Computer Incident Response Center Luxembourg logo
Organization

Computer Incident Response Center Luxembourg

Governmental, Luxembourg

GNA-1

CIRCL is the CERT (Computer Emergency Response Team/Computer Security Incident Response Team) for the private sector, communes and non-governmental entities in Luxembourg.


Website
https://www.circl.lu
Email
info@circl.lu
Vendor name
circl
GNA identifier
GNA-1 GCVE registry Recent publications

Products

9 products registered by Computer Incident Response Center Luxembourg

Open Source Threat Intelligence Platform & Open Standards For Threat Information Sharing

Client API to query any Passive DNS implementation following the Passive DNS - Common Output Format.

An open source platform to support analysts to organise their case and tasks.

AIL Framework

The Vulnerability-Lookup software is a powerful sharing platform to assist security teams, researchers, and system administrators in identifying and tracking vulnerabilities related to specific vendors and products. By leveraging known vulnerability databases, sightings, and configurations, the software provides...

Analyse a forensic target (such as a directory) to find and report files found and not found from CIRCL hashlookup public service or the Bloom filter from CIRCL hashlookup. This tool can help a digital forensic investigator to know the context, origin of specific files during a digital forensic investigation.

Lookyloo is a web interface that captures a webpage and then displays a tree of the domains, that call each other.

Convert Cyber Threat Intelligence data between MISP and STIX formats. Open-source REST API maintained by the MISP Project community.

Rulezet is an open-source, community-driven platform for sharing cybersecurity detection rules. This policy covers the official instance at rulezet.org. Anyone can also self-host Rulezet from its source code — if you are using a self-hosted instance, this default policy may have been customized by that instance's...

Recent vulnerabilities

CVE-2026-95806 (GCVE-0-2026-95806)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-22 15:09 – Updated: 2026-09-22 15:54
VLAI
Title
MISP: PHP phar stream wrapper enables deserialization and code execution via caller-influenced filesystem paths
Summary
MISP ships with PHP's phar stream wrapper registered in both its web entry point and its console entry point.  The phar stream wrapper causes PHP to treat a phar archive as a directory, which has two security consequences:    - any filesystem operation on a caller-influenced path that resolves to a phar archive triggers an implicit unserialize() call, creating a deserialization sink;  - a relocated application root can reach executable code inside an uploaded phar file, enabling arbitrary code execution as the web user. No component of MISP, the vendored CakePHP framework, or any runtime-loaded library reads or constructs phar archives. The wrapper therefore serves no legitimate purpose in the MISP runtime and exists solely as an available primitive for an attacker who can influence a filesystem path argument.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-22 15:53 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-502 - Deserialization of Untrusted Data
  • CWE-74 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
MISP MISP Affected: 0 , < 2.5.47 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
GCVE extensions
AI involvement GCVE-BCP-05-X-01
Whole record AI-generated Human-reviewed GNA-1

Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.

ai-computer-assisted:llm-generatedai-computer-assisted:classification
Model Source Identifier
qwen3.8:27b ollama qwen3.8:27b
Patch provenance GCVE-BCP-05-X-02
Generator
patch2vuln.py on 2026-09-22 15:01
Model
qwen3.8:27b
Input
https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/08fa755b6.patch f4fc3223e642…
Confidence
medium
Commit Subject Patch SHA-256
08fa755b6363 chg: [internal] Unregister the phar stream wrapper in the f4fc3223e642…
Fix summary

The phar stream wrapper is unregistered via stream_wrapper_unregister('phar') at the top of both the web and console entry points, before any framework bootstrap or application code executes. Because no MISP component, CakePHP, or runtime library requires the phar wrapper, removing it eliminates the implicit unserialize() sink and the directory-like phar archive behavior without functional impact. This closes the deserialization and code-execution primitive application-wide, independent of whether individual callers validate their path arguments.

Patch summary

Two files are modified. In app/Console/cake.php and app/webroot/index.php, a 14-line block is inserted immediately after the file header comment and before any existing logic. The block checks whether 'phar' is present in stream_get_wrappers() and, if so, calls stream_wrapper_unregister('phar'). A docblock comment explains the security rationale: the wrapper turns filesystem calls on caller-influenced paths into unserialize() sinks and allows a relocated application root to reach code inside an uploaded file. No other code is changed; the total diff is 28 insertions across the two files.

CVSS rationale

AV:N: The vulnerability is reachable through the web entry point (app/webroot/index.php), making it network-accessible. AC:H: Exploitation requires crafting a valid phar archive with a malicious serialized payload and identifying a code path where a caller-influenced filesystem argument resolves to that archive; the commit describes this as an 'argument-injection exploit,' implying non-trivial path manipulation. AT:N: No specific attack-target conditions are indicated. PR:L: MISP is a threat-intelligence platform that typically requires authenticated access; the commit references 'the web user' context, suggesting the attacker operates within the application's privilege boundary. UI:N: No user interaction is required. VC/VI/VA:H: Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the web user, compromising confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the MISP instance. SC/SI/SA:N: No evidence of impact on subsequent or other components beyond the MISP instance itself.

Weakness rationale
  • CWE-502 The phar stream wrapper causes PHP to invoke unserialize() implicitly whenever a filesystem operation resolves to a phar archive. An attacker who can influence the path argument (e.g., via argument injection) can supply a crafted phar file, triggering deserialization of attacker-controlled data and leading to code execution. This is the primary and most specific weakness.
  • CWE-74 The phar stream wrapper is a special element of the PHP runtime that was not neutralized (unregistered) in the MISP entry points. Its presence allows downstream filesystem calls to be subverted into deserialization sinks. This is a secondary, broader characterization of the same issue.
Attack pattern rationale
  • CAPEC-570 The core attack mechanism is that the phar stream wrapper turns a filesystem call on a caller-influenced path into an implicit unserialize() invocation. An attacker crafts a phar archive containing a malicious serialized payload and causes the application to perform a filesystem operation on that path, triggering deserialization and code execution. CAPEC-570 is the closest match. Uncertainty: the exact injection vector (which specific MISP endpoint or console command accepts the path) is not detailed in the patch, but the deserialization sink is explicitly described in the commit message.
  • CAPEC-100 The phar stream wrapper is a trusted, built-in PHP component that the attacker leverages in the MISP runtime environment where it serves no legitimate purpose. The attacker does not need to exploit a flaw in the wrapper itself; rather, its mere presence in the runtime provides the primitive. This is a secondary mapping; CAPEC-570 is preferred as the primary because it more precisely describes the deserialization mechanism.
Assumptions to verify
  • The affected version range is inferred from the tag_version_boundary (v2.5.47, 42 commits after fix), suggesting the fix is included in v2.5.47 and earlier versions are affected. The explicit context lists affected_version and fixed_version as null, so the exact boundary is uncertain.
  • PR:L is assumed because MISP is an authenticated threat-intelligence platform; however, the patch does not explicitly state whether the vulnerable code path requires authentication. If the argument-injection vector is reachable unauthenticated, PR should be N.
  • AC:H is assumed because crafting a valid phar archive and identifying the correct code path for the filesystem call is non-trivial; the commit describes it as an 'argument-injection exploit,' implying specific conditions must be met.
  • The CAPEC-570 mapping is based on the commit message's explicit description of the phar wrapper as an 'unserialize() sink'; the exact MISP endpoint or console command that accepts the attacker-influenced path is not identified in the patch.
  • The commit message references 'the job-argument guard reverted,' implying a prior guard existed and was removed, making the phar wrapper the remaining defense. The exact prior guard is not described in this patch.
  • The Co-Authored-By line lists 'Claude Opus 5 (1M context)' as a co-author; this is recorded in the metadata as a remediation developer but is an AI assistant, not a human contributor. It is excluded from credits to avoid attributing a CVE credit to a non-human entity.
Model comparison

Selected qwen3.8:27b by deterministic-consensus-v1
The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required.

Model Score Agreement Confidence Assumptions
qwen3.8:27b 4 9 medium 6
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-95806",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-09-22T15:53:57.690631Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T15:54:08.956Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "modules": [
            "app/Console/cake.php",
            "app/webroot/index.php"
          ],
          "product": "MISP",
          "programFiles": [
            "app/Console/cake.php",
            "app/webroot/index.php"
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP",
          "vendor": "MISP",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "2.5.47",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "iglocska"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "Claude Opus 5 (1M context)"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eMISP ships with PHP\u0027s phar stream wrapper registered in both its web entry point and its console entry point.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe phar stream wrapper causes PHP to treat a phar archive as a directory, which has two security consequences:\u0026nbsp;\u2003\u003c/p\u003e\u2003-\u0026nbsp;any filesystem operation on a caller-influenced path that resolves to a phar archive triggers an implicit unserialize() call, creating a deserialization sink;\u003cbr\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u2003-\u0026nbsp;a relocated application root can reach executable code inside an uploaded phar file, enabling arbitrary code execution as the web user.\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cp\u003eNo component of MISP, the vendored CakePHP framework, or any runtime-loaded library reads or constructs phar archives. The wrapper therefore serves no legitimate purpose in the MISP runtime and exists solely as an available primitive for an attacker who can influence a filesystem path argument.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "MISP ships with PHP\u0027s phar stream wrapper registered in both its web entry point and its console entry point.\u00a0\n\nThe phar stream wrapper causes PHP to treat a phar archive as a directory, which has two security consequences:\u00a0\u2003\n\n\u2003-\u00a0any filesystem operation on a caller-influenced path that resolves to a phar archive triggers an implicit unserialize() call, creating a deserialization sink;\n\u2003-\u00a0a relocated application root can reach executable code inside an uploaded phar file, enabling arbitrary code execution as the web user.\n\n\n\n\nNo component of MISP, the vendored CakePHP framework, or any runtime-loaded library reads or constructs phar archives. The wrapper therefore serves no legitimate purpose in the MISP runtime and exists solely as an available primitive for an attacker who can influence a filesystem path argument."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-570",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-570 Deserialization of Untrusted Data"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-100",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-100 Leveraging Trusted Components in an Untrusted Environment"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 7.7,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-502",
              "description": "CWE-502 Deserialization of Untrusted Data",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-74",
              "description": "CWE-74 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T15:09:09.738Z",
        "orgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
        "shortName": "CIRCL"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "Security patch",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/08fa755b6"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe phar stream wrapper is unregistered via stream_wrapper_unregister(\u0027phar\u0027) at the top of both the web and console entry points, before any framework bootstrap or application code executes. Because no MISP component, CakePHP, or runtime library requires the phar wrapper, removing it eliminates the implicit unserialize() sink and the directory-like phar archive behavior without functional impact. This closes the deserialization and code-execution primitive application-wide, independent of whether individual callers validate their path arguments.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The phar stream wrapper is unregistered via stream_wrapper_unregister(\u0027phar\u0027) at the top of both the web and console entry points, before any framework bootstrap or application code executes. Because no MISP component, CakePHP, or runtime library requires the phar wrapper, removing it eliminates the implicit unserialize() sink and the directory-like phar archive behavior without functional impact. This closes the deserialization and code-execution primitive application-wide, independent of whether individual callers validate their path arguments."
        }
      ],
      "title": "MISP: PHP phar stream wrapper enables deserialization and code execution via caller-influenced filesystem paths",
      "x_gcve": [
        {
          "extensions": {
            "bcp-05-x-01": {
              "ai_annotations": [
                {
                  "ai_level": "generated",
                  "description": "Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.",
                  "gna_source": 1,
                  "models": [
                    {
                      "gna_source": 1,
                      "identifier": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "name": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "source": "ollama"
                    }
                  ],
                  "review_status": "full",
                  "scope": "record",
                  "tags": [
                    "ai-computer-assisted:llm-generated",
                    "ai-computer-assisted:classification"
                  ]
                }
              ]
            },
            "bcp-05-x-02": {
              "x_patch2vuln": {
                "assumptions": [
                  "The affected version range is inferred from the tag_version_boundary (v2.5.47, 42 commits after fix), suggesting the fix is included in v2.5.47 and earlier versions are affected. The explicit context lists affected_version and fixed_version as null, so the exact boundary is uncertain.",
                  "PR:L is assumed because MISP is an authenticated threat-intelligence platform; however, the patch does not explicitly state whether the vulnerable code path requires authentication. If the argument-injection vector is reachable unauthenticated, PR should be N.",
                  "AC:H is assumed because crafting a valid phar archive and identifying the correct code path for the filesystem call is non-trivial; the commit describes it as an \u0027argument-injection exploit,\u0027 implying specific conditions must be met.",
                  "The CAPEC-570 mapping is based on the commit message\u0027s explicit description of the phar wrapper as an \u0027unserialize() sink\u0027; the exact MISP endpoint or console command that accepts the attacker-influenced path is not identified in the patch.",
                  "The commit message references \u0027the job-argument guard reverted,\u0027 implying a prior guard existed and was removed, making the phar wrapper the remaining defense. The exact prior guard is not described in this patch.",
                  "The Co-Authored-By line lists \u0027Claude Opus 5 (1M context)\u0027 as a co-author; this is recorded in the metadata as a remediation developer but is an AI assistant, not a human contributor. It is excluded from credits to avoid attributing a CVE credit to a non-human entity."
                ],
                "capecRationale": [
                  {
                    "capecId": "CAPEC-570",
                    "rationale": "The core attack mechanism is that the phar stream wrapper turns a filesystem call on a caller-influenced path into an implicit unserialize() invocation. An attacker crafts a phar archive containing a malicious serialized payload and causes the application to perform a filesystem operation on that path, triggering deserialization and code execution. CAPEC-570 is the closest match. Uncertainty: the exact injection vector (which specific MISP endpoint or console command accepts the path) is not detailed in the patch, but the deserialization sink is explicitly described in the commit message."
                  },
                  {
                    "capecId": "CAPEC-100",
                    "rationale": "The phar stream wrapper is a trusted, built-in PHP component that the attacker leverages in the MISP runtime environment where it serves no legitimate purpose. The attacker does not need to exploit a flaw in the wrapper itself; rather, its mere presence in the runtime provides the primitive. This is a secondary mapping; CAPEC-570 is preferred as the primary because it more precisely describes the deserialization mechanism."
                  }
                ],
                "commit": "08fa755b6363ec0b7194d97ea36800ae8eb8f919",
                "confidence": "medium",
                "credits": [
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "iglocska"
                  },
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "Claude Opus 5 (1M context)"
                  }
                ],
                "cvssRationale": "AV:N: The vulnerability is reachable through the web entry point (app/webroot/index.php), making it network-accessible. AC:H: Exploitation requires crafting a valid phar archive with a malicious serialized payload and identifying a code path where a caller-influenced filesystem argument resolves to that archive; the commit describes this as an \u0027argument-injection exploit,\u0027 implying non-trivial path manipulation. AT:N: No specific attack-target conditions are indicated. PR:L: MISP is a threat-intelligence platform that typically requires authenticated access; the commit references \u0027the web user\u0027 context, suggesting the attacker operates within the application\u0027s privilege boundary. UI:N: No user interaction is required. VC/VI/VA:H: Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the web user, compromising confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the MISP instance. SC/SI/SA:N: No evidence of impact on subsequent or other components beyond the MISP instance itself.",
                "fixSummary": "The phar stream wrapper is unregistered via stream_wrapper_unregister(\u0027phar\u0027) at the top of both the web and console entry points, before any framework bootstrap or application code executes. Because no MISP component, CakePHP, or runtime library requires the phar wrapper, removing it eliminates the implicit unserialize() sink and the directory-like phar archive behavior without functional impact. This closes the deserialization and code-execution primitive application-wide, independent of whether individual callers validate their path arguments.",
                "generatedAt": "2026-09-22T15:01:21.211955Z",
                "generator": "patch2vuln.py",
                "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                "modelComparison": {
                  "rankings": [
                    {
                      "agreementScore": 9,
                      "assumptionCount": 6,
                      "confidence": "medium",
                      "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "score": 4
                    }
                  ],
                  "selectedModel": "qwen3.8:27b",
                  "selectionMethod": "deterministic-consensus-v1",
                  "selectionNotice": "The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required."
                },
                "patchSha256": "f4fc3223e6421557e1c03c2182cfaa2b0c17a1a20870c71214708034faf1350f",
                "patchSummary": "Two files are modified. In app/Console/cake.php and app/webroot/index.php, a 14-line block is inserted immediately after the file header comment and before any existing logic. The block checks whether \u0027phar\u0027 is present in stream_get_wrappers() and, if so, calls stream_wrapper_unregister(\u0027phar\u0027). A docblock comment explains the security rationale: the wrapper turns filesystem calls on caller-influenced paths into unserialize() sinks and allows a relocated application root to reach code inside an uploaded file. No other code is changed; the total diff is 28 insertions across the two files.",
                "patchTruncated": false,
                "patches": [
                  {
                    "commit": "08fa755b6363ec0b7194d97ea36800ae8eb8f919",
                    "patchSha256": "f4fc3223e6421557e1c03c2182cfaa2b0c17a1a20870c71214708034faf1350f",
                    "source": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/08fa755b6.patch",
                    "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/08fa755b6.patch",
                    "subject": "chg: [internal] Unregister the phar stream wrapper in the"
                  }
                ],
                "source": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/08fa755b6.patch",
                "subject": "chg: [internal] Unregister the phar stream wrapper in the",
                "tagVersionBoundary": {
                  "commits_after_fix": 42,
                  "repository": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP",
                  "tag": "v2.5.47",
                  "version": "2.5.47",
                  "version_type": "semver"
                },
                "weaknessRationale": [
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-502",
                    "rationale": "The phar stream wrapper causes PHP to invoke unserialize() implicitly whenever a filesystem operation resolves to a phar archive. An attacker who can influence the path argument (e.g., via argument injection) can supply a crafted phar file, triggering deserialization of attacker-controlled data and leading to code execution. This is the primary and most specific weakness."
                  },
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-74",
                    "rationale": "The phar stream wrapper is a special element of the PHP runtime that was not neutralized (unregistered) in the MISP entry points. Its presence allows downstream filesystem calls to be subverted into deserialization sinks. This is a secondary, broader characterization of the same issue."
                  }
                ]
              }
            }
          },
          "recordType": "advisory",
          "vulnId": "GCVE-1-2026-20263"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
    "assignerShortName": "CIRCL",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-95806",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-22T15:09:09.738Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-22T15:09:04.977Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T15:54:08.956Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2026-95805 (GCVE-0-2026-95805)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-22 14:59 – Updated: 2026-09-22 15:53
VLAI
Title
MISP ACLComponent: Typo in previewEventAttributes ACL key bypasses intended access restriction
Summary
A typo in the MISP ACLComponent access control configuration caused the ACL rule for the previewEventAttributes action to reference the permission string 'theming_enabled*' (with a trailing asterisk) instead of the correct 'theming_enabled'. In the MISP ACL system, the array values define which role or permission grants access to a given controller action. The adjacent entry previewEventObjects correctly uses ['theming_enabled'], confirming the intended restriction. The malformed key 'theming_enabled*' does not match any valid permission identifier, causing the access control check for previewEventAttributes to malfunction. Depending on the ACL evaluation logic, this could result in either unauthorized users gaining access to the previewEventAttributes endpoint (authorization bypass) or legitimate users being denied access (availability impact).  The previewEventAttributes endpoint exposes event attribute data within MISP so an authorization bypass could expose sensitive indicator and attribute data to users who should not have access.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-22 15:53 UTC
CWE
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
MISP MISP Affected: 0 , < 2.5.47 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
GCVE extensions
AI involvement GCVE-BCP-05-X-01
Whole record AI-generated Human-reviewed GNA-1

Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.

ai-computer-assisted:llm-generatedai-computer-assisted:classification
Model Source Identifier
qwen3.8:27b ollama qwen3.8:27b
Patch provenance GCVE-BCP-05-X-02
Generator
patch2vuln.py on 2026-09-22 14:55
Model
qwen3.8:27b
Input
https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/5ac8d1e4d.patch c102952ebfab…
Confidence
medium
Commit Subject Patch SHA-256
5ac8d1e4dea7 fix: [ACL] typo in previewEventAttributes key c102952ebfab…
Fix summary

The fix corrects the ACL permission key for the previewEventAttributes action from the malformed string 'theming_enabled*' to the correct 'theming_enabled', restoring the intended access control restriction so that only users holding the theming_enabled permission can invoke the endpoint, consistent with the adjacent previewEventObjects entry.

Patch summary

In app/Controller/Component/ACLComponent.php (line 473), the ACL array value for the 'previewEventAttributes' key was changed from ['theming_enabled*'] to ['theming_enabled'], removing the erroneous trailing asterisk that made the permission string non-matching. One line changed, one insertion, one deletion.

CVSS rationale

AV:N: MISP is a network-accessible web application. AC:L: The vulnerability is a static typo in configuration; no race or complex condition is needed. AT:N: No attack target manipulation required. PR:L: The attacker must be an authenticated MISP user to reach the endpoint. UI:N: No victim interaction needed. VC:L: If the ACL bypass is confirmed, an unauthorized user could view event attribute data (limited confidentiality impact). VI:N and VA:N: No integrity or availability impact is evident from the patch. SC/SI/SA:N: No secondary system impact. The overall severity is Low, reflecting a single-endpoint access control misconfiguration with limited data exposure.

Weakness rationale
  • CWE-285 The ACL rule for previewEventAttributes contained a typo ('theming_enabled*') that prevented the authorization check from matching the intended permission, causing the access control mechanism to not enforce the restriction as designed. This is a direct failure of the authorization logic due to a misconfigured rule.
Attack pattern rationale
  • CAPEC-126 The closest plausible attack pattern is Forced Browsing, where an attacker accesses a resource (the previewEventAttributes endpoint) that should be restricted by the ACL. The typo in the ACL key may cause the authorization check to fail to deny access, effectively allowing a user without the theming_enabled permission to reach the endpoint. Uncertainty: the exact ACL evaluation behavior on a non-matching rule (default-deny vs. default-allow) is not visible in the patch, so it is also possible the typo causes a denial rather than a bypass. CAPEC-126 is selected as the best available match for an access-control bypass via misconfiguration.
Assumptions to verify
  • The exact ACL evaluation behavior when a permission string does not match any valid role (default-deny vs. default-allow) is not visible in the patch; the CVSS assumes the more security-relevant interpretation (authorization bypass) but a denial-of-service interpretation is also possible.
  • The affected version range is inferred from the tag boundary v2.5.47 (227 commits after the fix); the exact first affected version is not stated in the patch.
  • The CAPEC-126 mapping is the closest available pattern; the actual attack is a configuration typo rather than an active browsing technique, so the mapping is approximate.
  • The security impact is assumed to be limited to the previewEventAttributes endpoint; no evidence in the patch suggests other endpoints or data stores are affected.
  • The CVSS assumes the endpoint exposes event attribute data viewable by unauthorized users; the actual data sensitivity depends on MISP deployment configuration.
Model comparison

Selected qwen3.8:27b by deterministic-consensus-v1
The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required.

Model Score Agreement Confidence Assumptions
qwen3.8:27b 5 9 medium 5
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-95805",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-09-22T15:53:31.726592Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T15:53:42.092Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "modules": [
            "ACLComponent"
          ],
          "product": "MISP",
          "programFiles": [
            "app/Controller/Component/ACLComponent.php"
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP",
          "vendor": "MISP",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "2.5.47",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "Thomas Lacroix"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eA typo in the MISP ACLComponent access control configuration caused the ACL rule for the previewEventAttributes action to reference the permission string \u0027theming_enabled*\u0027 (with a trailing asterisk) instead of the correct \u0027theming_enabled\u0027. In the MISP ACL system, the array values define which role or permission grants access to a given controller action. The adjacent entry previewEventObjects correctly uses [\u0027theming_enabled\u0027], confirming the intended restriction. The malformed key \u0027theming_enabled*\u0027 does not match any valid permission identifier, causing the access control check for previewEventAttributes to malfunction. Depending on the ACL evaluation logic, this could result in either unauthorized users gaining access to the previewEventAttributes endpoint (authorization bypass) or legitimate users being denied access (availability impact).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe previewEventAttributes endpoint exposes event attribute data within MISP so an authorization bypass could expose sensitive indicator and attribute data to users who should not have access.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "A typo in the MISP ACLComponent access control configuration caused the ACL rule for the previewEventAttributes action to reference the permission string \u0027theming_enabled*\u0027 (with a trailing asterisk) instead of the correct \u0027theming_enabled\u0027. In the MISP ACL system, the array values define which role or permission grants access to a given controller action. The adjacent entry previewEventObjects correctly uses [\u0027theming_enabled\u0027], confirming the intended restriction. The malformed key \u0027theming_enabled*\u0027 does not match any valid permission identifier, causing the access control check for previewEventAttributes to malfunction. Depending on the ACL evaluation logic, this could result in either unauthorized users gaining access to the previewEventAttributes endpoint (authorization bypass) or legitimate users being denied access (availability impact).\u00a0\n\nThe previewEventAttributes endpoint exposes event attribute data within MISP so an authorization bypass could expose sensitive indicator and attribute data to users who should not have access."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-126",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-126 Forced Browsing"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 5.3,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-285",
              "description": "CWE-285 Improper Authorization",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T14:59:22.041Z",
        "orgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
        "shortName": "CIRCL"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "Security patch",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/5ac8d1e4d"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe fix corrects the ACL permission key for the previewEventAttributes action from the malformed string \u0027theming_enabled*\u0027 to the correct \u0027theming_enabled\u0027, restoring the intended access control restriction so that only users holding the theming_enabled permission can invoke the endpoint, consistent with the adjacent previewEventObjects entry.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The fix corrects the ACL permission key for the previewEventAttributes action from the malformed string \u0027theming_enabled*\u0027 to the correct \u0027theming_enabled\u0027, restoring the intended access control restriction so that only users holding the theming_enabled permission can invoke the endpoint, consistent with the adjacent previewEventObjects entry."
        }
      ],
      "title": "MISP ACLComponent: Typo in previewEventAttributes ACL key bypasses intended access restriction",
      "x_gcve": [
        {
          "extensions": {
            "bcp-05-x-01": {
              "ai_annotations": [
                {
                  "ai_level": "generated",
                  "description": "Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.",
                  "gna_source": 1,
                  "models": [
                    {
                      "gna_source": 1,
                      "identifier": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "name": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "source": "ollama"
                    }
                  ],
                  "review_status": "full",
                  "scope": "record",
                  "tags": [
                    "ai-computer-assisted:llm-generated",
                    "ai-computer-assisted:classification"
                  ]
                }
              ]
            },
            "bcp-05-x-02": {
              "x_patch2vuln": {
                "assumptions": [
                  "The exact ACL evaluation behavior when a permission string does not match any valid role (default-deny vs. default-allow) is not visible in the patch; the CVSS assumes the more security-relevant interpretation (authorization bypass) but a denial-of-service interpretation is also possible.",
                  "The affected version range is inferred from the tag boundary v2.5.47 (227 commits after the fix); the exact first affected version is not stated in the patch.",
                  "The CAPEC-126 mapping is the closest available pattern; the actual attack is a configuration typo rather than an active browsing technique, so the mapping is approximate.",
                  "The security impact is assumed to be limited to the previewEventAttributes endpoint; no evidence in the patch suggests other endpoints or data stores are affected.",
                  "The CVSS assumes the endpoint exposes event attribute data viewable by unauthorized users; the actual data sensitivity depends on MISP deployment configuration."
                ],
                "capecRationale": [
                  {
                    "capecId": "CAPEC-126",
                    "rationale": "The closest plausible attack pattern is Forced Browsing, where an attacker accesses a resource (the previewEventAttributes endpoint) that should be restricted by the ACL. The typo in the ACL key may cause the authorization check to fail to deny access, effectively allowing a user without the theming_enabled permission to reach the endpoint. Uncertainty: the exact ACL evaluation behavior on a non-matching rule (default-deny vs. default-allow) is not visible in the patch, so it is also possible the typo causes a denial rather than a bypass. CAPEC-126 is selected as the best available match for an access-control bypass via misconfiguration."
                  }
                ],
                "commit": "5ac8d1e4dea72f71bec3789350b748f0ad21c42c",
                "confidence": "medium",
                "credits": [
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "Thomas Lacroix"
                  }
                ],
                "cvssRationale": "AV:N: MISP is a network-accessible web application. AC:L: The vulnerability is a static typo in configuration; no race or complex condition is needed. AT:N: No attack target manipulation required. PR:L: The attacker must be an authenticated MISP user to reach the endpoint. UI:N: No victim interaction needed. VC:L: If the ACL bypass is confirmed, an unauthorized user could view event attribute data (limited confidentiality impact). VI:N and VA:N: No integrity or availability impact is evident from the patch. SC/SI/SA:N: No secondary system impact. The overall severity is Low, reflecting a single-endpoint access control misconfiguration with limited data exposure.",
                "fixSummary": "The fix corrects the ACL permission key for the previewEventAttributes action from the malformed string \u0027theming_enabled*\u0027 to the correct \u0027theming_enabled\u0027, restoring the intended access control restriction so that only users holding the theming_enabled permission can invoke the endpoint, consistent with the adjacent previewEventObjects entry.",
                "generatedAt": "2026-09-22T14:55:18.958107Z",
                "generator": "patch2vuln.py",
                "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                "modelComparison": {
                  "rankings": [
                    {
                      "agreementScore": 9,
                      "assumptionCount": 5,
                      "confidence": "medium",
                      "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "score": 5
                    }
                  ],
                  "selectedModel": "qwen3.8:27b",
                  "selectionMethod": "deterministic-consensus-v1",
                  "selectionNotice": "The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required."
                },
                "patchSha256": "c102952ebfaba16a0d028044d1bc0ab063381442b99de01bfc592144f2de9cc5",
                "patchSummary": "In app/Controller/Component/ACLComponent.php (line 473), the ACL array value for the \u0027previewEventAttributes\u0027 key was changed from [\u0027theming_enabled*\u0027] to [\u0027theming_enabled\u0027], removing the erroneous trailing asterisk that made the permission string non-matching. One line changed, one insertion, one deletion.",
                "patchTruncated": false,
                "patches": [
                  {
                    "commit": "5ac8d1e4dea72f71bec3789350b748f0ad21c42c",
                    "patchSha256": "c102952ebfaba16a0d028044d1bc0ab063381442b99de01bfc592144f2de9cc5",
                    "source": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/5ac8d1e4d.patch",
                    "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/5ac8d1e4d.patch",
                    "subject": "fix: [ACL] typo in previewEventAttributes key"
                  }
                ],
                "source": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/5ac8d1e4d.patch",
                "subject": "fix: [ACL] typo in previewEventAttributes key",
                "tagVersionBoundary": {
                  "commits_after_fix": 227,
                  "repository": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP",
                  "tag": "v2.5.47",
                  "version": "2.5.47",
                  "version_type": "semver"
                },
                "weaknessRationale": [
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-285",
                    "rationale": "The ACL rule for previewEventAttributes contained a typo (\u0027theming_enabled*\u0027) that prevented the authorization check from matching the intended permission, causing the access control mechanism to not enforce the restriction as designed. This is a direct failure of the authorization logic due to a misconfigured rule."
                  }
                ]
              }
            }
          },
          "recordType": "advisory",
          "vulnId": "GCVE-1-2026-20240"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
    "assignerShortName": "CIRCL",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-95805",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-22T14:59:22.041Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-22T14:59:19.797Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T15:53:42.092Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2026-95754 (GCVE-0-2026-95754)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-22 14:53 – Updated: 2026-09-22 15:53
VLAI
Title
MISP: Disabled-user check ineffective in pre-authentication TOTP login branch
Summary
In MISP's UsersController login() method, the pre-authentication database query used for the TOTP (two-factor authentication) verification branch did not include the User.disabled column in its SELECT fields list. The query selected only User.password, User.totp, and User.hotp_counter. When the TOTP branch subsequently accessed $unauth_user['User']['disabled'], the key was absent from the result set, producing a PHP 'Undefined array key' warning and causing the expression to evaluate as null (falsy). As a result, the disabled-user guard in the TOTP branch was effectively a no-op: a disabled, TOTP-enrolled user could proceed to the TOTP verification step rather than being rejected at that point.  The commit message explicitly states this was 'harmless in practice' because the subsequent identify() call re-validates the user and would still reject a disabled account.  The practical security impact is therefore minimal, limited to a very small information-disclosure difference in the login response (a TOTP prompt is presented instead of an immediate rejection) and a PHP warning in application logs.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: yes Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-22 15:53 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-285 - Improper Authentication
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
MISP MISP Affected: 0 , < 2.5.47 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
GCVE extensions
AI involvement GCVE-BCP-05-X-01
Whole record AI-generated Human-reviewed GNA-1

Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.

ai-computer-assisted:llm-generatedai-computer-assisted:classification
Model Source Identifier
qwen3.8:27b ollama qwen3.8:27b
Patch provenance GCVE-BCP-05-X-02
Generator
patch2vuln.py on 2026-09-22 14:51
Model
qwen3.8:27b
Input
https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/3df982ab1.patch 8ddba4461463…
Confidence
medium
Commit Subject Patch SHA-256
3df982ab192e fix: [login] Fetch User.disabled in the pre-auth TOTP lookup 8ddba4461463…
Fix summary

The fix adds User.disabled to the fields array of the pre-authentication find() query so that the disabled-user check in the TOTP branch reads the actual column value and correctly rejects disabled users before they reach the TOTP verification step, restoring the intended guard behavior.

Patch summary

A single-line change in app/Controller/UsersController.php appends 'User.disabled' to the fields list of the pre-authentication User find() query in the login() method (line 1385), ensuring the disabled flag is present in the result set when the TOTP branch evaluates it.

CVSS rationale

The vulnerability is reachable over the network (AV:N) via the web login endpoint with low complexity (AC:L), no attack target (AT:N), no prior privileges (PR:N), and no user interaction (UI:N). The only potential impact is a very minor confidentiality difference: a disabled, TOTP-enrolled user receives a TOTP prompt instead of an immediate rejection, which could marginally aid account-status enumeration (VC:L). There is no integrity or availability impact (VI:N, VA:N) and no secondary impacts (SC:N, SI:N, SA:N) because the subsequent identify() call still enforces the disabled-user check. The commit message explicitly characterizes the issue as 'harmless in practice.'

Weakness rationale
  • CWE-285 The disabled-user check in the TOTP login branch was ineffective because the required column was not fetched, allowing a disabled user to pass that guard. The subsequent identify() call still enforced the check, limiting the impact. CWE-285 is the narrowest defensible mapping for an authentication-state check that does not function as intended.
Attack pattern rationale
  • CAPEC-1 The closest plausible CAPEC is Brute Force, as the scenario involves an attacker attempting to authenticate using known credentials of a disabled, TOTP-enrolled account. The disabled-user guard that should have blocked the attempt at the TOTP branch was ineffective, allowing the attempt to proceed one step further than intended. This mapping is uncertain because the vulnerability does not enable a full authentication bypass (identify() still rejects the user) and the primary effect is a minor information-disclosure difference in the login response rather than a successful brute-force attack.
Assumptions to verify
  • The commit message states the issue is 'harmless in practice' because identify() re-checks the user; this advisory treats the security impact as minimal (minor information disclosure only).
  • The TOTP feature was introduced in 2023 per the commit message; the exact affected version range is not specified in the patch. The tag boundary v2.5.47 is used as an upper bound for the affected range but is not confirmed as the exact fixed version.
  • CAPEC-1 (Brute Force) is the closest available attack pattern; the actual scenario is a minor authentication-guard bypass rather than a full brute-force attack, so the mapping is approximate.
  • CVSS VC:L is assigned for the marginal information-disclosure difference in the login response; if the CNA determines no meaningful confidentiality impact exists, VC:N would be more appropriate, resulting in a score of 0.0.
  • The PHP version behavior (Warning vs Notice vs Error for undefined array keys) may vary, but in all supported PHP versions the code continues execution with a null value, so the security analysis is unaffected.
Model comparison

Selected qwen3.8:27b by deterministic-consensus-v1
The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required.

Model Score Agreement Confidence Assumptions
qwen3.8:27b 5 9 medium 5
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-95754",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-09-22T15:53:03.966908Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T15:53:14.911Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "modules": [
            "UsersController (login method",
            "TOTP branch)"
          ],
          "product": "MISP",
          "programFiles": [
            "app/Controller/UsersController.php"
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP",
          "vendor": "MISP",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "2.5.47",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "iglocska"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "Claude Fable 5.1"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eIn MISP\u0027s UsersController login() method, the pre-authentication database query used for the TOTP (two-factor authentication) verification branch did not include the User.disabled column in its SELECT fields list. The query selected only User.password, User.totp, and User.hotp_counter. When the TOTP branch subsequently accessed $unauth_user[\u0027User\u0027][\u0027disabled\u0027], the key was absent from the result set, producing a PHP \u0027Undefined array key\u0027 warning and causing the expression to evaluate as null (falsy). As a result, the disabled-user guard in the TOTP branch was effectively a no-op: a disabled, TOTP-enrolled user could proceed to the TOTP verification step rather than being rejected at that point.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe commit message explicitly states this was \u0027harmless in practice\u0027 because the subsequent identify() call re-validates the user and would still reject a disabled account.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe practical security impact is therefore minimal, limited to a very small information-disclosure difference in the login response (a TOTP prompt is presented instead of an immediate rejection) and a PHP warning in application logs.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "In MISP\u0027s UsersController login() method, the pre-authentication database query used for the TOTP (two-factor authentication) verification branch did not include the User.disabled column in its SELECT fields list. The query selected only User.password, User.totp, and User.hotp_counter. When the TOTP branch subsequently accessed $unauth_user[\u0027User\u0027][\u0027disabled\u0027], the key was absent from the result set, producing a PHP \u0027Undefined array key\u0027 warning and causing the expression to evaluate as null (falsy). As a result, the disabled-user guard in the TOTP branch was effectively a no-op: a disabled, TOTP-enrolled user could proceed to the TOTP verification step rather than being rejected at that point.\u00a0\n\nThe commit message explicitly states this was \u0027harmless in practice\u0027 because the subsequent identify() call re-validates the user and would still reject a disabled account.\u00a0\n\nThe practical security impact is therefore minimal, limited to a very small information-disclosure difference in the login response (a TOTP prompt is presented instead of an immediate rejection) and a PHP warning in application logs."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-1",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-1 Brute Force"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 6.9,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-285",
              "description": "CWE-285 Improper Authentication",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T14:53:56.006Z",
        "orgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
        "shortName": "CIRCL"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "Security patch",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/3df982ab1"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe fix adds User.disabled to the fields array of the pre-authentication find() query so that the disabled-user check in the TOTP branch reads the actual column value and correctly rejects disabled users before they reach the TOTP verification step, restoring the intended guard behavior.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The fix adds User.disabled to the fields array of the pre-authentication find() query so that the disabled-user check in the TOTP branch reads the actual column value and correctly rejects disabled users before they reach the TOTP verification step, restoring the intended guard behavior."
        }
      ],
      "title": "MISP: Disabled-user check ineffective in pre-authentication TOTP login branch",
      "x_gcve": [
        {
          "extensions": {
            "bcp-05-x-01": {
              "ai_annotations": [
                {
                  "ai_level": "generated",
                  "description": "Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.",
                  "gna_source": 1,
                  "models": [
                    {
                      "gna_source": 1,
                      "identifier": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "name": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "source": "ollama"
                    }
                  ],
                  "review_status": "full",
                  "scope": "record",
                  "tags": [
                    "ai-computer-assisted:llm-generated",
                    "ai-computer-assisted:classification"
                  ]
                }
              ]
            },
            "bcp-05-x-02": {
              "x_patch2vuln": {
                "assumptions": [
                  "The commit message states the issue is \u0027harmless in practice\u0027 because identify() re-checks the user; this advisory treats the security impact as minimal (minor information disclosure only).",
                  "The TOTP feature was introduced in 2023 per the commit message; the exact affected version range is not specified in the patch. The tag boundary v2.5.47 is used as an upper bound for the affected range but is not confirmed as the exact fixed version.",
                  "CAPEC-1 (Brute Force) is the closest available attack pattern; the actual scenario is a minor authentication-guard bypass rather than a full brute-force attack, so the mapping is approximate.",
                  "CVSS VC:L is assigned for the marginal information-disclosure difference in the login response; if the CNA determines no meaningful confidentiality impact exists, VC:N would be more appropriate, resulting in a score of 0.0.",
                  "The PHP version behavior (Warning vs Notice vs Error for undefined array keys) may vary, but in all supported PHP versions the code continues execution with a null value, so the security analysis is unaffected."
                ],
                "capecRationale": [
                  {
                    "capecId": "CAPEC-1",
                    "rationale": "The closest plausible CAPEC is Brute Force, as the scenario involves an attacker attempting to authenticate using known credentials of a disabled, TOTP-enrolled account. The disabled-user guard that should have blocked the attempt at the TOTP branch was ineffective, allowing the attempt to proceed one step further than intended. This mapping is uncertain because the vulnerability does not enable a full authentication bypass (identify() still rejects the user) and the primary effect is a minor information-disclosure difference in the login response rather than a successful brute-force attack."
                  }
                ],
                "commit": "3df982ab192e05f5369d62af5674c7a874b32756",
                "confidence": "medium",
                "credits": [
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "iglocska"
                  },
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "Claude Fable 5.1"
                  }
                ],
                "cvssRationale": "The vulnerability is reachable over the network (AV:N) via the web login endpoint with low complexity (AC:L), no attack target (AT:N), no prior privileges (PR:N), and no user interaction (UI:N). The only potential impact is a very minor confidentiality difference: a disabled, TOTP-enrolled user receives a TOTP prompt instead of an immediate rejection, which could marginally aid account-status enumeration (VC:L). There is no integrity or availability impact (VI:N, VA:N) and no secondary impacts (SC:N, SI:N, SA:N) because the subsequent identify() call still enforces the disabled-user check. The commit message explicitly characterizes the issue as \u0027harmless in practice.\u0027",
                "fixSummary": "The fix adds User.disabled to the fields array of the pre-authentication find() query so that the disabled-user check in the TOTP branch reads the actual column value and correctly rejects disabled users before they reach the TOTP verification step, restoring the intended guard behavior.",
                "generatedAt": "2026-09-22T14:51:29.308929Z",
                "generator": "patch2vuln.py",
                "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                "modelComparison": {
                  "rankings": [
                    {
                      "agreementScore": 9,
                      "assumptionCount": 5,
                      "confidence": "medium",
                      "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "score": 5
                    }
                  ],
                  "selectedModel": "qwen3.8:27b",
                  "selectionMethod": "deterministic-consensus-v1",
                  "selectionNotice": "The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required."
                },
                "patchSha256": "8ddba4461463bf2e5b115b4bdd168f91b246f1fcd796dc4da8873ed8da2397c0",
                "patchSummary": "A single-line change in app/Controller/UsersController.php appends \u0027User.disabled\u0027 to the fields list of the pre-authentication User find() query in the login() method (line 1385), ensuring the disabled flag is present in the result set when the TOTP branch evaluates it.",
                "patchTruncated": false,
                "patches": [
                  {
                    "commit": "3df982ab192e05f5369d62af5674c7a874b32756",
                    "patchSha256": "8ddba4461463bf2e5b115b4bdd168f91b246f1fcd796dc4da8873ed8da2397c0",
                    "source": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/3df982ab1.patch",
                    "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/3df982ab1.patch",
                    "subject": "fix: [login] Fetch User.disabled in the pre-auth TOTP lookup"
                  }
                ],
                "source": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/3df982ab1.patch",
                "subject": "fix: [login] Fetch User.disabled in the pre-auth TOTP lookup",
                "tagVersionBoundary": {
                  "commits_after_fix": 271,
                  "repository": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP",
                  "tag": "v2.5.47",
                  "version": "2.5.47",
                  "version_type": "semver"
                },
                "weaknessRationale": [
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-285",
                    "rationale": "The disabled-user check in the TOTP login branch was ineffective because the required column was not fetched, allowing a disabled user to pass that guard. The subsequent identify() call still enforced the check, limiting the impact. CWE-285 is the narrowest defensible mapping for an authentication-state check that does not function as intended."
                  }
                ]
              }
            }
          },
          "recordType": "advisory",
          "vulnId": "GCVE-1-2026-20024"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
    "assignerShortName": "CIRCL",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-95754",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-22T14:53:56.006Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-22T14:53:53.341Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T15:53:14.911Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2026-95679 (GCVE-0-2026-95679)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-22 13:50 – Updated: 2026-09-22 15:37
VLAI
Title
MISP Unauthenticated Blind SSRF via XML Body Processing
Summary
MISP's RequestHandlerComponent automatically decodes XML request bodies on all write requests. The underlying Xml::build() library contains a logic error in its readFile guard condition (readFile && http || https), where PHP operator precedence causes the https branch to bypass the readFile check entirely. As a result, a request body containing a bare HTTPS URL is treated as a locator and fetched by the server. Because the cspReport endpoint accepts XML content type and is unauthenticated by design, an unauthenticated remote attacker can send a POST request with a crafted XML body to cause the MISP server to issue an outbound HTTPS request to an arbitrary target reachable from the server. The attacker does not receive the response body, but can use the vulnerability to probe internal services, trigger actions on internal HTTPS endpoints, or perform timing-based reconnaissance of the server's network environment.  The vulnerability affects any MISP deployment where the cspReport endpoint is reachable and the server has network access to internal or external HTTPS services.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: yes Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-22 15:36 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-918 - Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
  • CWE-20 - Improper Input Validation
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
MISP MISP Affected: 0 , < 2.5.47 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
GCVE extensions
AI involvement GCVE-BCP-05-X-01
Whole record AI-generated Human-reviewed GNA-1

Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.

ai-computer-assisted:llm-generatedai-computer-assisted:classification
Model Source Identifier
qwen3.8:27b ollama qwen3.8:27b
Patch provenance GCVE-BCP-05-X-02
Generator
patch2vuln.py on 2026-09-22 13:46
Model
qwen3.8:27b
Input
https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/716fc49d3.patch 99e7ef2fbd5a…
Confidence
medium
Commit Subject Patch SHA-256
716fc49d3816 fix: [security] Decode only an XML body that is actually a 99e7ef2fbd5a…
Fix summary

The fix introduces a custom XML input type handler in AppController::beforeFilter() that validates the request body contains an XML document marker (the < character) before passing it to the XML decoder. If the body does not contain <, it returns an empty array, preventing the Xml::build() locator/fetch code path from being reached regardless of the vendored library's internal guard logic. This ensures only actual XML documents are processed, eliminating the SSRF vector.

Patch summary

Adds 15 lines to app/Controller/AppController.php in the beforeFilter() method. Registers a custom XML input type via RequestHandler->addInputType('xml', ...) with a closure that checks whether the body is a string containing the < character. If not, it returns an empty array (no decoding). If yes, it delegates to RequestHandler->convertXml(). This ensures only actual XML documents are processed, preventing bare URLs from being interpreted as fetch locators by the vendored Xml::build() library.

CVSS rationale

AV:N: The cspReport endpoint is network-accessible. AC:L: The attack requires only a POST request with a specific Content-Type and a URL as the body; no race conditions or complex setup. AT:N: No attack target manipulation is required. PR:N: The cspReport endpoint is unauthenticated by design. UI:N: No user interaction is needed. VC/VI/VA:N: The SSRF is blind; the response is not returned to the attacker, and there is no direct impact on MISP's confidentiality, integrity, or availability. SC/SI/SA:N: The blind nature means no data from secondary systems is exfiltrated to the attacker, and no confirmed integrity or availability impact on secondary systems is evidenced. Note: if the server processes the fetched response in a way that leaks data or triggers side effects on internal services, the secondary impact metrics could be higher; this is not confirmed by the available evidence.

Weakness rationale
  • CWE-918 The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to cause the MISP server to issue outbound HTTPS requests to arbitrary attacker-specified URLs by sending a crafted XML body to the cspReport endpoint. The server fetches the URL as if it were an XML document locator, constituting a blind SSRF.
  • CWE-20 The root cause is that the XML request body is not validated to confirm it is an actual XML document before being passed to Xml::build(). The framework's default behavior treats any XML content-type body as a document without checking for document structure, allowing a bare URL to be interpreted as a fetch locator.
Attack pattern rationale
  • CAPEC-12 The framework's default behavior is to automatically decode any XML-typed request body through Xml::build() without validating that the body is actually an XML document. This unsafe default, combined with a logic error in the vendored library's guard condition, allows an attacker to exploit the default processing path to trigger an outbound request. CAPEC-12 is the closest available mapping; the attack is more specifically about exploiting a logic error in input validation within the default processing pipeline rather than a purely misconfigured default. No CAPEC entry more precisely describes SSRF via unvalidated input in an automatic content-type handler.
Assumptions to verify
  • The cspReport endpoint is unauthenticated by design, as stated in the commit message.
  • The SSRF is limited to HTTPS targets because the operator precedence bug only ungates the https branch of the readFile guard.
  • The SSRF is blind: the fetched response is not returned to the attacker, limiting direct data exfiltration.
  • The exact affected version range before 2.5.47 is not precisely determined; the tag boundary indicates the fix is included in v2.5.47.
  • CAPEC-12 is the closest available mapping; the attack is more specifically about exploiting a logic error in input validation within an automatic content-type handler rather than a purely misconfigured default.
  • CVSS impact metrics are set to None based on the blind nature of the SSRF; if the server processes the fetched response in a way that leaks data or triggers actions on internal services, the impact could be higher.
  • The vendored Xml::build() library's behavior with a locator (fetching the URL) is taken from the commit message description; the actual library code was not included in the patch.
Model comparison

Selected qwen3.8:27b by deterministic-consensus-v1
The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required.

