation to border unmapped memory, which is unlikely with the normal\u003cbr\u003eallocator.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe FIPS modules are not affected by this issue."
            }
          ],
          "value": "Issue summary: When CMS password-based decryption (RFC 3211 / PWRI key unwrap)\nprocesses attacker-supplied CMS data, an attacker-chosen stream-mode KEK\ncipher can trigger a heap out-of-bounds read in kek_unwrap_key().\n\nImpact summary: A heap buffer over-read may trigger a crash which leads to\nDenial of Service for an application if the input buffer ends at a memory\npage boundary and the following page is unmapped. There is no information\ndisclosure as the over-read bytes are not revealed to the attacker.\n\nThe key unwrapping function performs a check-byte test as specified in the\nRFC that reads 7 bytes from a heap allocation that is based on the wrapped\nkey length from the message. There is a minimum length check based on the\nblock length of the wrapping cipher. However the cipher is selected from\nan OID carried in the attacker\u0027s PWRI keyEncryptionAlgorithm with no\nrequirement that the cipher be a block cipher. When an attacker selects\na stream-mode cipher the guard will be ineffective and the allocated buffer\ncontaining the unwrapped key can be too small to fit the check-bytes\nspecified in the RFC and a buffer over-read can happen.\n\nApplications calling CMS_decrypt() or CMS_decrypt_set1_password()\n(equivalently openssl cms -decrypt -pwri_password ...) on untrusted CMS\ndata are vulnerable to this issue. No password knowledge is required: the\nover-read happens during the unwrap attempt before any authentication\nsucceeds.\n\nThe over-read is limited to a few bytes and is not written to output, so\nthere is no information disclosure. Triggering a crash requires the\nallocation to border unmapped memory, which is unlikely with the normal\nallocator.\n\nThe FIPS modules are not affected by this issue."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "format": "other",
          "other": {
            "content": {
              "text": "Low"
            },
            "type": "https://openssl-library.org/policies/general/security-policy/"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-125",
              "description": "CWE-125 Out-of-bounds Read",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-06-10T07:47:51.139Z",
        "orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
        "shortName": "openssl"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260609.txt"
        },
        {
          "name": "4.0.1 git commit",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/3d8d5bc1056b2f62da9fede23fedbf47e85187b0"
        },
        {
          "name": "3.6.3 git commit",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/77bf00ab13f6ff5e516535432f0328ed70ec0c26"
        },
        {
          "name": "3.5.7 git commit",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/715349a1d7c6db970e6815dafb90915f07307f98"
        },
        {
          "name": "3.4.6 git commit",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/05b066366842f930fadd9a6e94df98030af431bb"
        },
        {
          "name": "3.0.21 git commit",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/eecbe330977e8d023aae1ca2d9bdbe983ef3fdc6"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Out-of-Bounds Read in CMS Password-Based Decryption",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
    "assignerShortName": "openssl",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-9076",
    "datePublished": "2026-06-09T16:03:16.306Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-05-20T12:43:37.677Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-06-10T07:47:51.139Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-9076",
      "date": "2026-09-04",
      "epss": "0.00707",
      "percentile": "0.51058"
    },
    "microsoft_vex": {
      "current_release_date": "2026-06-23T14:49:15.000Z",
      "cve": "CVE-2026-9076",
      "id": "msrc_CVE-2026-9076",
      "initial_release_date": "2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z",
      "product_status:fixed": "2",
      "product_status:known_affected": "2",
      "product_status:known_not_affected": "5",
      "source": "Microsoft CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "Out-of-Bounds Read in CMS Password-Based Decryption",
      "url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/csaf/vex/2026/msrc_cve-2026-9076.json",
