CVE-2025-5115 (GCVE-0-2025-5115)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-08-20 19:07 – Updated: 2025-11-04 21:11
VLAI
Title
MadeYouReset HTTP/2 vulnerability
Summary
In Eclipse Jetty, versions <=9.4.57, <=10.0.25, <=11.0.25, <=12.0.21, <=12.1.0.alpha2, an HTTP/2 client may trigger the server to send RST_STREAM frames, for example by sending frames that are malformed or that should not be sent in a particular stream state, therefore forcing the server to consume resources such as CPU and memory. For example, a client can open a stream and then send WINDOW_UPDATE frames with window size increment of 0, which is illegal. Per specification https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9113.html#name-window_update , the server should send a RST_STREAM frame. The client can now open another stream and send another bad WINDOW_UPDATE, therefore causing the server to consume more resources than necessary, as this case does not exceed the max number of concurrent streams, yet the client is able to create an enormous amount of streams in a short period of time. The attack can be performed with other conditions (for example, a DATA frame for a closed stream) that cause the server to send a RST_STREAM frame. Links: * https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/security/advisories/GHSA-mmxm-8w33-wc4h
Severity
7.7 (High)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: yes Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
  • CWE-400 - Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Eclipse Jetty Eclipse Jetty Affected: >=9.3.0 , ≤ <=9.4.57 (semver)
Affected: >=10.0.0 , ≤ <=10.0.25 (semver)
Affected: >=11.0.0 , ≤ <=11.0.25 (semver)
Affected: >=12.0.0 , ≤ <=12.0.21 (semver)
Affected: >=12.1.0.alpha0 , ≤ <=12.1.0.alpha2 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-5115",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-08-20T19:28:04.700843Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-08-20T19:28:12.942Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      },
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-11-04T21:11:37.182Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/09/msg00014.html"
          },
          {
            "url": "https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/767506"
          },
          {
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/09/17/1"
          },
          {
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/08/20/4"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2",
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageName": "pkg:maven/org.eclipse.jetty.http2/http2-common",
          "product": "Eclipse Jetty",
          "repo": "https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project",
          "vendor": "Eclipse Jetty",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "\u003c=9.4.57",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003e=9.3.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "\u003c=10.0.25",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003e=10.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "\u003c=11.0.25",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003e=11.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "\u003c=12.0.21",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003e=12.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "\u003c=12.1.0.alpha2",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003e=12.1.0.alpha0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn Eclipse Jetty, versions \u0026lt;=9.4.57, \u0026lt;=10.0.25, \u0026lt;=11.0.25, \u0026lt;=12.0.21, \u0026lt;=12.1.0.alpha2, an HTTP/2 client may trigger the server to send RST_STREAM frames, for example by sending frames that are malformed or that should not be sent in a particular stream state, therefore forcing the server to consume resources such as CPU and memory.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor example, a client can open a stream and then send WINDOW_UPDATE frames with window size increment of 0, which is illegal.\nPer specification\u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9113.html#name-window_update\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e, the server should send a RST_STREAM frame.\nThe client can now open another stream and send another bad WINDOW_UPDATE, therefore causing the server to consume more resources than necessary, as this case does not exceed the max number of concurrent streams, yet the client is able to create an enormous amount of streams in a short period of time.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe attack can be performed with other conditions (for example, a DATA frame for a closed stream) that cause the server to send a RST_STREAM frame.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLinks:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/security/advisories/GHSA-mmxm-8w33-wc4h\"\u003ehttps://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/security/advisories/GHSA-mmxm-8w33-wc4h\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "In Eclipse Jetty, versions \u003c=9.4.57, \u003c=10.0.25, \u003c=11.0.25, \u003c=12.0.21, \u003c=12.1.0.alpha2, an HTTP/2 client may trigger the server to send RST_STREAM frames, for example by sending frames that are malformed or that should not be sent in a particular stream state, therefore forcing the server to consume resources such as CPU and memory.\n\n\nFor example, a client can open a stream and then send WINDOW_UPDATE frames with window size increment of 0, which is illegal.\nPer specification  https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9113.html#name-window_update , the server should send a RST_STREAM frame.\nThe client can now open another stream and send another bad WINDOW_UPDATE, therefore causing the server to consume more resources than necessary, as this case does not exceed the max number of concurrent streams, yet the client is able to create an enormous amount of streams in a short period of time.\n\n\nThe attack can be performed with other conditions (for example, a DATA frame for a closed stream) that cause the server to send a RST_STREAM frame.\n\n\n\nLinks:\n\n\n\n  *   https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/security/advisories/GHSA-mmxm-8w33-wc4h"