Model Score Agreement Confidence Assumptions
qwen3.8:27b 3 9 medium 7
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-95679",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-09-22T15:36:14.509188Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T15:37:46.734Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "modules": [
            "app/Controller/AppController.php"
          ],
          "product": "MISP",
          "programFiles": [
            "app/Controller/AppController.php"
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP",
          "vendor": "MISP",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "2.5.47",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "reporter",
          "value": "Niels Teusink of Eye Security"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "iglocska"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "Claude Opus 5 (1M context)"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eMISP\u0027s RequestHandlerComponent automatically decodes XML request bodies on all write requests. The underlying Xml::build() library contains a logic error in its readFile guard condition (readFile \u0026amp;\u0026amp; http || https), where PHP operator precedence causes the https branch to bypass the readFile check entirely. As a result, a request body containing a bare HTTPS URL is treated as a locator and fetched by the server. Because the cspReport endpoint accepts XML content type and is unauthenticated by design, an unauthenticated remote attacker can send a POST request with a crafted XML body to cause the MISP server to issue an outbound HTTPS request to an arbitrary target reachable from the server.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe attacker does not receive the response body, but can use the vulnerability to probe internal services, trigger actions on internal HTTPS endpoints, or perform timing-based reconnaissance of the server\u0027s network environment.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe vulnerability affects any MISP deployment where the cspReport endpoint is reachable and the server has network access to internal or external HTTPS services.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "MISP\u0027s RequestHandlerComponent automatically decodes XML request bodies on all write requests. The underlying Xml::build() library contains a logic error in its readFile guard condition (readFile \u0026\u0026 http || https), where PHP operator precedence causes the https branch to bypass the readFile check entirely. As a result, a request body containing a bare HTTPS URL is treated as a locator and fetched by the server. Because the cspReport endpoint accepts XML content type and is unauthenticated by design, an unauthenticated remote attacker can send a POST request with a crafted XML body to cause the MISP server to issue an outbound HTTPS request to an arbitrary target reachable from the server.\n\nThe attacker does not receive the response body, but can use the vulnerability to probe internal services, trigger actions on internal HTTPS endpoints, or perform timing-based reconnaissance of the server\u0027s network environment.\u00a0\n\nThe vulnerability affects any MISP deployment where the cspReport endpoint is reachable and the server has network access to internal or external HTTPS services."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-12",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-12 Exploiting Unsafe Default Behavior"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 6.9,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-918",
              "description": "CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-20",
              "description": "CWE-20 Improper Input Validation",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T13:50:48.696Z",
        "orgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
        "shortName": "CIRCL"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "Security patch",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/716fc49d3"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe fix introduces a custom XML input type handler in AppController::beforeFilter() that validates the request body contains an XML document marker (the \u0026lt; character) before passing it to the XML decoder. If the body does not contain \u0026lt;, it returns an empty array, preventing the Xml::build() locator/fetch code path from being reached regardless of the vendored library\u0027s internal guard logic. This ensures only actual XML documents are processed, eliminating the SSRF vector.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The fix introduces a custom XML input type handler in AppController::beforeFilter() that validates the request body contains an XML document marker (the \u003c character) before passing it to the XML decoder. If the body does not contain \u003c, it returns an empty array, preventing the Xml::build() locator/fetch code path from being reached regardless of the vendored library\u0027s internal guard logic. This ensures only actual XML documents are processed, eliminating the SSRF vector."
        }
      ],
      "title": "MISP Unauthenticated Blind SSRF via XML Body Processing",
      "x_gcve": [
        {
          "extensions": {
            "bcp-05-x-01": {
              "ai_annotations": [
                {
                  "ai_level": "generated",
                  "description": "Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.",
                  "gna_source": 1,
                  "models": [
                    {
                      "gna_source": 1,
                      "identifier": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "name": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "source": "ollama"
                    }
                  ],
                  "review_status": "full",
                  "scope": "record",
                  "tags": [
                    "ai-computer-assisted:llm-generated",
                    "ai-computer-assisted:classification"
                  ]
                }
              ]
            },
            "bcp-05-x-02": {
              "x_patch2vuln": {
                "assumptions": [
                  "The cspReport endpoint is unauthenticated by design, as stated in the commit message.",
                  "The SSRF is limited to HTTPS targets because the operator precedence bug only ungates the https branch of the readFile guard.",
                  "The SSRF is blind: the fetched response is not returned to the attacker, limiting direct data exfiltration.",
                  "The exact affected version range before 2.5.47 is not precisely determined; the tag boundary indicates the fix is included in v2.5.47.",
                  "CAPEC-12 is the closest available mapping; the attack is more specifically about exploiting a logic error in input validation within an automatic content-type handler rather than a purely misconfigured default.",
                  "CVSS impact metrics are set to None based on the blind nature of the SSRF; if the server processes the fetched response in a way that leaks data or triggers actions on internal services, the impact could be higher.",
                  "The vendored Xml::build() library\u0027s behavior with a locator (fetching the URL) is taken from the commit message description; the actual library code was not included in the patch."
                ],
                "capecRationale": [
                  {
                    "capecId": "CAPEC-12",
                    "rationale": "The framework\u0027s default behavior is to automatically decode any XML-typed request body through Xml::build() without validating that the body is actually an XML document. This unsafe default, combined with a logic error in the vendored library\u0027s guard condition, allows an attacker to exploit the default processing path to trigger an outbound request. CAPEC-12 is the closest available mapping; the attack is more specifically about exploiting a logic error in input validation within the default processing pipeline rather than a purely misconfigured default. No CAPEC entry more precisely describes SSRF via unvalidated input in an automatic content-type handler."
                  }
                ],
                "commit": "716fc49d3816dd17d8aeeee074a12f430edc2a55",
                "confidence": "medium",
                "credits": [
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "reporter",
                    "value": "Niels Teusink of Eye Security"
                  },
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "iglocska"
                  },
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "Claude Opus 5 (1M context)"
                  }
                ],
                "cvssRationale": "AV:N: The cspReport endpoint is network-accessible. AC:L: The attack requires only a POST request with a specific Content-Type and a URL as the body; no race conditions or complex setup. AT:N: No attack target manipulation is required. PR:N: The cspReport endpoint is unauthenticated by design. UI:N: No user interaction is needed. VC/VI/VA:N: The SSRF is blind; the response is not returned to the attacker, and there is no direct impact on MISP\u0027s confidentiality, integrity, or availability. SC/SI/SA:N: The blind nature means no data from secondary systems is exfiltrated to the attacker, and no confirmed integrity or availability impact on secondary systems is evidenced. Note: if the server processes the fetched response in a way that leaks data or triggers side effects on internal services, the secondary impact metrics could be higher; this is not confirmed by the available evidence.",
                "fixSummary": "The fix introduces a custom XML input type handler in AppController::beforeFilter() that validates the request body contains an XML document marker (the \u003c character) before passing it to the XML decoder. If the body does not contain \u003c, it returns an empty array, preventing the Xml::build() locator/fetch code path from being reached regardless of the vendored library\u0027s internal guard logic. This ensures only actual XML documents are processed, eliminating the SSRF vector.",
                "generatedAt": "2026-09-22T13:46:08.714767Z",
                "generator": "patch2vuln.py",
                "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                "modelComparison": {
                  "rankings": [
                    {
                      "agreementScore": 9,
                      "assumptionCount": 7,
                      "confidence": "medium",
                      "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "score": 3
                    }
                  ],
                  "selectedModel": "qwen3.8:27b",
                  "selectionMethod": "deterministic-consensus-v1",
                  "selectionNotice": "The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required."
                },
                "patchSha256": "99e7ef2fbd5abebda159b377fe3bb3f75026c9966eb556d2d713642448af9d60",
                "patchSummary": "Adds 15 lines to app/Controller/AppController.php in the beforeFilter() method. Registers a custom XML input type via RequestHandler-\u003eaddInputType(\u0027xml\u0027, ...) with a closure that checks whether the body is a string containing the \u003c character. If not, it returns an empty array (no decoding). If yes, it delegates to RequestHandler-\u003econvertXml(). This ensures only actual XML documents are processed, preventing bare URLs from being interpreted as fetch locators by the vendored Xml::build() library.",
                "patchTruncated": false,
                "patches": [
                  {
                    "commit": "716fc49d3816dd17d8aeeee074a12f430edc2a55",
                    "patchSha256": "99e7ef2fbd5abebda159b377fe3bb3f75026c9966eb556d2d713642448af9d60",
                    "source": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/716fc49d3.patch",
                    "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/716fc49d3.patch",
                    "subject": "fix: [security] Decode only an XML body that is actually a"
                  }
                ],
                "source": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/716fc49d3.patch",
                "subject": "fix: [security] Decode only an XML body that is actually a",
                "tagVersionBoundary": {
                  "commits_after_fix": 41,
                  "repository": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP",
                  "tag": "v2.5.47",
                  "version": "2.5.47",
                  "version_type": "semver"
                },
                "weaknessRationale": [
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-918",
                    "rationale": "The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to cause the MISP server to issue outbound HTTPS requests to arbitrary attacker-specified URLs by sending a crafted XML body to the cspReport endpoint. The server fetches the URL as if it were an XML document locator, constituting a blind SSRF."
                  },
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-20",
                    "rationale": "The root cause is that the XML request body is not validated to confirm it is an actual XML document before being passed to Xml::build(). The framework\u0027s default behavior treats any XML content-type body as a document without checking for document structure, allowing a bare URL to be interpreted as a fetch locator."
                  }
                ]
              }
            }
          },
          "recordType": "advisory",
          "vulnId": "GCVE-1-2026-20205"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
    "assignerShortName": "CIRCL",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-95679",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-22T13:50:48.696Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-22T13:50:46.243Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T15:37:46.734Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2026-95658 (GCVE-0-2026-95658)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-22 12:31 – Updated: 2026-09-22 15:35
VLAI
Title
MISP CSRF vulnerability in workflow moduleStatelessExecution allows cross-site execution of workflow modules
Summary
MISP's WorkflowsController exposed the moduleStatelessExecution action in the Security component's unlockedActions list. In CakePHP, listing an action in unlockedActions disables both the CSRF token check and the field hash validation for that action. Because moduleStatelessExecution executes a workflow module's exec() method with caller-supplied input and parameters, the absence of CSRF protection allowed an attacker to craft a cross-site form post (or equivalent cross-origin request) that, when submitted by an authenticated site administrator, would cause the administrator's browser to invoke the action on the MISP instance.  The attacker could select any workflow module to execute, including action modules that write blocklist and warninglist entries, and supply arbitrary input and parameters of their choosing. This constitutes a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability with high integrity impact on the MISP instance's security-related data.  The vulnerability was identified during an internal security review and was not externally reported. The fix is included in MISP v2.5.47.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-22 15:34 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-352 - Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
MISP MISP Affected: 0 , < 2.5.47 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
GCVE extensions
AI involvement GCVE-BCP-05-X-01
Whole record AI-generated Human-reviewed GNA-1

Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.

ai-computer-assisted:llm-generatedai-computer-assisted:classification
Model Source Identifier
qwen3.8:27b ollama qwen3.8:27b
Patch provenance GCVE-BCP-05-X-02
Generator
patch2vuln.py on 2026-09-22 12:15
Model
qwen3.8:27b
Input
https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/f05e0d1c2.patch 3f8a00ca2976…
Confidence
high
Commit Subject Patch SHA-256
f05e0d1c263b fix: [security] Keep the CSRF check on stateless workflow 3f8a00ca2976…
Fix summary

The moduleStatelessExecution action is removed from the unlockedActions list, restoring the CSRF token check. A new mechanism (_csrfTokenHeaderOnly) is introduced that enforces the CSRF token while exempting only the field hash, which the legitimate caller (the module dialog) cannot produce because it posts a hand-built object. The module dialog's AJAX request is updated to send the CSRF token in the X-CSRF-Token header, satisfying the token check without requiring a field hash.

Patch summary

In WorkflowsController::beforeFilter(), the line adding 'moduleStatelessExecution' to $this->Security->unlockedActions is replaced with a call to $this->_csrfTokenHeaderOnly(['moduleStatelessExecution']), which enforces CSRF token validation while waiving only the field hash requirement. In execute_module.ctp, the jQuery $.ajax() call is modified to include the header 'X-CSRF-Token' populated from window.csrfToken, so the legitimate client-side caller passes the token check via the header rather than a form field.

CVSS rationale

AV:N: The attack is delivered over the network via a malicious web page. AC:L: Crafting a cross-site form post is straightforward. AT:N: No special conditions or timing are required. PR:N: The attacker requires no account or privileges on the MISP instance. UI:A: The victim (a site admin) must actively visit the attacker-controlled page or click a link that triggers the form submission. VC:N: No confidentiality impact is evident. VI:H: The attacker can write arbitrary blocklist and warninglist entries, significantly compromising the integrity of MISP's security data. VA:N: No availability impact. SC/SI/SA:N: No evidence of impact on other systems beyond MISP itself.

Weakness rationale
  • CWE-352 The vulnerable action was placed in unlockedActions, which disabled the CSRF token check. This allowed a cross-site form post to trigger a state-changing action (workflow module execution) on behalf of an authenticated administrator, which is the textbook definition of CSRF.
Attack pattern rationale
  • CAPEC-124 The attack pattern described in the commit message is a cross-site form post that causes an authenticated site admin to execute a workflow module with attacker-chosen parameters. This maps directly to CAPEC-124, which describes an attacker exploiting the trust a web application places in a user's browser session to perform unauthorized actions. The mapping is confident because the commit message explicitly describes a cross-site form post bypassing CSRF protection.
Assumptions to verify
  • The affected version range is inferred from the tag_version_boundary metadata (v2.5.47, 6 commits after fix), implying the fix is included in v2.5.47 and prior versions are affected. The exact introduction version of the vulnerable code is unknown.
  • UI:A is used because the CSRF attack requires the victim to actively navigate to the attacker's page or click a link; a purely passive load (e.g., embedded iframe auto-submit) would map to UI:P, but the commit message describes a 'cross-site form post' which typically requires at least a page visit.
  • SI:N is chosen because the evidence only demonstrates integrity impact on MISP's own blocklist and warninglist data; no evidence supports impact on downstream or external systems.
  • The CAPEC-124 mapping is confident based on the explicit description of a cross-site form post in the commit message.
  • The commit message states the issue was 'found during the internal review, not externally reported,' but does not explicitly name a finder; therefore no finder credit is assigned.
  • The _csrfTokenHeaderOnly method is referenced in the patch but its implementation is not shown; it is assumed to enforce CSRF token validation while exempting the field hash, as described in the commit message.
Model comparison

Selected qwen3.8:27b by deterministic-consensus-v1
The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required.

Model Score Agreement Confidence Assumptions
qwen3.8:27b 5 9 high 6
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-95658",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-09-22T15:34:56.912472Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T15:35:08.313Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "modules": [
            "WorkflowsController",
            "Workflows module execution"
          ],
          "product": "MISP",
          "programFiles": [
            "app/Controller/WorkflowsController.php",
            "app/View/Elements/Workflows/execute_module.ctp"
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP",
          "vendor": "MISP",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "2.5.47",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "iglocska"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "Claude Opus 5 (1M context)"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eMISP\u0027s WorkflowsController exposed the moduleStatelessExecution action in the Security component\u0027s unlockedActions list. In CakePHP, listing an action in unlockedActions disables both the CSRF token check and the field hash validation for that action. Because moduleStatelessExecution executes a workflow module\u0027s exec() method with caller-supplied input and parameters, the absence of CSRF protection allowed an attacker to craft a cross-site form post (or equivalent cross-origin request) that, when submitted by an authenticated site administrator, would cause the administrator\u0027s browser to invoke the action on the MISP instance.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe attacker could select any workflow module to execute, including action modules that write blocklist and warninglist entries, and supply arbitrary input and parameters of their choosing. This constitutes a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability with high integrity impact on the MISP instance\u0027s security-related data.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe vulnerability was identified during an internal security review and was not externally reported. The fix is included in MISP v2.5.47.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "MISP\u0027s WorkflowsController exposed the moduleStatelessExecution action in the Security component\u0027s unlockedActions list. In CakePHP, listing an action in unlockedActions disables both the CSRF token check and the field hash validation for that action. Because moduleStatelessExecution executes a workflow module\u0027s exec() method with caller-supplied input and parameters, the absence of CSRF protection allowed an attacker to craft a cross-site form post (or equivalent cross-origin request) that, when submitted by an authenticated site administrator, would cause the administrator\u0027s browser to invoke the action on the MISP instance.\u00a0\n\nThe attacker could select any workflow module to execute, including action modules that write blocklist and warninglist entries, and supply arbitrary input and parameters of their choosing. This constitutes a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability with high integrity impact on the MISP instance\u0027s security-related data.\u00a0\n\nThe vulnerability was identified during an internal security review and was not externally reported. The fix is included in MISP v2.5.47."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-124",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-124 Cross-Site Request Forgery"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 6.9,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "ACTIVE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-352",
              "description": "CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T12:31:23.222Z",
        "orgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
        "shortName": "CIRCL"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "Security patch",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/f05e0d1c2"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe moduleStatelessExecution action is removed from the unlockedActions list, restoring the CSRF token check. A new mechanism (_csrfTokenHeaderOnly) is introduced that enforces the CSRF token while exempting only the field hash, which the legitimate caller (the module dialog) cannot produce because it posts a hand-built object. The module dialog\u0027s AJAX request is updated to send the CSRF token in the X-CSRF-Token header, satisfying the token check without requiring a field hash.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The moduleStatelessExecution action is removed from the unlockedActions list, restoring the CSRF token check. A new mechanism (_csrfTokenHeaderOnly) is introduced that enforces the CSRF token while exempting only the field hash, which the legitimate caller (the module dialog) cannot produce because it posts a hand-built object. The module dialog\u0027s AJAX request is updated to send the CSRF token in the X-CSRF-Token header, satisfying the token check without requiring a field hash."
        }
      ],
      "title": "MISP CSRF vulnerability in workflow moduleStatelessExecution allows cross-site execution of workflow modules",
      "x_gcve": [
        {
          "extensions": {
            "bcp-05-x-01": {
              "ai_annotations": [
                {
                  "ai_level": "generated",
                  "description": "Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.",
                  "gna_source": 1,
                  "models": [
                    {
                      "gna_source": 1,
                      "identifier": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "name": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "source": "ollama"
                    }
                  ],
                  "review_status": "full",
                  "scope": "record",
                  "tags": [
                    "ai-computer-assisted:llm-generated",
                    "ai-computer-assisted:classification"
                  ]
                }
              ]
            },
            "bcp-05-x-02": {
              "x_patch2vuln": {
                "assumptions": [
                  "The affected version range is inferred from the tag_version_boundary metadata (v2.5.47, 6 commits after fix), implying the fix is included in v2.5.47 and prior versions are affected. The exact introduction version of the vulnerable code is unknown.",
                  "UI:A is used because the CSRF attack requires the victim to actively navigate to the attacker\u0027s page or click a link; a purely passive load (e.g., embedded iframe auto-submit) would map to UI:P, but the commit message describes a \u0027cross-site form post\u0027 which typically requires at least a page visit.",
                  "SI:N is chosen because the evidence only demonstrates integrity impact on MISP\u0027s own blocklist and warninglist data; no evidence supports impact on downstream or external systems.",
                  "The CAPEC-124 mapping is confident based on the explicit description of a cross-site form post in the commit message.",
                  "The commit message states the issue was \u0027found during the internal review, not externally reported,\u0027 but does not explicitly name a finder; therefore no finder credit is assigned.",
                  "The _csrfTokenHeaderOnly method is referenced in the patch but its implementation is not shown; it is assumed to enforce CSRF token validation while exempting the field hash, as described in the commit message."
                ],
                "capecRationale": [
                  {
                    "capecId": "CAPEC-124",
                    "rationale": "The attack pattern described in the commit message is a cross-site form post that causes an authenticated site admin to execute a workflow module with attacker-chosen parameters. This maps directly to CAPEC-124, which describes an attacker exploiting the trust a web application places in a user\u0027s browser session to perform unauthorized actions. The mapping is confident because the commit message explicitly describes a cross-site form post bypassing CSRF protection."
                  }
                ],
                "commit": "f05e0d1c263b211108644fe6f1600ad7fde9b915",
                "confidence": "high",
                "credits": [
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "iglocska"
                  },
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "Claude Opus 5 (1M context)"
                  }
                ],
                "cvssRationale": "AV:N: The attack is delivered over the network via a malicious web page. AC:L: Crafting a cross-site form post is straightforward. AT:N: No special conditions or timing are required. PR:N: The attacker requires no account or privileges on the MISP instance. UI:A: The victim (a site admin) must actively visit the attacker-controlled page or click a link that triggers the form submission. VC:N: No confidentiality impact is evident. VI:H: The attacker can write arbitrary blocklist and warninglist entries, significantly compromising the integrity of MISP\u0027s security data. VA:N: No availability impact. SC/SI/SA:N: No evidence of impact on other systems beyond MISP itself.",
                "fixSummary": "The moduleStatelessExecution action is removed from the unlockedActions list, restoring the CSRF token check. A new mechanism (_csrfTokenHeaderOnly) is introduced that enforces the CSRF token while exempting only the field hash, which the legitimate caller (the module dialog) cannot produce because it posts a hand-built object. The module dialog\u0027s AJAX request is updated to send the CSRF token in the X-CSRF-Token header, satisfying the token check without requiring a field hash.",
                "generatedAt": "2026-09-22T12:15:58.553959Z",
                "generator": "patch2vuln.py",
                "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                "modelComparison": {
                  "rankings": [
                    {
                      "agreementScore": 9,
                      "assumptionCount": 6,
                      "confidence": "high",
                      "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "score": 5
                    }
                  ],
                  "selectedModel": "qwen3.8:27b",
                  "selectionMethod": "deterministic-consensus-v1",
                  "selectionNotice": "The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required."
                },
                "patchSha256": "3f8a00ca29761ed6a3986633e60ec67a964e3bfc1dc1e2631a2c2d80df827d30",
                "patchSummary": "In WorkflowsController::beforeFilter(), the line adding \u0027moduleStatelessExecution\u0027 to $this-\u003eSecurity-\u003eunlockedActions is replaced with a call to $this-\u003e_csrfTokenHeaderOnly([\u0027moduleStatelessExecution\u0027]), which enforces CSRF token validation while waiving only the field hash requirement. In execute_module.ctp, the jQuery $.ajax() call is modified to include the header \u0027X-CSRF-Token\u0027 populated from window.csrfToken, so the legitimate client-side caller passes the token check via the header rather than a form field.",
                "patchTruncated": false,
                "patches": [
                  {
                    "commit": "f05e0d1c263b211108644fe6f1600ad7fde9b915",
                    "patchSha256": "3f8a00ca29761ed6a3986633e60ec67a964e3bfc1dc1e2631a2c2d80df827d30",
                    "source": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/f05e0d1c2.patch",
                    "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/f05e0d1c2.patch",
                    "subject": "fix: [security] Keep the CSRF check on stateless workflow"
                  }
                ],
                "source": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/f05e0d1c2.patch",
                "subject": "fix: [security] Keep the CSRF check on stateless workflow",
                "tagVersionBoundary": {
                  "commits_after_fix": 6,
                  "repository": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP",
                  "tag": "v2.5.47",
                  "version": "2.5.47",
                  "version_type": "semver"
                },
                "weaknessRationale": [
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-352",
                    "rationale": "The vulnerable action was placed in unlockedActions, which disabled the CSRF token check. This allowed a cross-site form post to trigger a state-changing action (workflow module execution) on behalf of an authenticated administrator, which is the textbook definition of CSRF."
                  }
                ]
              }
            }
          },
          "recordType": "advisory",
          "vulnId": "GCVE-1-2026-20261"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
    "assignerShortName": "CIRCL",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-95658",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-22T12:31:23.222Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-22T12:31:20.344Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T15:35:08.313Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2026-95659 (GCVE-0-2026-95659)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-22 12:40 – Updated: 2026-09-22 15:34
VLAI
Title
MISP Reflected XSS via Unvalidated Object Type in AnalystData Overmind Thread
Summary
MISP contains a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the AnalystDataController::viewForObject action. The method accepted a parent object type parameter from the URL without validation and passed it to the Overmind-themed AnalystData thread view element, where it was interpolated into two translated strings and rendered into the HTML response without output encoding. An authenticated attacker who can induce a victim to navigate to a crafted URL can inject arbitrary JavaScript that executes in the victim's browser within the MISP application context. This may allow the attacker to read session data, manipulate the page, or perform actions on behalf of the victim.  The vulnerability requires the victim to be authenticated to MISP and to actively visit the attacker-supplied URL. The affected component is the AnalystData controller and the Overmind theme's AnalystData thread element. Version affected: <2.5.47
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-22 15:34 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-79 - Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
  • CWE-116 - Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output
  • CWE-20 - Improper Input Validation
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
MISP MISP Affected: 0 , < 2.5.47 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
GCVE extensions
AI involvement GCVE-BCP-05-X-01
Whole record AI-generated Human-reviewed GNA-1

Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.

ai-computer-assisted:llm-generatedai-computer-assisted:classification
Model Source Identifier
qwen3.8:27b ollama qwen3.8:27b
Patch provenance GCVE-BCP-05-X-02
Generator
patch2vuln.py on 2026-09-22 12:33
Model
qwen3.8:27b
Input
https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/23b879073.patch 4476bdd487c3…
Confidence
high
Commit Subject Patch SHA-256
23b879073eef fix: [security] Reflected XSS via the object type in the 4476bdd487c3…
Fix summary

The fix introduces two layers of defense. First, the viewForObject action now validates the object_type parameter against the AnalystData::valid_targets whitelist and rejects any value not in that list with a NotFoundException, preventing arbitrary strings from reaching the view layer. Second, the two output sinks in the Overmind thread.ctp template now apply the h() HTML-encoding function to the object type before interpolation into translated strings, ensuring that even if a valid type were to contain special characters, it would be rendered as inert text rather than executable markup.

Patch summary

In AnalystDataController.php, the patch adds an import of the AnalystData model and inserts a guard clause at the top of viewForObject that checks the $object_type parameter against AnalystData::valid_targets using a strict in_array comparison; if the value is not in the list, a NotFoundException is thrown. In thread.ctp, two occurrences of strtolower($objectType) passed directly into __() translation calls are wrapped with h() to HTML-encode the value before it is embedded in the rendered HTML output.

CVSS rationale

AV:N: The vulnerability is exploitable over the network via a crafted URL. AC:L: No race conditions or special environment conditions are required; the attacker simply crafts a URL with a malicious object_type value. AT:N: No manipulation of the attack target is needed. PR:L: The victim must be authenticated to MISP to reach the AnalystData view. UI:A: The victim must actively navigate to the attacker-supplied URL (e.g., click a link), which constitutes active user interaction. VC:N, VI:N, VA:N: The vulnerable MISP server itself is not directly compromised; the impact is on the victim's browser session. SC:L: The attacker can read data available in the victim's browser context (cookies, session tokens, page content) but impact is limited to the current page. SI:L: The attacker can modify the rendered page or submit forms on behalf of the victim within the session. SA:N: No broader security impact on other systems is expected from this reflected XSS.

Weakness rationale
  • CWE-79 The object_type URL parameter is reflected into HTML output without encoding, allowing script injection. This is a textbook reflected XSS.
  • CWE-116 The view template interpolated the object type into translated strings without applying h() HTML encoding, which is the direct encoding failure that permits the XSS.
  • CWE-20 The controller accepted any arbitrary string as the object_type parameter without validating it against the known set of valid analyst-data target types, allowing attacker-controlled data to reach the output layer.
Attack pattern rationale
  • CAPEC-127 The vulnerability is a reflected XSS: attacker-controlled input from the URL is reflected into the HTML response without encoding. CAPEC-127 is the most specific and directly applicable attack pattern. No uncertainty in this mapping.
  • CAPEC-61 CAPEC-61 is the broader parent pattern for XSS attacks. It is included as a secondary mapping to cover the general class of the vulnerability. CAPEC-127 is the more precise match; CAPEC-61 is listed for completeness.
Assumptions to verify
  • The affected version range is inferred from the tag_version_boundary metadata (v2.5.47 with 58 commits after the fix), suggesting the fix is included in v2.5.47. The exact first affected version is not specified in the patch.
  • PR:L assumes the AnalystData viewForObject action requires authentication, which is consistent with MISP's typical access model but not explicitly confirmed in the patch.
  • UI:A assumes the victim must actively navigate to a crafted URL (e.g., click a link). If the malicious URL could be loaded in an iframe or auto-redirected, UI:P might be more appropriate, but the evidence supports active navigation.
  • SC:L and SI:L reflect the typical impact of reflected XSS limited to the current page context; a more severe impact (SC:H, SI:H) is possible if the XSS can exfiltrate full session credentials or perform privileged actions, but the patch evidence does not confirm the scope of available data.
  • The CAPEC-61 mapping is a broader parent pattern included for completeness; CAPEC-127 is the primary and most precise match.
Model comparison

Selected qwen3.8:27b by deterministic-consensus-v1
The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required.

Model Score Agreement Confidence Assumptions
qwen3.8:27b 6 9 high 5
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-95659",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-09-22T15:34:30.477077Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T15:34:41.995Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "modules": [
            "AnalystDataController",
            "Overmind theme AnalystData thread element"
          ],
          "product": "MISP",
          "programFiles": [
            "app/Controller/AnalystDataController.php",
            "app/View/Themed/Overmind/Elements/AnalystData/thread.ctp"
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP",
          "vendor": "MISP",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "2.5.47",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "reporter",
          "value": "Jeroen Pinoy"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "iglocska"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "Claude Fable 5.1"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eMISP contains a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the AnalystDataController::viewForObject action. The method accepted a parent object type parameter from the URL without validation and passed it to the Overmind-themed AnalystData thread view element, where it was interpolated into two translated strings and rendered into the HTML response without output encoding. An authenticated attacker who can induce a victim to navigate to a crafted URL can inject arbitrary JavaScript that executes in the victim\u0027s browser within the MISP application context. This may allow the attacker to read session data, manipulate the page, or perform actions on behalf of the victim.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe vulnerability requires the victim to be authenticated to MISP and to actively visit the attacker-supplied URL. The affected component is the AnalystData controller and the Overmind theme\u0027s AnalystData thread element.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eVersion affected: \u0026lt;2.5.47\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "MISP contains a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the AnalystDataController::viewForObject action. The method accepted a parent object type parameter from the URL without validation and passed it to the Overmind-themed AnalystData thread view element, where it was interpolated into two translated strings and rendered into the HTML response without output encoding. An authenticated attacker who can induce a victim to navigate to a crafted URL can inject arbitrary JavaScript that executes in the victim\u0027s browser within the MISP application context. This may allow the attacker to read session data, manipulate the page, or perform actions on behalf of the victim.\u00a0\n\nThe vulnerability requires the victim to be authenticated to MISP and to actively visit the attacker-supplied URL. The affected component is the AnalystData controller and the Overmind theme\u0027s AnalystData thread element.\n\nVersion affected: \u003c2.5.47"
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-127",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-127 Cross Site Scripting (Reflected)"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-61",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-61 Cross Site Scripting"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 4.8,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
            "userInteraction": "ACTIVE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-79",
              "description": "CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-116",
              "description": "CWE-116 Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-20",
              "description": "CWE-20 Improper Input Validation",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T12:41:31.639Z",
        "orgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
        "shortName": "CIRCL"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "Security patch",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/23b879073"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe fix introduces two layers of defense. First, the viewForObject action now validates the object_type parameter against the AnalystData::valid_targets whitelist and rejects any value not in that list with a NotFoundException, preventing arbitrary strings from reaching the view layer. Second, the two output sinks in the Overmind thread.ctp template now apply the h() HTML-encoding function to the object type before interpolation into translated strings, ensuring that even if a valid type were to contain special characters, it would be rendered as inert text rather than executable markup.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The fix introduces two layers of defense. First, the viewForObject action now validates the object_type parameter against the AnalystData::valid_targets whitelist and rejects any value not in that list with a NotFoundException, preventing arbitrary strings from reaching the view layer. Second, the two output sinks in the Overmind thread.ctp template now apply the h() HTML-encoding function to the object type before interpolation into translated strings, ensuring that even if a valid type were to contain special characters, it would be rendered as inert text rather than executable markup."
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "MISP Reflected XSS via Unvalidated Object Type in AnalystData Overmind Thread",
      "x_gcve": [
        {
          "extensions": {
            "bcp-05-x-01": {
              "ai_annotations": [
                {
                  "ai_level": "generated",
                  "description": "Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.",
                  "gna_source": 1,
                  "models": [
                    {
                      "gna_source": 1,
                      "identifier": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "name": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "source": "ollama"
                    }
                  ],
                  "review_status": "full",
                  "scope": "record",
                  "tags": [
                    "ai-computer-assisted:llm-generated",
                    "ai-computer-assisted:classification"
                  ]
                }
              ]
            },
            "bcp-05-x-02": {
              "x_patch2vuln": {
                "assumptions": [
                  "The affected version range is inferred from the tag_version_boundary metadata (v2.5.47 with 58 commits after the fix), suggesting the fix is included in v2.5.47. The exact first affected version is not specified in the patch.",
                  "PR:L assumes the AnalystData viewForObject action requires authentication, which is consistent with MISP\u0027s typical access model but not explicitly confirmed in the patch.",
                  "UI:A assumes the victim must actively navigate to a crafted URL (e.g., click a link). If the malicious URL could be loaded in an iframe or auto-redirected, UI:P might be more appropriate, but the evidence supports active navigation.",
                  "SC:L and SI:L reflect the typical impact of reflected XSS limited to the current page context; a more severe impact (SC:H, SI:H) is possible if the XSS can exfiltrate full session credentials or perform privileged actions, but the patch evidence does not confirm the scope of available data.",
                  "The CAPEC-61 mapping is a broader parent pattern included for completeness; CAPEC-127 is the primary and most precise match."
                ],
                "capecRationale": [
                  {
                    "capecId": "CAPEC-127",
                    "rationale": "The vulnerability is a reflected XSS: attacker-controlled input from the URL is reflected into the HTML response without encoding. CAPEC-127 is the most specific and directly applicable attack pattern. No uncertainty in this mapping."
                  },
                  {
                    "capecId": "CAPEC-61",
                    "rationale": "CAPEC-61 is the broader parent pattern for XSS attacks. It is included as a secondary mapping to cover the general class of the vulnerability. CAPEC-127 is the more precise match; CAPEC-61 is listed for completeness."
                  }
                ],
                "commit": "23b879073eefce37e1065295d180c4bea7cef95f",
                "confidence": "high",
                "credits": [
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "reporter",
                    "value": "Jeroen Pinoy"
                  },
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "iglocska"
                  },
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "Claude Fable 5.1"
                  }
                ],
                "cvssRationale": "AV:N: The vulnerability is exploitable over the network via a crafted URL. AC:L: No race conditions or special environment conditions are required; the attacker simply crafts a URL with a malicious object_type value. AT:N: No manipulation of the attack target is needed. PR:L: The victim must be authenticated to MISP to reach the AnalystData view. UI:A: The victim must actively navigate to the attacker-supplied URL (e.g., click a link), which constitutes active user interaction. VC:N, VI:N, VA:N: The vulnerable MISP server itself is not directly compromised; the impact is on the victim\u0027s browser session. SC:L: The attacker can read data available in the victim\u0027s browser context (cookies, session tokens, page content) but impact is limited to the current page. SI:L: The attacker can modify the rendered page or submit forms on behalf of the victim within the session. SA:N: No broader security impact on other systems is expected from this reflected XSS.",
                "fixSummary": "The fix introduces two layers of defense. First, the viewForObject action now validates the object_type parameter against the AnalystData::valid_targets whitelist and rejects any value not in that list with a NotFoundException, preventing arbitrary strings from reaching the view layer. Second, the two output sinks in the Overmind thread.ctp template now apply the h() HTML-encoding function to the object type before interpolation into translated strings, ensuring that even if a valid type were to contain special characters, it would be rendered as inert text rather than executable markup.",
                "generatedAt": "2026-09-22T12:33:44.255419Z",
                "generator": "patch2vuln.py",
                "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                "modelComparison": {
                  "rankings": [
                    {
                      "agreementScore": 9,
                      "assumptionCount": 5,
                      "confidence": "high",
                      "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "score": 6
                    }
                  ],
                  "selectedModel": "qwen3.8:27b",
                  "selectionMethod": "deterministic-consensus-v1",
                  "selectionNotice": "The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required."
                },
                "patchSha256": "4476bdd487c3b17c3cffff36a76763c107e8bf284095d61bd6860865ce8912e0",
                "patchSummary": "In AnalystDataController.php, the patch adds an import of the AnalystData model and inserts a guard clause at the top of viewForObject that checks the $object_type parameter against AnalystData::valid_targets using a strict in_array comparison; if the value is not in the list, a NotFoundException is thrown. In thread.ctp, two occurrences of strtolower($objectType) passed directly into __() translation calls are wrapped with h() to HTML-encode the value before it is embedded in the rendered HTML output.",
                "patchTruncated": false,
                "patches": [
                  {
                    "commit": "23b879073eefce37e1065295d180c4bea7cef95f",
                    "patchSha256": "4476bdd487c3b17c3cffff36a76763c107e8bf284095d61bd6860865ce8912e0",
                    "source": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/23b879073.patch",
                    "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/23b879073.patch",
                    "subject": "fix: [security] Reflected XSS via the object type in the"
                  }
                ],
                "source": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/23b879073.patch",
                "subject": "fix: [security] Reflected XSS via the object type in the",
                "tagVersionBoundary": {
                  "commits_after_fix": 58,
                  "repository": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP",
                  "tag": "v2.5.47",
                  "version": "2.5.47",
                  "version_type": "semver"
                },
                "weaknessRationale": [
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-79",
                    "rationale": "The object_type URL parameter is reflected into HTML output without encoding, allowing script injection. This is a textbook reflected XSS."
                  },
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-116",
                    "rationale": "The view template interpolated the object type into translated strings without applying h() HTML encoding, which is the direct encoding failure that permits the XSS."
                  },
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-20",
                    "rationale": "The controller accepted any arbitrary string as the object_type parameter without validating it against the known set of valid analyst-data target types, allowing attacker-controlled data to reach the output layer."
                  }
                ]
              }
            }
          },
          "recordType": "advisory",
          "vulnId": "GCVE-1-2026-20234"
        }
      ],
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
    "assignerShortName": "CIRCL",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-95659",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-22T12:40:38.097Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-22T12:40:33.071Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T15:34:41.995Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2026-95661 (GCVE-0-2026-95661)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-22 12:54 – Updated: 2026-09-22 15:34
VLAI
Title
MISP Reflected Cross-Site Scripting in Attribute Histogram via Unescaped URL-Supplied Type List
Summary
MISP contains a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the attribute histogram view. The $selectedTypes variable, which is derived from the URL path segment , was interpolated directly into a JavaScript array literal inside an onClick HTML attribute without any encoding or escaping. An attacker who can cause an authenticated MISP user to visit a crafted URL containing a malicious type value can execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser within the MISP application origin. Successful exploitation allows the attacker to read session cookies, perform actions on behalf of the victim, or exfiltrate sensitive data accessible from the MISP interface.  The vulnerability requires the victim to be authenticated and to actively navigate to the attacker-supplied URL.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-22 15:33 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-79 - Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
MISP MISP Affected: 0 , < 2.5.47 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
GCVE extensions
AI involvement GCVE-BCP-05-X-01
Whole record AI-generated Human-reviewed GNA-1

Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.

ai-computer-assisted:llm-generatedai-computer-assisted:classification
Model Source Identifier
qwen3.8:27b ollama qwen3.8:27b
Patch provenance GCVE-BCP-05-X-02
Generator
patch2vuln.py on 2026-09-22 12:45
Model
qwen3.8:27b
Input
https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/95b8f21f6.patch 33d145872395…
Confidence
high
Commit Subject Patch SHA-256
95b8f21f6be9 fix: [security] Escape the selected types in the attribute 33d145872395…
Fix summary

The fix replaces the unsafe raw PHP loop that concatenated type values into a JavaScript array literal with a call to json_encode() using the JSON_HEX_TAG, JSON_HEX_APOS, JSON_HEX_QUOT, and JSON_HEX_AMP flags. This ensures that all special characters (angle brackets, quotes, ampersands) in the type values are hex-encoded, preventing any value from breaking out of the JavaScript string/array context and injecting arbitrary script.

Patch summary

In app/View/Elements/histogram.ctp, the onClick attribute previously built a JS array by iterating over $selectedTypes and echoing each value between double quotes with no escaping: [<?php foreach ($selectedTypes as $t) echo '"' . $t . '", ' ?>]. The patch replaces this with a single json_encode($selectedTypes, JSON_HEX_TAG | JSON_HEX_APOS | JSON_HEX_QUOT | JSON_HEX_AMP) call, producing a safely encoded JSON array literal that cannot be broken out of by any element value.

CVSS rationale

AV:N: The vulnerability is exploitable over the network via a crafted URL. AC:L: No race conditions or special environment conditions are required; the attacker simply crafts a URL with a malicious type value. AT:N: No manipulation of the attack target is needed. PR:N: The attacker requires no privileges on the MISP instance; the victim must be authenticated, but that is a precondition on the victim, not a privilege requirement on the attacker. UI:A: The victim must actively click a link or navigate to the attacker-supplied URL for the reflected payload to execute. VC:N, VI:N, VA:N: The MISP server itself is not directly compromised; the impact is confined to the victim's browser session. SC:L: The attacker can read session tokens or data visible in the MISP UI within the victim's browser. SI:L: The attacker can perform actions on behalf of the victim within the MISP application. SA:N: No availability impact on the victim's browser or the MISP server.

Weakness rationale
  • CWE-79 The patch directly addresses the reflection of untrusted, URL-supplied data into a JavaScript context within an HTML attribute without encoding. This is a textbook reflected XSS (CWE-79). The specific sub-type is reflected XSS in a JavaScript context (inline event handler), but CWE-79 is the standard and most precise mapping.
Attack pattern rationale
  • CAPEC-1 CAPEC-1 is the canonical CAPEC pattern for cross-site scripting attacks, covering reflected, stored, and DOM-based variants. The patch evidence shows a reflected XSS where URL-supplied data is injected into an inline JavaScript event handler. CAPEC-1 is the closest and most direct match. No more specific CAPEC sub-pattern for reflected XSS in inline JS handlers exists in the CAPEC catalog, so CAPEC-1 is the best available mapping.
Assumptions to verify
  • The affected version boundary is inferred from the tag_version_boundary metadata (v2.5.47 with 46 commits after the fix); the exact first affected version is not stated in the patch and is assumed to be all versions prior to the fix commit.
  • The UI:A (Active) rating assumes the victim must click a link or manually navigate to the crafted URL; if the URL could be triggered via an auto-redirect or embedded iframe, UI:P (Passive) might be more appropriate.
  • SC:L and SI:L are conservative ratings for the secondary-system impact; a full session hijack or data exfiltration could justify SC:H/SI:H, but the patch evidence does not specify the exact scope of exploitable data.
  • The CAPEC-1 mapping is the closest available pattern; no CAPEC sub-pattern specifically covers reflected XSS in inline JavaScript event handlers, so the general XSS pattern is used.
  • The commit message references 'any logged-in victim,' implying authentication is required; the exact role or permission level of the victim is not specified.
Model comparison

Selected qwen3.8:27b by deterministic-consensus-v1
The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required.

Model Score Agreement Confidence Assumptions
qwen3.8:27b 6 9 high 5
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-95661",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-09-22T15:33:57.327364Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T15:34:06.853Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "modules": [
            "app/View/Elements/histogram.ctp"
          ],
          "product": "MISP",
          "programFiles": [
            "app/View/Elements/histogram.ctp"
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP",
          "vendor": "MISP",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "2.5.47",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "reporter",
          "value": "Jeroen Pinoy"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "iglocska"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "Claude Opus 4.8"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eMISP contains a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the attribute histogram view. The $selectedTypes variable, which is derived from the URL path segment , was interpolated directly into a JavaScript array literal inside an onClick HTML attribute without any encoding or escaping. An attacker who can cause an authenticated MISP user to visit a crafted URL containing a malicious type value can execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim\u0027s browser within the MISP application origin.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSuccessful exploitation allows the attacker to read session cookies, perform actions on behalf of the victim, or exfiltrate sensitive data accessible from the MISP interface.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe vulnerability requires the victim to be authenticated and to actively navigate to the attacker-supplied URL.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "MISP contains a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the attribute histogram view. The $selectedTypes variable, which is derived from the URL path segment , was interpolated directly into a JavaScript array literal inside an onClick HTML attribute without any encoding or escaping. An attacker who can cause an authenticated MISP user to visit a crafted URL containing a malicious type value can execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim\u0027s browser within the MISP application origin.\n\nSuccessful exploitation allows the attacker to read session cookies, perform actions on behalf of the victim, or exfiltrate sensitive data accessible from the MISP interface.\u00a0\n\nThe vulnerability requires the victim to be authenticated and to actively navigate to the attacker-supplied URL."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-1",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-1 Cross Site Scripting (XSS)"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 5.1,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
            "userInteraction": "ACTIVE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-79",
              "description": "CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T12:54:46.496Z",
        "orgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
        "shortName": "CIRCL"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "Security patch",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/95b8f21f6"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe fix replaces the unsafe raw PHP loop that concatenated type values into a JavaScript array literal with a call to json_encode() using the JSON_HEX_TAG, JSON_HEX_APOS, JSON_HEX_QUOT, and JSON_HEX_AMP flags. This ensures that all special characters (angle brackets, quotes, ampersands) in the type values are hex-encoded, preventing any value from breaking out of the JavaScript string/array context and injecting arbitrary script.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The fix replaces the unsafe raw PHP loop that concatenated type values into a JavaScript array literal with a call to json_encode() using the JSON_HEX_TAG, JSON_HEX_APOS, JSON_HEX_QUOT, and JSON_HEX_AMP flags. This ensures that all special characters (angle brackets, quotes, ampersands) in the type values are hex-encoded, preventing any value from breaking out of the JavaScript string/array context and injecting arbitrary script."
        }
      ],
      "title": "MISP Reflected Cross-Site Scripting in Attribute Histogram via Unescaped URL-Supplied Type List",
      "x_gcve": [
        {
          "extensions": {
            "bcp-05-x-01": {
              "ai_annotations": [
                {
                  "ai_level": "generated",
                  "description": "Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.",
                  "gna_source": 1,
                  "models": [
                    {
                      "gna_source": 1,
                      "identifier": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "name": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "source": "ollama"
                    }
                  ],
                  "review_status": "full",
                  "scope": "record",
                  "tags": [
                    "ai-computer-assisted:llm-generated",
                    "ai-computer-assisted:classification"
                  ]
                }
              ]
            },
            "bcp-05-x-02": {
              "x_patch2vuln": {
                "assumptions": [
                  "The affected version boundary is inferred from the tag_version_boundary metadata (v2.5.47 with 46 commits after the fix); the exact first affected version is not stated in the patch and is assumed to be all versions prior to the fix commit.",
                  "The UI:A (Active) rating assumes the victim must click a link or manually navigate to the crafted URL; if the URL could be triggered via an auto-redirect or embedded iframe, UI:P (Passive) might be more appropriate.",
                  "SC:L and SI:L are conservative ratings for the secondary-system impact; a full session hijack or data exfiltration could justify SC:H/SI:H, but the patch evidence does not specify the exact scope of exploitable data.",
                  "The CAPEC-1 mapping is the closest available pattern; no CAPEC sub-pattern specifically covers reflected XSS in inline JavaScript event handlers, so the general XSS pattern is used.",
                  "The commit message references \u0027any logged-in victim,\u0027 implying authentication is required; the exact role or permission level of the victim is not specified."
                ],
                "capecRationale": [
                  {
                    "capecId": "CAPEC-1",
                    "rationale": "CAPEC-1 is the canonical CAPEC pattern for cross-site scripting attacks, covering reflected, stored, and DOM-based variants. The patch evidence shows a reflected XSS where URL-supplied data is injected into an inline JavaScript event handler. CAPEC-1 is the closest and most direct match. No more specific CAPEC sub-pattern for reflected XSS in inline JS handlers exists in the CAPEC catalog, so CAPEC-1 is the best available mapping."
                  }
                ],
                "commit": "95b8f21f6be9e20323dd101e7d085fc34765c7b7",
                "confidence": "high",
                "credits": [
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "reporter",
                    "value": "Jeroen Pinoy"
                  },
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "iglocska"
                  },
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "Claude Opus 4.8"
                  }
                ],
                "cvssRationale": "AV:N: The vulnerability is exploitable over the network via a crafted URL. AC:L: No race conditions or special environment conditions are required; the attacker simply crafts a URL with a malicious type value. AT:N: No manipulation of the attack target is needed. PR:N: The attacker requires no privileges on the MISP instance; the victim must be authenticated, but that is a precondition on the victim, not a privilege requirement on the attacker. UI:A: The victim must actively click a link or navigate to the attacker-supplied URL for the reflected payload to execute. VC:N, VI:N, VA:N: The MISP server itself is not directly compromised; the impact is confined to the victim\u0027s browser session. SC:L: The attacker can read session tokens or data visible in the MISP UI within the victim\u0027s browser. SI:L: The attacker can perform actions on behalf of the victim within the MISP application. SA:N: No availability impact on the victim\u0027s browser or the MISP server.",
                "fixSummary": "The fix replaces the unsafe raw PHP loop that concatenated type values into a JavaScript array literal with a call to json_encode() using the JSON_HEX_TAG, JSON_HEX_APOS, JSON_HEX_QUOT, and JSON_HEX_AMP flags. This ensures that all special characters (angle brackets, quotes, ampersands) in the type values are hex-encoded, preventing any value from breaking out of the JavaScript string/array context and injecting arbitrary script.",
                "generatedAt": "2026-09-22T12:45:39.951248Z",
                "generator": "patch2vuln.py",
                "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                "modelComparison": {
                  "rankings": [
                    {
                      "agreementScore": 9,
                      "assumptionCount": 5,
                      "confidence": "high",
                      "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "score": 6
                    }
                  ],
                  "selectedModel": "qwen3.8:27b",
                  "selectionMethod": "deterministic-consensus-v1",
                  "selectionNotice": "The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required."
                },
                "patchSha256": "33d14587239572ed6af4ca5d122f4b92405dbce1ff0317a1ff1e6e026073dc8c",
                "patchSummary": "In app/View/Elements/histogram.ctp, the onClick attribute previously built a JS array by iterating over $selectedTypes and echoing each value between double quotes with no escaping: [\u003c?php foreach ($selectedTypes as $t) echo \u0027\"\u0027 . $t . \u0027\", \u0027 ?\u003e]. The patch replaces this with a single json_encode($selectedTypes, JSON_HEX_TAG | JSON_HEX_APOS | JSON_HEX_QUOT | JSON_HEX_AMP) call, producing a safely encoded JSON array literal that cannot be broken out of by any element value.",
                "patchTruncated": false,
                "patches": [
                  {
                    "commit": "95b8f21f6be9e20323dd101e7d085fc34765c7b7",
                    "patchSha256": "33d14587239572ed6af4ca5d122f4b92405dbce1ff0317a1ff1e6e026073dc8c",
                    "source": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/95b8f21f6.patch",
                    "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/95b8f21f6.patch",
                    "subject": "fix: [security] Escape the selected types in the attribute"
                  }
                ],
                "source": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/95b8f21f6.patch",
                "subject": "fix: [security] Escape the selected types in the attribute",
                "tagVersionBoundary": {
                  "commits_after_fix": 46,
                  "repository": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP",
                  "tag": "v2.5.47",
                  "version": "2.5.47",
                  "version_type": "semver"
                },
                "weaknessRationale": [
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-79",
                    "rationale": "The patch directly addresses the reflection of untrusted, URL-supplied data into a JavaScript context within an HTML attribute without encoding. This is a textbook reflected XSS (CWE-79). The specific sub-type is reflected XSS in a JavaScript context (inline event handler), but CWE-79 is the standard and most precise mapping."
                  }
                ]
              }
            }
          },
          "recordType": "advisory",
          "vulnId": "GCVE-1-2026-20161"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
    "assignerShortName": "CIRCL",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-95661",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-22T12:54:46.496Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-22T12:54:43.824Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T15:34:06.853Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2026-95665 (GCVE-0-2026-95665)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-22 13:01 – Updated: 2026-09-22 15:33
VLAI
Title
MISP Reflected Cross-Site Scripting in Event Export Confirmation Form via Unescaped JSON
Summary
MISP contains a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the event REST search export confirmation form. The view template app/View/Events/ajax/eventRestSearchExportConfirmationForm.ctp renders a URL-supplied event ID list into a single-quoted JavaScript string literal using PHP's json_encode() without any hex-encoding flags. By default, json_encode() escapes double quotes and backslashes but does not escape single quotes. Because the JavaScript string is delimited by single quotes, an attacker can inject a single-quote character to terminate the string literal and execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session. The vulnerability affects the Default and UiBeta themes, both of which render this view. The Overmind theme's own copy of the form already passed the value through an escaped data attribute and was not affected by this specific sink. Preconditions: the victim must be an authenticated MISP user and must actively open or navigate to the attacker-crafted URL. The attacker does not require an account or any prior access to the MISP instance. Security impact: successful exploitation allows execution of arbitrary JavaScript in the context of the MISP web application, potentially leading to session hijacking, unauthorized actions performed on behalf of the victim, exfiltration of sensitive data visible in the session, or further client-side attacks. The vulnerable component's own confidentiality, integrity, and availability are not directly compromised; the impact is on the underlying user session.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-22 15:32 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-79 - Improper Neutralization of Input in Web Page ('Cross-site Scripting')
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
MISP MISP Affected: 0 , < 2.5.47 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
GCVE extensions
AI involvement GCVE-BCP-05-X-01
Whole record AI-generated Human-reviewed GNA-1

Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.

ai-computer-assisted:llm-generatedai-computer-assisted:classification
Model Source Identifier
qwen3.8:27b ollama qwen3.8:27b
Patch provenance GCVE-BCP-05-X-02
Generator
patch2vuln.py on 2026-09-22 12:57
Model
qwen3.8:27b
Input
https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/ad4ff238d.patch b2c68a624115…
Confidence
high
Commit Subject Patch SHA-256
ad4ff238df97 fix: [security] Escape the event id list in the export b2c68a624115…
Fix summary

The vulnerability is remediated by adding the JSON_HEX_TAG, JSON_HEX_APOS, JSON_HEX_QUOT, and JSON_HEX_AMP flags to the json_encode() call at the rendering sink. These flags cause angle brackets, single quotes, double quotes, and ampersands to be hex-encoded (e.g., ' becomes \u0027), preventing any of these characters from breaking out of the single-quoted JavaScript string literal and thereby eliminating the script injection vector.