      "version": "4"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-9076\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"published\":\"2026-06-09T17:17:50.997\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-07-23T08:10:00.137\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Issue summary: When CMS password-based decryption (RFC 3211 / PWRI key unwrap)\\nprocesses attacker-supplied CMS data, an attacker-chosen stream-mode KEK\\ncipher can trigger a heap out-of-bounds read in kek_unwrap_key().\\n\\nImpact summary: A heap buffer over-read may trigger a crash which leads to\\nDenial of Service for an application if the input buffer ends at a memory\\npage boundary and the following page is unmapped. There is no information\\ndisclosure as the over-read bytes are not revealed to the attacker.\\n\\nThe key unwrapping function performs a check-byte test as specified in the\\nRFC that reads 7 bytes from a heap allocation that is based on the wrapped\\nkey length from the message. There is a minimum length check based on the\\nblock length of the wrapping cipher. However the cipher is selected from\\nan OID carried in the attacker\u0027s PWRI keyEncryptionAlgorithm with no\\nrequirement that the cipher be a block cipher. When an attacker selects\\na stream-mode cipher the guard will be ineffective and the allocated buffer\\ncontaining the unwrapped key can be too small to fit the check-bytes\\nspecified in the RFC and a buffer over-read can happen.\\n\\nApplications calling CMS_decrypt() or CMS_decrypt_set1_password()\\n(equivalently openssl cms -decrypt -pwri_password ...) on untrusted CMS\\ndata are vulnerable to this issue. No password knowledge is required: the\\nover-read happens during the unwrap attempt before any authentication\\nsucceeds.\\n\\nThe over-read is limited to a few bytes and is not written to output, so\\nthere is no information disclosure. Triggering a crash requires the\\nallocation to border unmapped memory, which is unlikely with the normal\\nallocator.\\n\\nThe FIPS modules are not affected by this issue.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Resumen del problema: Cuando el descifrado basado en contrase\u00f1a de CMS (RFC 3211 / desenvolvimiento de clave PWRI) procesa datos CMS suministrados por el atacante, un cifrado KEK en modo de flujo elegido por el atacante puede desencadenar una lectura fuera de l\u00edmites en el heap en kek_unwrap_key().\\n\\nResumen del impacto: Una lectura excesiva del b\u00fafer del heap puede desencadenar un fallo que lleva a la denegaci\u00f3n de servicio para una aplicaci\u00f3n si el b\u00fafer de entrada termina en un l\u00edmite de p\u00e1gina de memoria y la p\u00e1gina siguiente no est\u00e1 mapeada. No hay revelaci\u00f3n de informaci\u00f3n ya que los bytes le\u00eddos en exceso no se revelan al atacante.\\n\\nLa funci\u00f3n de desenvolvimiento de clave realiza una prueba de bytes de verificaci\u00f3n seg\u00fan lo especificado en el RFC que lee 7 bytes de una asignaci\u00f3n en el heap que se basa en la longitud de la clave envuelta del mensaje. Hay una verificaci\u00f3n de longitud m\u00ednima basada en la longitud de bloque del cifrado de envoltura. Sin embargo, el cifrado se selecciona de un OID transportado en el algoritmo de cifrado de clave PWRI del atacante sin el requisito de que el cifrado sea un cifrado de bloque. Cuando un atacante selecciona un cifrado en modo de flujo, la protecci\u00f3n ser\u00e1 ineficaz y el b\u00fafer asignado que contiene la clave desenvuelta puede ser demasiado peque\u00f1o para contener los bytes de verificaci\u00f3n especificados en el RFC y puede ocurrir una lectura excesiva del b\u00fafer.\\n\\nLas aplicaciones que llaman a \u0027CMS_decrypt()\u0027 o \u0027CMS_decrypt_set1_password()\u0027 (equivalentemente OpenSSL cms -decrypt -pwri_password ...) en datos CMS no confiables son vulnerables a este problema. No se requiere conocimiento de la contrase\u00f1a: la lectura excesiva ocurre durante el intento de desenvolvimiento antes de que cualquier autenticaci\u00f3n tenga \u00e9xito.\\n\\nLa lectura excesiva est\u00e1 limitada a unos pocos bytes y no se escribe en la salida, por lo que no hay revelaci\u00f3n de informaci\u00f3n. Desencadenar un fallo requiere que la asignaci\u00f3n limite con memoria no mapeada, lo cual es poco probable con el asignador normal.\\n\\nLos m\u00f3dulos FIPS no se ven afectados por este problema.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"OpenSSL\",\"product\":\"OpenSSL\",\"defaultStatus\":\"unaffected\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"4.0.0\",\"lessThan\":\"4.0.1\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"3.6.0\",\"lessThan\":\"3.6.3\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"3.5.0\",\"lessThan\":\"3.5.7\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"3.4.0\",\"lessThan\":\"3.4.6\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"3.0.0\",\"lessThan\":\"3.0.21\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"1.1.1\",\"lessThan\":\"1.1.1zh\",\"versionType\":\"custom\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"1.0.2\",\"lessThan\":\"1.0.2zq\",\"versionType\":\"custom\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":3.6}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2026-06-09T19:04:07.840133Z\",\"id\":\"CVE-2026-9076\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"none\"},{\"automatable\":\"yes\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"partial\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-125\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"1.0.2\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"1.0.2zq\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"F534B804-67B6-49DA-8A86-0FF21E512908\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"1.1.1\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"1.1.1zh\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"43EFE1E3-4049-4EE6-A2AE-BDBA38E6870F\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"3.0.