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 7.7,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-400",
              "description": "CWE-400 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-08-21T10:36:49.477Z",
        "orgId": "e51fbebd-6053-4e49-959f-1b94eeb69a2c",
        "shortName": "eclipse"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "issue-tracking"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/security/advisories/GHSA-mmxm-8w33-wc4h"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/pull/13449"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "release-notes"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/releases/tag/jetty-12.1.0"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "release-notes"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/releases/tag/jetty-12.0.25"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "release-notes"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/releases/tag/jetty-11.0.26"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "release-notes"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/releases/tag/jetty-10.0.26"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "release-notes"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/releases/tag/jetty-9.4.58.v20250814"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "MadeYouReset HTTP/2 vulnerability",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "e51fbebd-6053-4e49-959f-1b94eeb69a2c",
    "assignerShortName": "eclipse",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-5115",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-20T19:07:11.546Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-05-23T08:55:59.861Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-11-04T21:11:37.182Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2025-5115",
      "date": "2026-07-30",
      "epss": "0.01625",
      "percentile": "0.7375"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-5115\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"emo@eclipse.org\",\"published\":\"2025-08-20T20:15:33.377\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-06-17T09:47:13.537\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"In Eclipse Jetty, versions \u003c=9.4.57, \u003c=10.0.25, \u003c=11.0.25, \u003c=12.0.21, \u003c=12.1.0.alpha2, an HTTP/2 client may trigger the server to send RST_STREAM frames, for example by sending frames that are malformed or that should not be sent in a particular stream state, therefore forcing the server to consume resources such as CPU and memory.\\n\\n\\nFor example, a client can open a stream and then send WINDOW_UPDATE frames with window size increment of 0, which is illegal.\\nPer specification  https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9113.html#name-window_update , the server should send a RST_STREAM frame.\\nThe client can now open another stream and send another bad WINDOW_UPDATE, therefore causing the server to consume more resources than necessary, as this case does not exceed the max number of concurrent streams, yet the client is able to create an enormous amount of streams in a short period of time.\\n\\n\\nThe attack can be performed with other conditions (for example, a DATA frame for a closed stream) that cause the server to send a RST_STREAM frame.\\n\\n\\n\\nLinks:\\n\\n\\n\\n  *   https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/security/advisories/GHSA-mmxm-8w33-wc4h\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"En Eclipse Jetty, versiones \u0026lt;=9.4.57, \u0026lt;=10.0.25, \u0026lt;=11.0.25, \u0026lt;=12.0.21, \u0026lt;=12.1.0.alpha2, un cliente HTTP/2 puede provocar que el servidor env\u00ede tramas RST_STREAM, por ejemplo, enviando tramas con formato incorrecto o que no deber\u00edan enviarse en un estado de flujo espec\u00edfico, lo que obliga al servidor a consumir recursos como CPU y memoria. Por ejemplo, un cliente puede abrir un flujo y luego enviar tramas WINDOW_UPDATE con un incremento de tama\u00f1o de ventana de 0, lo cual es ilegal. Seg\u00fan la especificaci\u00f3n https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9113.html#name-window_update, el servidor debe enviar una trama RST_STREAM. El cliente ahora puede abrir otra transmisi\u00f3n y enviar otra WINDOW_UPDATE incorrecta, lo que provoca que el servidor consuma m\u00e1s recursos de los necesarios. En este caso, no se supera el n\u00famero m\u00e1ximo de transmisiones simult\u00e1neas, pero el cliente puede crear una enorme cantidad de transmisiones en poco tiempo. El ataque puede ejecutarse con otras condiciones (por ejemplo, una trama DATA para una transmisi\u00f3n cerrada) que provocan que el servidor env\u00ede una trama RST_STREAM. Enlaces: * https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/security/advisories/GHSA-mmxm-8w33-wc4h\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"emo@eclipse.org\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"Eclipse Jetty\",\"product\":\"Eclipse