Patch summary

A single-line change in app/View/Events/ajax/eventRestSearchExportConfirmationForm.ctp: the json_encode($idList) call is replaced with json_encode($idList, JSON_HEX_TAG | JSON_HEX_APOS | JSON_HEX_QUOT | JSON_HEX_AMP), ensuring that single quotes, double quotes, angle brackets, and ampersands in the event ID list are hex-escaped before being interpolated into the single-quoted JavaScript string literal in the redirectToExportResult() function.

CVSS rationale

AV:N: the exploit is delivered over the network via a crafted URL. AC:L: the attack requires only crafting a URL with a single quote in the event ID list; no race conditions or special conditions are needed. AT:N: no additional attack complexity beyond what AC captures. PR:N: the attacker does not need any MISP account or privileges; the victim must be authenticated, but PR measures attacker privileges. UI:A: the victim must actively open or click the crafted link. VC/VI/VA:N: the MISP server's own confidentiality, integrity, and availability are not directly impacted. SC:L: the attacker can read session data, cookies, or other sensitive information in the victim's browser context. SI:L: the attacker can perform actions on behalf of the victim (e.g., submit forms, modify data via the API). SA:N: no impact on the availability of the underlying system.

Weakness rationale
  • CWE-79 The root cause is the failure to neutralize a single-quote character in user-controlled input (the URL-supplied event ID list) before embedding it in a single-quoted JavaScript string context. json_encode() without hex flags does not escape single quotes, allowing script injection. This is a textbook reflected XSS (CWE-79).
Attack pattern rationale
  • CAPEC-1 The attack pattern involves injecting a script fragment (a single quote followed by arbitrary JavaScript) into a web page via a URL parameter, which is then reflected into the page's JavaScript context without proper encoding. This matches CAPEC-1 (Cross Site Scripting) directly. The injection is reflected (not stored) and occurs in a script context rather than an HTML context, but CAPEC-1 is the closest and most general applicable pattern. No more specific CAPEC for script-context reflected XSS exists in the CAPEC catalog, so CAPEC-1 is the best available match.
Assumptions to verify
  • The tag_version_boundary metadata indicates the fix commit is 44 commits after tag v2.5.47, suggesting versions up to and including 2.5.47 may be affected, but no explicit affected or fixed version range is stated in the patch or commit message. The version boundary is inferred from repository metadata and may not be precise.
  • The CVSS v4.0 AT (Attack Complexity) metric value 'N' is used as the neutral/none value; the exact valid value set for AT in CVSS v4.0 is not fully confirmed from the patch evidence alone.
  • The CAPEC-1 mapping is the closest general XSS pattern available; no CAPEC specifically covers script-context reflected XSS via unescaped JSON in a single-quoted JS string, so CAPEC-1 is the best available match.
  • The Overmind theme is assumed unaffected because the commit message states it already passed the value through an escaped data attribute; this is based solely on the commit message and was not independently verified.
  • PR:N is assigned because the attacker does not require authentication to craft the malicious URL; the requirement that the victim be logged in is captured in UI:A rather than PR.
Model comparison

Selected qwen3.8:27b by deterministic-consensus-v1
The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required.

Model Score Agreement Confidence Assumptions
qwen3.8:27b 6 9 high 5
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-95665",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-09-22T15:32:57.787316Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T15:33:05.484Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "modules": [
            "Events export confirmation form (app/View/Events/ajax/eventRestSearchExportConfirmationForm.ctp)",
            "Default theme",
            "UiBeta theme"
          ],
          "product": "MISP",
          "programFiles": [
            "app/View/Events/ajax/eventRestSearchExportConfirmationForm.ctp"
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP",
          "vendor": "MISP",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "2.5.47",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "reporter",
          "value": "Niels Teusink of Eye Security"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "iglocska"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "Claude Opus 5 (1M context)"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eMISP contains a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the event REST search export confirmation form. The view template app/View/Events/ajax/eventRestSearchExportConfirmationForm.ctp renders a URL-supplied event ID list into a single-quoted JavaScript string literal using PHP\u0027s json_encode() without any hex-encoding flags. By default, json_encode() escapes double quotes and backslashes but does not escape single quotes. Because the JavaScript string is delimited by single quotes, an attacker can inject a single-quote character to terminate the string literal and execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim\u0027s browser session.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe vulnerability affects the Default and UiBeta themes, both of which render this view. The Overmind theme\u0027s own copy of the form already passed the value through an escaped data attribute and was not affected by this specific sink.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003ePreconditions: the victim must be an authenticated MISP user and must actively open or navigate to the attacker-crafted URL. The attacker does not require an account or any prior access to the MISP instance.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSecurity impact: successful exploitation allows execution of arbitrary JavaScript in the context of the MISP web application, potentially leading to session hijacking, unauthorized actions performed on behalf of the victim, exfiltration of sensitive data visible in the session, or further client-side attacks. The vulnerable component\u0027s own confidentiality, integrity, and availability are not directly compromised; the impact is on the underlying user session.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "MISP contains a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the event REST search export confirmation form. The view template app/View/Events/ajax/eventRestSearchExportConfirmationForm.ctp renders a URL-supplied event ID list into a single-quoted JavaScript string literal using PHP\u0027s json_encode() without any hex-encoding flags. By default, json_encode() escapes double quotes and backslashes but does not escape single quotes. Because the JavaScript string is delimited by single quotes, an attacker can inject a single-quote character to terminate the string literal and execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim\u0027s browser session.\n\nThe vulnerability affects the Default and UiBeta themes, both of which render this view. The Overmind theme\u0027s own copy of the form already passed the value through an escaped data attribute and was not affected by this specific sink.\n\nPreconditions: the victim must be an authenticated MISP user and must actively open or navigate to the attacker-crafted URL. The attacker does not require an account or any prior access to the MISP instance.\n\nSecurity impact: successful exploitation allows execution of arbitrary JavaScript in the context of the MISP web application, potentially leading to session hijacking, unauthorized actions performed on behalf of the victim, exfiltration of sensitive data visible in the session, or further client-side attacks. The vulnerable component\u0027s own confidentiality, integrity, and availability are not directly compromised; the impact is on the underlying user session."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-1",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-1 Cross Site Scripting"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 5.1,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
            "userInteraction": "ACTIVE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-79",
              "description": "CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input in Web Page (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T13:01:45.225Z",
        "orgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
        "shortName": "CIRCL"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "Security patch",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/ad4ff238d"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe vulnerability is remediated by adding the JSON_HEX_TAG, JSON_HEX_APOS, JSON_HEX_QUOT, and JSON_HEX_AMP flags to the json_encode() call at the rendering sink. These flags cause angle brackets, single quotes, double quotes, and ampersands to be hex-encoded (e.g., \u0027 becomes \\u0027), preventing any of these characters from breaking out of the single-quoted JavaScript string literal and thereby eliminating the script injection vector.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The vulnerability is remediated by adding the JSON_HEX_TAG, JSON_HEX_APOS, JSON_HEX_QUOT, and JSON_HEX_AMP flags to the json_encode() call at the rendering sink. These flags cause angle brackets, single quotes, double quotes, and ampersands to be hex-encoded (e.g., \u0027 becomes \\u0027), preventing any of these characters from breaking out of the single-quoted JavaScript string literal and thereby eliminating the script injection vector."
        }
      ],
      "title": "MISP Reflected Cross-Site Scripting in Event Export Confirmation Form via Unescaped JSON",
      "x_gcve": [
        {
          "extensions": {
            "bcp-05-x-01": {
              "ai_annotations": [
                {
                  "ai_level": "generated",
                  "description": "Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.",
                  "gna_source": 1,
                  "models": [
                    {
                      "gna_source": 1,
                      "identifier": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "name": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "source": "ollama"
                    }
                  ],
                  "review_status": "full",
                  "scope": "record",
                  "tags": [
                    "ai-computer-assisted:llm-generated",
                    "ai-computer-assisted:classification"
                  ]
                }
              ]
            },
            "bcp-05-x-02": {
              "x_patch2vuln": {
                "assumptions": [
                  "The tag_version_boundary metadata indicates the fix commit is 44 commits after tag v2.5.47, suggesting versions up to and including 2.5.47 may be affected, but no explicit affected or fixed version range is stated in the patch or commit message. The version boundary is inferred from repository metadata and may not be precise.",
                  "The CVSS v4.0 AT (Attack Complexity) metric value \u0027N\u0027 is used as the neutral/none value; the exact valid value set for AT in CVSS v4.0 is not fully confirmed from the patch evidence alone.",
                  "The CAPEC-1 mapping is the closest general XSS pattern available; no CAPEC specifically covers script-context reflected XSS via unescaped JSON in a single-quoted JS string, so CAPEC-1 is the best available match.",
                  "The Overmind theme is assumed unaffected because the commit message states it already passed the value through an escaped data attribute; this is based solely on the commit message and was not independently verified.",
                  "PR:N is assigned because the attacker does not require authentication to craft the malicious URL; the requirement that the victim be logged in is captured in UI:A rather than PR."
                ],
                "capecRationale": [
                  {
                    "capecId": "CAPEC-1",
                    "rationale": "The attack pattern involves injecting a script fragment (a single quote followed by arbitrary JavaScript) into a web page via a URL parameter, which is then reflected into the page\u0027s JavaScript context without proper encoding. This matches CAPEC-1 (Cross Site Scripting) directly. The injection is reflected (not stored) and occurs in a script context rather than an HTML context, but CAPEC-1 is the closest and most general applicable pattern. No more specific CAPEC for script-context reflected XSS exists in the CAPEC catalog, so CAPEC-1 is the best available match."
                  }
                ],
                "commit": "ad4ff238df978d459ac6efe0a58038748fa4a649",
                "confidence": "high",
                "credits": [
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "reporter",
                    "value": "Niels Teusink of Eye Security"
                  },
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "iglocska"
                  },
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "Claude Opus 5 (1M context)"
                  }
                ],
                "cvssRationale": "AV:N: the exploit is delivered over the network via a crafted URL. AC:L: the attack requires only crafting a URL with a single quote in the event ID list; no race conditions or special conditions are needed. AT:N: no additional attack complexity beyond what AC captures. PR:N: the attacker does not need any MISP account or privileges; the victim must be authenticated, but PR measures attacker privileges. UI:A: the victim must actively open or click the crafted link. VC/VI/VA:N: the MISP server\u0027s own confidentiality, integrity, and availability are not directly impacted. SC:L: the attacker can read session data, cookies, or other sensitive information in the victim\u0027s browser context. SI:L: the attacker can perform actions on behalf of the victim (e.g., submit forms, modify data via the API). SA:N: no impact on the availability of the underlying system.",
                "fixSummary": "The vulnerability is remediated by adding the JSON_HEX_TAG, JSON_HEX_APOS, JSON_HEX_QUOT, and JSON_HEX_AMP flags to the json_encode() call at the rendering sink. These flags cause angle brackets, single quotes, double quotes, and ampersands to be hex-encoded (e.g., \u0027 becomes \\u0027), preventing any of these characters from breaking out of the single-quoted JavaScript string literal and thereby eliminating the script injection vector.",
                "generatedAt": "2026-09-22T12:57:11.104186Z",
                "generator": "patch2vuln.py",
                "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                "modelComparison": {
                  "rankings": [
                    {
                      "agreementScore": 9,
                      "assumptionCount": 5,
                      "confidence": "high",
                      "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "score": 6
                    }
                  ],
                  "selectedModel": "qwen3.8:27b",
                  "selectionMethod": "deterministic-consensus-v1",
                  "selectionNotice": "The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required."
                },
                "patchSha256": "b2c68a62411584c586558a3ab03529c380d9bdb0824ac292b26e7f8b3278fa01",
                "patchSummary": "A single-line change in app/View/Events/ajax/eventRestSearchExportConfirmationForm.ctp: the json_encode($idList) call is replaced with json_encode($idList, JSON_HEX_TAG | JSON_HEX_APOS | JSON_HEX_QUOT | JSON_HEX_AMP), ensuring that single quotes, double quotes, angle brackets, and ampersands in the event ID list are hex-escaped before being interpolated into the single-quoted JavaScript string literal in the redirectToExportResult() function.",
                "patchTruncated": false,
                "patches": [
                  {
                    "commit": "ad4ff238df978d459ac6efe0a58038748fa4a649",
                    "patchSha256": "b2c68a62411584c586558a3ab03529c380d9bdb0824ac292b26e7f8b3278fa01",
                    "source": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/ad4ff238d.patch",
                    "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/ad4ff238d.patch",
                    "subject": "fix: [security] Escape the event id list in the export"
                  }
                ],
                "source": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/ad4ff238d.patch",
                "subject": "fix: [security] Escape the event id list in the export",
                "tagVersionBoundary": {
                  "commits_after_fix": 44,
                  "repository": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP",
                  "tag": "v2.5.47",
                  "version": "2.5.47",
                  "version_type": "semver"
                },
                "weaknessRationale": [
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-79",
                    "rationale": "The root cause is the failure to neutralize a single-quote character in user-controlled input (the URL-supplied event ID list) before embedding it in a single-quoted JavaScript string context. json_encode() without hex flags does not escape single quotes, allowing script injection. This is a textbook reflected XSS (CWE-79)."
                  }
                ]
              }
            }
          },
          "recordType": "advisory",
          "vulnId": "GCVE-1-2026-20129"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
    "assignerShortName": "CIRCL",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-95665",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-22T13:01:45.225Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-22T13:01:42.885Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T15:33:05.484Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2026-95667 (GCVE-0-2026-95667)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-22 13:11 – Updated: 2026-09-22 15:32
VLAI
Title
MISP Installer Log and FIFO Created World-Readable, Exposing Sensitive Credentials
Summary
The MISP installer scripts (for Debian 12, Debian 13, Ubuntu 24.04, and RHEL 9.4) create a log file at /var/log/misp_install.log and a named pipe (FIFO) at /var/log/misp_install.log.pipe to capture all installer output. The log captures highly sensitive data including the generated admin password, database passwords, GPG passphrase, and supervisor password. However, the log file was created by the tee command under the system default umask, resulting in world-readable permissions (typically 0644). Similarly, the FIFO was created with mkfifo without an explicit mode, also inheriting the default umask and remaining world-readable during the window before it was unlinked.  Any local unprivileged user on the system could read the log file or the FIFO to obtain these credentials.  Additionally, the log file was not removed before creation, meaning a pre-existing symlink in /var/log could have been used to redirect the write to an arbitrary location. Version affected: <2.5.47
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-22 15:32 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-732 - Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource
  • CWE-22 - Path Traversal
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
MISP MISP Affected: 0 , < 2.5.47 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
GCVE extensions
AI involvement GCVE-BCP-05-X-01
Whole record AI-generated Human-reviewed GNA-1

Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.

ai-computer-assisted:llm-generatedai-computer-assisted:classification
Model Source Identifier
qwen3.8:27b ollama qwen3.8:27b
Patch provenance GCVE-BCP-05-X-02
Generator
patch2vuln.py on 2026-09-22 13:03
Model
qwen3.8:27b
Input
https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/d5d72ab38.patch e0af51eb247c…
Confidence
high
Commit Subject Patch SHA-256
d5d72ab38eda fix: [security] Create the installer log and its FIFO e0af51eb247c…
Fix summary

The installer scripts now explicitly create the log file with 0600 permissions using install -m 0600 and the FIFO with mkfifo -m 0600, ensuring both are root-readable/writable only from the moment of creation. The log file is also removed (rm -f) before creation to prevent a pre-existing symlink in /var/log from being used to redirect the write to an attacker-controlled path. This matches the existing 0600 treatment applied to /root/misp_settings.txt by the save_settings() function.

Patch summary

In all four installer scripts (INSTALL.debian12.sh, INSTALL.debian13.sh, INSTALL.ubuntu2404.sh, xINSTALL.rhel94.sh), the single line mkfifo ${logfile}.pipe is replaced with three lines: rm -f "$logfile" to remove any pre-existing file or symlink; install -m 0600 /dev/null "$logfile" to create the log file with root-only permissions; and mkfifo -m 0600 ${logfile}.pipe to create the FIFO with root-only permissions. The subsequent tee and exec redirection lines remain unchanged.

CVSS rationale

Attack Vector is Local because the attacker must have a local account or shell access on the system where the MISP installer runs. Attack Complexity is Low because reading a world-readable file requires no special conditions. No Attack Target manipulation is needed. Privileges Required is None because the file is world-readable (0644) and any unprivileged local user can read it. No User Interaction is required. Confidentiality impact is High because the log contains the admin password, database passwords, GPG passphrase, and supervisor password, granting full compromise of the MISP deployment. Integrity and Availability impacts are None. Scope is Not Changed because the exposed credentials belong to the same MISP system. The vulnerability is transient (only during installation) but the log file persists after installation unless manually removed.

Weakness rationale
  • CWE-732 The installer log file and FIFO were created under the default umask, resulting in world-readable permissions on a file containing sensitive credentials (admin password, database passwords, GPG passphrase, supervisor password). The fix explicitly sets 0600 permissions, confirming the root cause was incorrect permission assignment.
  • CWE-22 The log file was not removed before creation, allowing a pre-existing symlink in /var/log to redirect the write to an arbitrary file. The fix adds rm -f before creation to mitigate this symlink-following risk. This is a secondary weakness addressed by the same patch.
Attack pattern rationale
  • CAPEC-135 The most direct attack pattern is a local unprivileged user simply reading the world-readable log file at /var/log/misp_install.log to harvest sensitive credentials. No complex exploitation is required beyond file read access. CAPEC-135 covers the general pattern of an attacker leveraging misconfigured file permissions to access sensitive data. The symlink variant (CWE-22) could also map to CAPEC-135 as a sub-technique of permission exploitation.
Assumptions to verify
  • The affected version range is inferred from the tag_version_boundary (v2.5.47 with 38 commits after fix); the exact first affected version is not specified in the patch metadata.
  • The vulnerability is transient in the sense that it only manifests during the installer execution window, but the log file persists on disk after installation and remains world-readable unless the administrator manually changes permissions or removes it.
  • The CVSS assumes the log file remains on disk after installation; if it is immediately removed by the installer, the exposure window is shorter but the file is still readable during the installation process.
  • CAPEC-135 is the closest available attack pattern; no CAPEC specifically covers 'reading a world-readable log file containing credentials,' so the general permission-misuse pattern is the best match.
  • The symlink attack vector (CWE-22) is a secondary concern addressed by the same patch; the primary vulnerability is the incorrect file permissions (CWE-732).
  • The installer is assumed to run as root (standard for system installation scripts), which is why 0600 permissions restrict access to root only.
Model comparison

Selected qwen3.8:27b by deterministic-consensus-v1
The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required.

Model Score Agreement Confidence Assumptions
qwen3.8:27b 5 9 high 6
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-95667",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-09-22T15:32:35.402501Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T15:32:43.415Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "modules": [
            "Installer scripts (INSTALL/INSTALL.debian12.sh",
            "INSTALL/INSTALL.debian13.sh",
            "INSTALL/INSTALL.ubuntu2404.sh",
            "INSTALL/xINSTALL.rhel94.sh)"
          ],
          "product": "MISP",
          "programFiles": [
            "INSTALL/INSTALL.debian12.sh",
            "INSTALL/INSTALL.debian13.sh",
            "INSTALL/INSTALL.ubuntu2404.sh",
            "INSTALL/xINSTALL.rhel94.sh"
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP",
          "vendor": "MISP",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "2.5.47",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "reporter",
          "value": "Niels Teusink of Eye Security"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "iglocska"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "Claude Opus 5 (1M context)"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe MISP installer scripts (for Debian 12, Debian 13, Ubuntu 24.04, and RHEL 9.4) create a log file at /var/log/misp_install.log and a named pipe (FIFO) at /var/log/misp_install.log.pipe to capture all installer output. The log captures highly sensitive data including the generated admin password, database passwords, GPG passphrase, and supervisor password. However, the log file was created by the tee command under the system default umask, resulting in world-readable permissions (typically 0644). Similarly, the FIFO was created with mkfifo without an explicit mode, also inheriting the default umask and remaining world-readable during the window before it was unlinked.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAny local unprivileged user on the system could read the log file or the FIFO to obtain these credentials.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAdditionally, the log file was not removed before creation, meaning a pre-existing symlink in /var/log could have been used to redirect the write to an arbitrary location.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eVersion affected: \u0026lt;2.5.47\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The MISP installer scripts (for Debian 12, Debian 13, Ubuntu 24.04, and RHEL 9.4) create a log file at /var/log/misp_install.log and a named pipe (FIFO) at /var/log/misp_install.log.pipe to capture all installer output. The log captures highly sensitive data including the generated admin password, database passwords, GPG passphrase, and supervisor password. However, the log file was created by the tee command under the system default umask, resulting in world-readable permissions (typically 0644). Similarly, the FIFO was created with mkfifo without an explicit mode, also inheriting the default umask and remaining world-readable during the window before it was unlinked.\u00a0\n\nAny local unprivileged user on the system could read the log file or the FIFO to obtain these credentials.\u00a0\n\nAdditionally, the log file was not removed before creation, meaning a pre-existing symlink in /var/log could have been used to redirect the write to an arbitrary location.\n\nVersion affected: \u003c2.5.47"
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-135",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-135 Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Security Permissions"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "LOCAL",
            "baseScore": 6.9,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-732",
              "description": "CWE-732 Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-22",
              "description": "CWE-22 Path Traversal",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T13:11:44.277Z",
        "orgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
        "shortName": "CIRCL"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "Security patch",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/d5d72ab38"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe installer scripts now explicitly create the log file with 0600 permissions using install -m 0600 and the FIFO with mkfifo -m 0600, ensuring both are root-readable/writable only from the moment of creation. The log file is also removed (rm -f) before creation to prevent a pre-existing symlink in /var/log from being used to redirect the write to an attacker-controlled path. This matches the existing 0600 treatment applied to /root/misp_settings.txt by the save_settings() function.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The installer scripts now explicitly create the log file with 0600 permissions using install -m 0600 and the FIFO with mkfifo -m 0600, ensuring both are root-readable/writable only from the moment of creation. The log file is also removed (rm -f) before creation to prevent a pre-existing symlink in /var/log from being used to redirect the write to an attacker-controlled path. This matches the existing 0600 treatment applied to /root/misp_settings.txt by the save_settings() function."
        }
      ],
      "title": "MISP Installer Log and FIFO Created World-Readable, Exposing Sensitive Credentials",
      "x_gcve": [
        {
          "extensions": {
            "bcp-05-x-01": {
              "ai_annotations": [
                {
                  "ai_level": "generated",
                  "description": "Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.",
                  "gna_source": 1,
                  "models": [
                    {
                      "gna_source": 1,
                      "identifier": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "name": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "source": "ollama"
                    }
                  ],
                  "review_status": "full",
                  "scope": "record",
                  "tags": [
                    "ai-computer-assisted:llm-generated",
                    "ai-computer-assisted:classification"
                  ]
                }
              ]
            },
            "bcp-05-x-02": {
              "x_patch2vuln": {
                "assumptions": [
                  "The affected version range is inferred from the tag_version_boundary (v2.5.47 with 38 commits after fix); the exact first affected version is not specified in the patch metadata.",
                  "The vulnerability is transient in the sense that it only manifests during the installer execution window, but the log file persists on disk after installation and remains world-readable unless the administrator manually changes permissions or removes it.",
                  "The CVSS assumes the log file remains on disk after installation; if it is immediately removed by the installer, the exposure window is shorter but the file is still readable during the installation process.",
                  "CAPEC-135 is the closest available attack pattern; no CAPEC specifically covers \u0027reading a world-readable log file containing credentials,\u0027 so the general permission-misuse pattern is the best match.",
                  "The symlink attack vector (CWE-22) is a secondary concern addressed by the same patch; the primary vulnerability is the incorrect file permissions (CWE-732).",
                  "The installer is assumed to run as root (standard for system installation scripts), which is why 0600 permissions restrict access to root only."
                ],
                "capecRationale": [
                  {
                    "capecId": "CAPEC-135",
                    "rationale": "The most direct attack pattern is a local unprivileged user simply reading the world-readable log file at /var/log/misp_install.log to harvest sensitive credentials. No complex exploitation is required beyond file read access. CAPEC-135 covers the general pattern of an attacker leveraging misconfigured file permissions to access sensitive data. The symlink variant (CWE-22) could also map to CAPEC-135 as a sub-technique of permission exploitation."
                  }
                ],
                "commit": "d5d72ab38eda4a6c343b784494a4ae9d0d94bd80",
                "confidence": "high",
                "credits": [
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "reporter",
                    "value": "Niels Teusink of Eye Security"
                  },
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "iglocska"
                  },
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "Claude Opus 5 (1M context)"
                  }
                ],
                "cvssRationale": "Attack Vector is Local because the attacker must have a local account or shell access on the system where the MISP installer runs. Attack Complexity is Low because reading a world-readable file requires no special conditions. No Attack Target manipulation is needed. Privileges Required is None because the file is world-readable (0644) and any unprivileged local user can read it. No User Interaction is required. Confidentiality impact is High because the log contains the admin password, database passwords, GPG passphrase, and supervisor password, granting full compromise of the MISP deployment. Integrity and Availability impacts are None. Scope is Not Changed because the exposed credentials belong to the same MISP system. The vulnerability is transient (only during installation) but the log file persists after installation unless manually removed.",
                "fixSummary": "The installer scripts now explicitly create the log file with 0600 permissions using install -m 0600 and the FIFO with mkfifo -m 0600, ensuring both are root-readable/writable only from the moment of creation. The log file is also removed (rm -f) before creation to prevent a pre-existing symlink in /var/log from being used to redirect the write to an attacker-controlled path. This matches the existing 0600 treatment applied to /root/misp_settings.txt by the save_settings() function.",
                "generatedAt": "2026-09-22T13:03:07.672539Z",
                "generator": "patch2vuln.py",
                "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                "modelComparison": {
                  "rankings": [
                    {
                      "agreementScore": 9,
                      "assumptionCount": 6,
                      "confidence": "high",
                      "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "score": 5
                    }
                  ],
                  "selectedModel": "qwen3.8:27b",
                  "selectionMethod": "deterministic-consensus-v1",
                  "selectionNotice": "The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required."
                },
                "patchSha256": "e0af51eb247c4727485796d1bd4fcc2c30cb34c2a733043a3371df7e94cb81f0",
                "patchSummary": "In all four installer scripts (INSTALL.debian12.sh, INSTALL.debian13.sh, INSTALL.ubuntu2404.sh, xINSTALL.rhel94.sh), the single line mkfifo ${logfile}.pipe is replaced with three lines: rm -f \"$logfile\" to remove any pre-existing file or symlink; install -m 0600 /dev/null \"$logfile\" to create the log file with root-only permissions; and mkfifo -m 0600 ${logfile}.pipe to create the FIFO with root-only permissions. The subsequent tee and exec redirection lines remain unchanged.",
                "patchTruncated": false,
                "patches": [
                  {
                    "commit": "d5d72ab38eda4a6c343b784494a4ae9d0d94bd80",
                    "patchSha256": "e0af51eb247c4727485796d1bd4fcc2c30cb34c2a733043a3371df7e94cb81f0",
                    "source": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/d5d72ab38.patch",
                    "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/d5d72ab38.patch",
                    "subject": "fix: [security] Create the installer log and its FIFO"
                  }
                ],
                "source": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/d5d72ab38.patch",
                "subject": "fix: [security] Create the installer log and its FIFO",
                "tagVersionBoundary": {
                  "commits_after_fix": 38,
                  "repository": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP",
                  "tag": "v2.5.47",
                  "version": "2.5.47",
                  "version_type": "semver"
                },
                "weaknessRationale": [
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-732",
                    "rationale": "The installer log file and FIFO were created under the default umask, resulting in world-readable permissions on a file containing sensitive credentials (admin password, database passwords, GPG passphrase, supervisor password). The fix explicitly sets 0600 permissions, confirming the root cause was incorrect permission assignment."
                  },
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-22",
                    "rationale": "The log file was not removed before creation, allowing a pre-existing symlink in /var/log to redirect the write to an arbitrary file. The fix adds rm -f before creation to mitigate this symlink-following risk. This is a secondary weakness addressed by the same patch."
                  }
                ]
              }
            }
          },
          "recordType": "advisory",
          "vulnId": "GCVE-1-2026-20100"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
    "assignerShortName": "CIRCL",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-95667",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-22T13:11:44.277Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-22T13:11:36.849Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T15:32:43.415Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2026-95671 (GCVE-0-2026-95671)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-22 13:20 – Updated: 2026-09-22 15:32
VLAI
Title
MISP Collections: Missing Authorization Check for Sharing Group on PUT Request in collections/add
Summary
In MISP, the CollectionsController add() method enforced the sharing-group usability authorization check and element capture only when the HTTP request method was POST. However, the underlying CRUDComponent::add() method persists data on both POST and PUT requests. As a result, an authenticated user could issue a PUT request to the collections/add endpoint, bypassing the sharing-group authorization check entirely. This allowed the creation of a collection with distribution=4 (shared with a specific sharing group) targeting a sharing group that the user was not authorized to use. The bypassed check would normally verify that the current user has access to the specified sharing group before allowing the collection to be associated with it. The security impact is that an authenticated user can place collection data into a sharing group context they do not have legitimate access to, potentially exposing that data to all members of the unauthorized sharing group and violating the intended access-control boundaries of the MISP instance. The vulnerability requires an authenticated session and knowledge of a valid sharing group identifier; no user interaction or special tooling is needed beyond sending a PUT request instead of a POST request to the same endpoint.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-22 15:32 UTC
CWE
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
MISP MISP Affected: 0 , < 2.5.47 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
GCVE extensions
AI involvement GCVE-BCP-05-X-01
Whole record AI-generated Human-reviewed GNA-1

Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.

ai-computer-assisted:llm-generatedai-computer-assisted:classification
Model Source Identifier
qwen3.8:27b ollama qwen3.8:27b
Patch provenance GCVE-BCP-05-X-02
Generator
patch2vuln.py on 2026-09-22 13:13
Model
qwen3.8:27b
Input
https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/c20f5a836.patch a49bc540d446…
Confidence
medium
Commit Subject Patch SHA-256
c20f5a83621d fix: [security] Authorise the collection sharing group on PUT a49bc540d446…
Fix summary

The authorization guard in CollectionsController::add() was extended to cover PUT requests in addition to POST requests. The sharing-group usability check (which validates that the current user can use the target sharing group) and the element capture logic now execute regardless of whether the request arrives as POST or PUT, ensuring that CRUDComponent::add() cannot persist a collection with an unauthorized sharing group via either HTTP verb.

Patch summary

In app/Controller/CollectionsController.php, the condition guarding the sharing-group authorization check and element capture was changed from 'if ($this->request->is('post'))' to 'if ($this->request->is('post') || $this->request->is('put'))'. A comment was added explaining that CRUDComponent::add() persists on either verb, so the guard must cover both. Four lines inserted, one line deleted in total.

CVSS rationale

AV:N - MISP is a web application accessible over the network. AC:L - The attack requires only changing the HTTP method from POST to PUT; no race conditions, complex payloads, or special conditions are needed. AT:N - No attack target manipulation is required. PR:L - An authenticated MISP user is required; the vulnerability is in the authorization layer, not authentication. UI:N - No victim interaction is needed. VC:N - The primary data in the collection is user-created; the vulnerability does not directly expose other users' data to the attacker. VI:L - The attacker can create a collection in a sharing group they are not authorized to use, violating the integrity of the sharing-group access model. VA:N - No availability impact. SC:N - No secondary confidentiality impact identified. SI:L - Secondary integrity impact: data is placed in an unauthorized sharing-group context, potentially visible to that group's members. SA:N - No secondary availability impact.

Weakness rationale
  • CWE-862 The sharing-group usability authorization check was present for POST but entirely absent for PUT requests to the same endpoint. The authorization logic was not missing in design; it was simply not applied to one of the HTTP methods that triggers the same persistence path, resulting in a missing authorization enforcement for PUT.
  • CWE-285 The application performed an authorization check (sharing-group usability) but applied it conditionally based on the HTTP method, allowing an attacker to bypass the check by selecting a different method. This is an improper authorization implementation where the check is not consistently enforced across all code paths that lead to the sensitive operation.
Attack pattern rationale
  • CAPEC-114 The attacker manipulates the HTTP method parameter (changing POST to PUT) to bypass the authorization check that is keyed on the method. The HTTP method acts as a routing parameter that the application uses to decide whether to enforce authorization; tampering with it causes the check to be skipped. This is the closest CAPEC to the observed bypass technique, though the pattern is more specifically an authorization bypass via method selection rather than classic parameter tampering. Uncertainty: no CAPEC specifically covers 'bypassing authorization by altering the HTTP verb'; CAPEC-114 is the best available match.
Assumptions to verify
  • The affected version boundary is inferred from the tag_version_boundary metadata (v2.5.47 with 54 commits after fix); the exact last affected version and first fixed version are not explicitly stated in the patch and may differ.
  • The CVSS assumes the primary impact is integrity (unauthorized placement of data in a sharing group) rather than confidentiality, since the data in the collection is user-created. If the collection grants read access to other data in the sharing group, the confidentiality impact could be higher.
  • CAPEC-114 (Parameter Tampering) is the closest available CAPEC for bypassing an authorization check by altering the HTTP method; no CAPEC specifically models HTTP-verb-based authorization bypass.
  • The patch does not include version tags or release notes; affected version ranges are approximate.
  • The Co-Authored-By line references an AI assistant (Claude Opus 4.8); it is credited as a tool rather than a human remediation developer.
Model comparison

Selected qwen3.8:27b by deterministic-consensus-v1
The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required.

Model Score Agreement Confidence Assumptions
qwen3.8:27b 5 9 medium 5
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-95671",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-09-22T15:32:15.165861Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T15:32:21.567Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "modules": [
            "CollectionsController"
          ],
          "product": "MISP",
          "programFiles": [
            "app/Controller/CollectionsController.php"
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP",
          "vendor": "MISP",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "2.5.47",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "reporter",
          "value": "Jeroen Pinoy"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "iglocska"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "Claude Opus 4.8"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eIn MISP, the CollectionsController add() method enforced the sharing-group usability authorization check and element capture only when the HTTP request method was POST. However, the underlying CRUDComponent::add() method persists data on both POST and PUT requests. As a result, an authenticated user could issue a PUT request to the collections/add endpoint, bypassing the sharing-group authorization check entirely. This allowed the creation of a collection with distribution=4 (shared with a specific sharing group) targeting a sharing group that the user was not authorized to use. The bypassed check would normally verify that the current user has access to the specified sharing group before allowing the collection to be associated with it.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe security impact is that an authenticated user can place collection data into a sharing group context they do not have legitimate access to, potentially exposing that data to all members of the unauthorized sharing group and violating the intended access-control boundaries of the MISP instance.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe vulnerability requires an authenticated session and knowledge of a valid sharing group identifier; no user interaction or special tooling is needed beyond sending a PUT request instead of a POST request to the same endpoint.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "In MISP, the CollectionsController add() method enforced the sharing-group usability authorization check and element capture only when the HTTP request method was POST. However, the underlying CRUDComponent::add() method persists data on both POST and PUT requests. As a result, an authenticated user could issue a PUT request to the collections/add endpoint, bypassing the sharing-group authorization check entirely. This allowed the creation of a collection with distribution=4 (shared with a specific sharing group) targeting a sharing group that the user was not authorized to use. The bypassed check would normally verify that the current user has access to the specified sharing group before allowing the collection to be associated with it.\n\nThe security impact is that an authenticated user can place collection data into a sharing group context they do not have legitimate access to, potentially exposing that data to all members of the unauthorized sharing group and violating the intended access-control boundaries of the MISP instance.\n\nThe vulnerability requires an authenticated session and knowledge of a valid sharing group identifier; no user interaction or special tooling is needed beyond sending a PUT request instead of a POST request to the same endpoint."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-114",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-114 Parameter Tampering"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 5.3,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-862",
              "description": "CWE-862 Missing Authorization",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-285",
              "description": "CWE-285 Improper Authorization",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T13:20:25.683Z",
        "orgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
        "shortName": "CIRCL"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "Security patch",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/c20f5a836"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe authorization guard in CollectionsController::add() was extended to cover PUT requests in addition to POST requests. The sharing-group usability check (which validates that the current user can use the target sharing group) and the element capture logic now execute regardless of whether the request arrives as POST or PUT, ensuring that CRUDComponent::add() cannot persist a collection with an unauthorized sharing group via either HTTP verb.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The authorization guard in CollectionsController::add() was extended to cover PUT requests in addition to POST requests. The sharing-group usability check (which validates that the current user can use the target sharing group) and the element capture logic now execute regardless of whether the request arrives as POST or PUT, ensuring that CRUDComponent::add() cannot persist a collection with an unauthorized sharing group via either HTTP verb."
        }
      ],
      "title": "MISP Collections: Missing Authorization Check for Sharing Group on PUT Request in collections/add",
      "x_gcve": [
        {
          "extensions": {
            "bcp-05-x-01": {
              "ai_annotations": [
                {
                  "ai_level": "generated",
                  "description": "Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.",
                  "gna_source": 1,
                  "models": [
                    {
                      "gna_source": 1,
                      "identifier": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "name": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "source": "ollama"
                    }
                  ],
                  "review_status": "full",
                  "scope": "record",
                  "tags": [
                    "ai-computer-assisted:llm-generated",
                    "ai-computer-assisted:classification"
                  ]
                }
              ]
            },
            "bcp-05-x-02": {
              "x_patch2vuln": {
                "assumptions": [
                  "The affected version boundary is inferred from the tag_version_boundary metadata (v2.5.47 with 54 commits after fix); the exact last affected version and first fixed version are not explicitly stated in the patch and may differ.",
                  "The CVSS assumes the primary impact is integrity (unauthorized placement of data in a sharing group) rather than confidentiality, since the data in the collection is user-created. If the collection grants read access to other data in the sharing group, the confidentiality impact could be higher.",
                  "CAPEC-114 (Parameter Tampering) is the closest available CAPEC for bypassing an authorization check by altering the HTTP method; no CAPEC specifically models HTTP-verb-based authorization bypass.",
                  "The patch does not include version tags or release notes; affected version ranges are approximate.",
                  "The Co-Authored-By line references an AI assistant (Claude Opus 4.8); it is credited as a tool rather than a human remediation developer."
                ],
                "capecRationale": [
                  {
                    "capecId": "CAPEC-114",
                    "rationale": "The attacker manipulates the HTTP method parameter (changing POST to PUT) to bypass the authorization check that is keyed on the method. The HTTP method acts as a routing parameter that the application uses to decide whether to enforce authorization; tampering with it causes the check to be skipped. This is the closest CAPEC to the observed bypass technique, though the pattern is more specifically an authorization bypass via method selection rather than classic parameter tampering. Uncertainty: no CAPEC specifically covers \u0027bypassing authorization by altering the HTTP verb\u0027; CAPEC-114 is the best available match."
                  }
                ],
                "commit": "c20f5a83621de6c534847e1728a1f5af843079b7",
                "confidence": "medium",
                "credits": [
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "reporter",
                    "value": "Jeroen Pinoy"
                  },
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "iglocska"
                  },
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "Claude Opus 4.8"
                  }
                ],
                "cvssRationale": "AV:N - MISP is a web application accessible over the network. AC:L - The attack requires only changing the HTTP method from POST to PUT; no race conditions, complex payloads, or special conditions are needed. AT:N - No attack target manipulation is required. PR:L - An authenticated MISP user is required; the vulnerability is in the authorization layer, not authentication. UI:N - No victim interaction is needed. VC:N - The primary data in the collection is user-created; the vulnerability does not directly expose other users\u0027 data to the attacker. VI:L - The attacker can create a collection in a sharing group they are not authorized to use, violating the integrity of the sharing-group access model. VA:N - No availability impact. SC:N - No secondary confidentiality impact identified. SI:L - Secondary integrity impact: data is placed in an unauthorized sharing-group context, potentially visible to that group\u0027s members. SA:N - No secondary availability impact.",
                "fixSummary": "The authorization guard in CollectionsController::add() was extended to cover PUT requests in addition to POST requests. The sharing-group usability check (which validates that the current user can use the target sharing group) and the element capture logic now execute regardless of whether the request arrives as POST or PUT, ensuring that CRUDComponent::add() cannot persist a collection with an unauthorized sharing group via either HTTP verb.",
                "generatedAt": "2026-09-22T13:13:03.522587Z",
                "generator": "patch2vuln.py",
                "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                "modelComparison": {
                  "rankings": [
                    {
                      "agreementScore": 9,
                      "assumptionCount": 5,
                      "confidence": "medium",
                      "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "score": 5
                    }
                  ],
                  "selectedModel": "qwen3.8:27b",
                  "selectionMethod": "deterministic-consensus-v1",
                  "selectionNotice": "The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required."
                },
                "patchSha256": "a49bc540d4465370f1ecbf71f09c9aa51e3a77f3c196f60ddea7210f17f8b1a7",
                "patchSummary": "In app/Controller/CollectionsController.php, the condition guarding the sharing-group authorization check and element capture was changed from \u0027if ($this-\u003erequest-\u003eis(\u0027post\u0027))\u0027 to \u0027if ($this-\u003erequest-\u003eis(\u0027post\u0027) || $this-\u003erequest-\u003eis(\u0027put\u0027))\u0027. A comment was added explaining that CRUDComponent::add() persists on either verb, so the guard must cover both. Four lines inserted, one line deleted in total.",
                "patchTruncated": false,
                "patches": [
                  {
                    "commit": "c20f5a83621de6c534847e1728a1f5af843079b7",
                    "patchSha256": "a49bc540d4465370f1ecbf71f09c9aa51e3a77f3c196f60ddea7210f17f8b1a7",
                    "source": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/c20f5a836.patch",
                    "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/c20f5a836.patch",
                    "subject": "fix: [security] Authorise the collection sharing group on PUT"
                  }
                ],
                "source": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/c20f5a836.patch",
                "subject": "fix: [security] Authorise the collection sharing group on PUT",
                "tagVersionBoundary": {
                  "commits_after_fix": 54,
                  "repository": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP",
                  "tag": "v2.5.47",
                  "version": "2.5.47",
                  "version_type": "semver"
                },
                "weaknessRationale": [
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-862",
                    "rationale": "The sharing-group usability authorization check was present for POST but entirely absent for PUT requests to the same endpoint. The authorization logic was not missing in design; it was simply not applied to one of the HTTP methods that triggers the same persistence path, resulting in a missing authorization enforcement for PUT."
                  },
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-285",
                    "rationale": "The application performed an authorization check (sharing-group usability) but applied it conditionally based on the HTTP method, allowing an attacker to bypass the check by selecting a different method. This is an improper authorization implementation where the check is not consistently enforced across all code paths that lead to the sensitive operation."
                  }
                ]
              }
            }
          },
          "recordType": "advisory",
          "vulnId": "GCVE-1-2026-20271"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
    "assignerShortName": "CIRCL",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-95671",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-22T13:20:25.683Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-22T13:20:20.466Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T15:32:21.567Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}
displaying 1 - 10 vulnerabilities in total 269

GCVE-1-2026-20183 (CVE-2026-100177)

Vulnerability from gna-1 – Published: 2026-09-25 13:35 – Updated: 2026-09-25 13:55
VLAI
Title
Ail Framework Crawler: Missing Cookiejar Authorization Check Allows Cross-Organization Cookiejar Attachment
Summary
The AIL Framework crawler task creation API (api_add_crawler_task) contained an insufficient authorization check when a user supplied a cookiejar UUID to attach to a one-shot or scheduled crawler task. The original code only verified that the cookiejar existed and, if its access level was 0, compared the cookiejar's owning user ID to the requesting user ID. It did not validate organizational boundaries, did not account for the requesting user's role. When the cookiejar level was not 0, no access check was performed at all. An authenticated user could therefore reference another organization's cookiejar by UUID and have the crawler use that organization's stored cookies (session tokens, authentication credentials) when performing web crawls, effectively leaking or exfiltrating the victim organization's session data. The vulnerability requires an authenticated user with the ability to create crawler tasks. The attacker must know or guess a valid cookiejar UUID belonging to another organization. The impact is unauthorized access to another organization's stored cookies and session data through the crawler infrastructure.
CWE
  • CWE-639 - Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
  • CWE-20 - Improper Input Validation
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
ail project ail framework Affected: unspecified , < 7.1 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
GCVE extensions
AI involvement GCVE-BCP-05-X-01
Whole record AI-generated Human-reviewed GNA-1

Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.

ai-computer-assisted:llm-generatedai-computer-assisted:classification
Model Source Identifier
qwen3.8:27b ollama qwen3.8:27b
Patch provenance GCVE-BCP-05-X-02
Generator
patch2vuln.py on 2026-09-25 13:30
Model
qwen3.8:27b
Input
https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/3773ca36658c57ce592aebe74e27c855eb64f58a.patch 43e163a1b90d…
Confidence
medium
Commit Subject Patch SHA-256
3773ca36658c chg: [security] crawler, enforce cookiejar ACL when creating 43e163a1b90d…
Fix summary

The cookiejar attachment path in api_add_crawler_task is now validated through the existing api_check_cookiejar_access_acl() function, which enforces organization, user, and role-based access control for the 'view' action on the referenced cookiejar. The user_role parameter is propagated from the API and UI entry points (api_rest.py, crawler_splash.py) into the ACL check. Separately, URL scheme validation is enforced unconditionally: only http and https schemes are accepted, and non-conforming URLs are rejected with a 400 error before any further processing.

Patch summary

In bin/lib/crawlers.py: (1) is_global_url() now returns False for any scheme other than http/https (previously returned True for data/file schemes) and handles URLs lacking a netloc by prepending http://. (2) api_validate_global_urls() now rejects non-HTTP/HTTPS schemes with a 400 error before the local-IP filter check. (3) The Cookiejar class gains a get_creator() alias. (4) The CrawlerTask.create() method validates the URL scheme. (5) api_add_crawler_task() replaces the inline level-0 user-ID comparison with a call to api_check_cookiejar_access_acl(cookiejar_uuid, user_org, user_id, user_role, action='view') and accepts a new user_role parameter. (6) api_add_crawler_capture() now calls api_validate_global_urls(). In var/www/blueprints/api_rest.py and crawler_splash.py: user_role is extracted from the authenticated session and passed to api_add_crawler_task().

CVSS rationale

The vulnerability is exploitable over the network (AV:N) with low complexity (AC:L) since the attacker only needs to substitute a known or guessed cookiejar UUID in an API request. No attack target manipulation is required (AT:N). An authenticated user with crawler task creation privileges is needed (PR:L). No user interaction is required (UI:N). The vulnerable component itself does not lose confidentiality, integrity, or availability (VC:N, VI:N, VA:N). However, the subsequent impact is high on confidentiality (SC:H) because the attacker gains access to another organization's stored cookies and session tokens via the crawler, which could be used to impersonate the victim on target sites. No subsequent integrity or availability impact is evident (SI:N, SA:N).

Weakness rationale
  • CWE-639 The cookiejar UUID is a user-supplied identifier (key) that was not properly validated against the requesting user's organization and role. The old code only compared user IDs when level was 0 and skipped the check entirely otherwise, allowing cross-organization access to another user's cookiejar.
  • CWE-20 The URL scheme validation was incorrect: data: and file: schemes were treated as valid global URLs, and the scheme check was skipped when the local-IP filter was disabled. The fix enforces that only http and https schemes are accepted unconditionally.
Attack pattern rationale
  • CAPEC-1 The attacker tampers with the cookiejar UUID parameter in the crawler task creation API request to reference a resource (cookiejar) belonging to another organization. The system failed to validate that the referenced object was accessible to the requesting user's organization. This is the closest CAPEC pattern to an IDOR-style parameter substitution; no CAPEC specifically named 'Insecure Direct Object Reference' exists, so CAPEC-1 (modifying a request parameter to access unauthorized resources) is the best available match.
Assumptions to verify
  • The api_check_cookiejar_access_acl() function is assumed to correctly enforce organization, user, and role-based access control; its implementation is not included in this patch.
  • The cookiejar UUID is assumed to be guessable or discoverable by an authenticated user (e.g., via enumeration or information leakage); if UUIDs are truly random and unguessable, exploitability is reduced but the authorization flaw remains.
  • The CVSS assumes the primary security impact is subsequent confidentiality (access to another org's cookies/sessions) rather than direct compromise of the Ail Framework itself.
  • The CAPEC-1 mapping is the closest available pattern for an IDOR/parameter-substitution attack; no CAPEC specifically covers insecure direct object reference, so this mapping carries some uncertainty.
  • The affected version boundary is inferred from the tag v7.1 (26 commits after the fix commit), suggesting the fix landed before the v7.1 release; exact affected version range is not confirmed.
  • The URL scheme validation fix (rejecting data:/file: schemes) is treated as a secondary hardening change within the same patch set rather than a separate vulnerability.
Model comparison

Selected qwen3.8:27b by deterministic-consensus-v1
The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required.