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"3.0.21\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"EDB88756-EDFE-4886-A267-3F19342A6042\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"3.4.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"3.4.6\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"BF7E21E7-AEC0-4882-B1F1-2D056B506F22\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"3.5.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"3.5.7\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"6B6B9930-C549-4D88-9784-AF32CCDDB87A\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"3.6.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"3.6.3\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"D41B3C45-EC73-4DC8-989D-B2E2792E102F\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:4.0.0:-:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"6E881B9A-1A0A-4BC0-8160-20C00561167D\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/05b066366842f930fadd9a6e94df98030af431bb\",\"source\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/3d8d5bc1056b2f62da9fede23fedbf47e85187b0\",\"source\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/715349a1d7c6db970e6815dafb90915f07307f98\",\"source\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/77bf00ab13f6ff5e516535432f0328ed70ec0c26\",\"source\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/eecbe330977e8d023aae1ca2d9bdbe983ef3fdc6\",\"source\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260609.txt\",\"source\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}",
    "redhat_vex": {
      "aggregate_severity": "Low",
      "current_release_date": "2026-09-01T12:07:33+00:00",
      "cve": "CVE-2026-9076",
      "id": "CVE-2026-9076",
      "initial_release_date": "2026-06-09T00:00:00+00:00",
      "product_status:fixed": "103",
      "product_status:known_affected": "53",
      "product_status:known_not_affected": "11",
      "source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service due to heap out-of-bounds read in CMS password-based decryption",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-9076.json",
      "version": "3"
    },
    "suse_vex": {
      "aggregate_severity": "moderate",
      "current_release_date": "2026-07-22T16:39:11Z",
      "cve": "CVE-2026-9076",
      "id": "CVE-2026-9076",
      "initial_release_date": "2026-06-13T02:29:07Z",
      "product_status:known_affected": "503",
      "product_status:known_not_affected": "84",
      "product_status:recommended": "362",
      "source": "SUSE CSAF VEX",
      "status": "interim",
      "title": "SUSE CVE CVE-2026-9076",
      "url": "https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/csaf-vex/cve-2026-9076.json",
      "version": "14"
    },
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 7.5, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\"}}, {\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-9076\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-06-09T19:04:07.840133Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-06-09T19:04:03.021Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Out-of-Bounds Read in CMS Password-Based Decryption\", \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"reporter\", \"value\": \"Bhabani Sankar Das\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"reporter\", \"value\": \"Haruki Oyama (Waseda University)\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"remediation developer\", \"value\": \"Nikola Pajkovsky\"}], \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"https://openssl-library.org/policies/general/security-policy/\", \"content\": {\"text\": \"Low\"}}, \"format\": \"other\"}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"OpenSSL\", \"product\": \"OpenSSL\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"4.0.0\", \"lessThan\": \"4.0.1\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"3.6.0\", \"lessThan\": \"3.6.3\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"3.5.0\", \"lessThan\": \"3.5.7\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"3.4.0\", \"lessThan\": \"3.4.6\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"3.0.0\", \"lessThan\": \"3.0.21\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"1.1.1\", \"lessThan\": \"1.1.1zh\", \"versionType\": \"custom\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"1.0.2\", \"lessThan\": \"1.0.2zq\", \"versionType\": \"custom\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"datePublic\": \"2026-06-09T14:00:00.000Z\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260609.txt\", \"name\": \"OpenSSL Advisory\", \"tags\": [\"vendor-advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/3d8d5bc1056b2f62da9fede23fedbf47e85187b0\", \"name\": \"4.0.1 git commit\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/77bf00ab13f6ff5e516535432f0328ed70ec0c26\", \"name\": \"3.6.3 git commit\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/715349a1d7c6db970e6815dafb90915f07307f98\", \"name\": \"3.5.7 git commit\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/05b066366842f930fadd9a6e94df98030af431bb\", \"name\": \"3.4.6 git commit\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/eecbe330977e8d023aae1ca2d9bdbe983ef3fdc6\", \"name\": \"3.0.21 git commit\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"Vulnogram 0.2.0\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Issue summary: When CMS password-based decryption (RFC 3211 / PWRI key unwrap)\\nprocesses attacker-supplied CMS data, an attacker-chosen stream-mode KEK\\ncipher can trigger a heap out-of-bounds read in kek_unwrap_key().