Jetty\",\"defaultStatus\":\"unaffected\",\"collectionURL\":\"https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2\",\"packageName\":\"pkg:maven/org.eclipse.jetty.http2/http2-common\",\"repo\":\"https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"\u003e=9.3.0\",\"lessThanOrEqual\":\"\u003c=9.4.57\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"\u003e=10.0.0\",\"lessThanOrEqual\":\"\u003c=10.0.25\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"\u003e=11.0.0\",\"lessThanOrEqual\":\"\u003c=11.0.25\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"\u003e=12.0.0\",\"lessThanOrEqual\":\"\u003c=12.0.21\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"\u003e=12.1.0.alpha0\",\"lessThanOrEqual\":\"\u003c=12.1.0.alpha2\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"emo@eclipse.org\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":7.7,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"attackRequirements\":\"NONE\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}],\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":3.6}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2025-08-20T19:28:04.700843Z\",\"id\":\"CVE-2025-5115\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"none\"},{\"automatable\":\"yes\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"partial\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"emo@eclipse.org\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-400\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:eclipse:jetty:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"9.3.0\",\"versionEndIncluding\":\"9.4.57\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"8F512BB3-9D38-43E0-9962-876DA3232AE2\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:eclipse:jetty:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"10.0.0\",\"versionEndIncluding\":\"10.0.25\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"CDD3D394-58B1-4E91-8F5C-E343F6EB4108\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:eclipse:jetty:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"11.0.0\",\"versionEndIncluding\":\"11.0.25\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"5B8C48CF-A987-4C4C-A1B5-8E6B2D321DAB\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:eclipse:jetty:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"12.0.0\",\"versionEndIncluding\":\"12.0.21\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"B535FBFA-91E1-4E8E-8731-1671DEA66413\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:eclipse:jetty:12.1.0:alpha0:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"4E708B1F-1405-48BA-8B32-9611D491286C\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:eclipse:jetty:12.1.0:alpha1:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"A837B906-9792-4AFA-8391-C8A00913E1D7\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:eclipse:jetty:12.1.0:alpha2:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"E8D7F1B4-3C3F-48FF-A7F0-C5462171E6EA\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/pull/13449\",\"source\":\"emo@eclipse.org\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/releases/tag/jetty-10.0.26\",\"source\":\"emo@eclipse.org\",\"tags\":[\"Release Notes\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/releases/tag/jetty-11.0.26\",\"source\":\"emo@eclipse.org\",\"tags\":[\"Release Notes\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/releases/tag/jetty-12.0.25\",\"source\":\"emo@eclipse.org\",\"tags\":[\"Release Notes\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/releases/tag/jetty-12.1.0\",\"source\":\"emo@eclipse.org\",\"tags\":[\"Release Notes\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/releases/tag/jetty-9.4.58.v20250814\",\"source\":\"emo@eclipse.org\",\"tags\":[\"Release Notes\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/security/advisories/GHSA-mmxm-8w33-wc4h\",\"source\":\"emo@eclipse.org\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/08/20/4\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/09/17/1\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/09/msg00014.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Mailing List\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/767506\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}",
    "redhat_vex": {
      "aggregate_severity": "Important",
      "current_release_date": "2026-07-27T03:52:48+00:00",
      "cve": "CVE-2025-5115",
      "id": "CVE-2025-5115",
      "initial_release_date": "2025-08-20T00:00:00+00:00",
      "product_status:fixed": "36",
      "product_status:known_affected": "8",
      "product_status:known_not_affected": "16",
      "source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "jetty: HTTP/2 (including DNS over HTTPS) contains a design flaw and is vulnerable to \"MadeYouReset\" DoS attack through HTTP/2 control frames",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2025/cve-2025-5115.json",
      "version": "3"
    },
    "suse_vex": {
      "aggregate_severity": "important",
      "current_release_date": "2026-05-27T03:11:48Z",
      "cve": "CVE-2025-5115",
      "id": "CVE-2025-5115",
      "initial_release_date": "2025-08-21T23:24:20Z",
      "product_status:known_affected": "8",
      "product_status:recommended": "238",
      "source": "SUSE CSAF VEX",
      "status": "interim",
      "title": "SUSE CVE CVE-2025-5115",
      "url": "https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/csaf-vex/cve-2025-5115.json",
      "version": "8"
    },
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CVE Program Container\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/09/msg00014.html\"}, {\"url\": \"https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/767506\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/09/17/1\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/08/20/4\"}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"shortName\": \"CVE\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-11-04T21:11:37.182Z\"}}, {\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2025-5115\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-08-20T19:28:04.700843Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-08-20T19:28:07.991Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"MadeYouReset HTTP/2 vulnerability\", \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV4_0\": {\"Safety\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"version\": \"4.0\", \"Recovery\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"baseScore\": 