Model Score Agreement Confidence Assumptions
qwen3.8:27b 4 9 medium 6

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "modules": [
            "bin/lib/crawlers.py",
            "var/www/blueprints/api_rest.py",
            "var/www/blueprints/crawler_splash.py"
          ],
          "product": "ail framework",
          "programFiles": [
            "bin/lib/crawlers.py",
            "var/www/blueprints/api_rest.py",
            "var/www/blueprints/crawler_splash.py"
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework",
          "vendor": "ail project",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "7.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "unspecified",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "terrtia"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Jeroen Pinoy"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe AIL Framework crawler task creation API (api_add_crawler_task) contained an insufficient authorization check when a user supplied a cookiejar UUID to attach to a one-shot or scheduled crawler task. The original code only verified that the cookiejar existed and, if its access level was 0, compared the cookiejar\u0027s owning user ID to the requesting user ID. It did not validate organizational boundaries, did not account for the requesting user\u0027s role. When the cookiejar level was not 0, no access check was performed at all. An authenticated user could therefore reference another organization\u0027s cookiejar by UUID and have the crawler use that organization\u0027s stored cookies (session tokens, authentication credentials) when performing web crawls, effectively leaking or exfiltrating the victim organization\u0027s session data.\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe vulnerability requires an authenticated user with the ability to create crawler tasks. The attacker must know or guess a valid cookiejar UUID belonging to another organization. The impact is unauthorized access to another organization\u0027s stored cookies and session data through the crawler infrastructure.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The AIL Framework crawler task creation API (api_add_crawler_task) contained an insufficient authorization check when a user supplied a cookiejar UUID to attach to a one-shot or scheduled crawler task. The original code only verified that the cookiejar existed and, if its access level was 0, compared the cookiejar\u0027s owning user ID to the requesting user ID. It did not validate organizational boundaries, did not account for the requesting user\u0027s role. When the cookiejar level was not 0, no access check was performed at all. An authenticated user could therefore reference another organization\u0027s cookiejar by UUID and have the crawler use that organization\u0027s stored cookies (session tokens, authentication credentials) when performing web crawls, effectively leaking or exfiltrating the victim organization\u0027s session data.\n\n\nThe vulnerability requires an authenticated user with the ability to create crawler tasks. The attacker must know or guess a valid cookiejar UUID belonging to another organization. The impact is unauthorized access to another organization\u0027s stored cookies and session data through the crawler infrastructure."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-1",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-1 Tamper with URLs"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 6.3,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-639",
              "description": "CWE-639 Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-20",
              "description": "CWE-20 Improper Input Validation",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "orgId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "Security patch",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/3773ca36658c57ce592aebe74e27c855eb64f58a"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe cookiejar attachment path in api_add_crawler_task is now validated through the existing api_check_cookiejar_access_acl() function, which enforces organization, user, and role-based access control for the \u0027view\u0027 action on the referenced cookiejar. The user_role parameter is propagated from the API and UI entry points (api_rest.py, crawler_splash.py) into the ACL check. Separately, URL scheme validation is enforced unconditionally: only http and https schemes are accepted, and non-conforming URLs are rejected with a 400 error before any further processing.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The cookiejar attachment path in api_add_crawler_task is now validated through the existing api_check_cookiejar_access_acl() function, which enforces organization, user, and role-based access control for the \u0027view\u0027 action on the referenced cookiejar. The user_role parameter is propagated from the API and UI entry points (api_rest.py, crawler_splash.py) into the ACL check. Separately, URL scheme validation is enforced unconditionally: only http and https schemes are accepted, and non-conforming URLs are rejected with a 400 error before any further processing."
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Ail Framework Crawler: Missing Cookiejar Authorization Check Allows Cross-Organization Cookiejar Attachment",
      "x_gcve": [
        {
          "extensions": {
            "bcp-05-x-01": {
              "ai_annotations": [
                {
                  "ai_level": "generated",
                  "description": "Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.",
                  "gna_source": 1,
                  "models": [
                    {
                      "gna_source": 1,
                      "identifier": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "name": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "source": "ollama"
                    }
                  ],
                  "review_status": "full",
                  "scope": "record",
                  "tags": [
                    "ai-computer-assisted:llm-generated",
                    "ai-computer-assisted:classification"
                  ]
                }
              ]
            },
            "bcp-05-x-02": {
              "x_patch2vuln": {
                "assumptions": [
                  "The api_check_cookiejar_access_acl() function is assumed to correctly enforce organization, user, and role-based access control; its implementation is not included in this patch.",
                  "The cookiejar UUID is assumed to be guessable or discoverable by an authenticated user (e.g., via enumeration or information leakage); if UUIDs are truly random and unguessable, exploitability is reduced but the authorization flaw remains.",
                  "The CVSS assumes the primary security impact is subsequent confidentiality (access to another org\u0027s cookies/sessions) rather than direct compromise of the Ail Framework itself.",
                  "The CAPEC-1 mapping is the closest available pattern for an IDOR/parameter-substitution attack; no CAPEC specifically covers insecure direct object reference, so this mapping carries some uncertainty.",
                  "The affected version boundary is inferred from the tag v7.1 (26 commits after the fix commit), suggesting the fix landed before the v7.1 release; exact affected version range is not confirmed.",
                  "The URL scheme validation fix (rejecting data:/file: schemes) is treated as a secondary hardening change within the same patch set rather than a separate vulnerability."
                ],
                "capecRationale": [
                  {
                    "capecId": "CAPEC-1",
                    "rationale": "The attacker tampers with the cookiejar UUID parameter in the crawler task creation API request to reference a resource (cookiejar) belonging to another organization. The system failed to validate that the referenced object was accessible to the requesting user\u0027s organization. This is the closest CAPEC pattern to an IDOR-style parameter substitution; no CAPEC specifically named \u0027Insecure Direct Object Reference\u0027 exists, so CAPEC-1 (modifying a request parameter to access unauthorized resources) is the best available match."
                  }
                ],
                "commit": "3773ca36658c57ce592aebe74e27c855eb64f58a",
                "confidence": "medium",
                "credits": [
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "terrtia"
                  }
                ],
                "cvssRationale": "The vulnerability is exploitable over the network (AV:N) with low complexity (AC:L) since the attacker only needs to substitute a known or guessed cookiejar UUID in an API request. No attack target manipulation is required (AT:N). An authenticated user with crawler task creation privileges is needed (PR:L). No user interaction is required (UI:N). The vulnerable component itself does not lose confidentiality, integrity, or availability (VC:N, VI:N, VA:N). However, the subsequent impact is high on confidentiality (SC:H) because the attacker gains access to another organization\u0027s stored cookies and session tokens via the crawler, which could be used to impersonate the victim on target sites. No subsequent integrity or availability impact is evident (SI:N, SA:N).",
                "fixSummary": "The cookiejar attachment path in api_add_crawler_task is now validated through the existing api_check_cookiejar_access_acl() function, which enforces organization, user, and role-based access control for the \u0027view\u0027 action on the referenced cookiejar. The user_role parameter is propagated from the API and UI entry points (api_rest.py, crawler_splash.py) into the ACL check. Separately, URL scheme validation is enforced unconditionally: only http and https schemes are accepted, and non-conforming URLs are rejected with a 400 error before any further processing.",
                "generatedAt": "2026-09-25T13:30:48.386437Z",
                "generator": "patch2vuln.py",
                "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                "modelComparison": {
                  "rankings": [
                    {
                      "agreementScore": 9,
                      "assumptionCount": 6,
                      "confidence": "medium",
                      "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "score": 4
                    }
                  ],
                  "selectedModel": "qwen3.8:27b",
                  "selectionMethod": "deterministic-consensus-v1",
                  "selectionNotice": "The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required."
                },
                "patchSha256": "43e163a1b90d5926293d5dbd7982d46241f08d7a9d2cb0edf86c963f794afac5",
                "patchSummary": "In bin/lib/crawlers.py: (1) is_global_url() now returns False for any scheme other than http/https (previously returned True for data/file schemes) and handles URLs lacking a netloc by prepending http://. (2) api_validate_global_urls() now rejects non-HTTP/HTTPS schemes with a 400 error before the local-IP filter check. (3) The Cookiejar class gains a get_creator() alias. (4) The CrawlerTask.create() method validates the URL scheme. (5) api_add_crawler_task() replaces the inline level-0 user-ID comparison with a call to api_check_cookiejar_access_acl(cookiejar_uuid, user_org, user_id, user_role, action=\u0027view\u0027) and accepts a new user_role parameter. (6) api_add_crawler_capture() now calls api_validate_global_urls(). In var/www/blueprints/api_rest.py and crawler_splash.py: user_role is extracted from the authenticated session and passed to api_add_crawler_task().",
                "patchTruncated": false,
                "patches": [
                  {
                    "commit": "3773ca36658c57ce592aebe74e27c855eb64f58a",
                    "patchSha256": "43e163a1b90d5926293d5dbd7982d46241f08d7a9d2cb0edf86c963f794afac5",
                    "source": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/3773ca36658c57ce592aebe74e27c855eb64f58a.patch",
                    "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/3773ca36658c57ce592aebe74e27c855eb64f58a.patch",
                    "subject": "chg: [security] crawler, enforce cookiejar ACL when creating"
                  }
                ],
                "source": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/3773ca36658c57ce592aebe74e27c855eb64f58a.patch",
                "subject": "chg: [security] crawler, enforce cookiejar ACL when creating",
                "tagVersionBoundary": {
                  "commits_after_fix": 26,
                  "repository": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework",
                  "tag": "v7.1",
                  "version": "7.1",
                  "version_type": "custom"
                },
                "weaknessRationale": [
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-639",
                    "rationale": "The cookiejar UUID is a user-supplied identifier (key) that was not properly validated against the requesting user\u0027s organization and role. The old code only compared user IDs when level was 0 and skipped the check entirely otherwise, allowing cross-organization access to another user\u0027s cookiejar."
                  },
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-20",
                    "rationale": "The URL scheme validation was incorrect: data: and file: schemes were treated as valid global URLs, and the scheme check was skipped when the local-IP filter was disabled. The fix enforces that only http and https schemes are accepted unconditionally."
                  }
                ]
              }
            }
          },
          "recordType": "advisory",
          "vulnId": "GCVE-1-2026-20183"
        }
      ],
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-100177",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-25T13:35:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-25T13:35:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T13:55:39.228706Z",
    "requesterUserId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
    "serial": 1,
    "state": "PUBLISHED",
    "vulnId": "GCVE-1-2026-20183"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

GCVE-1-2026-20279 (CVE-2026-100176)

Vulnerability from gna-1 – Published: 2026-09-25 13:29 – Updated: 2026-09-25 13:55
VLAI
Title
Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in AIL Framework Username Timeline Tooltip
Summary
The AIL Framework's username timeline feature is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting (XSS). Usernames imported from chats and crawled forums are stored without character restrictions. When an authenticated analyst views the username timeline, the application renders these stored usernames into the DOM using D3's html() method in the tooltip. Because the username value (d.obj) is interpolated directly into an HTML string without sanitization, a crafted username containing HTML event handlers (e.g., <img src=x onerror=alert(1)>) will execute arbitrary JavaScript in the analyst's browser when the analyst hovers over the corresponding timeline entry. The attack requires the victim to be an authenticated analyst with access to the timeline view and to interact with the malicious timeline entry (hover). Successful exploitation can lead to session hijacking, data exfiltration, or unauthorized actions performed within the analyst's authenticated session. The vulnerability resides in the client-side JavaScript file var/www/static/js/d3/timeline_basic.js.
CWE
  • CWE-79 - Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
ail project ail framework Affected: unspecified , < 7.1 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
GCVE extensions
AI involvement GCVE-BCP-05-X-01
Whole record AI-generated Human-reviewed GNA-1

Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.

ai-computer-assisted:llm-generatedai-computer-assisted:classification
Model Source Identifier
qwen3.8:27b ollama qwen3.8:27b
Patch provenance GCVE-BCP-05-X-02
Generator
patch2vuln.py on 2026-09-25 13:24
Model
qwen3.8:27b
Input
https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/455dd92c4179c53204368d93681ded4b57e31643.patch 36262636a3a7…
Confidence
medium
Commit Subject Patch SHA-256
455dd92c4179 chg: [security] fix XSS in username timeline tooltip. 36262636a3a7…
Fix summary

The fix applies the existing sanitize_text() helper to the user-controlled username value (d.obj) immediately before it is interpolated into the D3 tooltip HTML string. This ensures that any HTML or script content embedded in the stored username is neutralized before DOM insertion, preventing script execution while preserving the tooltip's intended formatting (line breaks and date/time display).

Patch summary

In var/www/static/js/d3/timeline_basic.js, the single line constructing the tooltip HTML was changed from tooltip.html(`${d.obj}<br>...`) to tooltip.html(`${sanitize_text(d.obj)}<br>...`). The only modification is wrapping the untrusted d.obj variable with the sanitize_text() function call at the HTML sink, leaving the rest of the tooltip template (br tags, date formatting) unchanged.

CVSS rationale

AV:N: The vulnerability is in a web application accessible over the network. AC:L: The attacker only needs to craft a username with HTML/JS in a chat or forum that gets crawled; no race conditions or complex conditions are needed. AT:N: No attack on the target system is required; the malicious username is stored as part of normal data import. PR:N: The attacker does not need any account or privilege on the AIL Framework; they only need to be a user in a source chat/forum. UI:A: The victim (analyst) must actively hover over the specific timeline entry to trigger script execution. VC:H: XSS in an authenticated analyst session can expose sensitive intelligence data, session tokens, and credentials. VI:H: The attacker can perform actions as the analyst, modify data, or exfiltrate information. VA:N: No impact on availability. SC/SI/SA:N: No subsequent system impact is evidenced.

Weakness rationale
  • CWE-79 The patch inserts a user-controlled value (username from imported chats/forums) into an HTML context via D3's html() method without sanitization. The fix adds sanitize_text() at the sink, confirming the root cause is missing output encoding/neutralization of untrusted data in an HTML context, which is the definition of CWE-79 (stored XSS variant).
Attack pattern rationale
  • CAPEC-1 CAPEC-1 describes the general pattern of injecting client-side scripts into web pages via untrusted input. The patch evidence shows a stored username (untrusted input from chats/forums) being rendered into an HTML tooltip without sanitization, matching the stored-XSS sub-pattern of CAPEC-1. This is the closest and most direct CAPEC mapping for an XSS vulnerability where attacker-controlled data is persisted and later rendered in a victim's browser.
Assumptions to verify
  • The UI:A (Active) user interaction metric assumes the analyst must deliberately hover over the specific timeline entry to trigger the XSS; passive rendering without hover is not evidenced in the patch.
  • The affected version boundary is inferred from the tag_version_boundary metadata (v7.1, 29 commits after fix); the exact last affected and first fixed version numbers are not explicitly stated in the patch.
  • PR:N assumes the attacker does not need an account on the AIL Framework itself, only a presence in a crawled chat or forum source; if the platform requires the attacker to be a registered user to have their username crawled, PR:L might be more appropriate.
  • The CAPEC-1 mapping is the closest available pattern for stored XSS; no more specific CAPEC ID for 'stored XSS via imported data rendered in a tooltip' exists in the CAPEC catalog.
  • The sanitize_text() helper is assumed to perform adequate HTML entity encoding or equivalent neutralization; its implementation is not shown in the patch.
  • VC:H and VI:H reflect the sensitivity of an intelligence-analysis platform where an authenticated analyst session may contain classified or highly sensitive data; if the deployment context is less sensitive, lower impact ratings could apply.
Model comparison

Selected qwen3.8:27b by deterministic-consensus-v1
The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required.

Model Score Agreement Confidence Assumptions
qwen3.8:27b 4 9 medium 6

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "modules": [
            "username timeline (D3 timeline_basic)"
          ],
          "product": "ail framework",
          "programFiles": [
            "var/www/static/js/d3/timeline_basic.js"
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework",
          "vendor": "ail project",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "7.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "unspecified",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "Aurelien Thirion"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Jeroen Pinoy"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe AIL Framework\u0027s username timeline feature is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting (XSS). Usernames imported from chats and crawled forums are stored without character restrictions. When an authenticated analyst views the username timeline, the application renders these stored usernames into the DOM using D3\u0027s html() method in the tooltip. Because the username value (d.obj) is interpolated directly into an HTML string without sanitization, a crafted username containing HTML event handlers (e.g., \u0026lt;img src=x onerror=alert(1)\u0026gt;) will execute arbitrary JavaScript in the analyst\u0027s browser when the analyst hovers over the corresponding timeline entry. The attack requires the victim to be an authenticated analyst with access to the timeline view and to interact with the malicious timeline entry (hover). Successful exploitation can lead to session hijacking, data exfiltration, or unauthorized actions performed within the analyst\u0027s authenticated session. The vulnerability resides in the client-side JavaScript file var/www/static/js/d3/timeline_basic.js.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The AIL Framework\u0027s username timeline feature is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting (XSS). Usernames imported from chats and crawled forums are stored without character restrictions. When an authenticated analyst views the username timeline, the application renders these stored usernames into the DOM using D3\u0027s html() method in the tooltip. Because the username value (d.obj) is interpolated directly into an HTML string without sanitization, a crafted username containing HTML event handlers (e.g., \u003cimg src=x onerror=alert(1)\u003e) will execute arbitrary JavaScript in the analyst\u0027s browser when the analyst hovers over the corresponding timeline entry. The attack requires the victim to be an authenticated analyst with access to the timeline view and to interact with the malicious timeline entry (hover). Successful exploitation can lead to session hijacking, data exfiltration, or unauthorized actions performed within the analyst\u0027s authenticated session. The vulnerability resides in the client-side JavaScript file var/www/static/js/d3/timeline_basic.js."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-1",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-1 Cross Site Scripting"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 8.5,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "ACTIVE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-79",
              "description": "CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "orgId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "Security patch",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/455dd92c4179c53204368d93681ded4b57e31643"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe fix applies the existing sanitize_text() helper to the user-controlled username value (d.obj) immediately before it is interpolated into the D3 tooltip HTML string. This ensures that any HTML or script content embedded in the stored username is neutralized before DOM insertion, preventing script execution while preserving the tooltip\u0027s intended formatting (line breaks and date/time display).\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The fix applies the existing sanitize_text() helper to the user-controlled username value (d.obj) immediately before it is interpolated into the D3 tooltip HTML string. This ensures that any HTML or script content embedded in the stored username is neutralized before DOM insertion, preventing script execution while preserving the tooltip\u0027s intended formatting (line breaks and date/time display)."
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in AIL Framework Username Timeline Tooltip",
      "x_gcve": [
        {
          "extensions": {
            "bcp-05-x-01": {
              "ai_annotations": [
                {
                  "ai_level": "generated",
                  "description": "Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.",
                  "gna_source": 1,
                  "models": [
                    {
                      "gna_source": 1,
                      "identifier": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "name": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "source": "ollama"
                    }
                  ],
                  "review_status": "full",
                  "scope": "record",
                  "tags": [
                    "ai-computer-assisted:llm-generated",
                    "ai-computer-assisted:classification"
                  ]
                }
              ]
            },
            "bcp-05-x-02": {
              "x_patch2vuln": {
                "assumptions": [
                  "The UI:A (Active) user interaction metric assumes the analyst must deliberately hover over the specific timeline entry to trigger the XSS; passive rendering without hover is not evidenced in the patch.",
                  "The affected version boundary is inferred from the tag_version_boundary metadata (v7.1, 29 commits after fix); the exact last affected and first fixed version numbers are not explicitly stated in the patch.",
                  "PR:N assumes the attacker does not need an account on the AIL Framework itself, only a presence in a crawled chat or forum source; if the platform requires the attacker to be a registered user to have their username crawled, PR:L might be more appropriate.",
                  "The CAPEC-1 mapping is the closest available pattern for stored XSS; no more specific CAPEC ID for \u0027stored XSS via imported data rendered in a tooltip\u0027 exists in the CAPEC catalog.",
                  "The sanitize_text() helper is assumed to perform adequate HTML entity encoding or equivalent neutralization; its implementation is not shown in the patch.",
                  "VC:H and VI:H reflect the sensitivity of an intelligence-analysis platform where an authenticated analyst session may contain classified or highly sensitive data; if the deployment context is less sensitive, lower impact ratings could apply."
                ],
                "capecRationale": [
                  {
                    "capecId": "CAPEC-1",
                    "rationale": "CAPEC-1 describes the general pattern of injecting client-side scripts into web pages via untrusted input. The patch evidence shows a stored username (untrusted input from chats/forums) being rendered into an HTML tooltip without sanitization, matching the stored-XSS sub-pattern of CAPEC-1. This is the closest and most direct CAPEC mapping for an XSS vulnerability where attacker-controlled data is persisted and later rendered in a victim\u0027s browser."
                  }
                ],
                "commit": "455dd92c4179c53204368d93681ded4b57e31643",
                "confidence": "medium",
                "credits": [
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "terrtia"
                  }
                ],
                "cvssRationale": "AV:N: The vulnerability is in a web application accessible over the network. AC:L: The attacker only needs to craft a username with HTML/JS in a chat or forum that gets crawled; no race conditions or complex conditions are needed. AT:N: No attack on the target system is required; the malicious username is stored as part of normal data import. PR:N: The attacker does not need any account or privilege on the AIL Framework; they only need to be a user in a source chat/forum. UI:A: The victim (analyst) must actively hover over the specific timeline entry to trigger script execution. VC:H: XSS in an authenticated analyst session can expose sensitive intelligence data, session tokens, and credentials. VI:H: The attacker can perform actions as the analyst, modify data, or exfiltrate information. VA:N: No impact on availability. SC/SI/SA:N: No subsequent system impact is evidenced.",
                "fixSummary": "The fix applies the existing sanitize_text() helper to the user-controlled username value (d.obj) immediately before it is interpolated into the D3 tooltip HTML string. This ensures that any HTML or script content embedded in the stored username is neutralized before DOM insertion, preventing script execution while preserving the tooltip\u0027s intended formatting (line breaks and date/time display).",
                "generatedAt": "2026-09-25T13:24:29.029450Z",
                "generator": "patch2vuln.py",
                "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                "modelComparison": {
                  "rankings": [
                    {
                      "agreementScore": 9,
                      "assumptionCount": 6,
                      "confidence": "medium",
                      "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "score": 4
                    }
                  ],
                  "selectedModel": "qwen3.8:27b",
                  "selectionMethod": "deterministic-consensus-v1",
                  "selectionNotice": "The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required."
                },
                "patchSha256": "36262636a3a75bbee1ac4f863ce7a5ce7939eb2e21fed5ede98403d38c29ec40",
                "patchSummary": "In var/www/static/js/d3/timeline_basic.js, the single line constructing the tooltip HTML was changed from tooltip.html(`${d.obj}\u003cbr\u003e...`) to tooltip.html(`${sanitize_text(d.obj)}\u003cbr\u003e...`). The only modification is wrapping the untrusted d.obj variable with the sanitize_text() function call at the HTML sink, leaving the rest of the tooltip template (br tags, date formatting) unchanged.",
                "patchTruncated": false,
                "patches": [
                  {
                    "commit": "455dd92c4179c53204368d93681ded4b57e31643",
                    "patchSha256": "36262636a3a75bbee1ac4f863ce7a5ce7939eb2e21fed5ede98403d38c29ec40",
                    "source": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/455dd92c4179c53204368d93681ded4b57e31643.patch",
                    "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/455dd92c4179c53204368d93681ded4b57e31643.patch",
                    "subject": "chg: [security] fix XSS in username timeline tooltip."
                  }
                ],
                "source": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/455dd92c4179c53204368d93681ded4b57e31643.patch",
                "subject": "chg: [security] fix XSS in username timeline tooltip.",
                "tagVersionBoundary": {
                  "commits_after_fix": 29,
                  "repository": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework",
                  "tag": "v7.1",
                  "version": "7.1",
                  "version_type": "custom"
                },
                "weaknessRationale": [
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-79",
                    "rationale": "The patch inserts a user-controlled value (username from imported chats/forums) into an HTML context via D3\u0027s html() method without sanitization. The fix adds sanitize_text() at the sink, confirming the root cause is missing output encoding/neutralization of untrusted data in an HTML context, which is the definition of CWE-79 (stored XSS variant)."
                  }
                ]
              }
            }
          },
          "recordType": "advisory",
          "vulnId": "GCVE-1-2026-20279"
        }
      ],
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-100176",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-25T13:29:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-25T13:29:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T13:55:11.866831Z",
    "requesterUserId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
    "serial": 1,
    "state": "PUBLISHED",
    "vulnId": "GCVE-1-2026-20279"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

GCVE-1-2026-20269 (CVE-2026-100174)

Vulnerability from gna-1 – Published: 2026-09-25 13:21 – Updated: 2026-09-25 13:54
VLAI
Title
Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in AIL Framework Tag Selector via Unescaped Tag Names
Summary
The AIL Framework tag selector component (var/www/static/js/tags.js) is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting (XSS). A user with the ability to create a custom tag could embed an HTML payload containing JavaScript event handlers (e.g., <img src=x onerror=alert(1)> or <svg onload=...>) in the tag name. When another authenticated user opened a page containing the tag selector, the malicious tag name was inserted into the DOM using jQuery's html property, causing the embedded script to execute in the victim's browser context. The vulnerable code paths affected both the suggestion/combo-item rendering (_renderComboItems) and the selected-tag rendering logic. In both cases, the display value derived from the tag's displayField was passed directly to the html property of a jQuery element constructor, which parses and inserts the string as raw HTML rather than as text. Preconditions: the attacker must have an authenticated account with permission to create custom tags, and the victim must be an authenticated user who views a page that renders the tag selector with the attacker's stored tag. The attack is stored (persistent) and does not require the victim to perform any action beyond loading the page. Security impact: successful exploitation allows arbitrary JavaScript execution in the victim's browser within the application's origin, potentially leading to session hijacking, unauthorized data access, form manipulation, or further client-side attacks.
CWE
  • CWE-79 - Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
  • CWE-94 - Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
ail project ail framework Affected: 0 , < 7.1 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
GCVE extensions
AI involvement GCVE-BCP-05-X-01
Whole record AI-generated Human-reviewed GNA-1

Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.

ai-computer-assisted:llm-generatedai-computer-assisted:classification
Model Source Identifier
qwen3.8:27b ollama qwen3.8:27b
Patch provenance GCVE-BCP-05-X-02
Generator
patch2vuln.py on 2026-09-25 13:16
Model
qwen3.8:27b
Input
https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/b2d0ed05f6cf79b2312a3f1f923d0d1a5d7a9edb.patch 2d147dabcc9b…
Confidence
medium
Commit Subject Patch SHA-256
b2d0ed05f6cf chg: [security] prevent stored XSS in 2d147dabcc9b…
Fix summary

The fix ensures that tag names and display values are rendered as plain text rather than as HTML when no custom renderer is explicitly configured. In the suggestion rendering path, the default (non-renderer) case now uses jQuery's .text() method, which HTML-escapes the content. In the selection rendering path, the default case uses document.createTextNode() to insert the value as a text node. Custom renderers, which are developer-supplied and trusted to produce safe HTML, continue to use .html() or .prepend() with raw HTML. The eval() call was also replaced with JSON.parse() to eliminate a code-injection vector.

Patch summary

In var/www/static/js/tags.js: (1) Replaced eval(data) with JSON.parse(data) for parsing array-like data strings. (2) In _renderComboItems, introduced a hasRenderer flag; when no custom renderer is set, the displayed value is inserted via resultItemEl.text(displayed) instead of the html property in the jQuery constructor. (3) In the selection rendering block, introduced a hasSelectionRenderer flag; when no custom selection renderer is set, the value is prepended as a text node via document.createTextNode(selectedItemHtml) instead of being set through the html property. (4) The comma separator for text-mode selections is now appended as a text node rather than concatenated into an HTML string.

CVSS rationale

AV:N: The vulnerability is exploitable over the network via a web application. AC:L: No race conditions or special timing are required; the payload is stored and triggers on page load. AT:N: No manipulation of the attack target is needed; the stored payload executes automatically. PR:L: The attacker needs a low-privilege authenticated account with permission to create custom tags. UI:P: The victim passively interacts by loading a page that contains the tag selector; no active click or download is required. VC:L: The XSS can read data from the victim's session and page context. VI:L: The XSS can modify page content and submit forms. VA:N: No availability impact is evident. SC:L: The compromised session can access other resources within the same origin. SI:L: The attacker can modify data through the victim's authenticated session. SA:N: No availability impact on subsequent components.

Weakness rationale
  • CWE-79 The patch explicitly addresses stored XSS: user-controlled tag names were inserted into the DOM as HTML via jQuery's html property without escaping. The fix renders these values as text nodes, which is the canonical remediation for CWE-79. The commit subject line also explicitly states 'prevent stored XSS'.
  • CWE-94 The replacement of eval(data) with JSON.parse(data) addresses a secondary code-injection weakness where a crafted data string could execute arbitrary JavaScript. This is a contributing factor but the primary vulnerability is the stored XSS in tag rendering.
Attack pattern rationale
  • CAPEC-66 CAPEC-66 describes the general XSS attack pattern where attacker-controlled input is reflected or stored and later rendered as executable content in a victim's browser. This patch fixes a stored XSS variant where malicious tag names are persisted and rendered as HTML. The mapping is direct and well-supported by the commit message and code changes. No more specific CAPEC entry for stored XSS in a tag/selector widget exists in the CAPEC catalog, making CAPEC-66 the closest and most appropriate match.
Assumptions to verify
  • The affected version range is inferred from the tag_version_boundary metadata indicating the fix commit is 31 commits before the v7.1 tag; exact version boundaries are not explicitly stated in the patch.
  • The UI:P (Passive) rating assumes the victim only needs to load a page containing the tag selector; if the application requires the victim to explicitly open a specific dialog or widget, UI:A (Active) could be more appropriate.
  • The CAPEC-66 mapping is the closest available pattern; no CAPEC entry specifically covers stored XSS in a tag-selector UI component, so the general XSS pattern is used.
  • The PR:L rating assumes that creating a custom tag requires only a basic authenticated account; if tag creation requires elevated privileges, PR:H would be more appropriate.
  • The eval() to JSON.parse() change is treated as a secondary hardening fix within the same patch set; the primary vulnerability addressed is the stored XSS in tag rendering.
  • No specific reporter or finder is identified in the patch metadata or commit message; only the remediation developer (commit author) is credited.
Model comparison

Selected qwen3.8:27b by deterministic-consensus-v1
The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required.

Model Score Agreement Confidence Assumptions
qwen3.8:27b 4 9 medium 6

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "modules": [
            "tag selector (tags.js)"
          ],
          "product": "ail framework",
          "programFiles": [
            "var/www/static/js/tags.js"
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework",
          "vendor": "ail project",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "7.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "Aurelien Thirion"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Jeroen Pinoy"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe AIL Framework tag selector component (var/www/static/js/tags.js) is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting (XSS). A user with the ability to create a custom tag could embed an HTML payload containing JavaScript event handlers (e.g., \u0026lt;img src=x onerror=alert(1)\u0026gt; or \u0026lt;svg onload=...\u0026gt;) in the tag name. When another authenticated user opened a page containing the tag selector, the malicious tag name was inserted into the DOM using jQuery\u0027s html property, causing the embedded script to execute in the victim\u0027s browser context.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe vulnerable code paths affected both the suggestion/combo-item rendering (_renderComboItems) and the selected-tag rendering logic. In both cases, the display value derived from the tag\u0027s displayField was passed directly to the html property of a jQuery element constructor, which parses and inserts the string as raw HTML rather than as text.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003ePreconditions: the attacker must have an authenticated account with permission to create custom tags, and the victim must be an authenticated user who views a page that renders the tag selector with the attacker\u0027s stored tag. The attack is stored (persistent) and does not require the victim to perform any action beyond loading the page.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSecurity impact: successful exploitation allows arbitrary JavaScript execution in the victim\u0027s browser within the application\u0027s origin, potentially leading to session hijacking, unauthorized data access, form manipulation, or further client-side attacks.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The AIL Framework tag selector component (var/www/static/js/tags.js) is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting (XSS). A user with the ability to create a custom tag could embed an HTML payload containing JavaScript event handlers (e.g., \u003cimg src=x onerror=alert(1)\u003e or \u003csvg onload=...\u003e) in the tag name. When another authenticated user opened a page containing the tag selector, the malicious tag name was inserted into the DOM using jQuery\u0027s html property, causing the embedded script to execute in the victim\u0027s browser context.\n\nThe vulnerable code paths affected both the suggestion/combo-item rendering (_renderComboItems) and the selected-tag rendering logic. In both cases, the display value derived from the tag\u0027s displayField was passed directly to the html property of a jQuery element constructor, which parses and inserts the string as raw HTML rather than as text.\n\nPreconditions: the attacker must have an authenticated account with permission to create custom tags, and the victim must be an authenticated user who views a page that renders the tag selector with the attacker\u0027s stored tag. The attack is stored (persistent) and does not require the victim to perform any action beyond loading the page.\n\nSecurity impact: successful exploitation allows arbitrary JavaScript execution in the victim\u0027s browser within the application\u0027s origin, potentially leading to session hijacking, unauthorized data access, form manipulation, or further client-side attacks."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-66",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-66 Cross Site Scripting (XSS)"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 5.1,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
            "userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-79",
              "description": "CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-94",
              "description": "CWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "orgId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "Security patch",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/b2d0ed05f6cf79b2312a3f1f923d0d1a5d7a9edb"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe fix ensures that tag names and display values are rendered as plain text rather than as HTML when no custom renderer is explicitly configured. In the suggestion rendering path, the default (non-renderer) case now uses jQuery\u0027s .text() method, which HTML-escapes the content. In the selection rendering path, the default case uses document.createTextNode() to insert the value as a text node. Custom renderers, which are developer-supplied and trusted to produce safe HTML, continue to use .html() or .prepend() with raw HTML. The eval() call was also replaced with JSON.parse() to eliminate a code-injection vector.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The fix ensures that tag names and display values are rendered as plain text rather than as HTML when no custom renderer is explicitly configured. In the suggestion rendering path, the default (non-renderer) case now uses jQuery\u0027s .text() method, which HTML-escapes the content. In the selection rendering path, the default case uses document.createTextNode() to insert the value as a text node. Custom renderers, which are developer-supplied and trusted to produce safe HTML, continue to use .html() or .prepend() with raw HTML. The eval() call was also replaced with JSON.parse() to eliminate a code-injection vector."
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in AIL Framework Tag Selector via Unescaped Tag Names",
      "x_gcve": [
        {
          "extensions": {
            "bcp-05-x-01": {
              "ai_annotations": [
                {
                  "ai_level": "generated",
                  "description": "Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.",
                  "gna_source": 1,
                  "models": [
                    {
                      "gna_source": 1,
                      "identifier": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "name": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "source": "ollama"
                    }
                  ],
                  "review_status": "full",
                  "scope": "record",
                  "tags": [
                    "ai-computer-assisted:llm-generated",
                    "ai-computer-assisted:classification"
                  ]
                }
              ]
            },
            "bcp-05-x-02": {
              "x_patch2vuln": {
                "assumptions": [
                  "The affected version range is inferred from the tag_version_boundary metadata indicating the fix commit is 31 commits before the v7.1 tag; exact version boundaries are not explicitly stated in the patch.",
                  "The UI:P (Passive) rating assumes the victim only needs to load a page containing the tag selector; if the application requires the victim to explicitly open a specific dialog or widget, UI:A (Active) could be more appropriate.",
                  "The CAPEC-66 mapping is the closest available pattern; no CAPEC entry specifically covers stored XSS in a tag-selector UI component, so the general XSS pattern is used.",
                  "The PR:L rating assumes that creating a custom tag requires only a basic authenticated account; if tag creation requires elevated privileges, PR:H would be more appropriate.",
                  "The eval() to JSON.parse() change is treated as a secondary hardening fix within the same patch set; the primary vulnerability addressed is the stored XSS in tag rendering.",
                  "No specific reporter or finder is identified in the patch metadata or commit message; only the remediation developer (commit author) is credited."
                ],
                "capecRationale": [
                  {
                    "capecId": "CAPEC-66",
                    "rationale": "CAPEC-66 describes the general XSS attack pattern where attacker-controlled input is reflected or stored and later rendered as executable content in a victim\u0027s browser. This patch fixes a stored XSS variant where malicious tag names are persisted and rendered as HTML. The mapping is direct and well-supported by the commit message and code changes. No more specific CAPEC entry for stored XSS in a tag/selector widget exists in the CAPEC catalog, making CAPEC-66 the closest and most appropriate match."
                  }
                ],
                "commit": "b2d0ed05f6cf79b2312a3f1f923d0d1a5d7a9edb",
                "confidence": "medium",
                "credits": [
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "terrtia"
                  }
                ],
                "cvssRationale": "AV:N: The vulnerability is exploitable over the network via a web application. AC:L: No race conditions or special timing are required; the payload is stored and triggers on page load. AT:N: No manipulation of the attack target is needed; the stored payload executes automatically. PR:L: The attacker needs a low-privilege authenticated account with permission to create custom tags. UI:P: The victim passively interacts by loading a page that contains the tag selector; no active click or download is required. VC:L: The XSS can read data from the victim\u0027s session and page context. VI:L: The XSS can modify page content and submit forms. VA:N: No availability impact is evident. SC:L: The compromised session can access other resources within the same origin. SI:L: The attacker can modify data through the victim\u0027s authenticated session. SA:N: No availability impact on subsequent components.",
                "fixSummary": "The fix ensures that tag names and display values are rendered as plain text rather than as HTML when no custom renderer is explicitly configured. In the suggestion rendering path, the default (non-renderer) case now uses jQuery\u0027s .text() method, which HTML-escapes the content. In the selection rendering path, the default case uses document.createTextNode() to insert the value as a text node. Custom renderers, which are developer-supplied and trusted to produce safe HTML, continue to use .html() or .prepend() with raw HTML. The eval() call was also replaced with JSON.parse() to eliminate a code-injection vector.",
                "generatedAt": "2026-09-25T13:16:06.156442Z",
                "generator": "patch2vuln.py",
                "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                "modelComparison": {
                  "rankings": [
                    {
                      "agreementScore": 9,
                      "assumptionCount": 6,
                      "confidence": "medium",
                      "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "score": 4
                    }
                  ],
                  "selectedModel": "qwen3.8:27b",
                  "selectionMethod": "deterministic-consensus-v1",
                  "selectionNotice": "The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required."
                },
                "patchSha256": "2d147dabcc9bebce7722917d80f13e49a10f9a2a4089ec6207cce9edb9187f77",
                "patchSummary": "In var/www/static/js/tags.js: (1) Replaced eval(data) with JSON.parse(data) for parsing array-like data strings. (2) In _renderComboItems, introduced a hasRenderer flag; when no custom renderer is set, the displayed value is inserted via resultItemEl.text(displayed) instead of the html property in the jQuery constructor. (3) In the selection rendering block, introduced a hasSelectionRenderer flag; when no custom selection renderer is set, the value is prepended as a text node via document.createTextNode(selectedItemHtml) instead of being set through the html property. (4) The comma separator for text-mode selections is now appended as a text node rather than concatenated into an HTML string.",
                "patchTruncated": false,
                "patches": [
                  {
                    "commit": "b2d0ed05f6cf79b2312a3f1f923d0d1a5d7a9edb",
                    "patchSha256": "2d147dabcc9bebce7722917d80f13e49a10f9a2a4089ec6207cce9edb9187f77",
                    "source": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/b2d0ed05f6cf79b2312a3f1f923d0d1a5d7a9edb.patch",
                    "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/b2d0ed05f6cf79b2312a3f1f923d0d1a5d7a9edb.patch",
                    "subject": "chg: [security] prevent stored XSS in"
                  }
                ],
                "source": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/b2d0ed05f6cf79b2312a3f1f923d0d1a5d7a9edb.patch",
                "subject": "chg: [security] prevent stored XSS in",
                "tagVersionBoundary": {
                  "commits_after_fix": 31,
                  "repository": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework",
                  "tag": "v7.1",
                  "version": "7.1",
                  "version_type": "custom"
                },
                "weaknessRationale": [
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-79",
                    "rationale": "The patch explicitly addresses stored XSS: user-controlled tag names were inserted into the DOM as HTML via jQuery\u0027s html property without escaping. The fix renders these values as text nodes, which is the canonical remediation for CWE-79. The commit subject line also explicitly states \u0027prevent stored XSS\u0027."
                  },
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-94",
                    "rationale": "The replacement of eval(data) with JSON.parse(data) addresses a secondary code-injection weakness where a crafted data string could execute arbitrary JavaScript. This is a contributing factor but the primary vulnerability is the stored XSS in tag rendering."
                  }
                ]
              }
            }
          },
          "recordType": "advisory",
          "vulnId": "GCVE-1-2026-20269"
        }
      ],
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-100174",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-25T13:21:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-25T13:22:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T13:54:48.431524Z",
    "requesterUserId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
    "serial": 1,
    "state": "PUBLISHED",
    "vulnId": "GCVE-1-2026-20269"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

GCVE-1-2026-20239 (CVE-2026-100172)

Vulnerability from gna-1 – Published: 2026-09-25 13:13 – Updated: 2026-09-25 13:54
VLAI
Title
Stored XSS in AIL Framework extracted-match popovers via unescaped dynamic values in HTML-enabled data-content attributes
Summary
The AIL Framework (ail-project/ail-framework) contains a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in two Jinja2 templates that render popovers for matched, tracked, or tagged content: var/www/templates/chats_explorer/block_message.html and var/www/templates/objects/item/show_item.html. In both templates, dynamic values associated with this content, including icon color, icon style, icon glyph, subtype, identifier, name, description, and matched value, are interpolated directly into the data-content HTML attribute of Bootstrap popover elements without appropriate output encoding. Because the popovers are configured with data-html="true", the content is interpreted as HTML in the victim's browser. An authenticated attacker who can influence matched, tracked, or tagged content may inject arbitrary HTML or JavaScript into these values. When a victim displays the affected popover, the injected markup may execute in the victim's session, potentially enabling data exfiltration or actions with the victim's privileges. The vulnerability is classified as stored XSS because the malicious payload can persist in the affected match, tracking, or tag-related data and be delivered to users who view the affected content.
CWE
  • CWE-79 - Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
ail project ail framework Affected: unspecified , < 7.1 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
GCVE extensions
AI involvement GCVE-BCP-05-X-01
Whole record AI-generated Human-reviewed GNA-1

Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.

ai-computer-assisted:llm-generatedai-computer-assisted:classification
Model Source Identifier
qwen3.8:27b ollama qwen3.8:27b
Patch provenance GCVE-BCP-05-X-02
Generator
patch2vuln.py on 2026-09-25 12:56
Model
qwen3.8:27b
Input
https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/ee63a0a96646790255e038f5ca5dd0ab5fe98db2.patch bd188338f882…
Confidence
medium
Commit Subject Patch SHA-256
ee63a0a96646 chg: [security] fix XSS in show item and message popover of bd188338f882…
Fix summary

The fix applies double HTML-escaping (Jinja2 forceescape|forceescape) to every dynamic value interpolated into the HTML-enabled data-content attribute of the popover elements in both templates. Double-escaping is required because the values must survive both the outer HTML attribute context and the inner HTML parsing performed by the popover plugin. This neutralizes any HTML or script injection from the extracted-match fields.

Patch summary

In block_message.html and show_item.html, the Jinja2 expressions for extracted_matches fields (icon color, icon style, icon, subtype, id, name, description) and the matched value r[1] are each suffixed with |forceescape|forceescape. No other logic, routing, or configuration changes are made. Two lines changed in total (one per file).

CVSS rationale

AV:N: web application reachable over the network. AC:L: crafting a message or item with a malicious extracted-match value requires no special race or timing. AT:N: no manipulation of the attack target is needed. PR:L: the attacker must be an authenticated user capable of creating or modifying chat messages or items. UI:P: the victim must passively interact (hover over the element) to trigger the popover rendering; no click or explicit action is required. VC:H: the injected script can read session cookies, DOM data, and API responses in the victim's browser. VI:H: the script can perform authenticated actions on behalf of the victim (create, modify, delete data). VA:N: no direct denial-of-service impact is evident. SC/SI/SA:N: the subcomponent (the AIL Framework server) is not directly compromised; the impact is confined to the victim's browser session.

Weakness rationale
  • CWE-79 Dynamic values from extracted-match data are interpolated into an HTML-enabled attribute without output encoding, allowing script injection. The fix adds forceescape, confirming the root cause is missing output encoding in an HTML context. CWE-79 is the precise weakness.
Attack pattern rationale
  • CAPEC-1 The patch directly addresses stored XSS: attacker-controlled content is persisted in application data (chat messages, items) and rendered as executable HTML in a victim's browser via an unescaped data-content attribute. CAPEC-1 is the canonical attack pattern for XSS and is the closest match. No uncertainty in this mapping.
Assumptions to verify
  • The AIL Framework requires authenticated access to create or modify chat messages and items; PR:L is assumed based on the application being a threat-intelligence platform with user accounts.
  • The extracted-match data (icon color, style, subtype, id, name, description) can be influenced by an authenticated user through normal application workflows (e.g., submitting content that the extraction pipeline processes).
  • The popover is triggered on hover (data-trigger="hover"), classified as passive user interaction (UI:P).
  • The tag v7.1 boundary with 143 commits after the fix suggests the fix landed before v7.1, but exact affected version ranges are not confirmed by the patch alone.
  • CAPEC-1 is selected as the closest standard attack pattern; no more specific CAPEC for stored XSS in HTML attributes exists in the CAPEC catalog.
Model comparison

Selected qwen3.8:27b by deterministic-consensus-v1
The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required.

Model Score Agreement Confidence Assumptions
qwen3.8:27b 5 9 medium 5

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "modules": [
            "chats_explorer (block_message.html)",
            "objects/item (show_item.html)"
          ],
          "product": "ail framework",
          "programFiles": [
            "var/www/templates/chats_explorer/block_message.html",
            "var/www/templates/objects/item/show_item.html"
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework",
          "vendor": "ail project",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "7.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "unspecified",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "Aurelien Thirion"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Jeroen Pinoy"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe AIL Framework (ail-project/ail-framework) contains a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in two Jinja2 templates that render popovers for matched, tracked, or tagged content: var/www/templates/chats_explorer/block_message.html and var/www/templates/objects/item/show_item.html. In both templates, dynamic values associated with this content, including icon color, icon style, icon glyph, subtype, identifier, name, description, and matched value, are interpolated directly into the data-content HTML attribute of Bootstrap popover elements without appropriate output encoding. Because the popovers are configured with data-html=\"true\", the content is interpreted as HTML in the victim\u0027s browser. An authenticated attacker who can influence matched, tracked, or tagged content may inject arbitrary HTML or JavaScript into these values. When a victim displays the affected popover, the injected markup may execute in the victim\u0027s session, potentially enabling data exfiltration or actions with the victim\u0027s privileges. The vulnerability is classified as stored XSS because the malicious payload can persist in the affected match, tracking, or tag-related data and be delivered to users who view the affected content.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The AIL Framework (ail-project/ail-framework) contains a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in two Jinja2 templates that render popovers for matched, tracked, or tagged content: var/www/templates/chats_explorer/block_message.html and var/www/templates/objects/item/show_item.html. In both templates, dynamic values associated with this content, including icon color, icon style, icon glyph, subtype, identifier, name, description, and matched value, are interpolated directly into the data-content HTML attribute of Bootstrap popover elements without appropriate output encoding. Because the popovers are configured with data-html=\"true\", the content is interpreted as HTML in the victim\u0027s browser. An authenticated attacker who can influence matched, tracked, or tagged content may inject arbitrary HTML or JavaScript into these values. When a victim displays the affected popover, the injected markup may execute in the victim\u0027s session, potentially enabling data exfiltration or actions with the victim\u0027s privileges. The vulnerability is classified as stored XSS because the malicious payload can persist in the affected match, tracking, or tag-related data and be delivered to users who view the affected content."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-1",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-1 Cross Site Scripting (XSS)"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 8.5,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-79",
              "description": "CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "orgId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "Security patch",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/ee63a0a96646790255e038f5ca5dd0ab5fe98db2"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe fix applies double HTML-escaping (Jinja2 forceescape|forceescape) to every dynamic value interpolated into the HTML-enabled data-content attribute of the popover elements in both templates. Double-escaping is required because the values must survive both the outer HTML attribute context and the inner HTML parsing performed by the popover plugin. This neutralizes any HTML or script injection from the extracted-match fields.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The fix applies double HTML-escaping (Jinja2 forceescape|forceescape) to every dynamic value interpolated into the HTML-enabled data-content attribute of the popover elements in both templates. Double-escaping is required because the values must survive both the outer HTML attribute context and the inner HTML parsing performed by the popover plugin. This neutralizes any HTML or script injection from the extracted-match fields."
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Stored XSS in AIL Framework extracted-match popovers via unescaped dynamic values in HTML-enabled data-content attributes",
      "x_gcve": [
        {
          "extensions": {
            "bcp-05-x-01": {
              "ai_annotations": [
                {
                  "ai_level": "generated",
                  "description": "Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.",
                  "gna_source": 1,
                  "models": [
                    {
                      "gna_source": 1,
                      "identifier": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "name": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "source": "ollama"
                    }
                  ],
                  "review_status": "full",
                  "scope": "record",
                  "tags": [
                    "ai-computer-assisted:llm-generated",
                    "ai-computer-assisted:classification"
                  ]
                }
              ]
            },
            "bcp-05-x-02": {
              "x_patch2vuln": {
                "assumptions": [
                  "The AIL Framework requires authenticated access to create or modify chat messages and items; PR:L is assumed based on the application being a threat-intelligence platform with user accounts.",
                  "The extracted-match data (icon color, style, subtype, id, name, description) can be influenced by an authenticated user through normal application workflows (e.g., submitting content that the extraction pipeline processes).",
                  "The popover is triggered on hover (data-trigger=\"hover\"), classified as passive user interaction (UI:P).",
                  "The tag v7.1 boundary with 143 commits after the fix suggests the fix landed before v7.1, but exact affected version ranges are not confirmed by the patch alone.",
                  "CAPEC-1 is selected as the closest standard attack pattern; no more specific CAPEC for stored XSS in HTML attributes exists in the CAPEC catalog."
                ],
                "capecRationale": [
                  {
                    "capecId": "CAPEC-1",
                    "rationale": "The patch directly addresses stored XSS: attacker-controlled content is persisted in application data (chat messages, items) and rendered as executable HTML in a victim\u0027s browser via an unescaped data-content attribute. CAPEC-1 is the canonical attack pattern for XSS and is the closest match. No uncertainty in this mapping."
                  }
                ],
                "commit": "ee63a0a96646790255e038f5ca5dd0ab5fe98db2",
                "confidence": "medium",
                "credits": [
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "terrtia"
                  }
                ],
                "cvssRationale": "AV:N: web application reachable over the network. AC:L: crafting a message or item with a malicious extracted-match value requires no special race or timing. AT:N: no manipulation of the attack target is needed. PR:L: the attacker must be an authenticated user capable of creating or modifying chat messages or items. UI:P: the victim must passively interact (hover over the element) to trigger the popover rendering; no click or explicit action is required. VC:H: the injected script can read session cookies, DOM data, and API responses in the victim\u0027s browser. VI:H: the script can perform authenticated actions on behalf of the victim (create, modify, delete data). VA:N: no direct denial-of-service impact is evident. SC/SI/SA:N: the subcomponent (the AIL Framework server) is not directly compromised; the impact is confined to the victim\u0027s browser session.",
                "fixSummary": "The fix applies double HTML-escaping (Jinja2 forceescape|forceescape) to every dynamic value interpolated into the HTML-enabled data-content attribute of the popover elements in both templates. Double-escaping is required because the values must survive both the outer HTML attribute context and the inner HTML parsing performed by the popover plugin. This neutralizes any HTML or script injection from the extracted-match fields.",
                "generatedAt": "2026-09-25T12:56:24.137641Z",
                "generator": "patch2vuln.py",
                "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                "modelComparison": {
                  "rankings": [
                    {
                      "agreementScore": 9,
                      "assumptionCount": 5,
                      "confidence": "medium",
                      "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "score": 5
                    }
                  ],
                  "selectedModel": "qwen3.8:27b",
                  "selectionMethod": "deterministic-consensus-v1",
                  "selectionNotice": "The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required."
                },
                "patchSha256": "bd188338f8828ab59743776228d2991b51a3f83b870dedf073a54c6139ad9e26",
                "patchSummary": "In block_message.html and show_item.html, the Jinja2 expressions for extracted_matches fields (icon color, icon style, icon, subtype, id, name, description) and the matched value r[1] are each suffixed with |forceescape|forceescape. No other logic, routing, or configuration changes are made. Two lines changed in total (one per file).",
                "patchTruncated": false,
                "patches": [
                  {
                    "commit": "ee63a0a96646790255e038f5ca5dd0ab5fe98db2",
                    "patchSha256": "bd188338f8828ab59743776228d2991b51a3f83b870dedf073a54c6139ad9e26",
                    "source": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/ee63a0a96646790255e038f5ca5dd0ab5fe98db2.patch",
                    "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/ee63a0a96646790255e038f5ca5dd0ab5fe98db2.patch",
                    "subject": "chg: [security] fix XSS in show item and message popover of"
                  }
                ],
                "source": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/ee63a0a96646790255e038f5ca5dd0ab5fe98db2.patch",
                "subject": "chg: [security] fix XSS in show item and message popover of",
                "tagVersionBoundary": {
                  "commits_after_fix": 143,
                  "repository": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework",
                  "tag": "v7.1",
                  "version": "7.1",
                  "version_type": "custom"
                },
                "weaknessRationale": [
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-79",
                    "rationale": "Dynamic values from extracted-match data are interpolated into an HTML-enabled attribute without output encoding, allowing script injection. The fix adds forceescape, confirming the root cause is missing output encoding in an HTML context. CWE-79 is the precise weakness."
                  }
                ]
              }
            }
          },
          "recordType": "advisory",
          "vulnId": "GCVE-1-2026-20239"
        }
      ],
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-100172",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-25T13:13:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-25T13:13:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T13:54:03.667825Z",
    "requesterUserId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
    "serial": 1,
    "state": "PUBLISHED",
    "vulnId": "GCVE-1-2026-20239"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

GCVE-1-2026-20276 (CVE-2026-100187)

Vulnerability from gna-1 – Published: 2026-09-25 13:40 – Updated: 2026-09-25 13:53
VLAI
Title
AIL Framework Onion Module: Non-Onion URL Accepted as Crawler Task Due to Bypassed Domain Validation
Summary
The Onion module in AIL Framework contained a performance shortcut in its URL extraction logic that accepted URLs as valid .onion targets based solely on a length check (exactly 69 characters) and a suffix check (ending in ".onion"), without performing proper hostname parsing or onion-domain validation. An unauthenticated attacker who could publish or control web content crawled by the framework could embed a crafted URL containing an IP address or non-onion hostname with a path ending in ".onion" that satisfied the length and suffix conditions. Such a URL would be extracted, its domain naively sliced from the string, and queued as a legitimate onion crawler task. This allowed unauthenticated content publishers to inject arbitrary non-onion targets into the crawler's task queue, influencing crawler behavior and potentially directing it toward unintended network resources. The vulnerability required no authentication, no user interaction, and only the ability to place crafted content in a location the framework would crawl. The security impact is a loss of integrity in the crawler's target selection: the framework processes and acts upon URLs that do not correspond to legitimate .onion services.
CWE
  • CWE-20 - Improper Input Validation
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
ail project ail framework Affected: unspecified , < 7.1 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
GCVE extensions
AI involvement GCVE-BCP-05-X-01
Whole record AI-generated Human-reviewed GNA-1

Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.

ai-computer-assisted:llm-generatedai-computer-assisted:classification
Model Source Identifier
qwen3.8:27b ollama qwen3.8:27b
Patch provenance GCVE-BCP-05-X-02
Generator
patch2vuln.py on 2026-09-25 13:37
Model
qwen3.8:27b
Input
https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/5c8a68b3d8c7d7b03e5febe4ac5b5aca91826adb.patch 9fbf19112822…
Confidence
medium
Commit Subject Patch SHA-256
5c8a68b3d8c7 chg: [security] Onion module, prevent non-onion crawler task 9fbf19112822…
Fix summary

The length-based shortcut that bypassed onion-domain validation is removed. Every extracted URL is now parsed using the standard URL domain extraction function, and the resulting hostname is validated against the existing onion-domain validation routine before the URL is added to the crawler task set. This ensures that only URLs whose hostname is a genuine .onion domain can be queued as crawler tasks.