\\n\\nImpact summary: A heap buffer over-read may trigger a crash which leads to\\nDenial of Service for an application if the input buffer ends at a memory\\npage boundary and the following page is unmapped. There is no information\\ndisclosure as the over-read bytes are not revealed to the attacker.\\n\\nThe key unwrapping function performs a check-byte test as specified in the\\nRFC that reads 7 bytes from a heap allocation that is based on the wrapped\\nkey length from the message. There is a minimum length check based on the\\nblock length of the wrapping cipher. However the cipher is selected from\\nan OID carried in the attacker\u0027s PWRI keyEncryptionAlgorithm with no\\nrequirement that the cipher be a block cipher. When an attacker selects\\na stream-mode cipher the guard will be ineffective and the allocated buffer\\ncontaining the unwrapped key can be too small to fit the check-bytes\\nspecified in the RFC and a buffer over-read can happen.\\n\\nApplications calling CMS_decrypt() or CMS_decrypt_set1_password()\\n(equivalently openssl cms -decrypt -pwri_password ...) on untrusted CMS\\ndata are vulnerable to this issue. No password knowledge is required: the\\nover-read happens during the unwrap attempt before any authentication\\nsucceeds.\\n\\nThe over-read is limited to a few bytes and is not written to output, so\\nthere is no information disclosure. Triggering a crash requires the\\nallocation to border unmapped memory, which is unlikely with the normal\\nallocator.\\n\\nThe FIPS modules are not affected by this issue.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"Issue summary: When CMS password-based decryption (RFC 3211 / PWRI key unwrap)\u003cbr\u003eprocesses attacker-supplied CMS data, an attacker-chosen stream-mode KEK\u003cbr\u003ecipher can trigger a heap out-of-bounds read in kek_unwrap_key().\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: A heap buffer over-read may trigger a crash which leads to\u003cbr\u003eDenial of Service for an application if the input buffer ends at a memory\u003cbr\u003epage boundary and the following page is unmapped. There is no information\u003cbr\u003edisclosure as the over-read bytes are not revealed to the attacker.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe key unwrapping function performs a check-byte test as specified in the\u003cbr\u003eRFC that reads 7 bytes from a heap allocation that is based on the wrapped\u003cbr\u003ekey length from the message. There is a minimum length check based on the\u003cbr\u003eblock length of the wrapping cipher. However the cipher is selected from\u003cbr\u003ean OID carried in the attacker\u0027s PWRI keyEncryptionAlgorithm with no\u003cbr\u003erequirement that the cipher be a block cipher. When an attacker selects\u003cbr\u003ea stream-mode cipher the guard will be ineffective and the allocated buffer\u003cbr\u003econtaining the unwrapped key can be too small to fit the check-bytes\u003cbr\u003especified in the RFC and a buffer over-read can happen.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eApplications calling CMS_decrypt() or CMS_decrypt_set1_password()\u003cbr\u003e(equivalently openssl cms -decrypt -pwri_password ...) on untrusted CMS\u003cbr\u003edata are vulnerable to this issue. No password knowledge is required: the\u003cbr\u003eover-read happens during the unwrap attempt before any authentication\u003cbr\u003esucceeds.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe over-read is limited to a few bytes and is not written to output, so\u003cbr\u003ethere is no information disclosure. Triggering a crash requires the\u003cbr\u003eallocation to border unmapped memory, which is unlikely with the normal\u003cbr\u003eallocator.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe FIPS modules are not affected by this issue.\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-125\", \"description\": \"CWE-125 Out-of-bounds Read\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5\", \"shortName\": \"openssl\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-06-10T07:47:51.139Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-9076\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-06-10T07:47:51.139Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-05-20T12:43:37.677Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-06-09T16:03:16.306Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"openssl\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.