7.7, \"Automatable\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"valueDensity\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H\", \"providerUrgency\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"attackRequirements\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"subIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"subAvailabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"vulnAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"subConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\": \"NOT_DEFINED\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}], \"affected\": [{\"repo\": \"https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project\", \"vendor\": \"Eclipse Jetty\", \"product\": \"Eclipse Jetty\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003e=9.3.0\", \"versionType\": \"semver\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"\u003c=9.4.57\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003e=10.0.0\", \"versionType\": \"semver\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"\u003c=10.0.25\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003e=11.0.0\", \"versionType\": \"semver\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"\u003c=11.0.25\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003e=12.0.0\", \"versionType\": \"semver\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"\u003c=12.0.21\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003e=12.1.0.alpha0\", \"versionType\": \"semver\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"\u003c=12.1.0.alpha2\"}], \"packageName\": \"pkg:maven/org.eclipse.jetty.http2/http2-common\", \"collectionURL\": \"https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2\", \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/security/advisories/GHSA-mmxm-8w33-wc4h\", \"tags\": [\"issue-tracking\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/pull/13449\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/releases/tag/jetty-12.1.0\", \"tags\": [\"release-notes\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/releases/tag/jetty-12.0.25\", \"tags\": [\"release-notes\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/releases/tag/jetty-11.0.26\", \"tags\": [\"release-notes\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/releases/tag/jetty-10.0.26\", \"tags\": [\"release-notes\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/releases/tag/jetty-9.4.58.v20250814\", \"tags\": [\"release-notes\"]}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"Vulnogram 0.2.0\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"In Eclipse Jetty, versions \u003c=9.4.57, \u003c=10.0.25, \u003c=11.0.25, \u003c=12.0.21, \u003c=12.1.0.alpha2, an HTTP/2 client may trigger the server to send RST_STREAM frames, for example by sending frames that are malformed or that should not be sent in a particular stream state, therefore forcing the server to consume resources such as CPU and memory.\\n\\n\\nFor example, a client can open a stream and then send WINDOW_UPDATE frames with window size increment of 0, which is illegal.\\nPer specification  https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9113.html#name-window_update , the server should send a RST_STREAM frame.\\nThe client can now open another stream and send another bad WINDOW_UPDATE, therefore causing the server to consume more resources than necessary, as this case does not exceed the max number of concurrent streams, yet the client is able to create an enormous amount of streams in a short period of time.\\n\\n\\nThe attack can be performed with other conditions (for example, a DATA frame for a closed stream) that cause the server to send a RST_STREAM frame.\\n\\n\\n\\nLinks:\\n\\n\\n\\n  *   https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/security/advisories/GHSA-mmxm-8w33-wc4h\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn Eclipse Jetty, versions \u0026lt;=9.4.57, \u0026lt;=10.0.25, \u0026lt;=11.0.25, \u0026lt;=12.0.21, \u0026lt;=12.1.0.alpha2, an HTTP/2 client may trigger the server to send RST_STREAM frames, for example by sending frames that are malformed or that should not be sent in a particular stream state, therefore forcing the server to consume resources such as CPU and memory.\u003c/p\u003e\\n\u003cp\u003eFor example, a client can open a stream and then send WINDOW_UPDATE frames with window size increment of 0, which is illegal.\\nPer specification\u003ca target=\\\"_blank\\\" rel=\\\"nofollow\\\" href=\\\"https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9113.html#name-window_update\\\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e, the server should send a RST_STREAM frame.\\nThe client can now open another stream and send another bad WINDOW_UPDATE, therefore causing the server to consume more resources than necessary, as this case does not exceed the max number of concurrent streams, yet the client is able to create an enormous amount of streams in a short period of time.\u003c/p\u003e\\n\u003cp\u003eThe attack can be performed with other conditions (for example, a DATA frame for a closed stream) that cause the server to send a RST_STREAM frame.\u003c/p\u003e\\n\\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLinks:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\\n\u003cul\u003e\\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca target=\\\"_blank\\\" rel=\\\"nofollow\\\" href=\\\"https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/security/advisories/GHSA-mmxm-8w33-wc4h\\\"\u003ehttps://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/security/advisories/GHSA-mmxm-8w33-wc4h\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-400\", \"description\": \"CWE-400 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"e51fbebd-6053-4e49-959f-1b94eeb69a2c\", \"shortName\": \"eclipse\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-08-21T10:36:49.477Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2025-5115\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-11-04T21:11:37.182Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2025-05-23T08:55:59.861Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"e51fbebd-6053-4e49-959f-1b94eeb69a2c\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-08-20T19:07:11.546Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"eclipse\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.