Patch summary

In bin/modules/Onion.py, the conditional block that checked len(url) == 69 and url.endswith('.onion') to shortcut domain extraction (url[7:]) without calling crawlers.is_valid_onion_domain() is removed. The code is replaced with an unconditional call to crawlers.get_url_domain(url) followed by a check that the returned domain is truthy and passes crawlers.is_valid_onion_domain(domain) before adding the domain and URL to the respective sets. Net change: 2 insertions, 9 deletions in a single file.

CVSS rationale

Attack Vector is Network because the attacker publishes crafted content on the web that the framework crawls. Attack Complexity is Low because the attacker only needs to construct a URL of exactly 69 characters ending in .onion with a non-onion hostname. No special Adversary Techniques are required. Privileges Required is None because the attacker is an unauthenticated content publisher. User Interaction is None because the crawler processes the content automatically. The primary impact is Low Integrity on the vulnerable component: the crawler task queue is polluted with non-onion URLs, violating the integrity of the framework's target selection. No confidentiality or availability impact is evident from the patch. No subsequent component impact is identified in the evidence.

Weakness rationale
  • CWE-20 The URL input was validated using an insufficient heuristic (string length and suffix) that could be satisfied by non-onion URLs. The proper hostname parsing and onion-domain validation step was bypassed by the shortcut, allowing attacker-controlled URLs to be accepted as valid onion targets.
Attack pattern rationale
  • CAPEC-126 The attacker tampers with URL parameters embedded in untrusted crawled content to bypass the application's validation logic and inject non-onion targets into the crawler task queue. CAPEC-126 is the closest available pattern describing manipulation of input parameters to achieve unintended application behavior. The mapping is approximate because the attack vector is content-based injection rather than direct request parameter manipulation, but the core mechanism (crafting input to bypass validation) aligns with this pattern.
Assumptions to verify
  • The affected version range is inferred from the tag_version_boundary metadata indicating the fix commit is 24 commits before the v7.1 tag; the exact version number of the vulnerable release is not specified in the patch.
  • The CVSS assumes the attacker can place crafted content in a location the AIL Framework crawler will process; the specific crawling scope and configuration are not detailed in the patch.
  • CAPEC-126 (Parameter Tampering) is the closest available attack pattern; the actual attack is content-based URL injection rather than classic request parameter tampering, so the mapping is approximate.
  • The impact is assessed as Low Integrity based on the evidence that non-onion URLs are queued as crawler tasks; broader downstream consequences (e.g., SSRF-like effects) are not evidenced in the patch and are not assumed.
  • The commit date (24 Sep 2026) is taken as-is from the patch metadata; no independent verification of the timeline is performed.
Model comparison

Selected qwen3.8:27b by deterministic-consensus-v1
The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required.

Model Score Agreement Confidence Assumptions
qwen3.8:27b 5 9 medium 5

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "modules": [
            "Onion module"
          ],
          "product": "ail framework",
          "programFiles": [
            "bin/modules/Onion.py"
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework",
          "vendor": "ail project",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "7.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "unspecified",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "Aurelien Thirion"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Jeroen Pinoy"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe Onion module in AIL Framework contained a performance shortcut in its URL extraction logic that accepted URLs as valid .onion targets based solely on a length check (exactly 69 characters) and a suffix check (ending in \".onion\"), without performing proper hostname parsing or onion-domain validation. An unauthenticated attacker who could publish or control web content crawled by the framework could embed a crafted URL containing an IP address or non-onion hostname with a path ending in \".onion\" that satisfied the length and suffix conditions. Such a URL would be extracted, its domain naively sliced from the string, and queued as a legitimate onion crawler task. This allowed unauthenticated content publishers to inject arbitrary non-onion targets into the crawler\u0027s task queue, influencing crawler behavior and potentially directing it toward unintended network resources. The vulnerability required no authentication, no user interaction, and only the ability to place crafted content in a location the framework would crawl. The security impact is a loss of integrity in the crawler\u0027s target selection: the framework processes and acts upon URLs that do not correspond to legitimate .onion services.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The Onion module in AIL Framework contained a performance shortcut in its URL extraction logic that accepted URLs as valid .onion targets based solely on a length check (exactly 69 characters) and a suffix check (ending in \".onion\"), without performing proper hostname parsing or onion-domain validation. An unauthenticated attacker who could publish or control web content crawled by the framework could embed a crafted URL containing an IP address or non-onion hostname with a path ending in \".onion\" that satisfied the length and suffix conditions. Such a URL would be extracted, its domain naively sliced from the string, and queued as a legitimate onion crawler task. This allowed unauthenticated content publishers to inject arbitrary non-onion targets into the crawler\u0027s task queue, influencing crawler behavior and potentially directing it toward unintended network resources. The vulnerability required no authentication, no user interaction, and only the ability to place crafted content in a location the framework would crawl. The security impact is a loss of integrity in the crawler\u0027s target selection: the framework processes and acts upon URLs that do not correspond to legitimate .onion services."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-126",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-126 Parameter Tampering"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 6.9,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-20",
              "description": "CWE-20 Improper Input Validation",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "orgId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "Security patch",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/5c8a68b3d8c7d7b03e5febe4ac5b5aca91826adb"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe length-based shortcut that bypassed onion-domain validation is removed. Every extracted URL is now parsed using the standard URL domain extraction function, and the resulting hostname is validated against the existing onion-domain validation routine before the URL is added to the crawler task set. This ensures that only URLs whose hostname is a genuine .onion domain can be queued as crawler tasks.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The length-based shortcut that bypassed onion-domain validation is removed. Every extracted URL is now parsed using the standard URL domain extraction function, and the resulting hostname is validated against the existing onion-domain validation routine before the URL is added to the crawler task set. This ensures that only URLs whose hostname is a genuine .onion domain can be queued as crawler tasks."
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "AIL Framework Onion Module: Non-Onion URL Accepted as Crawler Task Due to Bypassed Domain Validation",
      "x_gcve": [
        {
          "extensions": {
            "bcp-05-x-01": {
              "ai_annotations": [
                {
                  "ai_level": "generated",
                  "description": "Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.",
                  "gna_source": 1,
                  "models": [
                    {
                      "gna_source": 1,
                      "identifier": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "name": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "source": "ollama"
                    }
                  ],
                  "review_status": "full",
                  "scope": "record",
                  "tags": [
                    "ai-computer-assisted:llm-generated",
                    "ai-computer-assisted:classification"
                  ]
                }
              ]
            },
            "bcp-05-x-02": {
              "x_patch2vuln": {
                "assumptions": [
                  "The affected version range is inferred from the tag_version_boundary metadata indicating the fix commit is 24 commits before the v7.1 tag; the exact version number of the vulnerable release is not specified in the patch.",
                  "The CVSS assumes the attacker can place crafted content in a location the AIL Framework crawler will process; the specific crawling scope and configuration are not detailed in the patch.",
                  "CAPEC-126 (Parameter Tampering) is the closest available attack pattern; the actual attack is content-based URL injection rather than classic request parameter tampering, so the mapping is approximate.",
                  "The impact is assessed as Low Integrity based on the evidence that non-onion URLs are queued as crawler tasks; broader downstream consequences (e.g., SSRF-like effects) are not evidenced in the patch and are not assumed.",
                  "The commit date (24 Sep 2026) is taken as-is from the patch metadata; no independent verification of the timeline is performed."
                ],
                "capecRationale": [
                  {
                    "capecId": "CAPEC-126",
                    "rationale": "The attacker tampers with URL parameters embedded in untrusted crawled content to bypass the application\u0027s validation logic and inject non-onion targets into the crawler task queue. CAPEC-126 is the closest available pattern describing manipulation of input parameters to achieve unintended application behavior. The mapping is approximate because the attack vector is content-based injection rather than direct request parameter manipulation, but the core mechanism (crafting input to bypass validation) aligns with this pattern."
                  }
                ],
                "commit": "5c8a68b3d8c7d7b03e5febe4ac5b5aca91826adb",
                "confidence": "medium",
                "credits": [
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "terrtia"
                  }
                ],
                "cvssRationale": "Attack Vector is Network because the attacker publishes crafted content on the web that the framework crawls. Attack Complexity is Low because the attacker only needs to construct a URL of exactly 69 characters ending in .onion with a non-onion hostname. No special Adversary Techniques are required. Privileges Required is None because the attacker is an unauthenticated content publisher. User Interaction is None because the crawler processes the content automatically. The primary impact is Low Integrity on the vulnerable component: the crawler task queue is polluted with non-onion URLs, violating the integrity of the framework\u0027s target selection. No confidentiality or availability impact is evident from the patch. No subsequent component impact is identified in the evidence.",
                "fixSummary": "The length-based shortcut that bypassed onion-domain validation is removed. Every extracted URL is now parsed using the standard URL domain extraction function, and the resulting hostname is validated against the existing onion-domain validation routine before the URL is added to the crawler task set. This ensures that only URLs whose hostname is a genuine .onion domain can be queued as crawler tasks.",
                "generatedAt": "2026-09-25T13:37:37.543009Z",
                "generator": "patch2vuln.py",
                "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                "modelComparison": {
                  "rankings": [
                    {
                      "agreementScore": 9,
                      "assumptionCount": 5,
                      "confidence": "medium",
                      "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "score": 5
                    }
                  ],
                  "selectedModel": "qwen3.8:27b",
                  "selectionMethod": "deterministic-consensus-v1",
                  "selectionNotice": "The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required."
                },
                "patchSha256": "9fbf191128229c1859f3643b5f50921cdf5f36fd70734e8f68a05e237b987d60",
                "patchSummary": "In bin/modules/Onion.py, the conditional block that checked len(url) == 69 and url.endswith(\u0027.onion\u0027) to shortcut domain extraction (url[7:]) without calling crawlers.is_valid_onion_domain() is removed. The code is replaced with an unconditional call to crawlers.get_url_domain(url) followed by a check that the returned domain is truthy and passes crawlers.is_valid_onion_domain(domain) before adding the domain and URL to the respective sets. Net change: 2 insertions, 9 deletions in a single file.",
                "patchTruncated": false,
                "patches": [
                  {
                    "commit": "5c8a68b3d8c7d7b03e5febe4ac5b5aca91826adb",
                    "patchSha256": "9fbf191128229c1859f3643b5f50921cdf5f36fd70734e8f68a05e237b987d60",
                    "source": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/5c8a68b3d8c7d7b03e5febe4ac5b5aca91826adb.patch",
                    "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/5c8a68b3d8c7d7b03e5febe4ac5b5aca91826adb.patch",
                    "subject": "chg: [security] Onion module, prevent non-onion crawler task"
                  }
                ],
                "source": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/5c8a68b3d8c7d7b03e5febe4ac5b5aca91826adb.patch",
                "subject": "chg: [security] Onion module, prevent non-onion crawler task",
                "tagVersionBoundary": {
                  "commits_after_fix": 24,
                  "repository": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework",
                  "tag": "v7.1",
                  "version": "7.1",
                  "version_type": "custom"
                },
                "weaknessRationale": [
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-20",
                    "rationale": "The URL input was validated using an insufficient heuristic (string length and suffix) that could be satisfied by non-onion URLs. The proper hostname parsing and onion-domain validation step was bypassed by the shortcut, allowing attacker-controlled URLs to be accepted as valid onion targets."
                  }
                ]
              }
            }
          },
          "recordType": "advisory",
          "vulnId": "GCVE-1-2026-20276"
        }
      ],
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-100187",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-25T13:40:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-25T13:42:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T13:53:04.756019Z",
    "requesterUserId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
    "serial": 1,
    "state": "PUBLISHED",
    "vulnId": "GCVE-1-2026-20276"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

GCVE-1-2026-20292 (CVE-2026-100190)

Vulnerability from gna-1 – Published: 2026-09-25 13:49 – Updated: 2026-09-25 13:52
VLAI
Title
Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Crawler Capture Import in AIL Framework showDomain Page
Summary
The AIL Framework crawler splash domain page (showDomain.html) is vulnerable to stored cross-site script injection (XSS). User-supplied data originating from imported crawler captures—specifically item IDs, URLs, and screenshot file paths—was interpolated directly into inline JavaScript contexts within the HTML template. This included an onclick attribute that embedded raw screenshot and URL values into a JavaScript function call, and an inline script block that assigned a screenshot value to a JavaScript variable without escaping. An attacker with a user-role API client could craft a malicious crawler capture import containing JavaScript payloads in these fields. When any user (including privileged users) subsequently viewed the affected domain page, the injected script would execute in the victim's browser context, potentially allowing session hijacking, data exfiltration, or unauthorized actions on behalf of the victim. The vulnerability is stored in the application's data layer and triggered upon page rendering, requiring no further interaction beyond loading the domain view.
CWE
  • CWE-79 - Improper Neutralization of Input in Web Page ('Cross-site Scripting')
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
ail project ail framework Affected: unspecified , < 7.1 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
GCVE extensions
AI involvement GCVE-BCP-05-X-01
Whole record AI-generated Human-reviewed GNA-1

Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model.

ai-computer-assisted:llm-generatedai-computer-assisted:classification
Model Source Identifier
qwen3.8:27b ollama qwen3.8:27b
Patch provenance GCVE-BCP-05-X-02
Generator
patch2vuln.py on 2026-09-25 13:45
Model
qwen3.8:27b
Input
https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/31376ee3d04519c898bb9b3671453a41c4117340.patch c110d16dd8ee…
Confidence
medium
Commit Subject Patch SHA-256
31376ee3d045 chg: [security] prevent stored XSS through imported capture c110d16dd8ee…
Fix summary

The fix removes all capture-derived values (item IDs, URLs, screenshot paths) from inline JavaScript contexts (onclick attributes and inline script variable assignments). These values are now stored in HTML data attributes (data-screenshot, data-url, data-item-id), which are properly HTML-escaped by the Jinja2 template engine. Screenshot click handlers are bound programmatically via addEventListener on elements with a .reload-image class, and the reload_image function reads values from the DOM element's dataset rather than receiving raw string parameters. Additionally, item IDs are URL-encoded with encodeURIComponent before being appended to link hrefs, preventing injection through the ID field.

Patch summary

In showDomain.html: (1) Replaced inline onclick="reload_image('...')" with a data-attribute-based approach using data-screenshot, data-url, and data-item-id attributes on the table cell element, plus a .reload-image CSS class. (2) Removed the inline script block that assigned screenshot, URL, and ID values directly into JavaScript variables via Jinja2 interpolation; replaced with dataset reads from the domain_screenshot img element. (3) Changed reload_image() to accept a DOM element and read values from element.dataset instead of raw string arguments. (4) Added a programmatic event binding loop using document.querySelectorAll('.reload-image').forEach() with addEventListener('click'). (5) Applied encodeURIComponent() to item IDs when constructing screenshot link hrefs. (6) Changed the href URL construction to use url_for with keyword arguments instead of string interpolation.

CVSS rationale

AV:N: Exploitable over the network via the web application. AC:L: No special race conditions or complex setup; a crafted capture import suffices. AT:N: No manipulation of the attack target required. PR:L: Requires a user-role API client to import a malicious crawler capture (authenticated, low privilege). UI:P: The stored XSS in the inline script block executes passively when the victim loads the domain page; no click or active interaction is needed for the inline script vector. VC:N/VI:N/VA:N: The vulnerable component (server-side application) is not directly compromised in confidentiality, integrity, or availability. SC:H: Scope changes to the victim's browser session, enabling theft of session tokens, cookies, and sensitive data. SI:H: Scope integrity is impacted as the attacker can perform arbitrary actions in the victim's authenticated session. SA:N: No meaningful impact on the availability of the attacker's scope.

Weakness rationale
  • CWE-79 The patch explicitly addresses stored XSS by removing user-controlled values (screenshot paths, URLs, item IDs from crawler capture imports) from inline JavaScript contexts and replacing them with properly escaped data attributes and programmatic event binding. The commit message confirms the intent: 'prevent stored XSS through imported capture metadata in showDomain.'
Attack pattern rationale
  • CAPEC-1 The patch directly remediates a stored XSS vector where attacker-controlled data from a crawler capture import is reflected into inline JavaScript without neutralization. CAPEC-1 is the canonical attack pattern for XSS. The specific sub-variant is stored (persistent) XSS via a data import mechanism, but CAPEC-1 is the closest and most appropriate mapping available in the CAPEC catalog.
Assumptions to verify
  • The UI:P (Passive) rating assumes the inline script vector (screenshot variable assignment) executes on page load without requiring a user click. The onclick vector would require UI:A, but the inline script vector is sufficient for exploitation.
  • PR:L assumes the attacker needs a user-role API client to import a crafted crawler capture, as stated in the commit message. The exact privilege level and authentication mechanism are not further specified in the patch.
  • The version boundary 'less_than 7.1' is inferred from the tag_version_boundary metadata showing 21 commits after the fix before the v7.1 tag, suggesting the fix is included in v7.1. Exact affected version ranges are not confirmed.
  • CAPEC-1 is selected as the closest available attack pattern for stored XSS; no more specific CAPEC for stored XSS via data import exists in the catalog.
  • The patch does not include test cases or additional context about whether other template files have similar inline JavaScript interpolation patterns; this advisory covers only the single file in the patch.
Model comparison

Selected qwen3.8:27b by deterministic-consensus-v1
The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required.

Model Score Agreement Confidence Assumptions
qwen3.8:27b 5 9 medium 5

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "modules": [
            "crawler/crawler_splash"
          ],
          "product": "ail framework",
          "programFiles": [
            "var/www/templates/crawler/crawler_splash/showDomain.html"
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework",
          "vendor": "ail project",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "7.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "unspecified",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "Aurelien Thirion"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Jeroen Pinoy"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe AIL Framework crawler splash domain page (showDomain.html) is vulnerable to stored cross-site script injection (XSS). User-supplied data originating from imported crawler captures\u2014specifically item IDs, URLs, and screenshot file paths\u2014was interpolated directly into inline JavaScript contexts within the HTML template. This included an onclick attribute that embedded raw screenshot and URL values into a JavaScript function call, and an inline script block that assigned a screenshot value to a JavaScript variable without escaping. An attacker with a user-role API client could craft a malicious crawler capture import containing JavaScript payloads in these fields. When any user (including privileged users) subsequently viewed the affected domain page, the injected script would execute in the victim\u0027s browser context, potentially allowing session hijacking, data exfiltration, or unauthorized actions on behalf of the victim. The vulnerability is stored in the application\u0027s data layer and triggered upon page rendering, requiring no further interaction beyond loading the domain view.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The AIL Framework crawler splash domain page (showDomain.html) is vulnerable to stored cross-site script injection (XSS). User-supplied data originating from imported crawler captures\u2014specifically item IDs, URLs, and screenshot file paths\u2014was interpolated directly into inline JavaScript contexts within the HTML template. This included an onclick attribute that embedded raw screenshot and URL values into a JavaScript function call, and an inline script block that assigned a screenshot value to a JavaScript variable without escaping. An attacker with a user-role API client could craft a malicious crawler capture import containing JavaScript payloads in these fields. When any user (including privileged users) subsequently viewed the affected domain page, the injected script would execute in the victim\u0027s browser context, potentially allowing session hijacking, data exfiltration, or unauthorized actions on behalf of the victim. The vulnerability is stored in the application\u0027s data layer and triggered upon page rendering, requiring no further interaction beyond loading the domain view."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-1",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-1 Cross Site Scripting (XSS)"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 6.3,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-79",
              "description": "CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input in Web Page (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "orgId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "Security patch",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/31376ee3d04519c898bb9b3671453a41c4117340"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe fix removes all capture-derived values (item IDs, URLs, screenshot paths) from inline JavaScript contexts (onclick attributes and inline script variable assignments). These values are now stored in HTML data attributes (data-screenshot, data-url, data-item-id), which are properly HTML-escaped by the Jinja2 template engine. Screenshot click handlers are bound programmatically via addEventListener on elements with a .reload-image class, and the reload_image function reads values from the DOM element\u0027s dataset rather than receiving raw string parameters. Additionally, item IDs are URL-encoded with encodeURIComponent before being appended to link hrefs, preventing injection through the ID field.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The fix removes all capture-derived values (item IDs, URLs, screenshot paths) from inline JavaScript contexts (onclick attributes and inline script variable assignments). These values are now stored in HTML data attributes (data-screenshot, data-url, data-item-id), which are properly HTML-escaped by the Jinja2 template engine. Screenshot click handlers are bound programmatically via addEventListener on elements with a .reload-image class, and the reload_image function reads values from the DOM element\u0027s dataset rather than receiving raw string parameters. Additionally, item IDs are URL-encoded with encodeURIComponent before being appended to link hrefs, preventing injection through the ID field."
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Crawler Capture Import in AIL Framework showDomain Page",
      "x_gcve": [
        {
          "extensions": {
            "bcp-05-x-01": {
              "ai_annotations": [
                {
                  "ai_level": "generated",
                  "description": "Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model.",
                  "gna_source": 1,
                  "models": [
                    {
                      "gna_source": 1,
                      "identifier": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "name": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "source": "ollama"
                    }
                  ],
                  "review_status": "full",
                  "scope": "record",
                  "tags": [
                    "ai-computer-assisted:llm-generated",
                    "ai-computer-assisted:classification"
                  ]
                }
              ]
            },
            "bcp-05-x-02": {
              "x_patch2vuln": {
                "assumptions": [
                  "The UI:P (Passive) rating assumes the inline script vector (screenshot variable assignment) executes on page load without requiring a user click. The onclick vector would require UI:A, but the inline script vector is sufficient for exploitation.",
                  "PR:L assumes the attacker needs a user-role API client to import a crafted crawler capture, as stated in the commit message. The exact privilege level and authentication mechanism are not further specified in the patch.",
                  "The version boundary \u0027less_than 7.1\u0027 is inferred from the tag_version_boundary metadata showing 21 commits after the fix before the v7.1 tag, suggesting the fix is included in v7.1. Exact affected version ranges are not confirmed.",
                  "CAPEC-1 is selected as the closest available attack pattern for stored XSS; no more specific CAPEC for stored XSS via data import exists in the catalog.",
                  "The patch does not include test cases or additional context about whether other template files have similar inline JavaScript interpolation patterns; this advisory covers only the single file in the patch."
                ],
                "capecRationale": [
                  {
                    "capecId": "CAPEC-1",
                    "rationale": "The patch directly remediates a stored XSS vector where attacker-controlled data from a crawler capture import is reflected into inline JavaScript without neutralization. CAPEC-1 is the canonical attack pattern for XSS. The specific sub-variant is stored (persistent) XSS via a data import mechanism, but CAPEC-1 is the closest and most appropriate mapping available in the CAPEC catalog."
                  }
                ],
                "commit": "31376ee3d04519c898bb9b3671453a41c4117340",
                "confidence": "medium",
                "credits": [
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "terrtia"
                  }
                ],
                "cvssRationale": "AV:N: Exploitable over the network via the web application. AC:L: No special race conditions or complex setup; a crafted capture import suffices. AT:N: No manipulation of the attack target required. PR:L: Requires a user-role API client to import a malicious crawler capture (authenticated, low privilege). UI:P: The stored XSS in the inline script block executes passively when the victim loads the domain page; no click or active interaction is needed for the inline script vector. VC:N/VI:N/VA:N: The vulnerable component (server-side application) is not directly compromised in confidentiality, integrity, or availability. SC:H: Scope changes to the victim\u0027s browser session, enabling theft of session tokens, cookies, and sensitive data. SI:H: Scope integrity is impacted as the attacker can perform arbitrary actions in the victim\u0027s authenticated session. SA:N: No meaningful impact on the availability of the attacker\u0027s scope.",
                "fixSummary": "The fix removes all capture-derived values (item IDs, URLs, screenshot paths) from inline JavaScript contexts (onclick attributes and inline script variable assignments). These values are now stored in HTML data attributes (data-screenshot, data-url, data-item-id), which are properly HTML-escaped by the Jinja2 template engine. Screenshot click handlers are bound programmatically via addEventListener on elements with a .reload-image class, and the reload_image function reads values from the DOM element\u0027s dataset rather than receiving raw string parameters. Additionally, item IDs are URL-encoded with encodeURIComponent before being appended to link hrefs, preventing injection through the ID field.",
                "generatedAt": "2026-09-25T13:45:46.199650Z",
                "generator": "patch2vuln.py",
                "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                "modelComparison": {
                  "rankings": [
                    {
                      "agreementScore": 9,
                      "assumptionCount": 5,
                      "confidence": "medium",
                      "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "score": 5
                    }
                  ],
                  "selectedModel": "qwen3.8:27b",
                  "selectionMethod": "deterministic-consensus-v1",
                  "selectionNotice": "The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required."
                },
                "patchSha256": "c110d16dd8eee489472853615089aeb6b6e034457dcbaec9b038bf85ad96b920",
                "patchSummary": "In showDomain.html: (1) Replaced inline onclick=\"reload_image(\u0027...\u0027)\" with a data-attribute-based approach using data-screenshot, data-url, and data-item-id attributes on the table cell element, plus a .reload-image CSS class. (2) Removed the inline script block that assigned screenshot, URL, and ID values directly into JavaScript variables via Jinja2 interpolation; replaced with dataset reads from the domain_screenshot img element. (3) Changed reload_image() to accept a DOM element and read values from element.dataset instead of raw string arguments. (4) Added a programmatic event binding loop using document.querySelectorAll(\u0027.reload-image\u0027).forEach() with addEventListener(\u0027click\u0027). (5) Applied encodeURIComponent() to item IDs when constructing screenshot link hrefs. (6) Changed the href URL construction to use url_for with keyword arguments instead of string interpolation.",
                "patchTruncated": false,
                "patches": [
                  {
                    "commit": "31376ee3d04519c898bb9b3671453a41c4117340",
                    "patchSha256": "c110d16dd8eee489472853615089aeb6b6e034457dcbaec9b038bf85ad96b920",
                    "source": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/31376ee3d04519c898bb9b3671453a41c4117340.patch",
                    "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/31376ee3d04519c898bb9b3671453a41c4117340.patch",
                    "subject": "chg: [security] prevent stored XSS through imported capture"
                  }
                ],
                "source": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/31376ee3d04519c898bb9b3671453a41c4117340.patch",
                "subject": "chg: [security] prevent stored XSS through imported capture",
                "tagVersionBoundary": {
                  "commits_after_fix": 21,
                  "repository": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework",
                  "tag": "v7.1",
                  "version": "7.1",
                  "version_type": "custom"
                },
                "weaknessRationale": [
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-79",
                    "rationale": "The patch explicitly addresses stored XSS by removing user-controlled values (screenshot paths, URLs, item IDs from crawler capture imports) from inline JavaScript contexts and replacing them with properly escaped data attributes and programmatic event binding. The commit message confirms the intent: \u0027prevent stored XSS through imported capture metadata in showDomain.\u0027"
                  }
                ]
              }
            }
          },
          "recordType": "advisory",
          "vulnId": "GCVE-1-2026-20292"
        }
      ],
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-100190",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-25T13:49:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-25T13:52:13.769Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T13:52:14.626493Z",
    "requesterUserId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
    "serial": 1,
    "state": "PUBLISHED",
    "vulnId": "GCVE-1-2026-20292"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

GCVE-1-2026-20108 (CVE-2026-97898)

Vulnerability from gna-1 – Published: 2026-09-25 09:44 – Updated: 2026-09-25 10:07 Exclusively Hosted Service
VLAI
Title
Broken authorization in Akia keyless entry lets an authenticated guest unlock other rooms
Summary
Insecure Direct Object Reference / missing object-level authorization in the Akia keyless entry cloud service. The unlock action is relying on a client-supplied room/door identifier that is not properly authorized server-side against the authenticated guest's booking. An authenticated guest could unlock rooms other than their own, resulting in unauthorized physical access to guest rooms at an affected property. As of 19th September 2026 the service is no more vulnerable to this attack (feedback received by the reporter).  The attack is remote but the effect is local to an affected property.
CWE
  • CWE-862 - Missing Authorization
  • CWE-639 - Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
akia akia Affected: 0 , < 2026.10.19 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "akia",
          "vendor": "akia",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "2026.10.19",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Philipp Br\u00fcgger"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cdiv\u003eInsecure Direct Object Reference / missing object-level authorization in the Akia keyless entry cloud service. The unlock action is relying on a client-supplied room/door identifier that is not properly authorized server-side against the authenticated guest\u0027s booking. An authenticated guest could unlock rooms other than their own, resulting in unauthorized physical access to guest rooms at an affected property.\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv\u003eAs of 19th September 2026 the service is no more vulnerable to this attack (feedback received by the reporter).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv\u003eThe attack is remote but the effect is local to an affected property.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/div\u003e\u003cbr\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "Insecure Direct Object Reference / missing object-level authorization in the Akia keyless entry cloud service. The unlock action is relying on a client-supplied room/door identifier that is not properly authorized server-side against the authenticated guest\u0027s booking. An authenticated guest could unlock rooms other than their own, resulting in unauthorized physical access to guest rooms at an affected property.\n\n\n\n\nAs of 19th September 2026 the service is no more vulnerable to this attack (feedback received by the reporter).\u00a0\n\n\n\n\nThe attack is remote but the effect is local to an affected property."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-1",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-1 Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 8.4,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "userInteraction": "ACTIVE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-862",
              "description": "CWE-862 Missing Authorization",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-639",
              "description": "CWE-639 Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "orgId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "product"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.akia.com/platform/keyless-entry"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "tags": [
        "exclusively-hosted-service"
      ],
      "title": "Broken authorization in Akia keyless entry lets an authenticated guest unlock other rooms",
      "x_gcve": [
        {
          "recordType": "advisory",
          "vulnId": "gcve-1-2026-20108"
        }
      ],
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-97898",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-25T09:44:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-25T10:07:22.362Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T10:07:22.429982Z",
    "requesterUserId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
    "serial": 1,
    "state": "PUBLISHED",
    "vulnId": "GCVE-1-2026-20108"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

GCVE-1-2026-20190 (CVE-2026-97863)

Vulnerability from gna-1 – Published: 2026-09-25 08:02 – Updated: 2026-09-25 09:49
VLAI
Title
misp-modules: Shell Command Injection in MISP cisco_firesight_manager_ACL_rule_export Module via Unescaped Attribute Values
Summary
The cisco_firesight_manager_ACL_rule_export module in misp-modules generates a shell script (.sh) that authenticates to and calls the Cisco fireSIGHT Manager API. The module interpolates configuration values (IP address, login, password, domain ID, policy ID) and MISP attribute values (destination IPs, URLs, event info comments) directly into single-quoted shell string assignments without any escaping or sanitization. Because the values are placed inside single-quoted shell strings, any value containing a single-quote character (e.g., a crafted ip-dst or url attribute value submitted to MISP) breaks out of the quoting context, allowing an attacker to inject arbitrary shell commands into the exported script. A security analyst who subsequently executes the generated .sh file unmodified would run the injected commands with their own privileges, potentially exposing fireSIGHT Manager credentials, modifying ACL rules, or compromising the analyst workstation. Additionally, the module contained a secondary defect where the variable 'config' was only assigned inside a conditional block but referenced unconditionally afterward, causing a NameError (denial of service) when the request payload lacked a 'config' key. The vulnerability requires the attacker to have the ability to submit MISP events or attributes containing a single-quote character and the victim to execute the exported script. No authentication bypass is required beyond standard MISP event-submission privileges.
CWE
  • CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ("Command Injection")
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
misp misp-modules Affected: 0 , ≤ 3.0.10 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
GCVE extensions
AI involvement GCVE-BCP-05-X-01
Whole record AI-generated Not human-reviewed GNA-1

Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.

ai-computer-assisted:llm-generatedai-computer-assisted:classification
Model Source Identifier
qwen3.8:27b ollama qwen3.8:27b
Patch provenance GCVE-BCP-05-X-02
Generator
patch2vuln.py on 2026-09-25 07:48
Model
qwen3.8:27b
Input
https://github.com/elhoim/misp-modules/commit/625b54908efbd6acc8343aa3370d401dd370e748.patch 9c34349775d0…
Confidence
high
Commit Subject Patch SHA-256
625b54908efb fix: [cisco_firesight_manager_ACL_rule_export] shell-escape 9c34349775d0…
Fix summary

All user-controlled and configuration values interpolated into the generated shell script are now passed through Python's shlex.quote() function, which produces a safely quoted string that cannot be broken out of by embedded shell metacharacters. For the JSON access-rule block that embeds multiple attribute values within a single shell assignment, the JSON content is first assembled as plain text and then the entire assembled string is shlex-quoted once, preventing stray quote characters from corrupting the outer quoting. The 'config' variable is now initialized to an empty dictionary before the conditional assignment, eliminating the NameError.

Patch summary

Added 'import shlex' at the top of the module. Replaced direct .format() interpolation of config values (fmc_ip_addr, fmc_login, fmc_pass, domain_id, acpolicy_id) with shlex.quote()-wrapped values. Refactored the BLOCK_JSON_TMPL to separate the JSON content template (BLOCK_JSON_CONTENT_TMPL) from the shell assignment template; the JSON content is formatted first with raw attribute values, then the resulting string is passed through shlex.quote() before being substituted into the shell assignment. Initialized 'config = {}' before the 'if "config" in request:' block to prevent NameError.

CVSS rationale

AV:N: The attacker submits crafted MISP attribute values over the network to a MISP instance. AC:L: Injecting a single-quote character into an attribute value is trivial and requires no race conditions or special timing. AT:N: No special data manipulation or prior access to the target system is needed beyond submitting an event. PR:L: The attacker needs only basic MISP user privileges to create or modify events/attributes. UI:A: The victim analyst must actively execute the generated .sh file for the injected commands to run. VC:N, VI:N, VA:N: The MISP instance itself is not directly compromised; the impact is on the downstream system where the script executes. SC:H: The injected commands can exfiltrate fireSIGHT Manager credentials and analyst system data. SI:H: Arbitrary command execution allows modification of ACL rules, system files, or other integrity-critical resources. SA:H: Injected commands can disrupt or destroy the analyst workstation or fireSIGHT Manager availability.

Weakness rationale
  • CWE-78 The module constructs a shell script by interpolating untrusted values (MISP attribute values, configuration fields) into single-quoted shell strings without escaping. A single-quote character in any interpolated value breaks the quoting and allows arbitrary shell command injection. This is a textbook command injection via insufficient output encoding in a generated shell script.
Attack pattern rationale
  • CAPEC-88 The attack pattern involves an attacker supplying input containing shell metacharacters (specifically a single quote) that is incorporated into a shell command or script without proper sanitization, resulting in execution of attacker-controlled commands. The patch confirms the vulnerable pattern: values are interpolated into single-quoted shell assignments, and the fix is to apply shlex.quote() to neutralize shell metacharacters. This is the closest and most specific CAPEC mapping for the observed vulnerability.
Assumptions to verify
  • The CVSS UI metric is set to A (Active) because the victim analyst must deliberately execute the generated .sh file; CVSS v4.0 does not use the v3.x 'R' value.
  • PR is set to L assuming the attacker holds a basic MISP user role sufficient to create or modify events and attributes; the patch does not specify exact role requirements.
  • SC, SI, SA are rated H based on the potential for arbitrary command execution on the analyst workstation and the fireSIGHT Manager; actual impact depends on the analyst's local privileges and the fireSIGHT Manager's exposure.
  • The CAPEC-88 mapping is the closest available pattern; the vulnerability is specifically an output-encoding failure in generated shell script rather than direct command-line injection, but CAPEC-88 is the narrowest defensible match.
  • No specific affected or fixed version numbers are available from the patch metadata; the commit date (2026-08-31) is the only temporal anchor.
  • The secondary NameError bug (config variable) is a minor denial-of-service issue included in the same patch but is not the primary security concern.
Model comparison

Selected qwen3.8:27b by deterministic-consensus-v1
The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required.

Model Score Agreement Confidence Assumptions
qwen3.8:27b 5 9 high 6

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://github.com/MISP/misp-modules",
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "modules": [
            "cisco_firesight_manager_ACL_rule_export"
          ],
          "product": "misp-modules",
          "programFiles": [
            "misp_modules/modules/export_mod/cisco_firesight_manager_ACL_rule_export.py"
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/misp/misp-modules",
          "vendor": "misp",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "3.0.10",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "elhoim"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "Claude Opus 5"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe cisco_firesight_manager_ACL_rule_export module in misp-modules generates a shell script (.sh) that authenticates to and calls the Cisco fireSIGHT Manager API. The module interpolates configuration values (IP address, login, password, domain ID, policy ID) and MISP attribute values (destination IPs, URLs, event info comments) directly into single-quoted shell string assignments without any escaping or sanitization. Because the values are placed inside single-quoted shell strings, any value containing a single-quote character (e.g., a crafted ip-dst or url attribute value submitted to MISP) breaks out of the quoting context, allowing an attacker to inject arbitrary shell commands into the exported script. A security analyst who subsequently executes the generated .sh file unmodified would run the injected commands with their own privileges, potentially exposing fireSIGHT Manager credentials, modifying ACL rules, or compromising the analyst workstation. Additionally, the module contained a secondary defect where the variable \u0027config\u0027 was only assigned inside a conditional block but referenced unconditionally afterward, causing a NameError (denial of service) when the request payload lacked a \u0027config\u0027 key. The vulnerability requires the attacker to have the ability to submit MISP events or attributes containing a single-quote character and the victim to execute the exported script. No authentication bypass is required beyond standard MISP event-submission privileges.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The cisco_firesight_manager_ACL_rule_export module in misp-modules generates a shell script (.sh) that authenticates to and calls the Cisco fireSIGHT Manager API. The module interpolates configuration values (IP address, login, password, domain ID, policy ID) and MISP attribute values (destination IPs, URLs, event info comments) directly into single-quoted shell string assignments without any escaping or sanitization. Because the values are placed inside single-quoted shell strings, any value containing a single-quote character (e.g., a crafted ip-dst or url attribute value submitted to MISP) breaks out of the quoting context, allowing an attacker to inject arbitrary shell commands into the exported script. A security analyst who subsequently executes the generated .sh file unmodified would run the injected commands with their own privileges, potentially exposing fireSIGHT Manager credentials, modifying ACL rules, or compromising the analyst workstation. Additionally, the module contained a secondary defect where the variable \u0027config\u0027 was only assigned inside a conditional block but referenced unconditionally afterward, causing a NameError (denial of service) when the request payload lacked a \u0027config\u0027 key. The vulnerability requires the attacker to have the ability to submit MISP events or attributes containing a single-quote character and the victim to execute the exported script. No authentication bypass is required beyond standard MISP event-submission privileges."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-88",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-88 Shell Command Injection"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 6.3,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "userInteraction": "ACTIVE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-78",
              "description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\"Command Injection\")",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "orgId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "Security patch",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/misp/misp-modules/commit/625b54908efbd6acc8343aa3370d401dd370e748"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eAll user-controlled and configuration values interpolated into the generated shell script are now passed through Python\u0027s shlex.quote() function, which produces a safely quoted string that cannot be broken out of by embedded shell metacharacters. For the JSON access-rule block that embeds multiple attribute values within a single shell assignment, the JSON content is first assembled as plain text and then the entire assembled string is shlex-quoted once, preventing stray quote characters from corrupting the outer quoting. The \u0027config\u0027 variable is now initialized to an empty dictionary before the conditional assignment, eliminating the NameError.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "All user-controlled and configuration values interpolated into the generated shell script are now passed through Python\u0027s shlex.quote() function, which produces a safely quoted string that cannot be broken out of by embedded shell metacharacters. For the JSON access-rule block that embeds multiple attribute values within a single shell assignment, the JSON content is first assembled as plain text and then the entire assembled string is shlex-quoted once, preventing stray quote characters from corrupting the outer quoting. The \u0027config\u0027 variable is now initialized to an empty dictionary before the conditional assignment, eliminating the NameError."
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "misp-modules: Shell Command Injection in MISP cisco_firesight_manager_ACL_rule_export Module via Unescaped Attribute Values",
      "x_gcve": [
        {
          "extensions": {
            "bcp-05-x-01": {
              "ai_annotations": [
                {
                  "ai_level": "generated",
                  "description": "Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.",
                  "gna_source": 1,
                  "models": [
                    {
                      "gna_source": 1,
                      "identifier": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "name": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "source": "ollama"
                    }
                  ],
                  "review_status": "none",
                  "scope": "record",
                  "tags": [
                    "ai-computer-assisted:llm-generated",
                    "ai-computer-assisted:classification"
                  ]
                }
              ]
            },
            "bcp-05-x-02": {
              "x_patch2vuln": {
                "assumptions": [
                  "The CVSS UI metric is set to A (Active) because the victim analyst must deliberately execute the generated .sh file; CVSS v4.0 does not use the v3.x \u0027R\u0027 value.",
                  "PR is set to L assuming the attacker holds a basic MISP user role sufficient to create or modify events and attributes; the patch does not specify exact role requirements.",
                  "SC, SI, SA are rated H based on the potential for arbitrary command execution on the analyst workstation and the fireSIGHT Manager; actual impact depends on the analyst\u0027s local privileges and the fireSIGHT Manager\u0027s exposure.",
                  "The CAPEC-88 mapping is the closest available pattern; the vulnerability is specifically an output-encoding failure in generated shell script rather than direct command-line injection, but CAPEC-88 is the narrowest defensible match.",
                  "No specific affected or fixed version numbers are available from the patch metadata; the commit date (2026-08-31) is the only temporal anchor.",
                  "The secondary NameError bug (config variable) is a minor denial-of-service issue included in the same patch but is not the primary security concern."
                ],
                "capecRationale": [
                  {
                    "capecId": "CAPEC-88",
                    "rationale": "The attack pattern involves an attacker supplying input containing shell metacharacters (specifically a single quote) that is incorporated into a shell command or script without proper sanitization, resulting in execution of attacker-controlled commands. The patch confirms the vulnerable pattern: values are interpolated into single-quoted shell assignments, and the fix is to apply shlex.quote() to neutralize shell metacharacters. This is the closest and most specific CAPEC mapping for the observed vulnerability."
                  }
                ],
                "commit": "625b54908efbd6acc8343aa3370d401dd370e748",
                "confidence": "high",
                "credits": [
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "elhoim"
                  },
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "Claude Opus 5"
                  }
                ],
                "cvssRationale": "AV:N: The attacker submits crafted MISP attribute values over the network to a MISP instance. AC:L: Injecting a single-quote character into an attribute value is trivial and requires no race conditions or special timing. AT:N: No special data manipulation or prior access to the target system is needed beyond submitting an event. PR:L: The attacker needs only basic MISP user privileges to create or modify events/attributes. UI:A: The victim analyst must actively execute the generated .sh file for the injected commands to run. VC:N, VI:N, VA:N: The MISP instance itself is not directly compromised; the impact is on the downstream system where the script executes. SC:H: The injected commands can exfiltrate fireSIGHT Manager credentials and analyst system data. SI:H: Arbitrary command execution allows modification of ACL rules, system files, or other integrity-critical resources. SA:H: Injected commands can disrupt or destroy the analyst workstation or fireSIGHT Manager availability.",
                "draft": false,
                "fixSummary": "All user-controlled and configuration values interpolated into the generated shell script are now passed through Python\u0027s shlex.quote() function, which produces a safely quoted string that cannot be broken out of by embedded shell metacharacters. For the JSON access-rule block that embeds multiple attribute values within a single shell assignment, the JSON content is first assembled as plain text and then the entire assembled string is shlex-quoted once, preventing stray quote characters from corrupting the outer quoting. The \u0027config\u0027 variable is now initialized to an empty dictionary before the conditional assignment, eliminating the NameError.",
                "generatedAt": "2026-09-25T07:48:15.163752Z",
                "generator": "patch2vuln.py",
                "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                "modelComparison": {
                  "rankings": [
                    {
                      "agreementScore": 9,
                      "assumptionCount": 6,
                      "confidence": "high",
                      "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "score": 5
                    }
                  ],
                  "selectedModel": "qwen3.8:27b",
                  "selectionMethod": "deterministic-consensus-v1",
                  "selectionNotice": "The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required."
                },
                "patchSha256": "9c34349775d058188a7b9a4d44ff873fd285faf0ddda00b46aadbaa72f3b4e6e",
                "patchSummary": "Added \u0027import shlex\u0027 at the top of the module. Replaced direct .format() interpolation of config values (fmc_ip_addr, fmc_login, fmc_pass, domain_id, acpolicy_id) with shlex.quote()-wrapped values. Refactored the BLOCK_JSON_TMPL to separate the JSON content template (BLOCK_JSON_CONTENT_TMPL) from the shell assignment template; the JSON content is formatted first with raw attribute values, then the resulting string is passed through shlex.quote() before being substituted into the shell assignment. Initialized \u0027config = {}\u0027 before the \u0027if \"config\" in request:\u0027 block to prevent NameError.",
                "patchTruncated": false,
                "patches": [
                  {
                    "commit": "625b54908efbd6acc8343aa3370d401dd370e748",
                    "patchSha256": "9c34349775d058188a7b9a4d44ff873fd285faf0ddda00b46aadbaa72f3b4e6e",
                    "source": "https://github.com/elhoim/misp-modules/commit/625b54908efbd6acc8343aa3370d401dd370e748.patch",
                    "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/elhoim/misp-modules/commit/625b54908efbd6acc8343aa3370d401dd370e748.patch",
                    "subject": "fix: [cisco_firesight_manager_ACL_rule_export] shell-escape"
                  }
                ],
                "source": "https://github.com/elhoim/misp-modules/commit/625b54908efbd6acc8343aa3370d401dd370e748.patch",
                "subject": "fix: [cisco_firesight_manager_ACL_rule_export] shell-escape",
                "weaknessRationale": [
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-78",
                    "rationale": "The module constructs a shell script by interpolating untrusted values (MISP attribute values, configuration fields) into single-quoted shell strings without escaping. A single-quote character in any interpolated value breaks the quoting and allows arbitrary shell command injection. This is a textbook command injection via insufficient output encoding in a generated shell script."
                  }
                ]
              }
            }
          },
          "recordType": "advisory",
          "vulnId": "gcve-1-2026-20190"
        }
      ],
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-97863",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-25T08:02:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-25T08:02:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T09:49:45.859656Z",
    "requesterUserId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
    "serial": 1,
    "state": "PUBLISHED",
    "vulnId": "gcve-1-2026-20190"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

GCVE-1-2026-20263 (CVE-2026-95806)

Vulnerability from gna-1 – Published: 2026-09-22 15:08 – Updated: 2026-09-22 15:09
VLAI
Title
MISP: PHP phar stream wrapper enables deserialization and code execution via caller-influenced filesystem paths
Summary
MISP ships with PHP's phar stream wrapper registered in both its web entry point and its console entry point.  The phar stream wrapper causes PHP to treat a phar archive as a directory, which has two security consequences:    - any filesystem operation on a caller-influenced path that resolves to a phar archive triggers an implicit unserialize() call, creating a deserialization sink;  - a relocated application root can reach executable code inside an uploaded phar file, enabling arbitrary code execution as the web user. No component of MISP, the vendored CakePHP framework, or any runtime-loaded library reads or constructs phar archives. The wrapper therefore serves no legitimate purpose in the MISP runtime and exists solely as an available primitive for an attacker who can influence a filesystem path argument.
CWE
  • CWE-502 - Deserialization of Untrusted Data
  • CWE-74 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
MISP MISP Affected: 0 , < 2.5.47 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
GCVE extensions
AI involvement GCVE-BCP-05-X-01
Whole record AI-generated Human-reviewed GNA-1

Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.

ai-computer-assisted:llm-generatedai-computer-assisted:classification
Model Source Identifier
qwen3.8:27b ollama qwen3.8:27b
Patch provenance GCVE-BCP-05-X-02
Generator
patch2vuln.py on 2026-09-22 15:01
Model
qwen3.8:27b
Input
https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/08fa755b6.patch f4fc3223e642…
Confidence
medium
Commit Subject Patch SHA-256
08fa755b6363 chg: [internal] Unregister the phar stream wrapper in the f4fc3223e642…
Fix summary

The phar stream wrapper is unregistered via stream_wrapper_unregister('phar') at the top of both the web and console entry points, before any framework bootstrap or application code executes. Because no MISP component, CakePHP, or runtime library requires the phar wrapper, removing it eliminates the implicit unserialize() sink and the directory-like phar archive behavior without functional impact. This closes the deserialization and code-execution primitive application-wide, independent of whether individual callers validate their path arguments.

Patch summary

Two files are modified. In app/Console/cake.php and app/webroot/index.php, a 14-line block is inserted immediately after the file header comment and before any existing logic. The block checks whether 'phar' is present in stream_get_wrappers() and, if so, calls stream_wrapper_unregister('phar'). A docblock comment explains the security rationale: the wrapper turns filesystem calls on caller-influenced paths into unserialize() sinks and allows a relocated application root to reach code inside an uploaded file. No other code is changed; the total diff is 28 insertions across the two files.

CVSS rationale

AV:N: The vulnerability is reachable through the web entry point (app/webroot/index.php), making it network-accessible. AC:H: Exploitation requires crafting a valid phar archive with a malicious serialized payload and identifying a code path where a caller-influenced filesystem argument resolves to that archive; the commit describes this as an 'argument-injection exploit,' implying non-trivial path manipulation. AT:N: No specific attack-target conditions are indicated. PR:L: MISP is a threat-intelligence platform that typically requires authenticated access; the commit references 'the web user' context, suggesting the attacker operates within the application's privilege boundary. UI:N: No user interaction is required. VC/VI/VA:H: Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the web user, compromising confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the MISP instance. SC/SI/SA:N: No evidence of impact on subsequent or other components beyond the MISP instance itself.

Weakness rationale
  • CWE-502 The phar stream wrapper causes PHP to invoke unserialize() implicitly whenever a filesystem operation resolves to a phar archive. An attacker who can influence the path argument (e.g., via argument injection) can supply a crafted phar file, triggering deserialization of attacker-controlled data and leading to code execution. This is the primary and most specific weakness.
  • CWE-74 The phar stream wrapper is a special element of the PHP runtime that was not neutralized (unregistered) in the MISP entry points. Its presence allows downstream filesystem calls to be subverted into deserialization sinks. This is a secondary, broader characterization of the same issue.
Attack pattern rationale
  • CAPEC-570 The core attack mechanism is that the phar stream wrapper turns a filesystem call on a caller-influenced path into an implicit unserialize() invocation. An attacker crafts a phar archive containing a malicious serialized payload and causes the application to perform a filesystem operation on that path, triggering deserialization and code execution. CAPEC-570 is the closest match. Uncertainty: the exact injection vector (which specific MISP endpoint or console command accepts the path) is not detailed in the patch, but the deserialization sink is explicitly described in the commit message.
  • CAPEC-100 The phar stream wrapper is a trusted, built-in PHP component that the attacker leverages in the MISP runtime environment where it serves no legitimate purpose. The attacker does not need to exploit a flaw in the wrapper itself; rather, its mere presence in the runtime provides the primitive. This is a secondary mapping; CAPEC-570 is preferred as the primary because it more precisely describes the deserialization mechanism.
Assumptions to verify
  • The affected version range is inferred from the tag_version_boundary (v2.5.47, 42 commits after fix), suggesting the fix is included in v2.5.47 and earlier versions are affected. The explicit context lists affected_version and fixed_version as null, so the exact boundary is uncertain.
  • PR:L is assumed because MISP is an authenticated threat-intelligence platform; however, the patch does not explicitly state whether the vulnerable code path requires authentication. If the argument-injection vector is reachable unauthenticated, PR should be N.
  • AC:H is assumed because crafting a valid phar archive and identifying the correct code path for the filesystem call is non-trivial; the commit describes it as an 'argument-injection exploit,' implying specific conditions must be met.
  • The CAPEC-570 mapping is based on the commit message's explicit description of the phar wrapper as an 'unserialize() sink'; the exact MISP endpoint or console command that accepts the attacker-influenced path is not identified in the patch.
  • The commit message references 'the job-argument guard reverted,' implying a prior guard existed and was removed, making the phar wrapper the remaining defense. The exact prior guard is not described in this patch.
  • The Co-Authored-By line lists 'Claude Opus 5 (1M context)' as a co-author; this is recorded in the metadata as a remediation developer but is an AI assistant, not a human contributor. It is excluded from credits to avoid attributing a CVE credit to a non-human entity.
Model comparison

Selected qwen3.8:27b by deterministic-consensus-v1
The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required.

Model Score Agreement Confidence Assumptions
qwen3.8:27b 4 9 medium 6

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "modules": [
            "app/Console/cake.php",
            "app/webroot/index.php"
          ],
          "product": "MISP",
          "programFiles": [
            "app/Console/cake.php",
            "app/webroot/index.php"
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP",
          "vendor": "MISP",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "2.5.47",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "iglocska"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "Claude Opus 5 (1M context)"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eMISP ships with PHP\u0027s phar stream wrapper registered in both its web entry point and its console entry point.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe phar stream wrapper causes PHP to treat a phar archive as a directory, which has two security consequences:\u0026nbsp;\u2003\u003c/p\u003e\u2003-\u0026nbsp;any filesystem operation on a caller-influenced path that resolves to a phar archive triggers an implicit unserialize() call, creating a deserialization sink;\u003cbr\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u2003-\u0026nbsp;a relocated application root can reach executable code inside an uploaded phar file, enabling arbitrary code execution as the web user.\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cp\u003eNo component of MISP, the vendored CakePHP framework, or any runtime-loaded library reads or constructs phar archives. The wrapper therefore serves no legitimate purpose in the MISP runtime and exists solely as an available primitive for an attacker who can influence a filesystem path argument.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "MISP ships with PHP\u0027s phar stream wrapper registered in both its web entry point and its console entry point.\u00a0\n\nThe phar stream wrapper causes PHP to treat a phar archive as a directory, which has two security consequences:\u00a0\u2003\n\n\u2003-\u00a0any filesystem operation on a caller-influenced path that resolves to a phar archive triggers an implicit unserialize() call, creating a deserialization sink;\n\u2003-\u00a0a relocated application root can reach executable code inside an uploaded phar file, enabling arbitrary code execution as the web user.\n\n\n\n\nNo component of MISP, the vendored CakePHP framework, or any runtime-loaded library reads or constructs phar archives. The wrapper therefore serves no legitimate purpose in the MISP runtime and exists solely as an available primitive for an attacker who can influence a filesystem path argument."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-570",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-570 Deserialization of Untrusted Data"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-100",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-100 Leveraging Trusted Components in an Untrusted Environment"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 7.7,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-502",
              "description": "CWE-502 Deserialization of Untrusted Data",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-74",
              "description": "CWE-74 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "orgId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "Security patch",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/08fa755b6"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe phar stream wrapper is unregistered via stream_wrapper_unregister(\u0027phar\u0027) at the top of both the web and console entry points, before any framework bootstrap or application code executes. Because no MISP component, CakePHP, or runtime library requires the phar wrapper, removing it eliminates the implicit unserialize() sink and the directory-like phar archive behavior without functional impact. This closes the deserialization and code-execution primitive application-wide, independent of whether individual callers validate their path arguments.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The phar stream wrapper is unregistered via stream_wrapper_unregister(\u0027phar\u0027) at the top of both the web and console entry points, before any framework bootstrap or application code executes. Because no MISP component, CakePHP, or runtime library requires the phar wrapper, removing it eliminates the implicit unserialize() sink and the directory-like phar archive behavior without functional impact. This closes the deserialization and code-execution primitive application-wide, independent of whether individual callers validate their path arguments."
        }
      ],
      "title": "MISP: PHP phar stream wrapper enables deserialization and code execution via caller-influenced filesystem paths",
      "x_gcve": [
        {
          "extensions": {
            "bcp-05-x-01": {
              "ai_annotations": [
                {
                  "ai_level": "generated",
                  "description": "Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.",
                  "gna_source": 1,
                  "models": [
                    {
                      "gna_source": 1,
                      "identifier": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "name": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "source": "ollama"
                    }
                  ],
                  "review_status": "full",
                  "scope": "record",
                  "tags": [
                    "ai-computer-assisted:llm-generated",
                    "ai-computer-assisted:classification"
                  ]
                }
              ]
            },
            "bcp-05-x-02": {
              "x_patch2vuln": {
                "assumptions": [
                  "The affected version range is inferred from the tag_version_boundary (v2.5.47, 42 commits after fix), suggesting the fix is included in v2.5.47 and earlier versions are affected. The explicit context lists affected_version and fixed_version as null, so the exact boundary is uncertain.",
                  "PR:L is assumed because MISP is an authenticated threat-intelligence platform; however, the patch does not explicitly state whether the vulnerable code path requires authentication. If the argument-injection vector is reachable unauthenticated, PR should be N.",
                  "AC:H is assumed because crafting a valid phar archive and identifying the correct code path for the filesystem call is non-trivial; the commit describes it as an \u0027argument-injection exploit,\u0027 implying specific conditions must be met.",
                  "The CAPEC-570 mapping is based on the commit message\u0027s explicit description of the phar wrapper as an \u0027unserialize() sink\u0027; the exact MISP endpoint or console command that accepts the attacker-influenced path is not identified in the patch.",
                  "The commit message references \u0027the job-argument guard reverted,\u0027 implying a prior guard existed and was removed, making the phar wrapper the remaining defense. The exact prior guard is not described in this patch.",
                  "The Co-Authored-By line lists \u0027Claude Opus 5 (1M context)\u0027 as a co-author; this is recorded in the metadata as a remediation developer but is an AI assistant, not a human contributor. It is excluded from credits to avoid attributing a CVE credit to a non-human entity."
                ],
                "capecRationale": [
                  {
                    "capecId": "CAPEC-570",
                    "rationale": "The core attack mechanism is that the phar stream wrapper turns a filesystem call on a caller-influenced path into an implicit unserialize() invocation. An attacker crafts a phar archive containing a malicious serialized payload and causes the application to perform a filesystem operation on that path, triggering deserialization and code execution. CAPEC-570 is the closest match. Uncertainty: the exact injection vector (which specific MISP endpoint or console command accepts the path) is not detailed in the patch, but the deserialization sink is explicitly described in the commit message."
                  },
                  {
                    "capecId": "CAPEC-100",
                    "rationale": "The phar stream wrapper is a trusted, built-in PHP component that the attacker leverages in the MISP runtime environment where it serves no legitimate purpose. The attacker does not need to exploit a flaw in the wrapper itself; rather, its mere presence in the runtime provides the primitive. This is a secondary mapping; CAPEC-570 is preferred as the primary because it more precisely describes the deserialization mechanism."
                  }
                ],
                "commit": "08fa755b6363ec0b7194d97ea36800ae8eb8f919",
                "confidence": "medium",
                "credits": [
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "iglocska"
                  },
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "Claude Opus 5 (1M context)"
                  }
                ],
                "cvssRationale": "AV:N: The vulnerability is reachable through the web entry point (app/webroot/index.php), making it network-accessible. AC:H: Exploitation requires crafting a valid phar archive with a malicious serialized payload and identifying a code path where a caller-influenced filesystem argument resolves to that archive; the commit describes this as an \u0027argument-injection exploit,\u0027 implying non-trivial path manipulation. AT:N: No specific attack-target conditions are indicated. PR:L: MISP is a threat-intelligence platform that typically requires authenticated access; the commit references \u0027the web user\u0027 context, suggesting the attacker operates within the application\u0027s privilege boundary. UI:N: No user interaction is required. VC/VI/VA:H: Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the web user, compromising confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the MISP instance. SC/SI/SA:N: No evidence of impact on subsequent or other components beyond the MISP instance itself.",
                "fixSummary": "The phar stream wrapper is unregistered via stream_wrapper_unregister(\u0027phar\u0027) at the top of both the web and console entry points, before any framework bootstrap or application code executes. Because no MISP component, CakePHP, or runtime library requires the phar wrapper, removing it eliminates the implicit unserialize() sink and the directory-like phar archive behavior without functional impact. This closes the deserialization and code-execution primitive application-wide, independent of whether individual callers validate their path arguments.",
                "generatedAt": "2026-09-22T15:01:21.211955Z",
                "generator": "patch2vuln.py",
                "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                "modelComparison": {
                  "rankings": [
                    {
                      "agreementScore": 9,
                      "assumptionCount": 6,
                      "confidence": "medium",
                      "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "score": 4
                    }
                  ],
                  "selectedModel": "qwen3.8:27b",
                  "selectionMethod": "deterministic-consensus-v1",
                  "selectionNotice": "The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required."
                },
                "patchSha256": "f4fc3223e6421557e1c03c2182cfaa2b0c17a1a20870c71214708034faf1350f",
                "patchSummary": "Two files are modified. In app/Console/cake.php and app/webroot/index.php, a 14-line block is inserted immediately after the file header comment and before any existing logic. The block checks whether \u0027phar\u0027 is present in stream_get_wrappers() and, if so, calls stream_wrapper_unregister(\u0027phar\u0027). A docblock comment explains the security rationale: the wrapper turns filesystem calls on caller-influenced paths into unserialize() sinks and allows a relocated application root to reach code inside an uploaded file. No other code is changed; the total diff is 28 insertions across the two files.",
                "patchTruncated": false,
                "patches": [
                  {
                    "commit": "08fa755b6363ec0b7194d97ea36800ae8eb8f919",
                    "patchSha256": "f4fc3223e6421557e1c03c2182cfaa2b0c17a1a20870c71214708034faf1350f",
                    "source": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/08fa755b6.patch",
                    "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/08fa755b6.patch",
                    "subject": "chg: [internal] Unregister the phar stream wrapper in the"
                  }
                ],
                "source": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/08fa755b6.patch",
                "subject": "chg: [internal] Unregister the phar stream wrapper in the",
                "tagVersionBoundary": {
                  "commits_after_fix": 42,
                  "repository": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP",
                  "tag": "v2.5.47",
                  "version": "2.5.47",
                  "version_type": "semver"
                },
                "weaknessRationale": [
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-502",
                    "rationale": "The phar stream wrapper causes PHP to invoke unserialize() implicitly whenever a filesystem operation resolves to a phar archive. An attacker who can influence the path argument (e.g., via argument injection) can supply a crafted phar file, triggering deserialization of attacker-controlled data and leading to code execution. This is the primary and most specific weakness."
                  },
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-74",
                    "rationale": "The phar stream wrapper is a special element of the PHP runtime that was not neutralized (unregistered) in the MISP entry points. Its presence allows downstream filesystem calls to be subverted into deserialization sinks. This is a secondary, broader characterization of the same issue."
                  }
                ]
              }
            }
          },
          "recordType": "advisory",
          "vulnId": "GCVE-1-2026-20263"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-95806",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-22T15:08:51.542843Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-22T15:09:04.977Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T15:09:05.089365Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED",
    "vulnId": "GCVE-1-2026-20263"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

GCVE-1-2026-20240 (CVE-2026-95805)

Vulnerability from gna-1 – Published: 2026-09-22 14:59 – Updated: 2026-09-22 14:59
VLAI
Title
MISP ACLComponent: Typo in previewEventAttributes ACL key bypasses intended access restriction
Summary
A typo in the MISP ACLComponent access control configuration caused the ACL rule for the previewEventAttributes action to reference the permission string 'theming_enabled*' (with a trailing asterisk) instead of the correct 'theming_enabled'. In the MISP ACL system, the array values define which role or permission grants access to a given controller action. The adjacent entry previewEventObjects correctly uses ['theming_enabled'], confirming the intended restriction. The malformed key 'theming_enabled*' does not match any valid permission identifier, causing the access control check for previewEventAttributes to malfunction. Depending on the ACL evaluation logic, this could result in either unauthorized users gaining access to the previewEventAttributes endpoint (authorization bypass) or legitimate users being denied access (availability impact).  The previewEventAttributes endpoint exposes event attribute data within MISP so an authorization bypass could expose sensitive indicator and attribute data to users who should not have access.
CWE
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
MISP MISP Affected: 0 , < 2.5.47 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
GCVE extensions
AI involvement GCVE-BCP-05-X-01
Whole record AI-generated Human-reviewed GNA-1

Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.

ai-computer-assisted:llm-generatedai-computer-assisted:classification
Model Source Identifier
qwen3.8:27b ollama qwen3.8:27b
Patch provenance GCVE-BCP-05-X-02
Generator
patch2vuln.py on 2026-09-22 14:55
Model
qwen3.8:27b
Input
https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/5ac8d1e4d.patch c102952ebfab…
Confidence
medium
Commit Subject Patch SHA-256
5ac8d1e4dea7 fix: [ACL] typo in previewEventAttributes key c102952ebfab…
Fix summary

The fix corrects the ACL permission key for the previewEventAttributes action from the malformed string 'theming_enabled*' to the correct 'theming_enabled', restoring the intended access control restriction so that only users holding the theming_enabled permission can invoke the endpoint, consistent with the adjacent previewEventObjects entry.

Patch summary

In app/Controller/Component/ACLComponent.php (line 473), the ACL array value for the 'previewEventAttributes' key was changed from ['theming_enabled*'] to ['theming_enabled'], removing the erroneous trailing asterisk that made the permission string non-matching. One line changed, one insertion, one deletion.

CVSS rationale

AV:N: MISP is a network-accessible web application. AC:L: The vulnerability is a static typo in configuration; no race or complex condition is needed. AT:N: No attack target manipulation required. PR:L: The attacker must be an authenticated MISP user to reach the endpoint. UI:N: No victim interaction needed. VC:L: If the ACL bypass is confirmed, an unauthorized user could view event attribute data (limited confidentiality impact). VI:N and VA:N: No integrity or availability impact is evident from the patch. SC/SI/SA:N: No secondary system impact. The overall severity is Low, reflecting a single-endpoint access control misconfiguration with limited data exposure.

Weakness rationale
  • CWE-285 The ACL rule for previewEventAttributes contained a typo ('theming_enabled*') that prevented the authorization check from matching the intended permission, causing the access control mechanism to not enforce the restriction as designed. This is a direct failure of the authorization logic due to a misconfigured rule.
Attack pattern rationale
  • CAPEC-126 The closest plausible attack pattern is Forced Browsing, where an attacker accesses a resource (the previewEventAttributes endpoint) that should be restricted by the ACL. The typo in the ACL key may cause the authorization check to fail to deny access, effectively allowing a user without the theming_enabled permission to reach the endpoint. Uncertainty: the exact ACL evaluation behavior on a non-matching rule (default-deny vs. default-allow) is not visible in the patch, so it is also possible the typo causes a denial rather than a bypass. CAPEC-126 is selected as the best available match for an access-control bypass via misconfiguration.
Assumptions to verify
  • The exact ACL evaluation behavior when a permission string does not match any valid role (default-deny vs. default-allow) is not visible in the patch; the CVSS assumes the more security-relevant interpretation (authorization bypass) but a denial-of-service interpretation is also possible.
  • The affected version range is inferred from the tag boundary v2.5.47 (227 commits after the fix); the exact first affected version is not stated in the patch.
  • The CAPEC-126 mapping is the closest available pattern; the actual attack is a configuration typo rather than an active browsing technique, so the mapping is approximate.
  • The security impact is assumed to be limited to the previewEventAttributes endpoint; no evidence in the patch suggests other endpoints or data stores are affected.
  • The CVSS assumes the endpoint exposes event attribute data viewable by unauthorized users; the actual data sensitivity depends on MISP deployment configuration.
Model comparison

Selected qwen3.8:27b by deterministic-consensus-v1
The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required.

Model Score Agreement Confidence Assumptions
qwen3.8:27b 5 9 medium 5

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "modules": [
            "ACLComponent"
          ],
          "product": "MISP",
          "programFiles": [
            "app/Controller/Component/ACLComponent.php"
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP",
          "vendor": "MISP",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "2.5.47",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "Thomas Lacroix"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eA typo in the MISP ACLComponent access control configuration caused the ACL rule for the previewEventAttributes action to reference the permission string \u0027theming_enabled*\u0027 (with a trailing asterisk) instead of the correct \u0027theming_enabled\u0027. In the MISP ACL system, the array values define which role or permission grants access to a given controller action. The adjacent entry previewEventObjects correctly uses [\u0027theming_enabled\u0027], confirming the intended restriction. The malformed key \u0027theming_enabled*\u0027 does not match any valid permission identifier, causing the access control check for previewEventAttributes to malfunction. Depending on the ACL evaluation logic, this could result in either unauthorized users gaining access to the previewEventAttributes endpoint (authorization bypass) or legitimate users being denied access (availability impact).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe previewEventAttributes endpoint exposes event attribute data within MISP so an authorization bypass could expose sensitive indicator and attribute data to users who should not have access.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "A typo in the MISP ACLComponent access control configuration caused the ACL rule for the previewEventAttributes action to reference the permission string \u0027theming_enabled*\u0027 (with a trailing asterisk) instead of the correct \u0027theming_enabled\u0027. In the MISP ACL system, the array values define which role or permission grants access to a given controller action. The adjacent entry previewEventObjects correctly uses [\u0027theming_enabled\u0027], confirming the intended restriction. The malformed key \u0027theming_enabled*\u0027 does not match any valid permission identifier, causing the access control check for previewEventAttributes to malfunction. Depending on the ACL evaluation logic, this could result in either unauthorized users gaining access to the previewEventAttributes endpoint (authorization bypass) or legitimate users being denied access (availability impact).\u00a0\n\nThe previewEventAttributes endpoint exposes event attribute data within MISP so an authorization bypass could expose sensitive indicator and attribute data to users who should not have access."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-126",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-126 Forced Browsing"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 5.3,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-285",
              "description": "CWE-285 Improper Authorization",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "orgId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "Security patch",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/5ac8d1e4d"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe fix corrects the ACL permission key for the previewEventAttributes action from the malformed string \u0027theming_enabled*\u0027 to the correct \u0027theming_enabled\u0027, restoring the intended access control restriction so that only users holding the theming_enabled permission can invoke the endpoint, consistent with the adjacent previewEventObjects entry.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The fix corrects the ACL permission key for the previewEventAttributes action from the malformed string \u0027theming_enabled*\u0027 to the correct \u0027theming_enabled\u0027, restoring the intended access control restriction so that only users holding the theming_enabled permission can invoke the endpoint, consistent with the adjacent previewEventObjects entry."
        }
      ],
      "title": "MISP ACLComponent: Typo in previewEventAttributes ACL key bypasses intended access restriction",
      "x_gcve": [
        {
          "extensions": {
            "bcp-05-x-01": {
              "ai_annotations": [
                {
                  "ai_level": "generated",
                  "description": "Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.",
                  "gna_source": 1,
                  "models": [
                    {
                      "gna_source": 1,
                      "identifier": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "name": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "source": "ollama"
                    }
                  ],
                  "review_status": "full",
                  "scope": "record",
                  "tags": [
                    "ai-computer-assisted:llm-generated",
                    "ai-computer-assisted:classification"
                  ]
                }
              ]
            },
            "bcp-05-x-02": {
              "x_patch2vuln": {
                "assumptions": [
                  "The exact ACL evaluation behavior when a permission string does not match any valid role (default-deny vs. default-allow) is not visible in the patch; the CVSS assumes the more security-relevant interpretation (authorization bypass) but a denial-of-service interpretation is also possible.",
                  "The affected version range is inferred from the tag boundary v2.5.47 (227 commits after the fix); the exact first affected version is not stated in the patch.",
                  "The CAPEC-126 mapping is the closest available pattern; the actual attack is a configuration typo rather than an active browsing technique, so the mapping is approximate.",
                  "The security impact is assumed to be limited to the previewEventAttributes endpoint; no evidence in the patch suggests other endpoints or data stores are affected.",
                  "The CVSS assumes the endpoint exposes event attribute data viewable by unauthorized users; the actual data sensitivity depends on MISP deployment configuration."
                ],
                "capecRationale": [
                  {
                    "capecId": "CAPEC-126",
                    "rationale": "The closest plausible attack pattern is Forced Browsing, where an attacker accesses a resource (the previewEventAttributes endpoint) that should be restricted by the ACL. The typo in the ACL key may cause the authorization check to fail to deny access, effectively allowing a user without the theming_enabled permission to reach the endpoint. Uncertainty: the exact ACL evaluation behavior on a non-matching rule (default-deny vs. default-allow) is not visible in the patch, so it is also possible the typo causes a denial rather than a bypass. CAPEC-126 is selected as the best available match for an access-control bypass via misconfiguration."
                  }
                ],
                "commit": "5ac8d1e4dea72f71bec3789350b748f0ad21c42c",
                "confidence": "medium",
                "credits": [
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "Thomas Lacroix"
                  }
                ],
                "cvssRationale": "AV:N: MISP is a network-accessible web application. AC:L: The vulnerability is a static typo in configuration; no race or complex condition is needed. AT:N: No attack target manipulation required. PR:L: The attacker must be an authenticated MISP user to reach the endpoint. UI:N: No victim interaction needed. VC:L: If the ACL bypass is confirmed, an unauthorized user could view event attribute data (limited confidentiality impact). VI:N and VA:N: No integrity or availability impact is evident from the patch. SC/SI/SA:N: No secondary system impact. The overall severity is Low, reflecting a single-endpoint access control misconfiguration with limited data exposure.",
                "fixSummary": "The fix corrects the ACL permission key for the previewEventAttributes action from the malformed string \u0027theming_enabled*\u0027 to the correct \u0027theming_enabled\u0027, restoring the intended access control restriction so that only users holding the theming_enabled permission can invoke the endpoint, consistent with the adjacent previewEventObjects entry.",
                "generatedAt": "2026-09-22T14:55:18.958107Z",
                "generator": "patch2vuln.py",
                "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                "modelComparison": {
                  "rankings": [
                    {
                      "agreementScore": 9,
                      "assumptionCount": 5,
                      "confidence": "medium",
                      "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "score": 5
                    }
                  ],
                  "selectedModel": "qwen3.8:27b",
                  "selectionMethod": "deterministic-consensus-v1",
                  "selectionNotice": "The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required."
                },
                "patchSha256": "c102952ebfaba16a0d028044d1bc0ab063381442b99de01bfc592144f2de9cc5",
                "patchSummary": "In app/Controller/Component/ACLComponent.php (line 473), the ACL array value for the \u0027previewEventAttributes\u0027 key was changed from [\u0027theming_enabled*\u0027] to [\u0027theming_enabled\u0027], removing the erroneous trailing asterisk that made the permission string non-matching. One line changed, one insertion, one deletion.",
                "patchTruncated": false,
                "patches": [
                  {
                    "commit": "5ac8d1e4dea72f71bec3789350b748f0ad21c42c",
                    "patchSha256": "c102952ebfaba16a0d028044d1bc0ab063381442b99de01bfc592144f2de9cc5",
                    "source": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/5ac8d1e4d.patch",
                    "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/5ac8d1e4d.patch",
                    "subject": "fix: [ACL] typo in previewEventAttributes key"
                  }
                ],
                "source": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/5ac8d1e4d.patch",
                "subject": "fix: [ACL] typo in previewEventAttributes key",
                "tagVersionBoundary": {
                  "commits_after_fix": 227,
                  "repository": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP",
                  "tag": "v2.5.47",
                  "version": "2.5.47",
                  "version_type": "semver"
                },
                "weaknessRationale": [
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-285",
                    "rationale": "The ACL rule for previewEventAttributes contained a typo (\u0027theming_enabled*\u0027) that prevented the authorization check from matching the intended permission, causing the access control mechanism to not enforce the restriction as designed. This is a direct failure of the authorization logic due to a misconfigured rule."
                  }
                ]
              }
            }
          },
          "recordType": "advisory",
          "vulnId": "GCVE-1-2026-20240"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-95805",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-22T14:59:06.674611Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-22T14:59:19.797Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T14:59:19.861474Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED",
    "vulnId": "GCVE-1-2026-20240"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}
displaying 1 - 10 publications in total 282

CVE-2026-100190 (GCVE-0-2026-100190)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-25 13:52 – Updated: 2026-09-25 16:13
VLAI
Title
Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Crawler Capture Import in AIL Framework showDomain Page
Summary
The AIL Framework crawler splash domain page (showDomain.html) is vulnerable to stored cross-site script injection (XSS). User-supplied data originating from imported crawler captures—specifically item IDs, URLs, and screenshot file paths—was interpolated directly into inline JavaScript contexts within the HTML template. This included an onclick attribute that embedded raw screenshot and URL values into a JavaScript function call, and an inline script block that assigned a screenshot value to a JavaScript variable without escaping. An attacker with a user-role API client could craft a malicious crawler capture import containing JavaScript payloads in these fields. When any user (including privileged users) subsequently viewed the affected domain page, the injected script would execute in the victim's browser context, potentially allowing session hijacking, data exfiltration, or unauthorized actions on behalf of the victim. The vulnerability is stored in the application's data layer and triggered upon page rendering, requiring no further interaction beyond loading the domain view.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-25 16:13 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-79 - Improper Neutralization of Input in Web Page ('Cross-site Scripting')
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
ail project ail framework Affected: unspecified , < 7.1 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
GCVE extensions
AI involvement GCVE-BCP-05-X-01
Whole record AI-generated Human-reviewed GNA-1

Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model.

ai-computer-assisted:llm-generatedai-computer-assisted:classification
Model Source Identifier
qwen3.8:27b ollama qwen3.8:27b
Patch provenance GCVE-BCP-05-X-02
Generator
patch2vuln.py on 2026-09-25 13:45
Model
qwen3.8:27b
Input
https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/31376ee3d04519c898bb9b3671453a41c4117340.patch c110d16dd8ee…
Confidence
medium
Commit Subject Patch SHA-256
31376ee3d045 chg: [security] prevent stored XSS through imported capture c110d16dd8ee…
Fix summary

The fix removes all capture-derived values (item IDs, URLs, screenshot paths) from inline JavaScript contexts (onclick attributes and inline script variable assignments). These values are now stored in HTML data attributes (data-screenshot, data-url, data-item-id), which are properly HTML-escaped by the Jinja2 template engine. Screenshot click handlers are bound programmatically via addEventListener on elements with a .reload-image class, and the reload_image function reads values from the DOM element's dataset rather than receiving raw string parameters. Additionally, item IDs are URL-encoded with encodeURIComponent before being appended to link hrefs, preventing injection through the ID field.

Patch summary

In showDomain.html: (1) Replaced inline onclick="reload_image('...')" with a data-attribute-based approach using data-screenshot, data-url, and data-item-id attributes on the table cell element, plus a .reload-image CSS class. (2) Removed the inline script block that assigned screenshot, URL, and ID values directly into JavaScript variables via Jinja2 interpolation; replaced with dataset reads from the domain_screenshot img element. (3) Changed reload_image() to accept a DOM element and read values from element.dataset instead of raw string arguments. (4) Added a programmatic event binding loop using document.querySelectorAll('.reload-image').forEach() with addEventListener('click'). (5) Applied encodeURIComponent() to item IDs when constructing screenshot link hrefs. (6) Changed the href URL construction to use url_for with keyword arguments instead of string interpolation.

CVSS rationale

AV:N: Exploitable over the network via the web application. AC:L: No special race conditions or complex setup; a crafted capture import suffices. AT:N: No manipulation of the attack target required. PR:L: Requires a user-role API client to import a malicious crawler capture (authenticated, low privilege). UI:P: The stored XSS in the inline script block executes passively when the victim loads the domain page; no click or active interaction is needed for the inline script vector. VC:N/VI:N/VA:N: The vulnerable component (server-side application) is not directly compromised in confidentiality, integrity, or availability. SC:H: Scope changes to the victim's browser session, enabling theft of session tokens, cookies, and sensitive data. SI:H: Scope integrity is impacted as the attacker can perform arbitrary actions in the victim's authenticated session. SA:N: No meaningful impact on the availability of the attacker's scope.

Weakness rationale
  • CWE-79 The patch explicitly addresses stored XSS by removing user-controlled values (screenshot paths, URLs, item IDs from crawler capture imports) from inline JavaScript contexts and replacing them with properly escaped data attributes and programmatic event binding. The commit message confirms the intent: 'prevent stored XSS through imported capture metadata in showDomain.'
Attack pattern rationale
  • CAPEC-1 The patch directly remediates a stored XSS vector where attacker-controlled data from a crawler capture import is reflected into inline JavaScript without neutralization. CAPEC-1 is the canonical attack pattern for XSS. The specific sub-variant is stored (persistent) XSS via a data import mechanism, but CAPEC-1 is the closest and most appropriate mapping available in the CAPEC catalog.
Assumptions to verify
  • The UI:P (Passive) rating assumes the inline script vector (screenshot variable assignment) executes on page load without requiring a user click. The onclick vector would require UI:A, but the inline script vector is sufficient for exploitation.
  • PR:L assumes the attacker needs a user-role API client to import a crafted crawler capture, as stated in the commit message. The exact privilege level and authentication mechanism are not further specified in the patch.
  • The version boundary 'less_than 7.1' is inferred from the tag_version_boundary metadata showing 21 commits after the fix before the v7.1 tag, suggesting the fix is included in v7.1. Exact affected version ranges are not confirmed.
  • CAPEC-1 is selected as the closest available attack pattern for stored XSS; no more specific CAPEC for stored XSS via data import exists in the catalog.
  • The patch does not include test cases or additional context about whether other template files have similar inline JavaScript interpolation patterns; this advisory covers only the single file in the patch.
Model comparison

Selected qwen3.8:27b by deterministic-consensus-v1
The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required.

Model Score Agreement Confidence Assumptions
qwen3.8:27b 5 9 medium 5
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-100190",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-09-25T16:13:08.012327Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T16:13:26.973Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "modules": [
            "crawler/crawler_splash"
          ],
          "product": "ail framework",
          "programFiles": [
            "var/www/templates/crawler/crawler_splash/showDomain.html"
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework",
          "vendor": "ail project",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "7.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "unspecified",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "Aurelien Thirion"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Jeroen Pinoy"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe AIL Framework crawler splash domain page (showDomain.html) is vulnerable to stored cross-site script injection (XSS). User-supplied data originating from imported crawler captures\u2014specifically item IDs, URLs, and screenshot file paths\u2014was interpolated directly into inline JavaScript contexts within the HTML template. This included an onclick attribute that embedded raw screenshot and URL values into a JavaScript function call, and an inline script block that assigned a screenshot value to a JavaScript variable without escaping. An attacker with a user-role API client could craft a malicious crawler capture import containing JavaScript payloads in these fields. When any user (including privileged users) subsequently viewed the affected domain page, the injected script would execute in the victim\u0027s browser context, potentially allowing session hijacking, data exfiltration, or unauthorized actions on behalf of the victim. The vulnerability is stored in the application\u0027s data layer and triggered upon page rendering, requiring no further interaction beyond loading the domain view.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The AIL Framework crawler splash domain page (showDomain.html) is vulnerable to stored cross-site script injection (XSS). User-supplied data originating from imported crawler captures\u2014specifically item IDs, URLs, and screenshot file paths\u2014was interpolated directly into inline JavaScript contexts within the HTML template. This included an onclick attribute that embedded raw screenshot and URL values into a JavaScript function call, and an inline script block that assigned a screenshot value to a JavaScript variable without escaping. An attacker with a user-role API client could craft a malicious crawler capture import containing JavaScript payloads in these fields. When any user (including privileged users) subsequently viewed the affected domain page, the injected script would execute in the victim\u0027s browser context, potentially allowing session hijacking, data exfiltration, or unauthorized actions on behalf of the victim. The vulnerability is stored in the application\u0027s data layer and triggered upon page rendering, requiring no further interaction beyond loading the domain view."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-1",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-1 Cross Site Scripting (XSS)"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 6.3,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-79",
              "description": "CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input in Web Page (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T13:52:19.648Z",
        "orgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
        "shortName": "CIRCL"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "Security patch",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/31376ee3d04519c898bb9b3671453a41c4117340"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe fix removes all capture-derived values (item IDs, URLs, screenshot paths) from inline JavaScript contexts (onclick attributes and inline script variable assignments). These values are now stored in HTML data attributes (data-screenshot, data-url, data-item-id), which are properly HTML-escaped by the Jinja2 template engine. Screenshot click handlers are bound programmatically via addEventListener on elements with a .reload-image class, and the reload_image function reads values from the DOM element\u0027s dataset rather than receiving raw string parameters. Additionally, item IDs are URL-encoded with encodeURIComponent before being appended to link hrefs, preventing injection through the ID field.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The fix removes all capture-derived values (item IDs, URLs, screenshot paths) from inline JavaScript contexts (onclick attributes and inline script variable assignments). These values are now stored in HTML data attributes (data-screenshot, data-url, data-item-id), which are properly HTML-escaped by the Jinja2 template engine. Screenshot click handlers are bound programmatically via addEventListener on elements with a .reload-image class, and the reload_image function reads values from the DOM element\u0027s dataset rather than receiving raw string parameters. Additionally, item IDs are URL-encoded with encodeURIComponent before being appended to link hrefs, preventing injection through the ID field."
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Crawler Capture Import in AIL Framework showDomain Page",
      "x_gcve": [
        {
          "extensions": {
            "bcp-05-x-01": {
              "ai_annotations": [
                {
                  "ai_level": "generated",
                  "description": "Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model.",
                  "gna_source": 1,
                  "models": [
                    {
                      "gna_source": 1,
                      "identifier": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "name": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "source": "ollama"
                    }
                  ],
                  "review_status": "full",
                  "scope": "record",
                  "tags": [
                    "ai-computer-assisted:llm-generated",
                    "ai-computer-assisted:classification"
                  ]
                }
              ]
            },
            "bcp-05-x-02": {
              "x_patch2vuln": {
                "assumptions": [
                  "The UI:P (Passive) rating assumes the inline script vector (screenshot variable assignment) executes on page load without requiring a user click. The onclick vector would require UI:A, but the inline script vector is sufficient for exploitation.",
                  "PR:L assumes the attacker needs a user-role API client to import a crafted crawler capture, as stated in the commit message. The exact privilege level and authentication mechanism are not further specified in the patch.",
                  "The version boundary \u0027less_than 7.1\u0027 is inferred from the tag_version_boundary metadata showing 21 commits after the fix before the v7.1 tag, suggesting the fix is included in v7.1. Exact affected version ranges are not confirmed.",
                  "CAPEC-1 is selected as the closest available attack pattern for stored XSS; no more specific CAPEC for stored XSS via data import exists in the catalog.",
                  "The patch does not include test cases or additional context about whether other template files have similar inline JavaScript interpolation patterns; this advisory covers only the single file in the patch."
                ],
                "capecRationale": [
                  {
                    "capecId": "CAPEC-1",
                    "rationale": "The patch directly remediates a stored XSS vector where attacker-controlled data from a crawler capture import is reflected into inline JavaScript without neutralization. CAPEC-1 is the canonical attack pattern for XSS. The specific sub-variant is stored (persistent) XSS via a data import mechanism, but CAPEC-1 is the closest and most appropriate mapping available in the CAPEC catalog."
                  }
                ],
                "commit": "31376ee3d04519c898bb9b3671453a41c4117340",
                "confidence": "medium",
                "credits": [
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "terrtia"
                  }
                ],
                "cvssRationale": "AV:N: Exploitable over the network via the web application. AC:L: No special race conditions or complex setup; a crafted capture import suffices. AT:N: No manipulation of the attack target required. PR:L: Requires a user-role API client to import a malicious crawler capture (authenticated, low privilege). UI:P: The stored XSS in the inline script block executes passively when the victim loads the domain page; no click or active interaction is needed for the inline script vector. VC:N/VI:N/VA:N: The vulnerable component (server-side application) is not directly compromised in confidentiality, integrity, or availability. SC:H: Scope changes to the victim\u0027s browser session, enabling theft of session tokens, cookies, and sensitive data. SI:H: Scope integrity is impacted as the attacker can perform arbitrary actions in the victim\u0027s authenticated session. SA:N: No meaningful impact on the availability of the attacker\u0027s scope.",
                "fixSummary": "The fix removes all capture-derived values (item IDs, URLs, screenshot paths) from inline JavaScript contexts (onclick attributes and inline script variable assignments). These values are now stored in HTML data attributes (data-screenshot, data-url, data-item-id), which are properly HTML-escaped by the Jinja2 template engine. Screenshot click handlers are bound programmatically via addEventListener on elements with a .reload-image class, and the reload_image function reads values from the DOM element\u0027s dataset rather than receiving raw string parameters. Additionally, item IDs are URL-encoded with encodeURIComponent before being appended to link hrefs, preventing injection through the ID field.",
                "generatedAt": "2026-09-25T13:45:46.199650Z",
                "generator": "patch2vuln.py",
                "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                "modelComparison": {
                  "rankings": [
                    {
                      "agreementScore": 9,
                      "assumptionCount": 5,
                      "confidence": "medium",
                      "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "score": 5
                    }
                  ],
                  "selectedModel": "qwen3.8:27b",
                  "selectionMethod": "deterministic-consensus-v1",
                  "selectionNotice": "The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required."
                },
                "patchSha256": "c110d16dd8eee489472853615089aeb6b6e034457dcbaec9b038bf85ad96b920",
                "patchSummary": "In showDomain.html: (1) Replaced inline onclick=\"reload_image(\u0027...\u0027)\" with a data-attribute-based approach using data-screenshot, data-url, and data-item-id attributes on the table cell element, plus a .reload-image CSS class. (2) Removed the inline script block that assigned screenshot, URL, and ID values directly into JavaScript variables via Jinja2 interpolation; replaced with dataset reads from the domain_screenshot img element. (3) Changed reload_image() to accept a DOM element and read values from element.dataset instead of raw string arguments. (4) Added a programmatic event binding loop using document.querySelectorAll(\u0027.reload-image\u0027).forEach() with addEventListener(\u0027click\u0027). (5) Applied encodeURIComponent() to item IDs when constructing screenshot link hrefs. (6) Changed the href URL construction to use url_for with keyword arguments instead of string interpolation.",
                "patchTruncated": false,
                "patches": [
                  {
                    "commit": "31376ee3d04519c898bb9b3671453a41c4117340",
                    "patchSha256": "c110d16dd8eee489472853615089aeb6b6e034457dcbaec9b038bf85ad96b920",
                    "source": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/31376ee3d04519c898bb9b3671453a41c4117340.patch",
                    "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/31376ee3d04519c898bb9b3671453a41c4117340.patch",
                    "subject": "chg: [security] prevent stored XSS through imported capture"
                  }
                ],
                "source": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/31376ee3d04519c898bb9b3671453a41c4117340.patch",
                "subject": "chg: [security] prevent stored XSS through imported capture",
                "tagVersionBoundary": {
                  "commits_after_fix": 21,
                  "repository": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework",
                  "tag": "v7.1",
                  "version": "7.1",
                  "version_type": "custom"
                },
                "weaknessRationale": [
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-79",
                    "rationale": "The patch explicitly addresses stored XSS by removing user-controlled values (screenshot paths, URLs, item IDs from crawler capture imports) from inline JavaScript contexts and replacing them with properly escaped data attributes and programmatic event binding. The commit message confirms the intent: \u0027prevent stored XSS through imported capture metadata in showDomain.\u0027"
                  }
                ]
              }
            }
          },
          "recordType": "advisory",
          "vulnId": "GCVE-1-2026-20292"
        }
      ],
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
    "assignerShortName": "CIRCL",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-100190",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-25T13:52:19.648Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-25T13:52:13.769Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T16:13:26.973Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2026-100172 (GCVE-0-2026-100172)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-25 13:13 – Updated: 2026-09-25 15:19
VLAI
Title
Stored XSS in AIL Framework extracted-match popovers via unescaped dynamic values in HTML-enabled data-content attributes
Summary
The AIL Framework (ail-project/ail-framework) contains a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in two Jinja2 templates that render popovers for matched, tracked, or tagged content: var/www/templates/chats_explorer/block_message.html and var/www/templates/objects/item/show_item.html. In both templates, dynamic values associated with this content, including icon color, icon style, icon glyph, subtype, identifier, name, description, and matched value, are interpolated directly into the data-content HTML attribute of Bootstrap popover elements without appropriate output encoding. Because the popovers are configured with data-html="true", the content is interpreted as HTML in the victim's browser. An authenticated attacker who can influence matched, tracked, or tagged content may inject arbitrary HTML or JavaScript into these values. When a victim displays the affected popover, the injected markup may execute in the victim's session, potentially enabling data exfiltration or actions with the victim's privileges. The vulnerability is classified as stored XSS because the malicious payload can persist in the affected match, tracking, or tag-related data and be delivered to users who view the affected content.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-25 15:15 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-79 - Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
ail project ail framework Affected: unspecified , < 7.1 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
GCVE extensions
AI involvement GCVE-BCP-05-X-01
Whole record AI-generated Not human-reviewed GNA-1

Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.

ai-computer-assisted:llm-generatedai-computer-assisted:classification
Model Source Identifier
qwen3.8:27b ollama qwen3.8:27b
Patch provenance GCVE-BCP-05-X-02
Generator
patch2vuln.py on 2026-09-25 12:56
Model
qwen3.8:27b
Input
https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/ee63a0a96646790255e038f5ca5dd0ab5fe98db2.patch bd188338f882…
Confidence
medium
Commit Subject Patch SHA-256
ee63a0a96646 chg: [security] fix XSS in show item and message popover of bd188338f882…
Fix summary

The fix applies double HTML-escaping (Jinja2 forceescape|forceescape) to every dynamic value interpolated into the HTML-enabled data-content attribute of the popover elements in both templates. Double-escaping is required because the values must survive both the outer HTML attribute context and the inner HTML parsing performed by the popover plugin. This neutralizes any HTML or script injection from the extracted-match fields.

Patch summary

In block_message.html and show_item.html, the Jinja2 expressions for extracted_matches fields (icon color, icon style, icon, subtype, id, name, description) and the matched value r[1] are each suffixed with |forceescape|forceescape. No other logic, routing, or configuration changes are made. Two lines changed in total (one per file).

CVSS rationale

AV:N: web application reachable over the network. AC:L: crafting a message or item with a malicious extracted-match value requires no special race or timing. AT:N: no manipulation of the attack target is needed. PR:L: the attacker must be an authenticated user capable of creating or modifying chat messages or items. UI:P: the victim must passively interact (hover over the element) to trigger the popover rendering; no click or explicit action is required. VC:H: the injected script can read session cookies, DOM data, and API responses in the victim's browser. VI:H: the script can perform authenticated actions on behalf of the victim (create, modify, delete data). VA:N: no direct denial-of-service impact is evident. SC/SI/SA:N: the subcomponent (the AIL Framework server) is not directly compromised; the impact is confined to the victim's browser session.

Weakness rationale
  • CWE-79 Dynamic values from extracted-match data are interpolated into an HTML-enabled attribute without output encoding, allowing script injection. The fix adds forceescape, confirming the root cause is missing output encoding in an HTML context. CWE-79 is the precise weakness.
Attack pattern rationale
  • CAPEC-1 The patch directly addresses stored XSS: attacker-controlled content is persisted in application data (chat messages, items) and rendered as executable HTML in a victim's browser via an unescaped data-content attribute. CAPEC-1 is the canonical attack pattern for XSS and is the closest match. No uncertainty in this mapping.
Assumptions to verify
  • The AIL Framework requires authenticated access to create or modify chat messages and items; PR:L is assumed based on the application being a threat-intelligence platform with user accounts.
  • The extracted-match data (icon color, style, subtype, id, name, description) can be influenced by an authenticated user through normal application workflows (e.g., submitting content that the extraction pipeline processes).
  • The popover is triggered on hover (data-trigger="hover"), classified as passive user interaction (UI:P).
  • The tag v7.1 boundary with 143 commits after the fix suggests the fix landed before v7.1, but exact affected version ranges are not confirmed by the patch alone.
  • CAPEC-1 is selected as the closest standard attack pattern; no more specific CAPEC for stored XSS in HTML attributes exists in the CAPEC catalog.
Model comparison

Selected qwen3.8:27b by deterministic-consensus-v1
The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required.

Model Score Agreement Confidence Assumptions
qwen3.8:27b 5 9 medium 5
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-100172",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-09-25T15:15:12.313075Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T15:19:12.598Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "modules": [
            "chats_explorer (block_message.html)",
            "objects/item (show_item.html)"
          ],
          "product": "ail framework",
          "programFiles": [
            "var/www/templates/chats_explorer/block_message.html",
            "var/www/templates/objects/item/show_item.html"
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework",
          "vendor": "ail project",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "7.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "unspecified",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "Aurelien Thirion"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Jeroen Pinoy"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe AIL Framework (ail-project/ail-framework) contains a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in two Jinja2 templates that render popovers for matched, tracked, or tagged content: var/www/templates/chats_explorer/block_message.html and var/www/templates/objects/item/show_item.html. In both templates, dynamic values associated with this content, including icon color, icon style, icon glyph, subtype, identifier, name, description, and matched value, are interpolated directly into the data-content HTML attribute of Bootstrap popover elements without appropriate output encoding. Because the popovers are configured with data-html=\"true\", the content is interpreted as HTML in the victim\u0027s browser. An authenticated attacker who can influence matched, tracked, or tagged content may inject arbitrary HTML or JavaScript into these values. When a victim displays the affected popover, the injected markup may execute in the victim\u0027s session, potentially enabling data exfiltration or actions with the victim\u0027s privileges. The vulnerability is classified as stored XSS because the malicious payload can persist in the affected match, tracking, or tag-related data and be delivered to users who view the affected content.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The AIL Framework (ail-project/ail-framework) contains a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in two Jinja2 templates that render popovers for matched, tracked, or tagged content: var/www/templates/chats_explorer/block_message.html and var/www/templates/objects/item/show_item.html. In both templates, dynamic values associated with this content, including icon color, icon style, icon glyph, subtype, identifier, name, description, and matched value, are interpolated directly into the data-content HTML attribute of Bootstrap popover elements without appropriate output encoding. Because the popovers are configured with data-html=\"true\", the content is interpreted as HTML in the victim\u0027s browser. An authenticated attacker who can influence matched, tracked, or tagged content may inject arbitrary HTML or JavaScript into these values. When a victim displays the affected popover, the injected markup may execute in the victim\u0027s session, potentially enabling data exfiltration or actions with the victim\u0027s privileges. The vulnerability is classified as stored XSS because the malicious payload can persist in the affected match, tracking, or tag-related data and be delivered to users who view the affected content."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-1",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-1 Cross Site Scripting (XSS)"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 8.5,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-79",
              "description": "CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T13:13:56.996Z",
        "orgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
        "shortName": "CIRCL"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "Security patch",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/ee63a0a96646790255e038f5ca5dd0ab5fe98db2"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe fix applies double HTML-escaping (Jinja2 forceescape|forceescape) to every dynamic value interpolated into the HTML-enabled data-content attribute of the popover elements in both templates. Double-escaping is required because the values must survive both the outer HTML attribute context and the inner HTML parsing performed by the popover plugin. This neutralizes any HTML or script injection from the extracted-match fields.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The fix applies double HTML-escaping (Jinja2 forceescape|forceescape) to every dynamic value interpolated into the HTML-enabled data-content attribute of the popover elements in both templates. Double-escaping is required because the values must survive both the outer HTML attribute context and the inner HTML parsing performed by the popover plugin. This neutralizes any HTML or script injection from the extracted-match fields."
        }
      ],
      "title": "Stored XSS in AIL Framework extracted-match popovers via unescaped dynamic values in HTML-enabled data-content attributes",
      "x_gcve": [
        {
          "extensions": {
            "bcp-05-x-01": {
              "ai_annotations": [
                {
                  "ai_level": "generated",
                  "description": "Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.",
                  "gna_source": 1,
                  "models": [
                    {
                      "gna_source": 1,
                      "identifier": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "name": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "source": "ollama"
                    }
                  ],
                  "review_status": "none",
                  "scope": "record",
                  "tags": [
                    "ai-computer-assisted:llm-generated",
                    "ai-computer-assisted:classification"
                  ]
                }
              ]
            },
            "bcp-05-x-02": {
              "x_patch2vuln": {
                "assumptions": [
                  "The AIL Framework requires authenticated access to create or modify chat messages and items; PR:L is assumed based on the application being a threat-intelligence platform with user accounts.",
                  "The extracted-match data (icon color, style, subtype, id, name, description) can be influenced by an authenticated user through normal application workflows (e.g., submitting content that the extraction pipeline processes).",
                  "The popover is triggered on hover (data-trigger=\"hover\"), classified as passive user interaction (UI:P).",
                  "The tag v7.1 boundary with 143 commits after the fix suggests the fix landed before v7.1, but exact affected version ranges are not confirmed by the patch alone.",
                  "CAPEC-1 is selected as the closest standard attack pattern; no more specific CAPEC for stored XSS in HTML attributes exists in the CAPEC catalog."
                ],
                "capecRationale": [
                  {
                    "capecId": "CAPEC-1",
                    "rationale": "The patch directly addresses stored XSS: attacker-controlled content is persisted in application data (chat messages, items) and rendered as executable HTML in a victim\u0027s browser via an unescaped data-content attribute. CAPEC-1 is the canonical attack pattern for XSS and is the closest match. No uncertainty in this mapping."
                  }
                ],
                "commit": "ee63a0a96646790255e038f5ca5dd0ab5fe98db2",
                "confidence": "medium",
                "credits": [
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "terrtia"
                  }
                ],
                "cvssRationale": "AV:N: web application reachable over the network. AC:L: crafting a message or item with a malicious extracted-match value requires no special race or timing. AT:N: no manipulation of the attack target is needed. PR:L: the attacker must be an authenticated user capable of creating or modifying chat messages or items. UI:P: the victim must passively interact (hover over the element) to trigger the popover rendering; no click or explicit action is required. VC:H: the injected script can read session cookies, DOM data, and API responses in the victim\u0027s browser. VI:H: the script can perform authenticated actions on behalf of the victim (create, modify, delete data). VA:N: no direct denial-of-service impact is evident. SC/SI/SA:N: the subcomponent (the AIL Framework server) is not directly compromised; the impact is confined to the victim\u0027s browser session.",
                "fixSummary": "The fix applies double HTML-escaping (Jinja2 forceescape|forceescape) to every dynamic value interpolated into the HTML-enabled data-content attribute of the popover elements in both templates. Double-escaping is required because the values must survive both the outer HTML attribute context and the inner HTML parsing performed by the popover plugin. This neutralizes any HTML or script injection from the extracted-match fields.",
                "generatedAt": "2026-09-25T12:56:24.137641Z",
                "generator": "patch2vuln.py",
                "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                "modelComparison": {
                  "rankings": [
                    {
                      "agreementScore": 9,
                      "assumptionCount": 5,
                      "confidence": "medium",
                      "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "score": 5
                    }
                  ],
                  "selectedModel": "qwen3.8:27b",
                  "selectionMethod": "deterministic-consensus-v1",
                  "selectionNotice": "The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required."
                },
                "patchSha256": "bd188338f8828ab59743776228d2991b51a3f83b870dedf073a54c6139ad9e26",
                "patchSummary": "In block_message.html and show_item.html, the Jinja2 expressions for extracted_matches fields (icon color, icon style, icon, subtype, id, name, description) and the matched value r[1] are each suffixed with |forceescape|forceescape. No other logic, routing, or configuration changes are made. Two lines changed in total (one per file).",
                "patchTruncated": false,
                "patches": [
                  {
                    "commit": "ee63a0a96646790255e038f5ca5dd0ab5fe98db2",
                    "patchSha256": "bd188338f8828ab59743776228d2991b51a3f83b870dedf073a54c6139ad9e26",
                    "source": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/ee63a0a96646790255e038f5ca5dd0ab5fe98db2.patch",
                    "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/ee63a0a96646790255e038f5ca5dd0ab5fe98db2.patch",
                    "subject": "chg: [security] fix XSS in show item and message popover of"
                  }
                ],
                "source": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/ee63a0a96646790255e038f5ca5dd0ab5fe98db2.patch",
                "subject": "chg: [security] fix XSS in show item and message popover of",
                "tagVersionBoundary": {
                  "commits_after_fix": 143,
                  "repository": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework",
                  "tag": "v7.1",
                  "version": "7.1",
                  "version_type": "custom"
                },
                "weaknessRationale": [
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-79",
                    "rationale": "Dynamic values from extracted-match data are interpolated into an HTML-enabled attribute without output encoding, allowing script injection. The fix adds forceescape, confirming the root cause is missing output encoding in an HTML context. CWE-79 is the precise weakness."
                  }
                ]
              }
            }
          },
          "recordType": "advisory",
          "vulnId": "GCVE-1-2026-20239"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
    "assignerShortName": "CIRCL",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-100172",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-25T13:13:56.996Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-25T13:13:52.747Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T15:19:12.598Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2026-100174 (GCVE-0-2026-100174)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-25 13:22 – Updated: 2026-09-25 15:14
VLAI
Title
Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in AIL Framework Tag Selector via Unescaped Tag Names
Summary
The AIL Framework tag selector component (var/www/static/js/tags.js) is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting (XSS). A user with the ability to create a custom tag could embed an HTML payload containing JavaScript event handlers (e.g., <img src=x onerror=alert(1)> or <svg onload=...>) in the tag name. When another authenticated user opened a page containing the tag selector, the malicious tag name was inserted into the DOM using jQuery's html property, causing the embedded script to execute in the victim's browser context. The vulnerable code paths affected both the suggestion/combo-item rendering (_renderComboItems) and the selected-tag rendering logic. In both cases, the display value derived from the tag's displayField was passed directly to the html property of a jQuery element constructor, which parses and inserts the string as raw HTML rather than as text. Preconditions: the attacker must have an authenticated account with permission to create custom tags, and the victim must be an authenticated user who views a page that renders the tag selector with the attacker's stored tag. The attack is stored (persistent) and does not require the victim to perform any action beyond loading the page. Security impact: successful exploitation allows arbitrary JavaScript execution in the victim's browser within the application's origin, potentially leading to session hijacking, unauthorized data access, form manipulation, or further client-side attacks.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-25 15:14 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-79 - Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
  • CWE-94 - Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
ail project ail framework Affected: 0 , < 7.1 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
GCVE extensions
AI involvement GCVE-BCP-05-X-01
Whole record AI-generated Not human-reviewed GNA-1

Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.

ai-computer-assisted:llm-generatedai-computer-assisted:classification
Model Source Identifier
qwen3.8:27b ollama qwen3.8:27b
Patch provenance GCVE-BCP-05-X-02
Generator
patch2vuln.py on 2026-09-25 13:16
Model
qwen3.8:27b
Input
https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/b2d0ed05f6cf79b2312a3f1f923d0d1a5d7a9edb.patch 2d147dabcc9b…
Confidence
medium
Commit Subject Patch SHA-256
b2d0ed05f6cf chg: [security] prevent stored XSS in 2d147dabcc9b…
Fix summary

The fix ensures that tag names and display values are rendered as plain text rather than as HTML when no custom renderer is explicitly configured. In the suggestion rendering path, the default (non-renderer) case now uses jQuery's .text() method, which HTML-escapes the content. In the selection rendering path, the default case uses document.createTextNode() to insert the value as a text node. Custom renderers, which are developer-supplied and trusted to produce safe HTML, continue to use .html() or .prepend() with raw HTML. The eval() call was also replaced with JSON.parse() to eliminate a code-injection vector.

Patch summary

In var/www/static/js/tags.js: (1) Replaced eval(data) with JSON.parse(data) for parsing array-like data strings. (2) In _renderComboItems, introduced a hasRenderer flag; when no custom renderer is set, the displayed value is inserted via resultItemEl.text(displayed) instead of the html property in the jQuery constructor. (3) In the selection rendering block, introduced a hasSelectionRenderer flag; when no custom selection renderer is set, the value is prepended as a text node via document.createTextNode(selectedItemHtml) instead of being set through the html property. (4) The comma separator for text-mode selections is now appended as a text node rather than concatenated into an HTML string.

CVSS rationale

AV:N: The vulnerability is exploitable over the network via a web application. AC:L: No race conditions or special timing are required; the payload is stored and triggers on page load. AT:N: No manipulation of the attack target is needed; the stored payload executes automatically. PR:L: The attacker needs a low-privilege authenticated account with permission to create custom tags. UI:P: The victim passively interacts by loading a page that contains the tag selector; no active click or download is required. VC:L: The XSS can read data from the victim's session and page context. VI:L: The XSS can modify page content and submit forms. VA:N: No availability impact is evident. SC:L: The compromised session can access other resources within the same origin. SI:L: The attacker can modify data through the victim's authenticated session. SA:N: No availability impact on subsequent components.

Weakness rationale
  • CWE-79 The patch explicitly addresses stored XSS: user-controlled tag names were inserted into the DOM as HTML via jQuery's html property without escaping. The fix renders these values as text nodes, which is the canonical remediation for CWE-79. The commit subject line also explicitly states 'prevent stored XSS'.
  • CWE-94 The replacement of eval(data) with JSON.parse(data) addresses a secondary code-injection weakness where a crafted data string could execute arbitrary JavaScript. This is a contributing factor but the primary vulnerability is the stored XSS in tag rendering.
Attack pattern rationale
  • CAPEC-66 CAPEC-66 describes the general XSS attack pattern where attacker-controlled input is reflected or stored and later rendered as executable content in a victim's browser. This patch fixes a stored XSS variant where malicious tag names are persisted and rendered as HTML. The mapping is direct and well-supported by the commit message and code changes. No more specific CAPEC entry for stored XSS in a tag/selector widget exists in the CAPEC catalog, making CAPEC-66 the closest and most appropriate match.
Assumptions to verify
  • The affected version range is inferred from the tag_version_boundary metadata indicating the fix commit is 31 commits before the v7.1 tag; exact version boundaries are not explicitly stated in the patch.
  • The UI:P (Passive) rating assumes the victim only needs to load a page containing the tag selector; if the application requires the victim to explicitly open a specific dialog or widget, UI:A (Active) could be more appropriate.
  • The CAPEC-66 mapping is the closest available pattern; no CAPEC entry specifically covers stored XSS in a tag-selector UI component, so the general XSS pattern is used.
  • The PR:L rating assumes that creating a custom tag requires only a basic authenticated account; if tag creation requires elevated privileges, PR:H would be more appropriate.
  • The eval() to JSON.parse() change is treated as a secondary hardening fix within the same patch set; the primary vulnerability addressed is the stored XSS in tag rendering.
  • No specific reporter or finder is identified in the patch metadata or commit message; only the remediation developer (commit author) is credited.
Model comparison

Selected qwen3.8:27b by deterministic-consensus-v1
The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required.

Model Score Agreement Confidence Assumptions
qwen3.8:27b 4 9 medium 6
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-100174",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-09-25T15:14:24.607198Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T15:14:51.969Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "modules": [
            "tag selector (tags.js)"
          ],
          "product": "ail framework",
          "programFiles": [
            "var/www/static/js/tags.js"
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework",
          "vendor": "ail project",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "7.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "Aurelien Thirion"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Jeroen Pinoy"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe AIL Framework tag selector component (var/www/static/js/tags.js) is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting (XSS). A user with the ability to create a custom tag could embed an HTML payload containing JavaScript event handlers (e.g., \u0026lt;img src=x onerror=alert(1)\u0026gt; or \u0026lt;svg onload=...\u0026gt;) in the tag name. When another authenticated user opened a page containing the tag selector, the malicious tag name was inserted into the DOM using jQuery\u0027s html property, causing the embedded script to execute in the victim\u0027s browser context.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe vulnerable code paths affected both the suggestion/combo-item rendering (_renderComboItems) and the selected-tag rendering logic. In both cases, the display value derived from the tag\u0027s displayField was passed directly to the html property of a jQuery element constructor, which parses and inserts the string as raw HTML rather than as text.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003ePreconditions: the attacker must have an authenticated account with permission to create custom tags, and the victim must be an authenticated user who views a page that renders the tag selector with the attacker\u0027s stored tag. The attack is stored (persistent) and does not require the victim to perform any action beyond loading the page.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSecurity impact: successful exploitation allows arbitrary JavaScript execution in the victim\u0027s browser within the application\u0027s origin, potentially leading to session hijacking, unauthorized data access, form manipulation, or further client-side attacks.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The AIL Framework tag selector component (var/www/static/js/tags.js) is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting (XSS). A user with the ability to create a custom tag could embed an HTML payload containing JavaScript event handlers (e.g., \u003cimg src=x onerror=alert(1)\u003e or \u003csvg onload=...\u003e) in the tag name. When another authenticated user opened a page containing the tag selector, the malicious tag name was inserted into the DOM using jQuery\u0027s html property, causing the embedded script to execute in the victim\u0027s browser context.\n\nThe vulnerable code paths affected both the suggestion/combo-item rendering (_renderComboItems) and the selected-tag rendering logic. In both cases, the display value derived from the tag\u0027s displayField was passed directly to the html property of a jQuery element constructor, which parses and inserts the string as raw HTML rather than as text.\n\nPreconditions: the attacker must have an authenticated account with permission to create custom tags, and the victim must be an authenticated user who views a page that renders the tag selector with the attacker\u0027s stored tag. The attack is stored (persistent) and does not require the victim to perform any action beyond loading the page.\n\nSecurity impact: successful exploitation allows arbitrary JavaScript execution in the victim\u0027s browser within the application\u0027s origin, potentially leading to session hijacking, unauthorized data access, form manipulation, or further client-side attacks."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-66",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-66 Cross Site Scripting (XSS)"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 5.1,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
            "userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-79",
              "description": "CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-94",
              "description": "CWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T13:22:38.669Z",
        "orgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
        "shortName": "CIRCL"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "Security patch",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/b2d0ed05f6cf79b2312a3f1f923d0d1a5d7a9edb"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe fix ensures that tag names and display values are rendered as plain text rather than as HTML when no custom renderer is explicitly configured. In the suggestion rendering path, the default (non-renderer) case now uses jQuery\u0027s .text() method, which HTML-escapes the content. In the selection rendering path, the default case uses document.createTextNode() to insert the value as a text node. Custom renderers, which are developer-supplied and trusted to produce safe HTML, continue to use .html() or .prepend() with raw HTML. The eval() call was also replaced with JSON.parse() to eliminate a code-injection vector.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The fix ensures that tag names and display values are rendered as plain text rather than as HTML when no custom renderer is explicitly configured. In the suggestion rendering path, the default (non-renderer) case now uses jQuery\u0027s .text() method, which HTML-escapes the content. In the selection rendering path, the default case uses document.createTextNode() to insert the value as a text node. Custom renderers, which are developer-supplied and trusted to produce safe HTML, continue to use .html() or .prepend() with raw HTML. The eval() call was also replaced with JSON.parse() to eliminate a code-injection vector."
        }
      ],
      "title": "Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in AIL Framework Tag Selector via Unescaped Tag Names",
      "x_gcve": [
        {
          "extensions": {
            "bcp-05-x-01": {
              "ai_annotations": [
                {
                  "ai_level": "generated",
                  "description": "Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.",
                  "gna_source": 1,
                  "models": [
                    {
                      "gna_source": 1,
                      "identifier": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "name": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "source": "ollama"
                    }
                  ],
                  "review_status": "none",
                  "scope": "record",
                  "tags": [
                    "ai-computer-assisted:llm-generated",
                    "ai-computer-assisted:classification"
                  ]
                }
              ]
            },
            "bcp-05-x-02": {
              "x_patch2vuln": {
                "assumptions": [
                  "The affected version range is inferred from the tag_version_boundary metadata indicating the fix commit is 31 commits before the v7.1 tag; exact version boundaries are not explicitly stated in the patch.",
                  "The UI:P (Passive) rating assumes the victim only needs to load a page containing the tag selector; if the application requires the victim to explicitly open a specific dialog or widget, UI:A (Active) could be more appropriate.",
                  "The CAPEC-66 mapping is the closest available pattern; no CAPEC entry specifically covers stored XSS in a tag-selector UI component, so the general XSS pattern is used.",
                  "The PR:L rating assumes that creating a custom tag requires only a basic authenticated account; if tag creation requires elevated privileges, PR:H would be more appropriate.",
                  "The eval() to JSON.parse() change is treated as a secondary hardening fix within the same patch set; the primary vulnerability addressed is the stored XSS in tag rendering.",
                  "No specific reporter or finder is identified in the patch metadata or commit message; only the remediation developer (commit author) is credited."
                ],
                "capecRationale": [
                  {
                    "capecId": "CAPEC-66",
                    "rationale": "CAPEC-66 describes the general XSS attack pattern where attacker-controlled input is reflected or stored and later rendered as executable content in a victim\u0027s browser. This patch fixes a stored XSS variant where malicious tag names are persisted and rendered as HTML. The mapping is direct and well-supported by the commit message and code changes. No more specific CAPEC entry for stored XSS in a tag/selector widget exists in the CAPEC catalog, making CAPEC-66 the closest and most appropriate match."
                  }
                ],
                "commit": "b2d0ed05f6cf79b2312a3f1f923d0d1a5d7a9edb",
                "confidence": "medium",
                "credits": [
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "terrtia"
                  }
                ],
                "cvssRationale": "AV:N: The vulnerability is exploitable over the network via a web application. AC:L: No race conditions or special timing are required; the payload is stored and triggers on page load. AT:N: No manipulation of the attack target is needed; the stored payload executes automatically. PR:L: The attacker needs a low-privilege authenticated account with permission to create custom tags. UI:P: The victim passively interacts by loading a page that contains the tag selector; no active click or download is required. VC:L: The XSS can read data from the victim\u0027s session and page context. VI:L: The XSS can modify page content and submit forms. VA:N: No availability impact is evident. SC:L: The compromised session can access other resources within the same origin. SI:L: The attacker can modify data through the victim\u0027s authenticated session. SA:N: No availability impact on subsequent components.",
                "fixSummary": "The fix ensures that tag names and display values are rendered as plain text rather than as HTML when no custom renderer is explicitly configured. In the suggestion rendering path, the default (non-renderer) case now uses jQuery\u0027s .text() method, which HTML-escapes the content. In the selection rendering path, the default case uses document.createTextNode() to insert the value as a text node. Custom renderers, which are developer-supplied and trusted to produce safe HTML, continue to use .html() or .prepend() with raw HTML. The eval() call was also replaced with JSON.parse() to eliminate a code-injection vector.",
                "generatedAt": "2026-09-25T13:16:06.156442Z",
                "generator": "patch2vuln.py",
                "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                "modelComparison": {
                  "rankings": [
                    {
                      "agreementScore": 9,
                      "assumptionCount": 6,
                      "confidence": "medium",
                      "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "score": 4
                    }
                  ],
                  "selectedModel": "qwen3.8:27b",
                  "selectionMethod": "deterministic-consensus-v1",
                  "selectionNotice": "The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required."
                },
                "patchSha256": "2d147dabcc9bebce7722917d80f13e49a10f9a2a4089ec6207cce9edb9187f77",
                "patchSummary": "In var/www/static/js/tags.js: (1) Replaced eval(data) with JSON.parse(data) for parsing array-like data strings. (2) In _renderComboItems, introduced a hasRenderer flag; when no custom renderer is set, the displayed value is inserted via resultItemEl.text(displayed) instead of the html property in the jQuery constructor. (3) In the selection rendering block, introduced a hasSelectionRenderer flag; when no custom selection renderer is set, the value is prepended as a text node via document.createTextNode(selectedItemHtml) instead of being set through the html property. (4) The comma separator for text-mode selections is now appended as a text node rather than concatenated into an HTML string.",
                "patchTruncated": false,
                "patches": [
                  {
                    "commit": "b2d0ed05f6cf79b2312a3f1f923d0d1a5d7a9edb",
                    "patchSha256": "2d147dabcc9bebce7722917d80f13e49a10f9a2a4089ec6207cce9edb9187f77",
                    "source": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/b2d0ed05f6cf79b2312a3f1f923d0d1a5d7a9edb.patch",
                    "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/b2d0ed05f6cf79b2312a3f1f923d0d1a5d7a9edb.patch",
                    "subject": "chg: [security] prevent stored XSS in"
                  }
                ],
                "source": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/b2d0ed05f6cf79b2312a3f1f923d0d1a5d7a9edb.patch",
                "subject": "chg: [security] prevent stored XSS in",
                "tagVersionBoundary": {
                  "commits_after_fix": 31,
                  "repository": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework",
                  "tag": "v7.1",
                  "version": "7.1",
                  "version_type": "custom"
                },
                "weaknessRationale": [
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-79",
                    "rationale": "The patch explicitly addresses stored XSS: user-controlled tag names were inserted into the DOM as HTML via jQuery\u0027s html property without escaping. The fix renders these values as text nodes, which is the canonical remediation for CWE-79. The commit subject line also explicitly states \u0027prevent stored XSS\u0027."
                  },
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-94",
                    "rationale": "The replacement of eval(data) with JSON.parse(data) addresses a secondary code-injection weakness where a crafted data string could execute arbitrary JavaScript. This is a contributing factor but the primary vulnerability is the stored XSS in tag rendering."
                  }
                ]
              }
            }
          },
          "recordType": "advisory",
          "vulnId": "GCVE-1-2026-20269"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
    "assignerShortName": "CIRCL",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-100174",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-25T13:22:38.669Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-25T13:22:15.197Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T15:14:51.969Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2026-100176 (GCVE-0-2026-100176)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-25 13:29 – Updated: 2026-09-25 14:59
VLAI
Title
Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in AIL Framework Username Timeline Tooltip
Summary
The AIL Framework's username timeline feature is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting (XSS). Usernames imported from chats and crawled forums are stored without character restrictions. When an authenticated analyst views the username timeline, the application renders these stored usernames into the DOM using D3's html() method in the tooltip. Because the username value (d.obj) is interpolated directly into an HTML string without sanitization, a crafted username containing HTML event handlers (e.g., <img src=x onerror=alert(1)>) will execute arbitrary JavaScript in the analyst's browser when the analyst hovers over the corresponding timeline entry. The attack requires the victim to be an authenticated analyst with access to the timeline view and to interact with the malicious timeline entry (hover). Successful exploitation can lead to session hijacking, data exfiltration, or unauthorized actions performed within the analyst's authenticated session. The vulnerability resides in the client-side JavaScript file var/www/static/js/d3/timeline_basic.js.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-25 14:56 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-79 - Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
ail project ail framework Affected: unspecified , < 7.1 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
GCVE extensions
AI involvement GCVE-BCP-05-X-01
Whole record AI-generated Not human-reviewed GNA-1

Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.

ai-computer-assisted:llm-generatedai-computer-assisted:classification
Model Source Identifier
qwen3.8:27b ollama qwen3.8:27b
Patch provenance GCVE-BCP-05-X-02
Generator
patch2vuln.py on 2026-09-25 13:24
Model
qwen3.8:27b
Input
https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/455dd92c4179c53204368d93681ded4b57e31643.patch 36262636a3a7…
Confidence
medium
Commit Subject Patch SHA-256
455dd92c4179 chg: [security] fix XSS in username timeline tooltip. 36262636a3a7…
Fix summary

The fix applies the existing sanitize_text() helper to the user-controlled username value (d.obj) immediately before it is interpolated into the D3 tooltip HTML string. This ensures that any HTML or script content embedded in the stored username is neutralized before DOM insertion, preventing script execution while preserving the tooltip's intended formatting (line breaks and date/time display).

Patch summary

In var/www/static/js/d3/timeline_basic.js, the single line constructing the tooltip HTML was changed from tooltip.html(`${d.obj}<br>...`) to tooltip.html(`${sanitize_text(d.obj)}<br>...`). The only modification is wrapping the untrusted d.obj variable with the sanitize_text() function call at the HTML sink, leaving the rest of the tooltip template (br tags, date formatting) unchanged.

CVSS rationale

AV:N: The vulnerability is in a web application accessible over the network. AC:L: The attacker only needs to craft a username with HTML/JS in a chat or forum that gets crawled; no race conditions or complex conditions are needed. AT:N: No attack on the target system is required; the malicious username is stored as part of normal data import. PR:N: The attacker does not need any account or privilege on the AIL Framework; they only need to be a user in a source chat/forum. UI:A: The victim (analyst) must actively hover over the specific timeline entry to trigger script execution. VC:H: XSS in an authenticated analyst session can expose sensitive intelligence data, session tokens, and credentials. VI:H: The attacker can perform actions as the analyst, modify data, or exfiltrate information. VA:N: No impact on availability. SC/SI/SA:N: No subsequent system impact is evidenced.

Weakness rationale
  • CWE-79 The patch inserts a user-controlled value (username from imported chats/forums) into an HTML context via D3's html() method without sanitization. The fix adds sanitize_text() at the sink, confirming the root cause is missing output encoding/neutralization of untrusted data in an HTML context, which is the definition of CWE-79 (stored XSS variant).
Attack pattern rationale
  • CAPEC-1 CAPEC-1 describes the general pattern of injecting client-side scripts into web pages via untrusted input. The patch evidence shows a stored username (untrusted input from chats/forums) being rendered into an HTML tooltip without sanitization, matching the stored-XSS sub-pattern of CAPEC-1. This is the closest and most direct CAPEC mapping for an XSS vulnerability where attacker-controlled data is persisted and later rendered in a victim's browser.
Assumptions to verify
  • The UI:A (Active) user interaction metric assumes the analyst must deliberately hover over the specific timeline entry to trigger the XSS; passive rendering without hover is not evidenced in the patch.
  • The affected version boundary is inferred from the tag_version_boundary metadata (v7.1, 29 commits after fix); the exact last affected and first fixed version numbers are not explicitly stated in the patch.
  • PR:N assumes the attacker does not need an account on the AIL Framework itself, only a presence in a crawled chat or forum source; if the platform requires the attacker to be a registered user to have their username crawled, PR:L might be more appropriate.
  • The CAPEC-1 mapping is the closest available pattern for stored XSS; no more specific CAPEC ID for 'stored XSS via imported data rendered in a tooltip' exists in the CAPEC catalog.
  • The sanitize_text() helper is assumed to perform adequate HTML entity encoding or equivalent neutralization; its implementation is not shown in the patch.
  • VC:H and VI:H reflect the sensitivity of an intelligence-analysis platform where an authenticated analyst session may contain classified or highly sensitive data; if the deployment context is less sensitive, lower impact ratings could apply.
Model comparison

Selected qwen3.8:27b by deterministic-consensus-v1
The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required.

Model Score Agreement Confidence Assumptions
qwen3.8:27b 4 9 medium 6
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-100176",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-09-25T14:56:38.970855Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T14:59:28.644Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "modules": [
            "username timeline (D3 timeline_basic)"
          ],
          "product": "ail framework",
          "programFiles": [
            "var/www/static/js/d3/timeline_basic.js"
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework",
          "vendor": "ail project",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "7.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "unspecified",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "Aurelien Thirion"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Jeroen Pinoy"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe AIL Framework\u0027s username timeline feature is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting (XSS). Usernames imported from chats and crawled forums are stored without character restrictions. When an authenticated analyst views the username timeline, the application renders these stored usernames into the DOM using D3\u0027s html() method in the tooltip. Because the username value (d.obj) is interpolated directly into an HTML string without sanitization, a crafted username containing HTML event handlers (e.g., \u0026lt;img src=x onerror=alert(1)\u0026gt;) will execute arbitrary JavaScript in the analyst\u0027s browser when the analyst hovers over the corresponding timeline entry. The attack requires the victim to be an authenticated analyst with access to the timeline view and to interact with the malicious timeline entry (hover). Successful exploitation can lead to session hijacking, data exfiltration, or unauthorized actions performed within the analyst\u0027s authenticated session. The vulnerability resides in the client-side JavaScript file var/www/static/js/d3/timeline_basic.js.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The AIL Framework\u0027s username timeline feature is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting (XSS). Usernames imported from chats and crawled forums are stored without character restrictions. When an authenticated analyst views the username timeline, the application renders these stored usernames into the DOM using D3\u0027s html() method in the tooltip. Because the username value (d.obj) is interpolated directly into an HTML string without sanitization, a crafted username containing HTML event handlers (e.g., \u003cimg src=x onerror=alert(1)\u003e) will execute arbitrary JavaScript in the analyst\u0027s browser when the analyst hovers over the corresponding timeline entry. The attack requires the victim to be an authenticated analyst with access to the timeline view and to interact with the malicious timeline entry (hover). Successful exploitation can lead to session hijacking, data exfiltration, or unauthorized actions performed within the analyst\u0027s authenticated session. The vulnerability resides in the client-side JavaScript file var/www/static/js/d3/timeline_basic.js."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-1",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-1 Cross Site Scripting"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 8.5,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "ACTIVE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-79",
              "description": "CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T13:29:17.333Z",
        "orgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
        "shortName": "CIRCL"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "Security patch",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/455dd92c4179c53204368d93681ded4b57e31643"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe fix applies the existing sanitize_text() helper to the user-controlled username value (d.obj) immediately before it is interpolated into the D3 tooltip HTML string. This ensures that any HTML or script content embedded in the stored username is neutralized before DOM insertion, preventing script execution while preserving the tooltip\u0027s intended formatting (line breaks and date/time display).\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The fix applies the existing sanitize_text() helper to the user-controlled username value (d.obj) immediately before it is interpolated into the D3 tooltip HTML string. This ensures that any HTML or script content embedded in the stored username is neutralized before DOM insertion, preventing script execution while preserving the tooltip\u0027s intended formatting (line breaks and date/time display)."
        }
      ],
      "title": "Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in AIL Framework Username Timeline Tooltip",
      "x_gcve": [
        {
          "extensions": {
            "bcp-05-x-01": {
              "ai_annotations": [
                {
                  "ai_level": "generated",
                  "description": "Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.",
                  "gna_source": 1,
                  "models": [
                    {
                      "gna_source": 1,
                      "identifier": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "name": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "source": "ollama"
                    }
                  ],
                  "review_status": "none",
                  "scope": "record",
                  "tags": [
                    "ai-computer-assisted:llm-generated",
                    "ai-computer-assisted:classification"
                  ]
                }
              ]
            },
            "bcp-05-x-02": {
              "x_patch2vuln": {
                "assumptions": [
                  "The UI:A (Active) user interaction metric assumes the analyst must deliberately hover over the specific timeline entry to trigger the XSS; passive rendering without hover is not evidenced in the patch.",
                  "The affected version boundary is inferred from the tag_version_boundary metadata (v7.1, 29 commits after fix); the exact last affected and first fixed version numbers are not explicitly stated in the patch.",
                  "PR:N assumes the attacker does not need an account on the AIL Framework itself, only a presence in a crawled chat or forum source; if the platform requires the attacker to be a registered user to have their username crawled, PR:L might be more appropriate.",
                  "The CAPEC-1 mapping is the closest available pattern for stored XSS; no more specific CAPEC ID for \u0027stored XSS via imported data rendered in a tooltip\u0027 exists in the CAPEC catalog.",
                  "The sanitize_text() helper is assumed to perform adequate HTML entity encoding or equivalent neutralization; its implementation is not shown in the patch.",
                  "VC:H and VI:H reflect the sensitivity of an intelligence-analysis platform where an authenticated analyst session may contain classified or highly sensitive data; if the deployment context is less sensitive, lower impact ratings could apply."
                ],
                "capecRationale": [
                  {
                    "capecId": "CAPEC-1",
                    "rationale": "CAPEC-1 describes the general pattern of injecting client-side scripts into web pages via untrusted input. The patch evidence shows a stored username (untrusted input from chats/forums) being rendered into an HTML tooltip without sanitization, matching the stored-XSS sub-pattern of CAPEC-1. This is the closest and most direct CAPEC mapping for an XSS vulnerability where attacker-controlled data is persisted and later rendered in a victim\u0027s browser."
                  }
                ],
                "commit": "455dd92c4179c53204368d93681ded4b57e31643",
                "confidence": "medium",
                "credits": [
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "terrtia"
                  }
                ],
                "cvssRationale": "AV:N: The vulnerability is in a web application accessible over the network. AC:L: The attacker only needs to craft a username with HTML/JS in a chat or forum that gets crawled; no race conditions or complex conditions are needed. AT:N: No attack on the target system is required; the malicious username is stored as part of normal data import. PR:N: The attacker does not need any account or privilege on the AIL Framework; they only need to be a user in a source chat/forum. UI:A: The victim (analyst) must actively hover over the specific timeline entry to trigger script execution. VC:H: XSS in an authenticated analyst session can expose sensitive intelligence data, session tokens, and credentials. VI:H: The attacker can perform actions as the analyst, modify data, or exfiltrate information. VA:N: No impact on availability. SC/SI/SA:N: No subsequent system impact is evidenced.",
                "fixSummary": "The fix applies the existing sanitize_text() helper to the user-controlled username value (d.obj) immediately before it is interpolated into the D3 tooltip HTML string. This ensures that any HTML or script content embedded in the stored username is neutralized before DOM insertion, preventing script execution while preserving the tooltip\u0027s intended formatting (line breaks and date/time display).",
                "generatedAt": "2026-09-25T13:24:29.029450Z",
                "generator": "patch2vuln.py",
                "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                "modelComparison": {
                  "rankings": [
                    {
                      "agreementScore": 9,
                      "assumptionCount": 6,
                      "confidence": "medium",
                      "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "score": 4
                    }
                  ],
                  "selectedModel": "qwen3.8:27b",
                  "selectionMethod": "deterministic-consensus-v1",
                  "selectionNotice": "The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required."
                },
                "patchSha256": "36262636a3a75bbee1ac4f863ce7a5ce7939eb2e21fed5ede98403d38c29ec40",
                "patchSummary": "In var/www/static/js/d3/timeline_basic.js, the single line constructing the tooltip HTML was changed from tooltip.html(`${d.obj}\u003cbr\u003e...`) to tooltip.html(`${sanitize_text(d.obj)}\u003cbr\u003e...`). The only modification is wrapping the untrusted d.obj variable with the sanitize_text() function call at the HTML sink, leaving the rest of the tooltip template (br tags, date formatting) unchanged.",
                "patchTruncated": false,
                "patches": [
                  {
                    "commit": "455dd92c4179c53204368d93681ded4b57e31643",
                    "patchSha256": "36262636a3a75bbee1ac4f863ce7a5ce7939eb2e21fed5ede98403d38c29ec40",
                    "source": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/455dd92c4179c53204368d93681ded4b57e31643.patch",
                    "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/455dd92c4179c53204368d93681ded4b57e31643.patch",
                    "subject": "chg: [security] fix XSS in username timeline tooltip."
                  }
                ],
                "source": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/455dd92c4179c53204368d93681ded4b57e31643.patch",
                "subject": "chg: [security] fix XSS in username timeline tooltip.",
                "tagVersionBoundary": {
                  "commits_after_fix": 29,
                  "repository": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework",
                  "tag": "v7.1",
                  "version": "7.1",
                  "version_type": "custom"
                },
                "weaknessRationale": [
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-79",
                    "rationale": "The patch inserts a user-controlled value (username from imported chats/forums) into an HTML context via D3\u0027s html() method without sanitization. The fix adds sanitize_text() at the sink, confirming the root cause is missing output encoding/neutralization of untrusted data in an HTML context, which is the definition of CWE-79 (stored XSS variant)."
                  }
                ]
              }
            }
          },
          "recordType": "advisory",
          "vulnId": "GCVE-1-2026-20279"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
    "assignerShortName": "CIRCL",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-100176",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-25T13:29:17.333Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-25T13:29:14.017Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T14:59:28.644Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2026-100177 (GCVE-0-2026-100177)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-25 13:35 – Updated: 2026-09-25 14:55
VLAI
Title
Ail Framework Crawler: Missing Cookiejar Authorization Check Allows Cross-Organization Cookiejar Attachment
Summary
The AIL Framework crawler task creation API (api_add_crawler_task) contained an insufficient authorization check when a user supplied a cookiejar UUID to attach to a one-shot or scheduled crawler task. The original code only verified that the cookiejar existed and, if its access level was 0, compared the cookiejar's owning user ID to the requesting user ID. It did not validate organizational boundaries, did not account for the requesting user's role. When the cookiejar level was not 0, no access check was performed at all. An authenticated user could therefore reference another organization's cookiejar by UUID and have the crawler use that organization's stored cookies (session tokens, authentication credentials) when performing web crawls, effectively leaking or exfiltrating the victim organization's session data. The vulnerability requires an authenticated user with the ability to create crawler tasks. The attacker must know or guess a valid cookiejar UUID belonging to another organization. The impact is unauthorized access to another organization's stored cookies and session data through the crawler infrastructure.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-25 14:55 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-639 - Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
  • CWE-20 - Improper Input Validation
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
ail project ail framework Affected: unspecified , < 7.1 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
GCVE extensions
AI involvement GCVE-BCP-05-X-01
Whole record AI-generated Not human-reviewed GNA-1

Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.

ai-computer-assisted:llm-generatedai-computer-assisted:classification
Model Source Identifier
qwen3.8:27b ollama qwen3.8:27b
Patch provenance GCVE-BCP-05-X-02
Generator
patch2vuln.py on 2026-09-25 13:30
Model
qwen3.8:27b
Input
https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/3773ca36658c57ce592aebe74e27c855eb64f58a.patch 43e163a1b90d…
Confidence
medium
Commit Subject Patch SHA-256
3773ca36658c chg: [security] crawler, enforce cookiejar ACL when creating 43e163a1b90d…
Fix summary

The cookiejar attachment path in api_add_crawler_task is now validated through the existing api_check_cookiejar_access_acl() function, which enforces organization, user, and role-based access control for the 'view' action on the referenced cookiejar. The user_role parameter is propagated from the API and UI entry points (api_rest.py, crawler_splash.py) into the ACL check. Separately, URL scheme validation is enforced unconditionally: only http and https schemes are accepted, and non-conforming URLs are rejected with a 400 error before any further processing.

Patch summary

In bin/lib/crawlers.py: (1) is_global_url() now returns False for any scheme other than http/https (previously returned True for data/file schemes) and handles URLs lacking a netloc by prepending http://. (2) api_validate_global_urls() now rejects non-HTTP/HTTPS schemes with a 400 error before the local-IP filter check. (3) The Cookiejar class gains a get_creator() alias. (4) The CrawlerTask.create() method validates the URL scheme. (5) api_add_crawler_task() replaces the inline level-0 user-ID comparison with a call to api_check_cookiejar_access_acl(cookiejar_uuid, user_org, user_id, user_role, action='view') and accepts a new user_role parameter. (6) api_add_crawler_capture() now calls api_validate_global_urls(). In var/www/blueprints/api_rest.py and crawler_splash.py: user_role is extracted from the authenticated session and passed to api_add_crawler_task().

CVSS rationale

The vulnerability is exploitable over the network (AV:N) with low complexity (AC:L) since the attacker only needs to substitute a known or guessed cookiejar UUID in an API request. No attack target manipulation is required (AT:N). An authenticated user with crawler task creation privileges is needed (PR:L). No user interaction is required (UI:N). The vulnerable component itself does not lose confidentiality, integrity, or availability (VC:N, VI:N, VA:N). However, the subsequent impact is high on confidentiality (SC:H) because the attacker gains access to another organization's stored cookies and session tokens via the crawler, which could be used to impersonate the victim on target sites. No subsequent integrity or availability impact is evident (SI:N, SA:N).

Weakness rationale
  • CWE-639 The cookiejar UUID is a user-supplied identifier (key) that was not properly validated against the requesting user's organization and role. The old code only compared user IDs when level was 0 and skipped the check entirely otherwise, allowing cross-organization access to another user's cookiejar.
  • CWE-20 The URL scheme validation was incorrect: data: and file: schemes were treated as valid global URLs, and the scheme check was skipped when the local-IP filter was disabled. The fix enforces that only http and https schemes are accepted unconditionally.
Attack pattern rationale
  • CAPEC-1 The attacker tampers with the cookiejar UUID parameter in the crawler task creation API request to reference a resource (cookiejar) belonging to another organization. The system failed to validate that the referenced object was accessible to the requesting user's organization. This is the closest CAPEC pattern to an IDOR-style parameter substitution; no CAPEC specifically named 'Insecure Direct Object Reference' exists, so CAPEC-1 (modifying a request parameter to access unauthorized resources) is the best available match.
Assumptions to verify
  • The api_check_cookiejar_access_acl() function is assumed to correctly enforce organization, user, and role-based access control; its implementation is not included in this patch.
  • The cookiejar UUID is assumed to be guessable or discoverable by an authenticated user (e.g., via enumeration or information leakage); if UUIDs are truly random and unguessable, exploitability is reduced but the authorization flaw remains.
  • The CVSS assumes the primary security impact is subsequent confidentiality (access to another org's cookies/sessions) rather than direct compromise of the Ail Framework itself.
  • The CAPEC-1 mapping is the closest available pattern for an IDOR/parameter-substitution attack; no CAPEC specifically covers insecure direct object reference, so this mapping carries some uncertainty.
  • The affected version boundary is inferred from the tag v7.1 (26 commits after the fix commit), suggesting the fix landed before the v7.1 release; exact affected version range is not confirmed.
  • The URL scheme validation fix (rejecting data:/file: schemes) is treated as a secondary hardening change within the same patch set rather than a separate vulnerability.
Model comparison

Selected qwen3.8:27b by deterministic-consensus-v1
The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required.

Model Score Agreement Confidence Assumptions
qwen3.8:27b 4 9 medium 6
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-100177",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-09-25T14:55:38.429027Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T14:55:51.640Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "modules": [
            "bin/lib/crawlers.py",
            "var/www/blueprints/api_rest.py",
            "var/www/blueprints/crawler_splash.py"
          ],
          "product": "ail framework",
          "programFiles": [
            "bin/lib/crawlers.py",
            "var/www/blueprints/api_rest.py",
            "var/www/blueprints/crawler_splash.py"
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework",
          "vendor": "ail project",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "7.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "unspecified",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "terrtia"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Jeroen Pinoy"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe AIL Framework crawler task creation API (api_add_crawler_task) contained an insufficient authorization check when a user supplied a cookiejar UUID to attach to a one-shot or scheduled crawler task. The original code only verified that the cookiejar existed and, if its access level was 0, compared the cookiejar\u0027s owning user ID to the requesting user ID. It did not validate organizational boundaries, did not account for the requesting user\u0027s role. When the cookiejar level was not 0, no access check was performed at all. An authenticated user could therefore reference another organization\u0027s cookiejar by UUID and have the crawler use that organization\u0027s stored cookies (session tokens, authentication credentials) when performing web crawls, effectively leaking or exfiltrating the victim organization\u0027s session data.\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe vulnerability requires an authenticated user with the ability to create crawler tasks. The attacker must know or guess a valid cookiejar UUID belonging to another organization. The impact is unauthorized access to another organization\u0027s stored cookies and session data through the crawler infrastructure.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The AIL Framework crawler task creation API (api_add_crawler_task) contained an insufficient authorization check when a user supplied a cookiejar UUID to attach to a one-shot or scheduled crawler task. The original code only verified that the cookiejar existed and, if its access level was 0, compared the cookiejar\u0027s owning user ID to the requesting user ID. It did not validate organizational boundaries, did not account for the requesting user\u0027s role. When the cookiejar level was not 0, no access check was performed at all. An authenticated user could therefore reference another organization\u0027s cookiejar by UUID and have the crawler use that organization\u0027s stored cookies (session tokens, authentication credentials) when performing web crawls, effectively leaking or exfiltrating the victim organization\u0027s session data.\n\n\nThe vulnerability requires an authenticated user with the ability to create crawler tasks. The attacker must know or guess a valid cookiejar UUID belonging to another organization. The impact is unauthorized access to another organization\u0027s stored cookies and session data through the crawler infrastructure."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-1",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-1 Tamper with URLs"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 6.3,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-639",
              "description": "CWE-639 Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-20",
              "description": "CWE-20 Improper Input Validation",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T13:35:50.465Z",
        "orgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
        "shortName": "CIRCL"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "Security patch",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/3773ca36658c57ce592aebe74e27c855eb64f58a"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe cookiejar attachment path in api_add_crawler_task is now validated through the existing api_check_cookiejar_access_acl() function, which enforces organization, user, and role-based access control for the \u0027view\u0027 action on the referenced cookiejar. The user_role parameter is propagated from the API and UI entry points (api_rest.py, crawler_splash.py) into the ACL check. Separately, URL scheme validation is enforced unconditionally: only http and https schemes are accepted, and non-conforming URLs are rejected with a 400 error before any further processing.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The cookiejar attachment path in api_add_crawler_task is now validated through the existing api_check_cookiejar_access_acl() function, which enforces organization, user, and role-based access control for the \u0027view\u0027 action on the referenced cookiejar. The user_role parameter is propagated from the API and UI entry points (api_rest.py, crawler_splash.py) into the ACL check. Separately, URL scheme validation is enforced unconditionally: only http and https schemes are accepted, and non-conforming URLs are rejected with a 400 error before any further processing."
        }
      ],
      "title": "Ail Framework Crawler: Missing Cookiejar Authorization Check Allows Cross-Organization Cookiejar Attachment",
      "x_gcve": [
        {
          "extensions": {
            "bcp-05-x-01": {
              "ai_annotations": [
                {
                  "ai_level": "generated",
                  "description": "Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.",
                  "gna_source": 1,
                  "models": [
                    {
                      "gna_source": 1,
                      "identifier": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "name": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "source": "ollama"
                    }
                  ],
                  "review_status": "none",
                  "scope": "record",
                  "tags": [
                    "ai-computer-assisted:llm-generated",
                    "ai-computer-assisted:classification"
                  ]
                }
              ]
            },
            "bcp-05-x-02": {
              "x_patch2vuln": {
                "assumptions": [
                  "The api_check_cookiejar_access_acl() function is assumed to correctly enforce organization, user, and role-based access control; its implementation is not included in this patch.",
                  "The cookiejar UUID is assumed to be guessable or discoverable by an authenticated user (e.g., via enumeration or information leakage); if UUIDs are truly random and unguessable, exploitability is reduced but the authorization flaw remains.",
                  "The CVSS assumes the primary security impact is subsequent confidentiality (access to another org\u0027s cookies/sessions) rather than direct compromise of the Ail Framework itself.",
                  "The CAPEC-1 mapping is the closest available pattern for an IDOR/parameter-substitution attack; no CAPEC specifically covers insecure direct object reference, so this mapping carries some uncertainty.",
                  "The affected version boundary is inferred from the tag v7.1 (26 commits after the fix commit), suggesting the fix landed before the v7.1 release; exact affected version range is not confirmed.",
                  "The URL scheme validation fix (rejecting data:/file: schemes) is treated as a secondary hardening change within the same patch set rather than a separate vulnerability."
                ],
                "capecRationale": [
                  {
                    "capecId": "CAPEC-1",
                    "rationale": "The attacker tampers with the cookiejar UUID parameter in the crawler task creation API request to reference a resource (cookiejar) belonging to another organization. The system failed to validate that the referenced object was accessible to the requesting user\u0027s organization. This is the closest CAPEC pattern to an IDOR-style parameter substitution; no CAPEC specifically named \u0027Insecure Direct Object Reference\u0027 exists, so CAPEC-1 (modifying a request parameter to access unauthorized resources) is the best available match."
                  }
                ],
                "commit": "3773ca36658c57ce592aebe74e27c855eb64f58a",
                "confidence": "medium",
                "credits": [
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "terrtia"
                  }
                ],
                "cvssRationale": "The vulnerability is exploitable over the network (AV:N) with low complexity (AC:L) since the attacker only needs to substitute a known or guessed cookiejar UUID in an API request. No attack target manipulation is required (AT:N). An authenticated user with crawler task creation privileges is needed (PR:L). No user interaction is required (UI:N). The vulnerable component itself does not lose confidentiality, integrity, or availability (VC:N, VI:N, VA:N). However, the subsequent impact is high on confidentiality (SC:H) because the attacker gains access to another organization\u0027s stored cookies and session tokens via the crawler, which could be used to impersonate the victim on target sites. No subsequent integrity or availability impact is evident (SI:N, SA:N).",
                "fixSummary": "The cookiejar attachment path in api_add_crawler_task is now validated through the existing api_check_cookiejar_access_acl() function, which enforces organization, user, and role-based access control for the \u0027view\u0027 action on the referenced cookiejar. The user_role parameter is propagated from the API and UI entry points (api_rest.py, crawler_splash.py) into the ACL check. Separately, URL scheme validation is enforced unconditionally: only http and https schemes are accepted, and non-conforming URLs are rejected with a 400 error before any further processing.",
                "generatedAt": "2026-09-25T13:30:48.386437Z",
                "generator": "patch2vuln.py",
                "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                "modelComparison": {
                  "rankings": [
                    {
                      "agreementScore": 9,
                      "assumptionCount": 6,
                      "confidence": "medium",
                      "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "score": 4
                    }
                  ],
                  "selectedModel": "qwen3.8:27b",
                  "selectionMethod": "deterministic-consensus-v1",
                  "selectionNotice": "The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required."
                },
                "patchSha256": "43e163a1b90d5926293d5dbd7982d46241f08d7a9d2cb0edf86c963f794afac5",
                "patchSummary": "In bin/lib/crawlers.py: (1) is_global_url() now returns False for any scheme other than http/https (previously returned True for data/file schemes) and handles URLs lacking a netloc by prepending http://. (2) api_validate_global_urls() now rejects non-HTTP/HTTPS schemes with a 400 error before the local-IP filter check. (3) The Cookiejar class gains a get_creator() alias. (4) The CrawlerTask.create() method validates the URL scheme. (5) api_add_crawler_task() replaces the inline level-0 user-ID comparison with a call to api_check_cookiejar_access_acl(cookiejar_uuid, user_org, user_id, user_role, action=\u0027view\u0027) and accepts a new user_role parameter. (6) api_add_crawler_capture() now calls api_validate_global_urls(). In var/www/blueprints/api_rest.py and crawler_splash.py: user_role is extracted from the authenticated session and passed to api_add_crawler_task().",
                "patchTruncated": false,
                "patches": [
                  {
                    "commit": "3773ca36658c57ce592aebe74e27c855eb64f58a",
                    "patchSha256": "43e163a1b90d5926293d5dbd7982d46241f08d7a9d2cb0edf86c963f794afac5",
                    "source": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/3773ca36658c57ce592aebe74e27c855eb64f58a.patch",
                    "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/3773ca36658c57ce592aebe74e27c855eb64f58a.patch",
                    "subject": "chg: [security] crawler, enforce cookiejar ACL when creating"
                  }
                ],
                "source": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/3773ca36658c57ce592aebe74e27c855eb64f58a.patch",
                "subject": "chg: [security] crawler, enforce cookiejar ACL when creating",
                "tagVersionBoundary": {
                  "commits_after_fix": 26,
                  "repository": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework",
                  "tag": "v7.1",
                  "version": "7.1",
                  "version_type": "custom"
                },
                "weaknessRationale": [
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-639",
                    "rationale": "The cookiejar UUID is a user-supplied identifier (key) that was not properly validated against the requesting user\u0027s organization and role. The old code only compared user IDs when level was 0 and skipped the check entirely otherwise, allowing cross-organization access to another user\u0027s cookiejar."
                  },
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-20",
                    "rationale": "The URL scheme validation was incorrect: data: and file: schemes were treated as valid global URLs, and the scheme check was skipped when the local-IP filter was disabled. The fix enforces that only http and https schemes are accepted unconditionally."
                  }
                ]
              }
            }
          },
          "recordType": "advisory",
          "vulnId": "GCVE-1-2026-20183"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
    "assignerShortName": "CIRCL",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-100177",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-25T13:35:50.465Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-25T13:35:37.184Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T14:55:51.640Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2026-100187 (GCVE-0-2026-100187)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-25 13:42 – Updated: 2026-09-25 14:49
VLAI
Title
AIL Framework Onion Module: Non-Onion URL Accepted as Crawler Task Due to Bypassed Domain Validation
Summary
The Onion module in AIL Framework contained a performance shortcut in its URL extraction logic that accepted URLs as valid .onion targets based solely on a length check (exactly 69 characters) and a suffix check (ending in ".onion"), without performing proper hostname parsing or onion-domain validation. An unauthenticated attacker who could publish or control web content crawled by the framework could embed a crafted URL containing an IP address or non-onion hostname with a path ending in ".onion" that satisfied the length and suffix conditions. Such a URL would be extracted, its domain naively sliced from the string, and queued as a legitimate onion crawler task. This allowed unauthenticated content publishers to inject arbitrary non-onion targets into the crawler's task queue, influencing crawler behavior and potentially directing it toward unintended network resources. The vulnerability required no authentication, no user interaction, and only the ability to place crafted content in a location the framework would crawl. The security impact is a loss of integrity in the crawler's target selection: the framework processes and acts upon URLs that do not correspond to legitimate .onion services.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: yes Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-25 14:45 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-20 - Improper Input Validation
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
ail project ail framework Affected: unspecified , < 7.1 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
GCVE extensions
AI involvement GCVE-BCP-05-X-01
Whole record AI-generated Not human-reviewed GNA-1

Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.

ai-computer-assisted:llm-generatedai-computer-assisted:classification
Model Source Identifier
qwen3.8:27b ollama qwen3.8:27b
Patch provenance GCVE-BCP-05-X-02
Generator
patch2vuln.py on 2026-09-25 13:37
Model
qwen3.8:27b
Input
https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/5c8a68b3d8c7d7b03e5febe4ac5b5aca91826adb.patch 9fbf19112822…
Confidence
medium
Commit Subject Patch SHA-256
5c8a68b3d8c7 chg: [security] Onion module, prevent non-onion crawler task 9fbf19112822…
Fix summary

The length-based shortcut that bypassed onion-domain validation is removed. Every extracted URL is now parsed using the standard URL domain extraction function, and the resulting hostname is validated against the existing onion-domain validation routine before the URL is added to the crawler task set. This ensures that only URLs whose hostname is a genuine .onion domain can be queued as crawler tasks.

Patch summary

In bin/modules/Onion.py, the conditional block that checked len(url) == 69 and url.endswith('.onion') to shortcut domain extraction (url[7:]) without calling crawlers.is_valid_onion_domain() is removed. The code is replaced with an unconditional call to crawlers.get_url_domain(url) followed by a check that the returned domain is truthy and passes crawlers.is_valid_onion_domain(domain) before adding the domain and URL to the respective sets. Net change: 2 insertions, 9 deletions in a single file.

CVSS rationale

Attack Vector is Network because the attacker publishes crafted content on the web that the framework crawls. Attack Complexity is Low because the attacker only needs to construct a URL of exactly 69 characters ending in .onion with a non-onion hostname. No special Adversary Techniques are required. Privileges Required is None because the attacker is an unauthenticated content publisher. User Interaction is None because the crawler processes the content automatically. The primary impact is Low Integrity on the vulnerable component: the crawler task queue is polluted with non-onion URLs, violating the integrity of the framework's target selection. No confidentiality or availability impact is evident from the patch. No subsequent component impact is identified in the evidence.

Weakness rationale
  • CWE-20 The URL input was validated using an insufficient heuristic (string length and suffix) that could be satisfied by non-onion URLs. The proper hostname parsing and onion-domain validation step was bypassed by the shortcut, allowing attacker-controlled URLs to be accepted as valid onion targets.
Attack pattern rationale
  • CAPEC-126 The attacker tampers with URL parameters embedded in untrusted crawled content to bypass the application's validation logic and inject non-onion targets into the crawler task queue. CAPEC-126 is the closest available pattern describing manipulation of input parameters to achieve unintended application behavior. The mapping is approximate because the attack vector is content-based injection rather than direct request parameter manipulation, but the core mechanism (crafting input to bypass validation) aligns with this pattern.
Assumptions to verify
  • The affected version range is inferred from the tag_version_boundary metadata indicating the fix commit is 24 commits before the v7.1 tag; the exact version number of the vulnerable release is not specified in the patch.
  • The CVSS assumes the attacker can place crafted content in a location the AIL Framework crawler will process; the specific crawling scope and configuration are not detailed in the patch.
  • CAPEC-126 (Parameter Tampering) is the closest available attack pattern; the actual attack is content-based URL injection rather than classic request parameter tampering, so the mapping is approximate.
  • The impact is assessed as Low Integrity based on the evidence that non-onion URLs are queued as crawler tasks; broader downstream consequences (e.g., SSRF-like effects) are not evidenced in the patch and are not assumed.
  • The commit date (24 Sep 2026) is taken as-is from the patch metadata; no independent verification of the timeline is performed.
Model comparison

Selected qwen3.8:27b by deterministic-consensus-v1
The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required.

Model Score Agreement Confidence Assumptions
qwen3.8:27b 5 9 medium 5
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-100187",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-09-25T14:45:47.206440Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T14:49:57.208Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "modules": [
            "Onion module"
          ],
          "product": "ail framework",
          "programFiles": [
            "bin/modules/Onion.py"
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework",
          "vendor": "ail project",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "7.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "unspecified",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "Aurelien Thirion"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Jeroen Pinoy"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe Onion module in AIL Framework contained a performance shortcut in its URL extraction logic that accepted URLs as valid .onion targets based solely on a length check (exactly 69 characters) and a suffix check (ending in \".onion\"), without performing proper hostname parsing or onion-domain validation. An unauthenticated attacker who could publish or control web content crawled by the framework could embed a crafted URL containing an IP address or non-onion hostname with a path ending in \".onion\" that satisfied the length and suffix conditions. Such a URL would be extracted, its domain naively sliced from the string, and queued as a legitimate onion crawler task. This allowed unauthenticated content publishers to inject arbitrary non-onion targets into the crawler\u0027s task queue, influencing crawler behavior and potentially directing it toward unintended network resources. The vulnerability required no authentication, no user interaction, and only the ability to place crafted content in a location the framework would crawl. The security impact is a loss of integrity in the crawler\u0027s target selection: the framework processes and acts upon URLs that do not correspond to legitimate .onion services.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The Onion module in AIL Framework contained a performance shortcut in its URL extraction logic that accepted URLs as valid .onion targets based solely on a length check (exactly 69 characters) and a suffix check (ending in \".onion\"), without performing proper hostname parsing or onion-domain validation. An unauthenticated attacker who could publish or control web content crawled by the framework could embed a crafted URL containing an IP address or non-onion hostname with a path ending in \".onion\" that satisfied the length and suffix conditions. Such a URL would be extracted, its domain naively sliced from the string, and queued as a legitimate onion crawler task. This allowed unauthenticated content publishers to inject arbitrary non-onion targets into the crawler\u0027s task queue, influencing crawler behavior and potentially directing it toward unintended network resources. The vulnerability required no authentication, no user interaction, and only the ability to place crafted content in a location the framework would crawl. The security impact is a loss of integrity in the crawler\u0027s target selection: the framework processes and acts upon URLs that do not correspond to legitimate .onion services."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-126",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-126 Parameter Tampering"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 6.9,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-20",
              "description": "CWE-20 Improper Input Validation",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T13:42:16.854Z",
        "orgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
        "shortName": "CIRCL"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "Security patch",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/5c8a68b3d8c7d7b03e5febe4ac5b5aca91826adb"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe length-based shortcut that bypassed onion-domain validation is removed. Every extracted URL is now parsed using the standard URL domain extraction function, and the resulting hostname is validated against the existing onion-domain validation routine before the URL is added to the crawler task set. This ensures that only URLs whose hostname is a genuine .onion domain can be queued as crawler tasks.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The length-based shortcut that bypassed onion-domain validation is removed. Every extracted URL is now parsed using the standard URL domain extraction function, and the resulting hostname is validated against the existing onion-domain validation routine before the URL is added to the crawler task set. This ensures that only URLs whose hostname is a genuine .onion domain can be queued as crawler tasks."
        }
      ],
      "title": "AIL Framework Onion Module: Non-Onion URL Accepted as Crawler Task Due to Bypassed Domain Validation",
      "x_gcve": [
        {
          "extensions": {
            "bcp-05-x-01": {
              "ai_annotations": [
                {
                  "ai_level": "generated",
                  "description": "Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.",
                  "gna_source": 1,
                  "models": [
                    {
                      "gna_source": 1,
                      "identifier": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "name": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "source": "ollama"
                    }
                  ],
                  "review_status": "none",
                  "scope": "record",
                  "tags": [
                    "ai-computer-assisted:llm-generated",
                    "ai-computer-assisted:classification"
                  ]
                }
              ]
            },
            "bcp-05-x-02": {
              "x_patch2vuln": {
                "assumptions": [
                  "The affected version range is inferred from the tag_version_boundary metadata indicating the fix commit is 24 commits before the v7.1 tag; the exact version number of the vulnerable release is not specified in the patch.",
                  "The CVSS assumes the attacker can place crafted content in a location the AIL Framework crawler will process; the specific crawling scope and configuration are not detailed in the patch.",
                  "CAPEC-126 (Parameter Tampering) is the closest available attack pattern; the actual attack is content-based URL injection rather than classic request parameter tampering, so the mapping is approximate.",
                  "The impact is assessed as Low Integrity based on the evidence that non-onion URLs are queued as crawler tasks; broader downstream consequences (e.g., SSRF-like effects) are not evidenced in the patch and are not assumed.",
                  "The commit date (24 Sep 2026) is taken as-is from the patch metadata; no independent verification of the timeline is performed."
                ],
                "capecRationale": [
                  {
                    "capecId": "CAPEC-126",
                    "rationale": "The attacker tampers with URL parameters embedded in untrusted crawled content to bypass the application\u0027s validation logic and inject non-onion targets into the crawler task queue. CAPEC-126 is the closest available pattern describing manipulation of input parameters to achieve unintended application behavior. The mapping is approximate because the attack vector is content-based injection rather than direct request parameter manipulation, but the core mechanism (crafting input to bypass validation) aligns with this pattern."
                  }
                ],
                "commit": "5c8a68b3d8c7d7b03e5febe4ac5b5aca91826adb",
                "confidence": "medium",
                "credits": [
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "terrtia"
                  }
                ],
                "cvssRationale": "Attack Vector is Network because the attacker publishes crafted content on the web that the framework crawls. Attack Complexity is Low because the attacker only needs to construct a URL of exactly 69 characters ending in .onion with a non-onion hostname. No special Adversary Techniques are required. Privileges Required is None because the attacker is an unauthenticated content publisher. User Interaction is None because the crawler processes the content automatically. The primary impact is Low Integrity on the vulnerable component: the crawler task queue is polluted with non-onion URLs, violating the integrity of the framework\u0027s target selection. No confidentiality or availability impact is evident from the patch. No subsequent component impact is identified in the evidence.",
                "fixSummary": "The length-based shortcut that bypassed onion-domain validation is removed. Every extracted URL is now parsed using the standard URL domain extraction function, and the resulting hostname is validated against the existing onion-domain validation routine before the URL is added to the crawler task set. This ensures that only URLs whose hostname is a genuine .onion domain can be queued as crawler tasks.",
                "generatedAt": "2026-09-25T13:37:37.543009Z",
                "generator": "patch2vuln.py",
                "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                "modelComparison": {
                  "rankings": [
                    {
                      "agreementScore": 9,
                      "assumptionCount": 5,
                      "confidence": "medium",
                      "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "score": 5
                    }
                  ],
                  "selectedModel": "qwen3.8:27b",
                  "selectionMethod": "deterministic-consensus-v1",
                  "selectionNotice": "The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required."
                },
                "patchSha256": "9fbf191128229c1859f3643b5f50921cdf5f36fd70734e8f68a05e237b987d60",
                "patchSummary": "In bin/modules/Onion.py, the conditional block that checked len(url) == 69 and url.endswith(\u0027.onion\u0027) to shortcut domain extraction (url[7:]) without calling crawlers.is_valid_onion_domain() is removed. The code is replaced with an unconditional call to crawlers.get_url_domain(url) followed by a check that the returned domain is truthy and passes crawlers.is_valid_onion_domain(domain) before adding the domain and URL to the respective sets. Net change: 2 insertions, 9 deletions in a single file.",
                "patchTruncated": false,
                "patches": [
                  {
                    "commit": "5c8a68b3d8c7d7b03e5febe4ac5b5aca91826adb",
                    "patchSha256": "9fbf191128229c1859f3643b5f50921cdf5f36fd70734e8f68a05e237b987d60",
                    "source": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/5c8a68b3d8c7d7b03e5febe4ac5b5aca91826adb.patch",
                    "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/5c8a68b3d8c7d7b03e5febe4ac5b5aca91826adb.patch",
                    "subject": "chg: [security] Onion module, prevent non-onion crawler task"
                  }
                ],
                "source": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework/commit/5c8a68b3d8c7d7b03e5febe4ac5b5aca91826adb.patch",
                "subject": "chg: [security] Onion module, prevent non-onion crawler task",
                "tagVersionBoundary": {
                  "commits_after_fix": 24,
                  "repository": "https://github.com/ail-project/ail-framework",
                  "tag": "v7.1",
                  "version": "7.1",
                  "version_type": "custom"
                },
                "weaknessRationale": [
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-20",
                    "rationale": "The URL input was validated using an insufficient heuristic (string length and suffix) that could be satisfied by non-onion URLs. The proper hostname parsing and onion-domain validation step was bypassed by the shortcut, allowing attacker-controlled URLs to be accepted as valid onion targets."
                  }
                ]
              }
            }
          },
          "recordType": "advisory",
          "vulnId": "GCVE-1-2026-20276"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
    "assignerShortName": "CIRCL",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-100187",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-25T13:42:16.854Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-25T13:42:12.578Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T14:49:57.208Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2026-97863 (GCVE-0-2026-97863)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-25 08:03 – Updated: 2026-09-25 13:19
VLAI
Title
misp-modules: Shell Command Injection in MISP cisco_firesight_manager_ACL_rule_export Module via Unescaped Attribute Values
Summary
The cisco_firesight_manager_ACL_rule_export module in misp-modules generates a shell script (.sh) that authenticates to and calls the Cisco fireSIGHT Manager API. The module interpolates configuration values (IP address, login, password, domain ID, policy ID) and MISP attribute values (destination IPs, URLs, event info comments) directly into single-quoted shell string assignments without any escaping or sanitization. Because the values are placed inside single-quoted shell strings, any value containing a single-quote character (e.g., a crafted ip-dst or url attribute value submitted to MISP) breaks out of the quoting context, allowing an attacker to inject arbitrary shell commands into the exported script. A security analyst who subsequently executes the generated .sh file unmodified would run the injected commands with their own privileges, potentially exposing fireSIGHT Manager credentials, modifying ACL rules, or compromising the analyst workstation. Additionally, the module contained a secondary defect where the variable 'config' was only assigned inside a conditional block but referenced unconditionally afterward, causing a NameError (denial of service) when the request payload lacked a 'config' key. The vulnerability requires the attacker to have the ability to submit MISP events or attributes containing a single-quote character and the victim to execute the exported script. No authentication bypass is required beyond standard MISP event-submission privileges.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-25 13:18 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ("Command Injection")
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
misp misp-modules Affected: 0 , ≤ 3.0.10 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
GCVE extensions
AI involvement GCVE-BCP-05-X-01
Whole record AI-generated Not human-reviewed GNA-1

Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.

ai-computer-assisted:llm-generatedai-computer-assisted:classification
Model Source Identifier
qwen3.8:27b ollama qwen3.8:27b
Patch provenance GCVE-BCP-05-X-02
Generator
patch2vuln.py on 2026-09-25 07:48
Model
qwen3.8:27b
Input
https://github.com/elhoim/misp-modules/commit/625b54908efbd6acc8343aa3370d401dd370e748.patch 9c34349775d0…
Confidence
high
Commit Subject Patch SHA-256
625b54908efb fix: [cisco_firesight_manager_ACL_rule_export] shell-escape 9c34349775d0…
Fix summary

All user-controlled and configuration values interpolated into the generated shell script are now passed through Python's shlex.quote() function, which produces a safely quoted string that cannot be broken out of by embedded shell metacharacters. For the JSON access-rule block that embeds multiple attribute values within a single shell assignment, the JSON content is first assembled as plain text and then the entire assembled string is shlex-quoted once, preventing stray quote characters from corrupting the outer quoting. The 'config' variable is now initialized to an empty dictionary before the conditional assignment, eliminating the NameError.

Patch summary

Added 'import shlex' at the top of the module. Replaced direct .format() interpolation of config values (fmc_ip_addr, fmc_login, fmc_pass, domain_id, acpolicy_id) with shlex.quote()-wrapped values. Refactored the BLOCK_JSON_TMPL to separate the JSON content template (BLOCK_JSON_CONTENT_TMPL) from the shell assignment template; the JSON content is formatted first with raw attribute values, then the resulting string is passed through shlex.quote() before being substituted into the shell assignment. Initialized 'config = {}' before the 'if "config" in request:' block to prevent NameError.

CVSS rationale

AV:N: The attacker submits crafted MISP attribute values over the network to a MISP instance. AC:L: Injecting a single-quote character into an attribute value is trivial and requires no race conditions or special timing. AT:N: No special data manipulation or prior access to the target system is needed beyond submitting an event. PR:L: The attacker needs only basic MISP user privileges to create or modify events/attributes. UI:A: The victim analyst must actively execute the generated .sh file for the injected commands to run. VC:N, VI:N, VA:N: The MISP instance itself is not directly compromised; the impact is on the downstream system where the script executes. SC:H: The injected commands can exfiltrate fireSIGHT Manager credentials and analyst system data. SI:H: Arbitrary command execution allows modification of ACL rules, system files, or other integrity-critical resources. SA:H: Injected commands can disrupt or destroy the analyst workstation or fireSIGHT Manager availability.

Weakness rationale
  • CWE-78 The module constructs a shell script by interpolating untrusted values (MISP attribute values, configuration fields) into single-quoted shell strings without escaping. A single-quote character in any interpolated value breaks the quoting and allows arbitrary shell command injection. This is a textbook command injection via insufficient output encoding in a generated shell script.
Attack pattern rationale
  • CAPEC-88 The attack pattern involves an attacker supplying input containing shell metacharacters (specifically a single quote) that is incorporated into a shell command or script without proper sanitization, resulting in execution of attacker-controlled commands. The patch confirms the vulnerable pattern: values are interpolated into single-quoted shell assignments, and the fix is to apply shlex.quote() to neutralize shell metacharacters. This is the closest and most specific CAPEC mapping for the observed vulnerability.
Assumptions to verify
  • The CVSS UI metric is set to A (Active) because the victim analyst must deliberately execute the generated .sh file; CVSS v4.0 does not use the v3.x 'R' value.
  • PR is set to L assuming the attacker holds a basic MISP user role sufficient to create or modify events and attributes; the patch does not specify exact role requirements.
  • SC, SI, SA are rated H based on the potential for arbitrary command execution on the analyst workstation and the fireSIGHT Manager; actual impact depends on the analyst's local privileges and the fireSIGHT Manager's exposure.
  • The CAPEC-88 mapping is the closest available pattern; the vulnerability is specifically an output-encoding failure in generated shell script rather than direct command-line injection, but CAPEC-88 is the narrowest defensible match.
  • No specific affected or fixed version numbers are available from the patch metadata; the commit date (2026-08-31) is the only temporal anchor.
  • The secondary NameError bug (config variable) is a minor denial-of-service issue included in the same patch but is not the primary security concern.
Model comparison

Selected qwen3.8:27b by deterministic-consensus-v1
The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required.

Model Score Agreement Confidence Assumptions
qwen3.8:27b 5 9 high 6
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-97863",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-09-25T13:18:10.409406Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T13:19:52.508Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://github.com/MISP/misp-modules",
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "modules": [
            "cisco_firesight_manager_ACL_rule_export"
          ],
          "product": "misp-modules",
          "programFiles": [
            "misp_modules/modules/export_mod/cisco_firesight_manager_ACL_rule_export.py"
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/misp/misp-modules",
          "vendor": "misp",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "3.0.10",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "elhoim"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "Claude Opus 5"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe cisco_firesight_manager_ACL_rule_export module in misp-modules generates a shell script (.sh) that authenticates to and calls the Cisco fireSIGHT Manager API. The module interpolates configuration values (IP address, login, password, domain ID, policy ID) and MISP attribute values (destination IPs, URLs, event info comments) directly into single-quoted shell string assignments without any escaping or sanitization. Because the values are placed inside single-quoted shell strings, any value containing a single-quote character (e.g., a crafted ip-dst or url attribute value submitted to MISP) breaks out of the quoting context, allowing an attacker to inject arbitrary shell commands into the exported script. A security analyst who subsequently executes the generated .sh file unmodified would run the injected commands with their own privileges, potentially exposing fireSIGHT Manager credentials, modifying ACL rules, or compromising the analyst workstation. Additionally, the module contained a secondary defect where the variable \u0027config\u0027 was only assigned inside a conditional block but referenced unconditionally afterward, causing a NameError (denial of service) when the request payload lacked a \u0027config\u0027 key. The vulnerability requires the attacker to have the ability to submit MISP events or attributes containing a single-quote character and the victim to execute the exported script. No authentication bypass is required beyond standard MISP event-submission privileges.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The cisco_firesight_manager_ACL_rule_export module in misp-modules generates a shell script (.sh) that authenticates to and calls the Cisco fireSIGHT Manager API. The module interpolates configuration values (IP address, login, password, domain ID, policy ID) and MISP attribute values (destination IPs, URLs, event info comments) directly into single-quoted shell string assignments without any escaping or sanitization. Because the values are placed inside single-quoted shell strings, any value containing a single-quote character (e.g., a crafted ip-dst or url attribute value submitted to MISP) breaks out of the quoting context, allowing an attacker to inject arbitrary shell commands into the exported script. A security analyst who subsequently executes the generated .sh file unmodified would run the injected commands with their own privileges, potentially exposing fireSIGHT Manager credentials, modifying ACL rules, or compromising the analyst workstation. Additionally, the module contained a secondary defect where the variable \u0027config\u0027 was only assigned inside a conditional block but referenced unconditionally afterward, causing a NameError (denial of service) when the request payload lacked a \u0027config\u0027 key. The vulnerability requires the attacker to have the ability to submit MISP events or attributes containing a single-quote character and the victim to execute the exported script. No authentication bypass is required beyond standard MISP event-submission privileges."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-88",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-88 Shell Command Injection"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 6.3,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "userInteraction": "ACTIVE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-78",
              "description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\"Command Injection\")",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T09:50:00.869Z",
        "orgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
        "shortName": "CIRCL"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "Security patch",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/misp/misp-modules/commit/625b54908efbd6acc8343aa3370d401dd370e748"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eAll user-controlled and configuration values interpolated into the generated shell script are now passed through Python\u0027s shlex.quote() function, which produces a safely quoted string that cannot be broken out of by embedded shell metacharacters. For the JSON access-rule block that embeds multiple attribute values within a single shell assignment, the JSON content is first assembled as plain text and then the entire assembled string is shlex-quoted once, preventing stray quote characters from corrupting the outer quoting. The \u0027config\u0027 variable is now initialized to an empty dictionary before the conditional assignment, eliminating the NameError.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "All user-controlled and configuration values interpolated into the generated shell script are now passed through Python\u0027s shlex.quote() function, which produces a safely quoted string that cannot be broken out of by embedded shell metacharacters. For the JSON access-rule block that embeds multiple attribute values within a single shell assignment, the JSON content is first assembled as plain text and then the entire assembled string is shlex-quoted once, preventing stray quote characters from corrupting the outer quoting. The \u0027config\u0027 variable is now initialized to an empty dictionary before the conditional assignment, eliminating the NameError."
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "misp-modules: Shell Command Injection in MISP cisco_firesight_manager_ACL_rule_export Module via Unescaped Attribute Values",
      "x_gcve": [
        {
          "extensions": {
            "bcp-05-x-01": {
              "ai_annotations": [
                {
                  "ai_level": "generated",
                  "description": "Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.",
                  "gna_source": 1,
                  "models": [
                    {
                      "gna_source": 1,
                      "identifier": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "name": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "source": "ollama"
                    }
                  ],
                  "review_status": "none",
                  "scope": "record",
                  "tags": [
                    "ai-computer-assisted:llm-generated",
                    "ai-computer-assisted:classification"
                  ]
                }
              ]
            },
            "bcp-05-x-02": {
              "x_patch2vuln": {
                "assumptions": [
                  "The CVSS UI metric is set to A (Active) because the victim analyst must deliberately execute the generated .sh file; CVSS v4.0 does not use the v3.x \u0027R\u0027 value.",
                  "PR is set to L assuming the attacker holds a basic MISP user role sufficient to create or modify events and attributes; the patch does not specify exact role requirements.",
                  "SC, SI, SA are rated H based on the potential for arbitrary command execution on the analyst workstation and the fireSIGHT Manager; actual impact depends on the analyst\u0027s local privileges and the fireSIGHT Manager\u0027s exposure.",
                  "The CAPEC-88 mapping is the closest available pattern; the vulnerability is specifically an output-encoding failure in generated shell script rather than direct command-line injection, but CAPEC-88 is the narrowest defensible match.",
                  "No specific affected or fixed version numbers are available from the patch metadata; the commit date (2026-08-31) is the only temporal anchor.",
                  "The secondary NameError bug (config variable) is a minor denial-of-service issue included in the same patch but is not the primary security concern."
                ],
                "capecRationale": [
                  {
                    "capecId": "CAPEC-88",
                    "rationale": "The attack pattern involves an attacker supplying input containing shell metacharacters (specifically a single quote) that is incorporated into a shell command or script without proper sanitization, resulting in execution of attacker-controlled commands. The patch confirms the vulnerable pattern: values are interpolated into single-quoted shell assignments, and the fix is to apply shlex.quote() to neutralize shell metacharacters. This is the closest and most specific CAPEC mapping for the observed vulnerability."
                  }
                ],
                "commit": "625b54908efbd6acc8343aa3370d401dd370e748",
                "confidence": "high",
                "credits": [
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "elhoim"
                  },
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "Claude Opus 5"
                  }
                ],
                "cvssRationale": "AV:N: The attacker submits crafted MISP attribute values over the network to a MISP instance. AC:L: Injecting a single-quote character into an attribute value is trivial and requires no race conditions or special timing. AT:N: No special data manipulation or prior access to the target system is needed beyond submitting an event. PR:L: The attacker needs only basic MISP user privileges to create or modify events/attributes. UI:A: The victim analyst must actively execute the generated .sh file for the injected commands to run. VC:N, VI:N, VA:N: The MISP instance itself is not directly compromised; the impact is on the downstream system where the script executes. SC:H: The injected commands can exfiltrate fireSIGHT Manager credentials and analyst system data. SI:H: Arbitrary command execution allows modification of ACL rules, system files, or other integrity-critical resources. SA:H: Injected commands can disrupt or destroy the analyst workstation or fireSIGHT Manager availability.",
                "draft": false,
                "fixSummary": "All user-controlled and configuration values interpolated into the generated shell script are now passed through Python\u0027s shlex.quote() function, which produces a safely quoted string that cannot be broken out of by embedded shell metacharacters. For the JSON access-rule block that embeds multiple attribute values within a single shell assignment, the JSON content is first assembled as plain text and then the entire assembled string is shlex-quoted once, preventing stray quote characters from corrupting the outer quoting. The \u0027config\u0027 variable is now initialized to an empty dictionary before the conditional assignment, eliminating the NameError.",
                "generatedAt": "2026-09-25T07:48:15.163752Z",
                "generator": "patch2vuln.py",
                "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                "modelComparison": {
                  "rankings": [
                    {
                      "agreementScore": 9,
                      "assumptionCount": 6,
                      "confidence": "high",
                      "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "score": 5
                    }
                  ],
                  "selectedModel": "qwen3.8:27b",
                  "selectionMethod": "deterministic-consensus-v1",
                  "selectionNotice": "The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required."
                },
                "patchSha256": "9c34349775d058188a7b9a4d44ff873fd285faf0ddda00b46aadbaa72f3b4e6e",
                "patchSummary": "Added \u0027import shlex\u0027 at the top of the module. Replaced direct .format() interpolation of config values (fmc_ip_addr, fmc_login, fmc_pass, domain_id, acpolicy_id) with shlex.quote()-wrapped values. Refactored the BLOCK_JSON_TMPL to separate the JSON content template (BLOCK_JSON_CONTENT_TMPL) from the shell assignment template; the JSON content is formatted first with raw attribute values, then the resulting string is passed through shlex.quote() before being substituted into the shell assignment. Initialized \u0027config = {}\u0027 before the \u0027if \"config\" in request:\u0027 block to prevent NameError.",
                "patchTruncated": false,
                "patches": [
                  {
                    "commit": "625b54908efbd6acc8343aa3370d401dd370e748",
                    "patchSha256": "9c34349775d058188a7b9a4d44ff873fd285faf0ddda00b46aadbaa72f3b4e6e",
                    "source": "https://github.com/elhoim/misp-modules/commit/625b54908efbd6acc8343aa3370d401dd370e748.patch",
                    "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/elhoim/misp-modules/commit/625b54908efbd6acc8343aa3370d401dd370e748.patch",
                    "subject": "fix: [cisco_firesight_manager_ACL_rule_export] shell-escape"
                  }
                ],
                "source": "https://github.com/elhoim/misp-modules/commit/625b54908efbd6acc8343aa3370d401dd370e748.patch",
                "subject": "fix: [cisco_firesight_manager_ACL_rule_export] shell-escape",
                "weaknessRationale": [
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-78",
                    "rationale": "The module constructs a shell script by interpolating untrusted values (MISP attribute values, configuration fields) into single-quoted shell strings without escaping. A single-quote character in any interpolated value breaks the quoting and allows arbitrary shell command injection. This is a textbook command injection via insufficient output encoding in a generated shell script."
                  }
                ]
              }
            }
          },
          "recordType": "advisory",
          "vulnId": "gcve-1-2026-20190"
        }
      ],
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
    "assignerShortName": "CIRCL",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-97863",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-25T08:03:24.441Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-25T08:02:32.714Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T13:19:52.508Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2026-97898 (GCVE-0-2026-97898)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-25 10:07 – Updated: 2026-09-25 12:29 Exclusively Hosted Service
VLAI
Title
Broken authorization in Akia keyless entry lets an authenticated guest unlock other rooms
Summary
Insecure Direct Object Reference / missing object-level authorization in the Akia keyless entry cloud service. The unlock action is relying on a client-supplied room/door identifier that is not properly authorized server-side against the authenticated guest's booking. An authenticated guest could unlock rooms other than their own, resulting in unauthorized physical access to guest rooms at an affected property. As of 19th September 2026 the service is no more vulnerable to this attack (feedback received by the reporter).  The attack is remote but the effect is local to an affected property.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: yes Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-25 12:18 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-862 - Missing Authorization
  • CWE-639 - Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
akia akia Affected: 0 , < 2026.10.19 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-97898",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-09-25T12:18:28.132095Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T12:29:34.364Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "akia",
          "vendor": "akia",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "2026.10.19",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Philipp Br\u00fcgger"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cdiv\u003eInsecure Direct Object Reference / missing object-level authorization in the Akia keyless entry cloud service. The unlock action is relying on a client-supplied room/door identifier that is not properly authorized server-side against the authenticated guest\u0027s booking. An authenticated guest could unlock rooms other than their own, resulting in unauthorized physical access to guest rooms at an affected property.\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv\u003eAs of 19th September 2026 the service is no more vulnerable to this attack (feedback received by the reporter).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv\u003eThe attack is remote but the effect is local to an affected property.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/div\u003e\u003cbr\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "Insecure Direct Object Reference / missing object-level authorization in the Akia keyless entry cloud service. The unlock action is relying on a client-supplied room/door identifier that is not properly authorized server-side against the authenticated guest\u0027s booking. An authenticated guest could unlock rooms other than their own, resulting in unauthorized physical access to guest rooms at an affected property.\n\n\n\n\nAs of 19th September 2026 the service is no more vulnerable to this attack (feedback received by the reporter).\u00a0\n\n\n\n\nThe attack is remote but the effect is local to an affected property."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-1",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-1 Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 8.4,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "userInteraction": "ACTIVE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-862",
              "description": "CWE-862 Missing Authorization",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-639",
              "description": "CWE-639 Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T10:07:35.224Z",
        "orgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
        "shortName": "CIRCL"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "product"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.akia.com/platform/keyless-entry"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "tags": [
        "exclusively-hosted-service"
      ],
      "title": "Broken authorization in Akia keyless entry lets an authenticated guest unlock other rooms",
      "x_gcve": [
        {
          "recordType": "advisory",
          "vulnId": "gcve-1-2026-20108"
        }
      ],
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
    "assignerShortName": "CIRCL",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-97898",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-25T10:07:35.224Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-25T10:07:22.362Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T12:29:34.364Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2026-96559 (GCVE-0-2026-96559)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: – Updated: 2026-09-23 13:20
VLAI

This ID was for testing

Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-23T13:20:43.687Z",
        "orgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
        "shortName": "CIRCL"
      },
      "rejectedReasons": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "This ID was for testing"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
    "assignerShortName": "CIRCL",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-96559",
    "dateRejected": "2026-09-23T13:12:43.687Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-23T13:12:18.774Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-23T13:20:43.687Z",
    "state": "REJECTED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2026-95806 (GCVE-0-2026-95806)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-22 15:09 – Updated: 2026-09-22 15:54
VLAI
Title
MISP: PHP phar stream wrapper enables deserialization and code execution via caller-influenced filesystem paths
Summary
MISP ships with PHP's phar stream wrapper registered in both its web entry point and its console entry point.  The phar stream wrapper causes PHP to treat a phar archive as a directory, which has two security consequences:    - any filesystem operation on a caller-influenced path that resolves to a phar archive triggers an implicit unserialize() call, creating a deserialization sink;  - a relocated application root can reach executable code inside an uploaded phar file, enabling arbitrary code execution as the web user. No component of MISP, the vendored CakePHP framework, or any runtime-loaded library reads or constructs phar archives. The wrapper therefore serves no legitimate purpose in the MISP runtime and exists solely as an available primitive for an attacker who can influence a filesystem path argument.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-22 15:53 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-502 - Deserialization of Untrusted Data
  • CWE-74 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
MISP MISP Affected: 0 , < 2.5.47 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
GCVE extensions
AI involvement GCVE-BCP-05-X-01
Whole record AI-generated Human-reviewed GNA-1

Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.

ai-computer-assisted:llm-generatedai-computer-assisted:classification
Model Source Identifier
qwen3.8:27b ollama qwen3.8:27b
Patch provenance GCVE-BCP-05-X-02
Generator
patch2vuln.py on 2026-09-22 15:01
Model
qwen3.8:27b
Input
https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/08fa755b6.patch f4fc3223e642…
Confidence
medium
Commit Subject Patch SHA-256
08fa755b6363 chg: [internal] Unregister the phar stream wrapper in the f4fc3223e642…
Fix summary

The phar stream wrapper is unregistered via stream_wrapper_unregister('phar') at the top of both the web and console entry points, before any framework bootstrap or application code executes. Because no MISP component, CakePHP, or runtime library requires the phar wrapper, removing it eliminates the implicit unserialize() sink and the directory-like phar archive behavior without functional impact. This closes the deserialization and code-execution primitive application-wide, independent of whether individual callers validate their path arguments.

Patch summary

Two files are modified. In app/Console/cake.php and app/webroot/index.php, a 14-line block is inserted immediately after the file header comment and before any existing logic. The block checks whether 'phar' is present in stream_get_wrappers() and, if so, calls stream_wrapper_unregister('phar'). A docblock comment explains the security rationale: the wrapper turns filesystem calls on caller-influenced paths into unserialize() sinks and allows a relocated application root to reach code inside an uploaded file. No other code is changed; the total diff is 28 insertions across the two files.

CVSS rationale

AV:N: The vulnerability is reachable through the web entry point (app/webroot/index.php), making it network-accessible. AC:H: Exploitation requires crafting a valid phar archive with a malicious serialized payload and identifying a code path where a caller-influenced filesystem argument resolves to that archive; the commit describes this as an 'argument-injection exploit,' implying non-trivial path manipulation. AT:N: No specific attack-target conditions are indicated. PR:L: MISP is a threat-intelligence platform that typically requires authenticated access; the commit references 'the web user' context, suggesting the attacker operates within the application's privilege boundary. UI:N: No user interaction is required. VC/VI/VA:H: Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the web user, compromising confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the MISP instance. SC/SI/SA:N: No evidence of impact on subsequent or other components beyond the MISP instance itself.

Weakness rationale
  • CWE-502 The phar stream wrapper causes PHP to invoke unserialize() implicitly whenever a filesystem operation resolves to a phar archive. An attacker who can influence the path argument (e.g., via argument injection) can supply a crafted phar file, triggering deserialization of attacker-controlled data and leading to code execution. This is the primary and most specific weakness.
  • CWE-74 The phar stream wrapper is a special element of the PHP runtime that was not neutralized (unregistered) in the MISP entry points. Its presence allows downstream filesystem calls to be subverted into deserialization sinks. This is a secondary, broader characterization of the same issue.
Attack pattern rationale
  • CAPEC-570 The core attack mechanism is that the phar stream wrapper turns a filesystem call on a caller-influenced path into an implicit unserialize() invocation. An attacker crafts a phar archive containing a malicious serialized payload and causes the application to perform a filesystem operation on that path, triggering deserialization and code execution. CAPEC-570 is the closest match. Uncertainty: the exact injection vector (which specific MISP endpoint or console command accepts the path) is not detailed in the patch, but the deserialization sink is explicitly described in the commit message.
  • CAPEC-100 The phar stream wrapper is a trusted, built-in PHP component that the attacker leverages in the MISP runtime environment where it serves no legitimate purpose. The attacker does not need to exploit a flaw in the wrapper itself; rather, its mere presence in the runtime provides the primitive. This is a secondary mapping; CAPEC-570 is preferred as the primary because it more precisely describes the deserialization mechanism.
Assumptions to verify
  • The affected version range is inferred from the tag_version_boundary (v2.5.47, 42 commits after fix), suggesting the fix is included in v2.5.47 and earlier versions are affected. The explicit context lists affected_version and fixed_version as null, so the exact boundary is uncertain.
  • PR:L is assumed because MISP is an authenticated threat-intelligence platform; however, the patch does not explicitly state whether the vulnerable code path requires authentication. If the argument-injection vector is reachable unauthenticated, PR should be N.
  • AC:H is assumed because crafting a valid phar archive and identifying the correct code path for the filesystem call is non-trivial; the commit describes it as an 'argument-injection exploit,' implying specific conditions must be met.
  • The CAPEC-570 mapping is based on the commit message's explicit description of the phar wrapper as an 'unserialize() sink'; the exact MISP endpoint or console command that accepts the attacker-influenced path is not identified in the patch.
  • The commit message references 'the job-argument guard reverted,' implying a prior guard existed and was removed, making the phar wrapper the remaining defense. The exact prior guard is not described in this patch.
  • The Co-Authored-By line lists 'Claude Opus 5 (1M context)' as a co-author; this is recorded in the metadata as a remediation developer but is an AI assistant, not a human contributor. It is excluded from credits to avoid attributing a CVE credit to a non-human entity.
Model comparison

Selected qwen3.8:27b by deterministic-consensus-v1
The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required.

Model Score Agreement Confidence Assumptions
qwen3.8:27b 4 9 medium 6
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-95806",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-09-22T15:53:57.690631Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T15:54:08.956Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "modules": [
            "app/Console/cake.php",
            "app/webroot/index.php"
          ],
          "product": "MISP",
          "programFiles": [
            "app/Console/cake.php",
            "app/webroot/index.php"
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP",
          "vendor": "MISP",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "2.5.47",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "iglocska"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "Claude Opus 5 (1M context)"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eMISP ships with PHP\u0027s phar stream wrapper registered in both its web entry point and its console entry point.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe phar stream wrapper causes PHP to treat a phar archive as a directory, which has two security consequences:\u0026nbsp;\u2003\u003c/p\u003e\u2003-\u0026nbsp;any filesystem operation on a caller-influenced path that resolves to a phar archive triggers an implicit unserialize() call, creating a deserialization sink;\u003cbr\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u2003-\u0026nbsp;a relocated application root can reach executable code inside an uploaded phar file, enabling arbitrary code execution as the web user.\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cp\u003eNo component of MISP, the vendored CakePHP framework, or any runtime-loaded library reads or constructs phar archives. The wrapper therefore serves no legitimate purpose in the MISP runtime and exists solely as an available primitive for an attacker who can influence a filesystem path argument.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "MISP ships with PHP\u0027s phar stream wrapper registered in both its web entry point and its console entry point.\u00a0\n\nThe phar stream wrapper causes PHP to treat a phar archive as a directory, which has two security consequences:\u00a0\u2003\n\n\u2003-\u00a0any filesystem operation on a caller-influenced path that resolves to a phar archive triggers an implicit unserialize() call, creating a deserialization sink;\n\u2003-\u00a0a relocated application root can reach executable code inside an uploaded phar file, enabling arbitrary code execution as the web user.\n\n\n\n\nNo component of MISP, the vendored CakePHP framework, or any runtime-loaded library reads or constructs phar archives. The wrapper therefore serves no legitimate purpose in the MISP runtime and exists solely as an available primitive for an attacker who can influence a filesystem path argument."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-570",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-570 Deserialization of Untrusted Data"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-100",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-100 Leveraging Trusted Components in an Untrusted Environment"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 7.7,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-502",
              "description": "CWE-502 Deserialization of Untrusted Data",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-74",
              "description": "CWE-74 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T15:09:09.738Z",
        "orgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
        "shortName": "CIRCL"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "Security patch",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/08fa755b6"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eThe phar stream wrapper is unregistered via stream_wrapper_unregister(\u0027phar\u0027) at the top of both the web and console entry points, before any framework bootstrap or application code executes. Because no MISP component, CakePHP, or runtime library requires the phar wrapper, removing it eliminates the implicit unserialize() sink and the directory-like phar archive behavior without functional impact. This closes the deserialization and code-execution primitive application-wide, independent of whether individual callers validate their path arguments.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The phar stream wrapper is unregistered via stream_wrapper_unregister(\u0027phar\u0027) at the top of both the web and console entry points, before any framework bootstrap or application code executes. Because no MISP component, CakePHP, or runtime library requires the phar wrapper, removing it eliminates the implicit unserialize() sink and the directory-like phar archive behavior without functional impact. This closes the deserialization and code-execution primitive application-wide, independent of whether individual callers validate their path arguments."
        }
      ],
      "title": "MISP: PHP phar stream wrapper enables deserialization and code execution via caller-influenced filesystem paths",
      "x_gcve": [
        {
          "extensions": {
            "bcp-05-x-01": {
              "ai_annotations": [
                {
                  "ai_level": "generated",
                  "description": "Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.",
                  "gna_source": 1,
                  "models": [
                    {
                      "gna_source": 1,
                      "identifier": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "name": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "source": "ollama"
                    }
                  ],
                  "review_status": "full",
                  "scope": "record",
                  "tags": [
                    "ai-computer-assisted:llm-generated",
                    "ai-computer-assisted:classification"
                  ]
                }
              ]
            },
            "bcp-05-x-02": {
              "x_patch2vuln": {
                "assumptions": [
                  "The affected version range is inferred from the tag_version_boundary (v2.5.47, 42 commits after fix), suggesting the fix is included in v2.5.47 and earlier versions are affected. The explicit context lists affected_version and fixed_version as null, so the exact boundary is uncertain.",
                  "PR:L is assumed because MISP is an authenticated threat-intelligence platform; however, the patch does not explicitly state whether the vulnerable code path requires authentication. If the argument-injection vector is reachable unauthenticated, PR should be N.",
                  "AC:H is assumed because crafting a valid phar archive and identifying the correct code path for the filesystem call is non-trivial; the commit describes it as an \u0027argument-injection exploit,\u0027 implying specific conditions must be met.",
                  "The CAPEC-570 mapping is based on the commit message\u0027s explicit description of the phar wrapper as an \u0027unserialize() sink\u0027; the exact MISP endpoint or console command that accepts the attacker-influenced path is not identified in the patch.",
                  "The commit message references \u0027the job-argument guard reverted,\u0027 implying a prior guard existed and was removed, making the phar wrapper the remaining defense. The exact prior guard is not described in this patch.",
                  "The Co-Authored-By line lists \u0027Claude Opus 5 (1M context)\u0027 as a co-author; this is recorded in the metadata as a remediation developer but is an AI assistant, not a human contributor. It is excluded from credits to avoid attributing a CVE credit to a non-human entity."
                ],
                "capecRationale": [
                  {
                    "capecId": "CAPEC-570",
                    "rationale": "The core attack mechanism is that the phar stream wrapper turns a filesystem call on a caller-influenced path into an implicit unserialize() invocation. An attacker crafts a phar archive containing a malicious serialized payload and causes the application to perform a filesystem operation on that path, triggering deserialization and code execution. CAPEC-570 is the closest match. Uncertainty: the exact injection vector (which specific MISP endpoint or console command accepts the path) is not detailed in the patch, but the deserialization sink is explicitly described in the commit message."
                  },
                  {
                    "capecId": "CAPEC-100",
                    "rationale": "The phar stream wrapper is a trusted, built-in PHP component that the attacker leverages in the MISP runtime environment where it serves no legitimate purpose. The attacker does not need to exploit a flaw in the wrapper itself; rather, its mere presence in the runtime provides the primitive. This is a secondary mapping; CAPEC-570 is preferred as the primary because it more precisely describes the deserialization mechanism."
                  }
                ],
                "commit": "08fa755b6363ec0b7194d97ea36800ae8eb8f919",
                "confidence": "medium",
                "credits": [
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "iglocska"
                  },
                  {
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "remediation developer",
                    "value": "Claude Opus 5 (1M context)"
                  }
                ],
                "cvssRationale": "AV:N: The vulnerability is reachable through the web entry point (app/webroot/index.php), making it network-accessible. AC:H: Exploitation requires crafting a valid phar archive with a malicious serialized payload and identifying a code path where a caller-influenced filesystem argument resolves to that archive; the commit describes this as an \u0027argument-injection exploit,\u0027 implying non-trivial path manipulation. AT:N: No specific attack-target conditions are indicated. PR:L: MISP is a threat-intelligence platform that typically requires authenticated access; the commit references \u0027the web user\u0027 context, suggesting the attacker operates within the application\u0027s privilege boundary. UI:N: No user interaction is required. VC/VI/VA:H: Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the web user, compromising confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the MISP instance. SC/SI/SA:N: No evidence of impact on subsequent or other components beyond the MISP instance itself.",
                "fixSummary": "The phar stream wrapper is unregistered via stream_wrapper_unregister(\u0027phar\u0027) at the top of both the web and console entry points, before any framework bootstrap or application code executes. Because no MISP component, CakePHP, or runtime library requires the phar wrapper, removing it eliminates the implicit unserialize() sink and the directory-like phar archive behavior without functional impact. This closes the deserialization and code-execution primitive application-wide, independent of whether individual callers validate their path arguments.",
                "generatedAt": "2026-09-22T15:01:21.211955Z",
                "generator": "patch2vuln.py",
                "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                "modelComparison": {
                  "rankings": [
                    {
                      "agreementScore": 9,
                      "assumptionCount": 6,
                      "confidence": "medium",
                      "model": "qwen3.8:27b",
                      "score": 4
                    }
                  ],
                  "selectedModel": "qwen3.8:27b",
                  "selectionMethod": "deterministic-consensus-v1",
                  "selectionNotice": "The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required."
                },
                "patchSha256": "f4fc3223e6421557e1c03c2182cfaa2b0c17a1a20870c71214708034faf1350f",
                "patchSummary": "Two files are modified. In app/Console/cake.php and app/webroot/index.php, a 14-line block is inserted immediately after the file header comment and before any existing logic. The block checks whether \u0027phar\u0027 is present in stream_get_wrappers() and, if so, calls stream_wrapper_unregister(\u0027phar\u0027). A docblock comment explains the security rationale: the wrapper turns filesystem calls on caller-influenced paths into unserialize() sinks and allows a relocated application root to reach code inside an uploaded file. No other code is changed; the total diff is 28 insertions across the two files.",
                "patchTruncated": false,
                "patches": [
                  {
                    "commit": "08fa755b6363ec0b7194d97ea36800ae8eb8f919",
                    "patchSha256": "f4fc3223e6421557e1c03c2182cfaa2b0c17a1a20870c71214708034faf1350f",
                    "source": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/08fa755b6.patch",
                    "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/08fa755b6.patch",
                    "subject": "chg: [internal] Unregister the phar stream wrapper in the"
                  }
                ],
                "source": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/08fa755b6.patch",
                "subject": "chg: [internal] Unregister the phar stream wrapper in the",
                "tagVersionBoundary": {
                  "commits_after_fix": 42,
                  "repository": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP",
                  "tag": "v2.5.47",
                  "version": "2.5.47",
                  "version_type": "semver"
                },
                "weaknessRationale": [
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-502",
                    "rationale": "The phar stream wrapper causes PHP to invoke unserialize() implicitly whenever a filesystem operation resolves to a phar archive. An attacker who can influence the path argument (e.g., via argument injection) can supply a crafted phar file, triggering deserialization of attacker-controlled data and leading to code execution. This is the primary and most specific weakness."
                  },
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-74",
                    "rationale": "The phar stream wrapper is a special element of the PHP runtime that was not neutralized (unregistered) in the MISP entry points. Its presence allows downstream filesystem calls to be subverted into deserialization sinks. This is a secondary, broader characterization of the same issue."
                  }
                ]
              }
            }
          },
          "recordType": "advisory",
          "vulnId": "GCVE-1-2026-20263"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
    "assignerShortName": "CIRCL",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-95806",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-22T15:09:09.738Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-22T15:09:04.977Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T15:54:08.956Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}
displaying 1 - 10 assigned vulnerabilities in total 209